The right mentality of investment is to get a piece of return that is higher than FD or conventional tools like bonds with some risk involved.
Investment is not for "get rich" or "get rich quick".
Claim or not claim, I/we don't care, what we care what is the risk we are taking, what expected return can be.
In reit, we expect some yield for 7-8% which is 2x FD rate can offer, with any capital appreciation side is a bonus, and not something take for granted.
If FD is offering 7-8%, I/we might dump reit as well.
People only talk about good side of story of real physical properties investment, like who become millionaire become invested in properties, who gain 40% yield because buy at right location right timing etc.
But there are still a lot of people that buying some properties under abandoned project (which bank still charge loan interest), shoplots that grow grasses only, little tenants want to rent, buying lots in shopping mall that never fill up more than 30-50% etc.
There are also a lot of people bought properties at 10K, but now worth 150k, after 20-30 years, but if calculated carefully, the real/net return rate is worst than FD. But still people proclaim, it is a successful investment, see invested in properties 10K become 150K, or become millionaire, in fact it is not a successful investment.
This is always little point in comparing which investment is better than the others, it never has any conclusion because there is never "best/better" investment than the others. They just has some pros which one may like and comfortable with it.
wow.. my kinda answer