Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Pioneer Aficionados Club, Pioneer AV Reference Knowledge Base

views
     
paskal
post Apr 23 2010, 06:52 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(b48753 @ Apr 23 2010, 09:41 AM)
Hey guys, check the new updates of Pioneer A/V receivers. Now comes with 3D Ready and iPhone support  icon_idea.gif
*
here's the connections available on the VSX-1020:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


there's also speaker post for Front Height and Front Wide.
a cheaper solution for those wanting to try wide and height setup. previously only high end models that have the wide/height processing.

and here's the connections on the higher VSX-1120 (new line):
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

a full PREOUT connection on all 7 channels including the wide/height channels.

i reckon previously only available on elite series
paskal
post May 5 2010, 12:20 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(opjust @ May 5 2010, 11:37 AM)
Yes, looking for pioneer... something that can be upgraded gradually... start of in the budget 1.5-2k..
*
that much budget for a pioneer avr will only land you something that's gonna stuck until you sell it off as preout are (currently) only available in the elite series.

then again, most people are perfectly fine with it as multichannel amps are quite costly to begin with. most (if not all) prefer to dump money to upgrade their speakers, subs, tvs and not take the external amp path.
paskal
post May 5 2010, 06:38 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(opjust @ May 5 2010, 01:42 PM)
Hmm.. I hv to say I am completely clueless in this area..  what I hv in my mind like.. I want to bought 2 front speakers.. n whatever thing that we need to connect it at first..
and probably upgrade to buy rear speaker if got the budget..
*
in that case, i think it's wiser to buy a cheap AVR that could do HD Audio and dumping the extra money for speakers and subs.
if you wanna upgrade to experience HD Audio (which is the buzz nowadays, be it whether you could hear the difference or not), at least you don't have to sell off the avr. also a media player that don't support HD audio is cheaper. good enough for initial purchase.

IMHO it would sound better (overall experience) than buying yourself some expensive AVR that could do everything, but only to plug in some cheap satellite that you pulled off from some broken speaker somewhere; because all the money are already spent on that expensive AVR.

only to hit your head to the wall next month when that expensive AVR are phased out from the market for HDMI 1.4 and dolby pro logic IIz and audyssey wide support. causing that expensive AVR to drop 50% in price.

but then it's just a personal opinion.. smile.gif
paskal
post May 6 2010, 01:22 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(opjust @ May 5 2010, 09:30 PM)
haha! I can sense a lot of truth in that statement... when u say cheap AVR.. which brand u have in mind..
I just use my ps3 to play bluray or any mkv file. do ps3 support HD audio?


Added on May 5, 2010, 9:31 pm

hmm.. mind if u can share with me, where I can find a good place to get this stuff?
*

which version of ps3? i've read that the fat one could output lpcm and the slim one could bitstream. my friend has the slim one and that version confirm could bitstream hd audio to the avr.

sometimes good offer could be found in the garage sales, the music section. and you should also wait look in hifi4sale. sometimes once in a blue moon a good offer surface up. but don't hope too much.
also try to ask at hifi shops if there's used unit that people traded to upgrade.


QUOTE(serendipity168 @ May 6 2010, 10:36 AM)
Kawan, new units arriving soon.... hold back on your purchase


Added on May 6, 2010, 10:44 am
Dolby Pro Logic IIz? Haha...How many people out there would actually use a 9.1 setup?  doh.gif

Technology advances is inevitable. In an arms race, the only loser is the consumer. Unless of course, moneyflies.gif falls from the sky  tongue.gif

Best bet is to go mid-range
*
hey some people say it's better maaa.. some say there's a definite improvement from the use of wide or height speakers. some could hear it, some could not. the best way IMHO is to try it oneself and experience it rather than reading about it.
can't try it if the AVR don't support such things, no? tongue.gif

QUOTE(putih @ May 6 2010, 11:33 AM)
Seriously dude? Cheapest HD-audio capable avr I have seen was around rm1800. What brand are you talking about and where can our friend get it? Anyway, that alone has surpassed his budget of rm1500++.
I think if he wants to enter HD HT world, he need a minimum of RM7K. With his budget, he can only go with preowned DD/DTS 5.1 system.
*
the cheaper i've seen are either the yamaha rx-v465 or the pioneer vsx-819. in which both are selling at RM1.5k-something.
but the cheapest have to be the *used* RM1k-something denon 1610 which are already sold. laugh.gif

QUOTE(kayroll @ May 6 2010, 12:36 PM)
My Klipsch was match up with LX82... tongue.gif

Even without a sub sad.gif ...this pioneer avr still can drive klipsch with good  sound... rclxms.gif
*
i reckon klipsch speakers are easier to drive compared to other kevlar variant.
even my wharfedale could be driven to listening volume by my cheap vsx-519. should be easier if high sensitivity speakers (like klipsch) are paired to it.

and that's coming from an avr which have bloated power specs.. tongue.gif
paskal
post May 7 2010, 06:57 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(htkaki @ May 7 2010, 04:08 PM)
I have a very brief sneak peek on 1019's succesor.... whistling.gif
*
the succesor as in the VSX-1120 or the VSX-1020?

would be really nice if they introduce the 1120 over here..
paskal
post May 8 2010, 06:19 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(htkaki @ May 8 2010, 08:26 AM)
1020... best of all, it comes equipped with Dolby Pro-logic IIz and its pre-outs  thumbup.gif
*
woooottt!!!
7.1 preout with wide and height support!

this will be my next upgrade. as i like the pioneer sound more compared to marantz, denon and onkyo. thumbup.gif
paskal
post Jul 2 2010, 09:04 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(matyeo @ Jul 2 2010, 08:07 PM)
Guys...

who know market price for LX83 and VSX919.....
i have  friends want to sell this 2 model....

hmm.gif  hmm.gif

tks
*
the cheapest vsx-919 is going for RM1.8k new
paskal
post Jul 3 2010, 11:01 AM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(C.T. Seong @ Jul 3 2010, 10:27 AM)
wow !
notworthy.gif
*
wrong issit?

vsx-1019 is RM2.3k a few month back.
i think got someone in garage sales sold his new vsx919 for rm1.8k a few weeks back.
paskal
post Aug 8 2010, 09:49 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(weim76 @ Aug 8 2010, 09:15 PM)
Yup, I am also curious to know if there is anybody using these speakers out there at the moment.

If nobody is interested to buy my Series 8, I will most likely use it for my own listening pleasure...  brows.gif
*
at 6 ohm and 85dB sensitivity, you're gonna need a beast to drive it.
a beast like the LX82 with its' Bang & Olfusen ICEPower amp module would be perfect..
paskal
post Aug 9 2010, 12:14 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(weim76 @ Aug 9 2010, 10:34 AM)
Yeah, that is the problem. I have sold the LX82. The Series 8 speakers were supposed to go too. And I was planning to get something more affordable like the VSX-819 to couple with other speaker brands - use the extra cash for other commitments/debts.

Now I am seriously considering VSX-919 (7.1 channels) to pair with the Series 8. Then use the spare Surround Back channels to bi-amp to the front speakers to lessen the load. Good thing the front speakers allow bi-amping.

Do you think this may work? I normally don't crank up the volume as I stay in a link house. Appreciate your opinions on this. Thanks.
*
the VSX-919/1019 don't have a very good amp module. IINM, tested only to have about 28W of power.
paskal
post Aug 21 2010, 08:40 AM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(l_berd @ Aug 20 2010, 10:45 PM)
hi,

just surveyed at senq.. they offer me pioner 820+speaker (3 series) for RM5530.. worth?
*
pioneer 3 series speaker? which model actually?
but still for RM5.5k i do think you could get much better offers at hifi shops
paskal
post Feb 27 2012, 09:29 AM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
user posted image
last week it got pitted against a marantz sr6003.
this week i got my hands on it and have the whole week to compare it against the resident mrx300.
paskal
post Feb 27 2012, 05:25 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(htkaki @ Feb 27 2012, 09:35 AM)
How is it compare to SR6003? I only have a brief encounter at Danny's crib.
*
it beats the sr6003 in musicality, transparency, slam and integration between speakers. it sounds better than sr6003 in stereo music reproduction, concerts, multichannel music, and in movies playback.
not an easy feat considering the sr6003 is a very good receiver for concerts and music.

QUOTE(DannyOP @ Feb 27 2012, 11:56 AM)
what are your impressions? That's the amp I'm using now, pre-out to power amps. Just put it on sale, next upgrade will be pure processor.
*
the preamp section is of higher quality than even anthem mrx300. it beats the mrx300 in musicality, transparency, and especially in stereo reproduction. concert also sounds better on the lx55.

again, not an easy feat considering that the resident receiver had its preamp section heavily modified.
paskal
post Feb 27 2012, 06:30 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(htkaki @ Feb 27 2012, 05:52 PM)
Perhaps the SR6003 already 'aged' comparing to the new improved LX-55.

The LX-55 is impressively more lively and dynamic when I auditioned it at Danny's place compared to his previous avr, Anthem. I must confessed that the Pioneer has come quite a long way compared to the older gen which I had set up before. The only thing is probably it is a tad bright during my brief audition. Still bearable.

Still, I bet its upper range models must be quite impressive.  smile.gif
*
not without some weakness. i can't get the mcacc to sound right. after calibration mcacc made the sound thin and lifeless. the thing sounds better with some simple level and distance adjustment compared to mcacc advanced eq.

because of this drawback movies sounded a lot better on the anthem. on the lx the subwoofer sounded uncontrolled and boomy because i can't turn on the eq. lowering the sub level reduces the boominess but reduced the bass impact.
paskal
post Feb 27 2012, 07:25 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(Will.i.am.Smith @ Feb 27 2012, 06:43 PM)
These LX series now using Class D amplification stage, right?  brows.gif
*
no idea. the lx73 and lx83 used to be the only ones that uses class d icepower modules before this while the lower end lx53 and lx73 used some other method. not that it's a big issue as i'm plugging a poweramp into the receiver.
paskal
post Feb 27 2012, 11:25 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(DannyOP @ Feb 27 2012, 09:25 PM)
Not necessarily, provided the dedicated processor matches the system well. That being said I'm considering the xpa processor or the onkyo 5509.

My only concern about onkyo is that it doesn't sound good with music. Very likely the processor will have the same character as the avr. Wondering why Denon doesn't come out with a processor to compete. Right now there's only one processor it's xt32, not really much of a choice.
*
the newer onkyo that i've heard (*09 series) did a pretty good job with music. audited the 509 and 609 and onkyo did improved the receiver musicality compared to the past series. not as musical as the lx55, but they did a pretty good job nonetheless.
and while still retaining the onkyo slam and brutal presentation when doing movies.

i would like to think that the 5509 preserved the same trait as their other lower end receivers. that being said i wouldn't really place my bet with emotiva seeing how their previous processor turned out to be.
paskal
post Feb 28 2012, 07:39 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(htkaki @ Feb 28 2012, 05:30 PM)
paskal, if Danny did pull the trigger, then we can have a gathering at his place to find out  cheers.gif (not beer but root beers smile.gif )
*
that would be really nice! then we can have a better understanding on the emotiva. have someone bring over a 5509 and it would be even better.
paskal
post Feb 29 2012, 11:42 AM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(Will.i.am.Smith @ Feb 27 2012, 07:56 PM)
You should try dedicated AV processor, it'll improve more over the receiver used as AV processor purpose. I tried it before and i am a firm believer that dedicated processor and power amp is the way to go for the ultimate  brows.gif
*
i would really like to try one out, but currently nobody is using an AV processor near my place. must have someone bring it over to test it on my setup first before committing. not gonna do another blind purchase without home audition (ever) again.

QUOTE(paskal @ Feb 27 2012, 06:30 PM)
not without some weakness. i can't get the mcacc to sound right. after calibration mcacc made the sound thin and lifeless. the thing sounds better with some simple level and distance adjustment compared to mcacc advanced eq.

because of this drawback movies sounded a lot better on the anthem. on the lx the subwoofer sounded uncontrolled and boomy because i can't turn on the eq. lowering the sub level reduces the boominess but reduced the bass impact.
*
found the culprit. seems that standing wave correction brought more problem than solution. at least to my setup.

turning standing wave correction, enabling eq and disabling phase control plus i got a more natural sounding and better sound overall. the best (i think) that i could extract from the receiver (currently).

the lx55 overall sound is more refined than the mrx300. kindda like a more polite presentation than the mrx300. whilst the mrx300 is a more brutal sounding receiver with a harder hitting presentation. not up to the level of onkyo signature but definitely more aggressive than the lx55.

as good as the lx55 is, it loses out compared to ARC eq. ARC did some impressive things to my subwoofer. mcacc still made the subwoofer too boomy for my liking. bass impact is also better on the mrx.

but the thing is, a fella in hifi4sale PMed me asking about the mrx300. he said woo kee hong is asking for RM6k+ for the mrx300 after taking over distributorship from asia sound. and the lx55 is selling for under RM4k. for RM6k i'd rather go with the lx55 and keep the extra RM2k for some other component. the improvement from ARC is there, but i don't think it's worth the extra RM2k.
paskal
post Feb 29 2012, 05:21 PM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(Will.i.am.Smith @ Feb 29 2012, 02:30 PM)
Products from WKH might be but Hwee Seng wise, there's room for the negotiation.

You meant the 5509 not 3309?  brows.gif 5509 can be have locally close to the SG pricing which the amount is small enough to justify the trouble of going to SG to drag the unit back and warranty issue as well  laugh.gif
*
sorry my mistake. it is from hwee seng.
QUOTE
Hwee Seng the new distributor but selling at over RM6k.


ARC is indeed better, but at over RM2k more i couldn't justify the price. at under Rm4k the lx55 is a great choice to consider.

QUOTE(DannyOP @ Feb 29 2012, 01:37 PM)
I'll try out your suggestions. Hopefully will get the same results.

Btw except for Yamaha and Pioneer most of the receivers here are overpriced. Denon 4311 in Sg RM5.6k, here around RM10k, Onkyo 3309 around RM5.8k in Sg, here RM11k.
*
bro you got some good price for the 5509 from SG? brows.gif
paskal
post Mar 2 2012, 07:47 AM

armchair commando couch potato
*******
Senior Member
2,801 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Darul Aman
QUOTE(DannyOP @ Mar 2 2012, 04:32 AM)
Thanks Paskal for your suggestions, and thanks also to bro anfieldude to help me with the standing wave issue. The amp sounds much better now.. Still trying to sort out the phase and another issue you mentioned.

5509 comes to rm6k+ from sg.
*
phase control plus can be turned off by lowering it to 0ms. press the 'audio parameter' button on your remote then scroll down using the arrow button until 'phase c+' and lower it down to 0ms. mcacc sets it at 6ms at my setup. if i read correctly it's supposed to provide independent phase control over each driver inside the speaker.
you might also wanna cycle through the phase control option during playback by pressing 'phase ctrl' button on the remote. a simple phase control might sound better than the default advanced phase control.

5509 at RM6k is an option to consider. sell off the mrx300 and topup a bit to go discreet pre-power. brows.gif

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0327sec    0.76    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 07:28 PM