Til date, there's only one 1080P game I can think of and that is Gran Turismo 5, but there's a catch, @ 720P, there's 2xAA but @ 1080P there's 0xAA.

That is not true. If Title A has slowdowns on a console, having a display that has 120/240Hz refresh will not help at all.

These 120/240Hz refresh rate is targeted at Blu-Ray movies rather than console games due to the fact that the latest Blu-Ray movies are all encoded @ 24fps. Games on the other hand do not sync with the 120/240Hz displays thus there is no effect at all.

In fact, if you had a video which is not divisible by 24/30/60/120/240 then you'll likely be experiencing Judder as well. (This happens when your video's FPS isn't the same as your panel's refresh rate. Thus, for a natural smooth panning movement, you'll have to make sure your video's FPS, let's say 60 has to be the same as your panel's refresh rate, which is also 60Hz.)

And also, some people experience a so-called 'Soap Opera' effect when they had these refresh rate booster features enabled.
Source

EDIT : Case in point, these features are just 'bonus' features to the display itself. It's the marketing people that exaggerates them by a whole hundred miles. Though for me, I would rather have a display that has a 24Hz refresh option for Blu-Ray movies instead of these 120/240Hz options.

These vertical lines you speak of is an example of Tearing. Meaning your game's FPS is running higher/lower than the panel's refresh rate. To solve this situation, VSync has to be turned on.
Source

I do give credit to motionflow technology being able to make films look smoother and the like, however I still rest my case that it still doesn't do anything much to games, especially on consoles due to different titles on different machines having different framerates. Some have uncapped FPS, some are VSync-ed, some have slowdowns which motionflow can't even fix because it's due to the hardware being choked thus sloppy FPS.

Motionflow is mainly targeted for Blu-Ray movies to make motion smoother, but some people are not used to it thus they call it the 'Soap Opera' effect which was pointed out in my previous post.

But some models from manufacturers have poorly implemented motionflow technologies and some panels will exhibit artifacts and the like as gnsumas pointed out. Which is why I said when it comes to Blu-Ray movies, a 24Hz refresh rate panel is still the best as it is 1:1 sync-ed to the FPS of the video itself.

Here is an old list of LCD TVs that support 1080p24, I can't find a newer list. But if you're looking for one, look at the manual or something that talks about 24Hz or the manufacturer's website.

1080p24 panels

Not all PS3 games have the same FPS, in fact there are a lot of titles that experience tearing, I would think majority of PS3 games exhibit screen tearing, X360 games as well due to unstable framerates.

Head over to http://www.lensoftruth.com, and look at their Head2Head articles to see which games experience screen tearing and which ones don't.

EDIT : Here's an even longer list of displays that support 1080p24 and also 5:5 pulldown without motion enhancers on.

Displays that support 1080p/24 signal at multiplies of the original frame rate

I specifically said that I would rather have a 24Hz display for Blu-Ray movies. I did not said that I would use them for gaming.

If you have read the link, I would assume you would already know about there are two type of panels that are >100Hz. One that displays true multiples of 24 via 5:5 pulldown. And another that adds motion interpolation (motionflow) to the image.

Some of them are 120/240Hz and some of them display it natively 1920x1080 @ 24Hz.

EDIT : So in the end, to get the best out of Blu-Ray and the now defunct HD-DVD movies, you would be better off with a panel that displays 1080p24 or make sure your display is outputting @ a true multiple of 24, which in this case is 120Hz via 5:5 without motionflow features.

As for gaming, screen tearing will only be solved via VSync, if Title A on the PS3 does not have VSync turned on, therefore tearing will occur whether or not your panel is >100Hz or 50/60Hz, which brings me back to my original post stating that neither motionflow nor >100Hz refresh rate will do much difference to games.

Your original post could mean either >100Hz with motionflow or without motionflow. In regards to these panels, some will only output >100Hz with motionflow (or rather frame/motion interpolation) while some will output >100Hz without motionflow provided you turn something off.

As to whether screen tearing will be more pronounced or not, that depends on how much of a difference between your game's FPS and the display's refresh rate.

Let's say Title A's FPS is 30 FPS. Your display is currently set to output @ 1920x1080 24Hz. If you had it VSync-ed, your game will run at 24FPS. Thus tearing will not occur. However if the game is not VSync-ed tearing will occur however it might or might not be that noticeable due to the fact that 24 and 30 is only 6 digits away.

If your game is running at 30 FPS while your display is set to 120Hz, the difference itself is already huge, so tell me which will be more prominent in regards to tearing then sir?

For consoles, tearing most of the time is unavoidable since the FPS is all over the place for different titles.

For PC Gaming however, if your GPU can manage to push out >100FPS for every title, then by all means, get a >100Hz panel and VSync it (Important). If your GPU cannot push out such framerates, do you not agree then a standard 60Hz display is better then?

Yes, your recommendation states that one has to get a panel that supports a refresh rate higher than 100Hz to avoid choppy scenes, which is not true.

These choppy scenes in games are influenced by the hardware (in this case PS3) not being able to output sufficient frames during intensive scenes, which in this case we call it lag/stutter.

Refresh rate of the monitor does not influence the smoothness during gaming. Refresh rate will only play a part to avoid screen tearing if VSync is in play. Thus these are two different topics.

In regards to whether 60Hz or 120Hz is better to avoid screen tearing, for the PC, generally a 60Hz panel will be sufficient, provided your GPU is able to output more than 60FPS for every title, therefore you can VSync to avoid tearing. If you are confident your display can output more than 120Hz for every title, then by all means get a panel that supports 120Hz refresh rate and VSync it to avoid tearing.

If you do not wish to VSync your PC Games and your GPU is able to output >60FPS but <120FPS then get a 120Hz panel then, however there are some games that if are left running at uncapped FPS and it's >70FPS~ then you might experience fast forward/turbo mode glitch for those titles.

For the console, it does not matter whether your display is 60Hz or 120Hz, since most console titles can't reach 60FPS constant in the first place (other than Dante's Inferno).

(For this I apologise for not stating earlier that 24Hz is only supported for Blu-Ray and HD-DVD movies only AFAIK. When it comes to the PS3 and other consoles, during gaming, they will not output @ 24Hz, but rather 60Hz or 50Hz depending on the region of the game itself)

So in this case, if a game is 30FPS constant and the panel is 24Hz, (albeit impossible during gaming), yes tearing will occur. However, if you remember that tearing does not occur only when the FPS is > than the Refresh Rate of the display only. It occurs because the FPS does not sync with the Refresh Rate of the monitor.

Thus regardless of whether you get a 60Hz or 120Hz panel for your PS3, tearing will still occur due to the fact that PS3 titles do not have a constant FPS output.

Yes for PCs Tearing is the result of the FPS being higher than the Panel's RR. However for consoles this is not the case. Explain then why is there tearing @ sub 60 FPS with a 60Hz display then? It's because it's out of sync with the display's RR.

Somehow, tearing on console games are an example that you can get tearing on a 60Hz display but yet the game's FPS is way below that.

Bottom line is, if you want no tearing = VSync, it doesn't matter whether you have a 60Hz or 120Hz or 480Hz plasma display. Console Games are hardly VSync-ed.

hey guys, is the samsung b2230h any good? i knw if i add another rm100 i could get the 23" version but im slightly out of budget... just wana know u guys thoughts...

IINM, screen tearing on consoles happens when the 2nd frame in the buffer isn't processed completely and only a part of the entire frame appears on screen, leaving a part of the previous frame visible.

I might be mistaken, though.