comparison

digi88: total cost over 24 months = 3816

maxis100: total cost over 24 months = 3790

however, seeing the items in digi88, it is more reasonable to compare with maxis155

maxis155: total cost over 24 months = 4810

what you get for maxis155 over digi88 = 467minutes/month; call rate at 12sen/minute vs 15sen/minute for digi.

for lite user who seldom call/sms but surf net/use app often, digi is better

because maxis155 is closest to digi88 in terms of specifications

digi vs maxis
1gb vs 1gb
200sms vs 200sms
20mms vs 20mms
200min vs 667min
15sen/min vs 12sen/min
etc

which is also why i mentioned earlier, this is especially true if you are a light voice call user and use the iphone more for apps and data.

or in other words, heavy caller, low data: maxis > digi; heavy data, low caller: digi > maxis. personally i fall into the latter category, YMMV

digi 3g coverage can easily check from digi website; but i'd expect the answer to be no. they seemed pretty much focused only on klang valley atm.

This post has been edited by lin00b: Mar 31 2010, 09:33 PM

i for one cant understand the logic behind the 24+12 plan, since for the +12 period you'll be spending money without getting any benefit?

sounds like a temptation to get people to spend future money and get further into debt.

you drive porshe or kancil still need to pay for petrol right?