Anyway..congrats for reaching V5. hopefully 2.0 will also reach us soon
This post has been edited by izputra: Mar 15 2010, 07:29 AM
-= Naza-Kia Forte =- <Club> V5, Leaves You Speechless
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 07:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
Aiyaa
Anyway..congrats for reaching V5. hopefully 2.0 will also reach us soon This post has been edited by izputra: Mar 15 2010, 07:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 09:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 10:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(fahrur_07 @ Mar 15 2010, 10:13 AM) Regarding Forte with BK, i've snapped some pics before & share it in previous thread (V3). Post #1496 Added on March 15, 2010, 10:33 am QUOTE(redz3 @ Mar 15 2010, 10:29 AM) depends on what u mean by 'avail-able'. Very2 good answer indeed..unbelievable 'Bookable' since early Nov 09 'See-able' during launch 26 Nov 'On-malaysian-soil-able' mid Feb 2010 'Showroomcar-able' 5 march 2010 'testdrive-able' 11 march 2010 'arrivable-to -some-branch' today 15 March 2010 'register-able' and 'deliver-able' ... some say earliest 22 march , latest mid April. Avail-ability? .... some say the 150-200 unit of 2.0 all are booked. Believ-able??? This post has been edited by izputra: Mar 15 2010, 10:36 AM |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 10:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(apiltzs @ Mar 15 2010, 10:38 AM) Please refers to my airbags calculation on previous thread (V4). Post #3096 |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 02:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(ruth1977 @ Mar 15 2010, 02:11 PM) I know the 2.0 is already in the showroom and one forummer's earlier post (can't remember which) said he will be getting his 2.0 today. I hope this SA is just bs me, or else it looks like it may be longer wait for all of us That 'one forumer' did midnight joking only..hehe |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 04:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(iluvena @ Mar 15 2010, 04:33 PM) I like the last phrase "I'm supporting the brand that gives Malaysians more specs, better build quality and nice designs WITHOUT charging them an arm and a leg". That phrase has something to do with Forte as a value for money car right? i share the same thought...& yup, not worth buying a 'tin kosong', overpriced & over rated T&H cars.This post has been edited by izputra: Mar 15 2010, 04:47 PM |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 05:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(toyotarave @ Mar 15 2010, 05:04 PM) I think T and H are good cars just that we have had no other reasonable choices for reliability thats all and because the other brands had no experience building good cars - now that technology is accessible to those who can afford it - means that the consumer can choose - (with another comment but better hold back in case kena caught) Yaa..no doubt that T&H cars are good & reliable. My father & my brother also own a T & H cars respectively..both cars turned out to be as good & as reliable as it supposed to be. only the fact that both cars are highly overprice with the under-specced features that turned me off. an emergence of Forte with better & high-end specs, on par (if not better) build quality & yet at a very reasonable price make it an obvious choice for me to buy it. Sorry to T&H owners & fan..it is the facts indeed |
|
|
Mar 16 2010, 07:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(miet @ Mar 16 2010, 05:31 AM) Hmm..perhaps Honda's 2.0 emblem looks nicer & better build. Can buy it at Mudah. Click below links for the picsOriginal Honda 2.0 emblem (red). The same red emblem used on current gen Civic 2.0 http://img.mudah.my/images/43/4322216285.jpg Original Honda 2.0 emblem (chrome) http://img.mudah.my/images/38/3836109793.jpg Very2 nice right? but need to check the dimensions first whether it will suit well with our Forte SX emblem This post has been edited by izputra: Mar 16 2010, 08:00 AM |
|
|
Mar 16 2010, 09:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(miet @ Mar 16 2010, 09:10 AM) Is nice..but I'm afraid H fanboys would laugh at us say steal their trademark or whatever b**sh*t...hahaha Hmm..but for me the ebay one the design is not up to my expectation la. buying the chrome one (Honda 2.0 emblem) will do as it also looks quite universal from far Those I found in Ebay doesn't belongs to any car makers..they are universal emblem.. This post has been edited by izputra: Mar 16 2010, 09:23 AM |
|
|
Mar 16 2010, 12:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(ruth1977 @ Mar 16 2010, 12:08 PM) Maybe your SA already put your phone number on his rejected list of phone numbers. So his phone will reject your call automatically when u call him & u will feel like he is engage with some one or out of coverage or perhaps turned off the phone. Try using other phone to contact him..if can reach him, confirmed he already put your phone number in his Reject List. |
|
|
Mar 16 2010, 01:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Mar 16 2010, 01:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 17 2010, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(Blinque @ Mar 17 2010, 10:28 AM) Hi bros, just heard from my SA that they are starting to do allocations today for 2.0SX... Good news..but still sceptical about it. My SA still didn't inform me anything Hope for some good news from them Anyway, allocation today doesn't mean the car can be registered today right? |
|
|
Mar 17 2010, 10:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(Blinque @ Mar 17 2010, 10:52 AM) From what he said, allocation and registration (if full DP is already paid) can be done this 1-2 days. If true..then this is TRULY a good news indeed. I will check with my SA laterIf DP is not paid yet, then have to pay first before registration. That's what I understand. |
|
|
Mar 17 2010, 11:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Mar 17 2010, 11:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(choonwai11 @ Mar 17 2010, 11:15 AM) agreed, let them enjoy thmeself in their lower spec, overprice T and H, while we enjoy our great forte in more comfort. Yalorr..they just want to justify their purchase of T&H cars. Even got 1 person in Paultan.org website die2 stating good after sales service to justify his purchase of T cars (vios to be exact) because obviously he cant compare head to head about the specs & price offered by the new Korean cars even with if he slot in the Altis. If he did the comparison, clearly will lose big time This post has been edited by izputra: Mar 17 2010, 11:51 AM |
|
|
Mar 17 2010, 12:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(miet @ Mar 17 2010, 11:47 AM) I remember someone claimed that he test drove 2.0 b4, now I really doubt that... Yaa..as of what i knew, the 2.0 cars at showroom are for viewing purpose only for the time being. Maybe some of the branch 'legally' use it as a test drive car by putting the dummy (or should i say temporary) plate numbers so that the car can be driven OTR. Else, that 2.0 test drive car has to be registered first (got actual plate number) in order to use it as a test drive car in which i doubted.I'm thinking all 2.0 in showrooms are for viewing only.. Still cannot be registered. If test unit must have registered plate number. Can someone justify there are test drive units of 2.0 OTR?? |
|
|
Mar 17 2010, 12:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Mar 17 2010, 03:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
146 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0494sec
1.22
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 11:53 AM |