QUOTE(CoolSky @ Mar 17 2010, 12:20 AM)
Just for sharing from my previous fuel record:
1st Test
Brand: Petronas
Litres: 44.69L
Ron95: RM80.45
Total Mileage: 456.6km
FC (L/100KM): 9.7
Cents/KM = RM0.17
2nd Test
Brand: Petronas
Litres: 45.68L
Ron95: RM82.22
Total Mileage: 478.4km
FC (L/100KM): 9.5
Cents/KM = RM0.17
3rd Test
Brand: Shell
Litres: 46.97L
Ron95: RM84.55
Total Mileage: 502.5km
FC (L/100KM): 9.3
Cents/KM = RM0.168
4th Test
Brand: BHP
Litres: 49L
Ron95: RM88.20
Total Mileage: 514km
FC (L/100KM): 9.5
Cents/KM = RM0.17
Am still trying another tank of BHP for my Forte.
i have tested so far Esso & Shell 95 with more than 5 tanks for each brand with same route : Muar <->Melaka(including 10% of Muar/Melaka town drive). My conclusion here is they are the same performance for my car & my driving style : ~8.5L/100KM. I have BHP95 as my 1st tank, and i have a good feel of "power" of BHP. Unfortunately the station is quite far from my house and is not convenient for me to pump petrol. Start from this week, i will try Caltex, at least for 3 - 4 tanks.1st Test
Brand: Petronas
Litres: 44.69L
Ron95: RM80.45
Total Mileage: 456.6km
FC (L/100KM): 9.7
Cents/KM = RM0.17
2nd Test
Brand: Petronas
Litres: 45.68L
Ron95: RM82.22
Total Mileage: 478.4km
FC (L/100KM): 9.5
Cents/KM = RM0.17
3rd Test
Brand: Shell
Litres: 46.97L
Ron95: RM84.55
Total Mileage: 502.5km
FC (L/100KM): 9.3
Cents/KM = RM0.168
4th Test
Brand: BHP
Litres: 49L
Ron95: RM88.20
Total Mileage: 514km
FC (L/100KM): 9.5
Cents/KM = RM0.17
Am still trying another tank of BHP for my Forte.
Mar 17 2010, 06:47 AM

Quote
0.0243sec
0.61
7 queries
GZIP Disabled