Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Lecturer's salary and prospects in Malaysia

views
     
PhDExpert
post Feb 27 2010, 07:25 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


I'm 29 years old and would like to know about possible salary as lecturer at IPTS as well. I'm Electrical and Computer Engineering graduate.

My qualification
1. BEng (Hons) from Multimedia University, Malaysia (Top 3 students from the department and scholarships recipient)
2. MSc from University of Hong Kong (Top student, Gold medalist)
3. PhD from RMIT University, Australia (Scholarships from RMIT). During my PhD, I have published 15 publications in conferences (4 in top tier conferences) and journals (2 in top tier journals). The ranking of the conferences and journals are set by the Australian government as a measure to evaluate the quality of the publications throughout Australia. I don't think Malaysia has any ranking for the conferences and journals as I never see them publish in those top tier avenues.

My experience
I worked as lecturer at a college in malaysia for 5 months, an MNC for 5 months, and also 1 year of internship during undergraduate and postgraduate.

My possible offers
I receive offers from Japan and UK, though i'm considering contributing to my own country back home. Hope someone could shed some lights on lecturer salary at IPTS with the latest information.

For instance, in UK, I'm offered a full time three-year position as researcher and a part time tutoring job. After completing my research, they have agreed to provide 6,500 quid per year to fund my future research for the next 10 years. So, the total I receive within the next 10 years would be 65,000 quid equals RM357,500.

My questions
1. I wanted to know if my achievements are well recognised in malaysia, and being an above average achiever, does Malaysia provide any incentive like the UK or perk to promote brain gain?
2. What is the salary I get if I join an IPTS?
3. What are the incentives and perks?

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Feb 27 2010, 07:49 AM
PhDExpert
post Feb 27 2010, 11:10 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(f4tE @ Feb 27 2010, 10:44 AM)
PhDExpert.. I respect you for thinking about our own country and wanting to contribute back. But one point is please dont compare overseas salary with malaysian ringgit. Its not fair to the country.

1. Malaysia will definitely recognise your achievements with all the gold medalist and stuff that you have when u go for interview. But atfer that its your future achievements which is being considered.

2. I think its around rm5-6k which is way less than UK or watever country but is a comfortable starting salary to live in Malaysia. If you have so much confidence in your own ability then Im sure you will reach prof status in no time and earn more than rm10k or possibly 20k.

3. Not sure lol
*
Hello f4te,

Everyone in the country deserves respect from each other unless you are a slacker leeching the country laugh.gif I'm a modest person learning and researching my field most of the times, though I admit, after years of education, I hope my salary is not disappointing.

1. Yes, of course Malaysia is recognising my achievements. But, all I want is fair treatment among the lecturers. I'm of particular interest to know if

a. there is any discrimination/unfairness in research funding distribution.
b. there is any discrimination/unfairness in promotion.

This is because there is no transparency among the lecturers' qualification and publications in Malaysia. If you happened to visit the lecturers' homepage, you'll be disappointed with what they have. Either without or a list of low quality publications. This includes Head of Department of the School. In fact, I know some lecturers publish in a number of international conferences or journals that are commercialised. You pay, you publish. So, you could imagine the quality of the majority of the lecturers.

I would rather work at overseas if I could not secure any research funding though I'm working hard and had a top notch PhD.

2. I hope at least 6k for my first job, and subsequently earn RM20k per month. But then, the concern is job promotion. I hate if there is discrimination. After all the hard work, just because of discrimination, I could not be promoted.

After spending years at overseas, I view discrimination, be it positive or negative, as serious matter. So, I would appreciate if anyone could tell the situation in Malaysia. If there were discrimination in UK and Japan, I would not get a good deal from them, and this has proven to be false.


Added on February 27, 2010, 11:21 am
QUOTE(oumind @ Feb 27 2010, 10:57 AM)
PhDExpert, how about being a technopreneur?  You can solve one of the tough problems, e.g. DIY financial planning, effective portfolio optimization
*
Haha... I gotta consult you about these: technopreneur, DIY financial planning, and effective portfolio optimization biggrin.gif I'm learning to invest biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Feb 27 2010, 11:21 AM
PhDExpert
post Feb 28 2010, 12:03 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(pinkdevil88 @ Feb 27 2010, 04:58 PM)
Yes, any takers?? Does it make any difference on the job offer if you hold a degree/master from a more recognised university?? and also if your result is better then will you be offered a better position??
*
I wanted to know this too. That's in my list of questions:
QUOTE
1. I wanted to know if my achievements are well recognised in malaysia, and being an above average achiever, does Malaysia provide any incentive like the UK or perk to promote brain gain?
2. What is the salary I get if I join an IPTS?
3. What are the incentives and perks?

Added on February 28, 2010, 12:07 pm
QUOTE(DDSFan8 @ Feb 28 2010, 05:44 AM)
I remember reading a book called "I hate people".

Basically, one of the golden rules in the workplace is to blend into the situation.

Slowly then only you set goals to improve the present condition in the workplace.

So PHDExpert, before you secure any funding research or whatever, assess the situation first lor.
*
Consider a Poisson process, one person would not be able to ameliorate the situation. In other words, it does not take a single car to cause a traffic jam, but a host of cars. biggrin.gif There are many writers that never substantiate their points of views.


Added on February 28, 2010, 12:11 pm
QUOTE(azarimy @ Feb 28 2010, 09:53 AM)
just to focus on this one.

if u're looking to start at RM6k, i believe that's reasonable. some IPTS would pay a little bit higher than that. however, the highest paid lecturer in malaysia that i know of up to this day only gets RM17k per month. that covers for both IPTA and IPTS.

just be aware that IPTA and IPTS are virtually two different worlds. IPTS would pay u higher, but they literally own u. IPTS hardly does any research, so they expect that u will dedicate 80% of ur time in classrooms and lecture halls. IPTAs on the other hand actually requires u to do research and publications as well as other academic ventures. teaching is only about 30% of ur total job. but u do get a generous degree of freedom in terms of ur work.
*
In that case, I might target RM7,000 because I believe I'm an above average student as I hvae been honoured with medal and scholarships from overseas universities.

I believe IPTS like Monash and Nottingham are research based institution judging from their graduate schools. Correct me if I'm wrong.


Added on February 28, 2010, 12:18 pmOn personal note, I think it is only fair if I am rewarded with higher salary:

1. Most PhDs in Malaysia are sponsored by public and private universities. They have spent the country high cost of education fees and living costs at overseas. In fact, I don't see why my salary of RM8,000 to RM10,000 per month being senseless because I never spend a single cent from Malaysia to pursue Phd. Getting a PhD scholarships from overseas is highly competitive.

2. Malaysia pays a lot to hire expatriate with strong foreign accent. Isn't it unfairness if Malaysia hire me as a normal lecturer?

3. I wonder if Malaysia understands how we at overseas feel about its unfair treatment.

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Feb 28 2010, 12:26 PM
PhDExpert
post Feb 28 2010, 04:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


Not strange until you understand the real situation in Malaysia.

QUOTE(kotmj @ Feb 28 2010, 03:38 PM)
Man, your thinking is so strange. They're not hiring a student. They're hiring a researcher. That is a big distinction.
I'm intrigued to learn Malaysia is hiring researcher while in fact the lecturers are not producing world class publication. I have been attending top tier conferences throughput the world, and let me tell I have never met any researcher from Malaysian universities so far. By top tier conferences, they are ranked among the best by US, Australia and Singapore. Ever wonder why those countries ranked well in the ivy league? Because they publish in top tier conferences and journals, while what the Malaysian universities have done so far? Nothing more than low ranked publications with high acceptance rate. To most Universities in UK, Australia and Singapore, these low ranked conferences and journals are money making avenue. you publish through paying high prices. This is a serious issue.

Malaysian universities are paying high prices to send students to study at overseas. The Singapore is targeting Harvard, MIT, Cambridge, Oxford and ivy league Unis, but where do the Malaysian Universities send their staffs to? I don't have to tell here.

QUOTE
1. So, so strange. Nobody on the hiring panel gives a damn how much the country saved by not having to finance your studies, LOL!!!! LOL!!! Jesus.
Do you know each PhD student that Malaysian universities send to pursue at overseas cost more than RM300,000 for 3.5 to 5 years? So, where does this money come from? Those PhD students are university staffs! They receive salary and stipend for studying PhD at overseas!

For instance, each staff receives

RM4500 salary + benefits + bonus + US$2000 per month stipend at overseas + US10,000 per year school fees paid to the foreign University

Calculate yourself how much Malaysian universities spend to produce a PhD!

You don't shoot the blank without knowing the reality!

QUOTE
2. It's intriguing to see how an academic reasons about the real world. It's amusing!
You never know the reality.

QUOTE
3. I'm sure lots of Malaysians are losing sleep over your sense of unjustice! LOL!

You have to get out of your I-ness. Me, me, I, I, should, should. It's not about you. They are the one with the money, they are the one who will make the decision, and nobody gives a damn about the sort of "fairness" as you see it. Nothing is as it "should" be. Things are as they are. It is up to you to be the sort of person they will want to hire over others like you. What are they looking for? Stop, for just this one moment in your life, to think about yourself and your cv. Think about them instead. The dean who has to fill a position. What would he want to see of a candidate to give his faculty/school more presence? Etc.
Mind you, lecturer without PhD is called tutor; while lecturer with PhD is called LECTURER. How many people from Malaysia have got a PhD if the Universities do not send their tutor staff overseas for PhD? Oh yeah, the dean has to think about the money for the lecturers to pursue PhD study. Otherwise, all they could hire are tutors. Or maybe hire from overseas as expatriate at much higher cost.

Hiring locals with PhD like me at slightly higher salary, say an additional RM1000 is fair and square. I never spend a single cent from the University to pursue my PhD.

My PhD is from RMIT in Australia. Getting scholarships from overseas to pursue PhD at Melbourne University is extraordinarily difficult, unless one get scholarships from Malaysia. I admit RMIT is NOT an ivy league, but getting an overseas scholarships is VERY competitive. I hope you see how hard for many of us have been struggling, and this should translate into higher salary in my job application as lecturer.


Added on February 28, 2010, 4:58 pm
QUOTE(DDSFan8 @ Feb 28 2010, 03:22 PM)
aside from salary, any other benefits of being a lecturer?
*
At overseas, lecturer with PhD can earns side income from various sources:

1. Basic salary as lecturer (about 32,000 quid per annum)
2. Consultation
3. Marking PhD thesis from other universities
4. Adjunct lecturer
5. Online tutor
6. Research funding. The lecturer can earn, say 10% of the research funding.
7. Patent

All in all, lecturers with a PhD at 30s could earn up to 40,000-50,000 quid per annum.

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Feb 28 2010, 05:04 PM
PhDExpert
post Feb 28 2010, 05:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(kotmj @ Feb 28 2010, 05:18 PM)
I wasn't critiquing your qualifications which I'm sure is fantastic. I was surprised at how you were incredibly internally-focussed in your thinking. How hard something was to acquire is not necessarily a measure of its value in the eyes of others. Maybe it is. Maybe its not.

You mustn't go around thinking you're entitled to whatever you think you're entitled to. People hate that. OTHER people hate that. It is a lot more helpful to think what others might want, and how you can provide it. I'm asking you to transport yourself into the minds of others. You are unaccustomed to this mode of thinking.

Another thing you absolutely need to keep in mind of is the concept of sunk cost. Every textbook on microeconomics treats this, and there is a very good reason for this: It is non-intuitive. If a Uni has sunk a fortune into someone, they will likely prefer him over another candidate they have not invested in.
*
If the past achievements are considered as sunk cost, then why need brain gain? Better still, forget the past extraordinary experience, and also resume, right? Those achievements are not much valued in Malaysia, right?

Yes, there is no need to promote brain gain, the government and universities should fork out money themselves to groom its own PhD holders right?

Millions and billions of dollars have been invested, yet, I could hardly see any extraordinary research outcomes, is it right?

What lame excuses you have there smile.gif

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Feb 28 2010, 05:31 PM
PhDExpert
post Feb 28 2010, 05:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(kotmj @ Feb 28 2010, 05:32 PM)
I gave no excuses. I was merely depicting the way people think, especially when they are in groups.
*
No wonder Malaysia fails! This is definitely NOT the way in most developed country.

To be honest, with high quality publications, one could easily get a position at overseas. The problem is, in Malaysia, they don't even rank the conferences and journals! This is the MAJOR reason why we feel we are NOT appreciated as much as we do at overseas in Malaysia. With the kind of mentality that you have just depicted, you have really added salt to injury.

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Feb 28 2010, 05:46 PM
PhDExpert
post Feb 28 2010, 05:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(kotmj @ Feb 28 2010, 05:45 PM)
Are you trying to find a job or are you here to lament the country's backwardness? You have to pick your priority man.
*
So, you mean if I want a job in Malaysia, I should never lament the country, but accept any form of discrimination and backwardness?
PhDExpert
post Feb 28 2010, 05:52 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(ThanatosSwiftfire @ Feb 28 2010, 05:48 PM)
Look, what's your objective of working in Malaysia?

If you think this country is shortchanging you, you have 3 options
a) Leave, like most gutless ppl do.
b) Stay and attempt to make a difference.
c) Stay, but keep complaining without doing anything, and live most of ur life unhappy.

(edit, i added a 3rd option)
*
a) Who is gutless? Malaysia or the developed countries? I demanded nothing more than the recognition that I enjoy at overseas.

b) I had mentioned about the Poisson process.

c) I don't live an unhappy life

PhDExpert
post Feb 28 2010, 05:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(kotmj @ Feb 28 2010, 05:48 PM)
Yes. And take it up the ass and always swallow.


Added on February 28, 2010, 5:51 pmI thought you wanted a lecturing position with good merit-based upward mobility at an excellent pay?

But now you seem intent on condemning the very people who are supposed to provide you with the above? They are not compatible goals, you know.
*
Malaysians have got used to swallowing the bitter pills? Nah... I'm not condemning here, but I understand you might have been enduring the plight sad.gif

Do I appear condemning? What I have mentioned are normal practices in developed countries who appreciate human capital most. Is it too much for Malaysia to know the truth and have a sensible say on how to deal with it? Or should I say far be it for Malaysia to take up the normal practices in developed countries?


Added on February 28, 2010, 6:02 pm
QUOTE(epic.engineer @ Feb 28 2010, 05:55 PM)
Of course few people here appreciate quality, we're a long way from being a developed country. Your ranting on the internet about captain obvious things will not change them. That said, it's a free market. You are not being forced to work in Malaysia. If you believe you are better off elsewhere, you should do that. If you think you can do something about the problem, then do something about it. That said, i haven't seen any of your work so i can't tell how good you really are.

I have to agree with kotmj here.
*
1. The brain gain program is NOT in line with free market because of the extra perks and benefits.

2. Education is NOT a free market. It's a social sector that needs regular improvement from various bodies.

Sorry, I do not agree with your points.


This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Feb 28 2010, 06:02 PM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 05:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(kotmj @ Feb 28 2010, 06:56 PM)
PhDexpert, maybe you can tell us how the recruitment process for a lecturer looks like.
*
1. To be hired as a lecturer, one must have a PhD.

2. To be promoted to a senior lecturer, one must have a string of high quality publications. Low quality publications do NOT count. A lecturer must achieve sufficient amount of points for promotion. For instance, several countries have their own ranking though they are pretty much the same:

Singapore: Ranking in Singapore
Australia: Ranking in Australia

3. To be promoted to an Associate Professor, one must achieve certain amount of points in publications. In addition, one must have sufficient number of referees from well recognised institutions from Malaysia and Overseas. Any conflicts must be declared. This is another reason why universities at overseas are frantically looking for collaboration opportunities.

4. To be promoted to a Prof, similar procedure to point 3, but with more stringent rules.

At overseas, promotion is very much based on this system.

The Australia, NZ and Singapore use the system I mentioned.

In UK, publication citation from other universities count most.

In China, point system is based on points given by the international EI index

In Malaysia, what we have? A big NIL! So, there is NO transparency and our effort at overseas are NOT well appreciated to say the least.


Added on March 1, 2010, 5:31 am
QUOTE(azarimy @ Feb 28 2010, 06:46 PM)
my dear PHDExpert,

it's true that everyone deserve to be paid based on what they can give back. but malaysia cant pay what u deserve simply because we lack the economic backing. IPTAs rely heavily on government funding to function while IPTS rely heavily on the students.

almost none of the universities are capable of sustaining themselves purely via academic research, despite having some of the leading experts in the world. we are here at IPTAs because we can contribute back to the country so that one day, whenever that will be, malaysia will be capable of paying PhD holders like u with equal salary as the developed countries. if u wanna join now, well, u gotta work hard just like the rest of us.

yes, it's a brain leak. but there are other things that the government has to maintain while we pull ourselves together.
*
My main point is NOT salary. You misunderstood. I mentioned I could take the job at RM6,000-7,000, although an extra RM1,000 is fair and square. My main concern is:

1. Discrimination based on racial ground, as you have mentioned non-malays are hired under contract. Why the special treatment to Malays even in the hiring process. Promotion wise, it's even hopeless for non-Malays.
2. Lack of transparency in promotion, read my previous post. Where is the ranking and point system? Is it because the Head of Department or those in high position are of low quality that they never adopt the point system adopted by most institutions in the world?


Added on March 1, 2010, 5:50 am
QUOTE(depster666 @ Feb 28 2010, 07:48 PM)
This must be one of the most amusing threads I've ever read....

PhdExpert, with all due respect to your qualifications and recognitions, bla bla bla... there are few things you have to remember, and remember them well you must in chasing your dream tongue.gif;
As I mentioned, everyone deserves due recognition in Malaysia. I do NOT need extra careful treatment, just hope there is enough transparency and recognition. To be transparent, there must be a good system like those applied in UK, Australia, NZ and China. Yet, I do NOT see such transparency in Malaysia.

QUOTE
1. This is Malaysia, not some other developed countries like you always mentioned previously. In fact, people could say you are contradicting yourself when you keep comparing those ivy leagues, conferences and what not, WITH what malaysian institutions had managed to offer as far. So, how can local institutions could compare with those ivy leagues in terms of salary/recognition/remuneration???
Read my previous post. In China, academic position is very competitive as there is surplus of PhDs. They recruit through a point system, that's fair and square. Now you know why Beijing University and Tsing Hua University are ivy league. Am I asking too much for Malaysia to follow China?

QUOTE
2. Based on your qualifications, you are smart... but I would say you have to be a bit more street smart, ie understanding the local market environment, understanding what your prospective employers are looking in you, and how you can match the expectations with your profile.. You may know A to Z, but what if you employer wants you to do A, and only willing to pay you to do A? tongue.gif
Malaysia is competing with the rest of the world to become one of the top education hubs, adn to put some Unis in the ivy league. Did you mean the world should consider the local market environment before finalising the ivy league? Oh yeah, I remember a popular quote "Ini Malaysia" probably from a loser eh?

QUOTE
3. Nobody's here is telling you that you are wrong is seeking equal recognition on par with the qualification. They are all just saying that it might be a dream too far tongue.gif. Except for select few industries and some Fortune 100/500 MNC, everybody else has to swallow a bitter pill throughout their working career in malaysia.  Ever wonder why is there so much publicity about brain drain in malaysia? Why people still leaving, working and taking residence somewhere else, if malaysia really value the human capital? People in malaysia are at a cross road, move out for better pay and lifestyle, or stay back due to family commitment, etc, etc.
So, to work in Malaysia, one must swallow the bitter pills, whereas, to work in a developed country, one should just sit back and enjoy the sweet pleasures eh?

QUOTE
4. Refer to point 2. There's a small matter of organization/office politic that you have to tread as well in almost everywhere in malaysia..

Neway, good luck.. remember, dont just be book smart, be street smart as well. It's valuable ingredient for survival..
*
What do you mean by street smart? Is that to understand the Malaysian 'special' way? May be you admit that discrimination is wide spread in Malaysia, yet nothing is done, and so one has to be street smart, right? At overseas, they adopt point system backed with reference report in consideration of promotion, fair and square. In addition, all employees have to sign "Equal Opportunity" form in any application including research funding and promotion.

Are there Equal Opportunity in Malaysia? How does Malaysia compete in ivy league then?


This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 05:50 AM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 06:01 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(f4tE @ Feb 28 2010, 08:10 PM)
PhdExpert seems to be overrun. I think he wont be visiting this thread again. Just in case he does, i have a neutral comment for him tongue.gif
Far be it from overrun!

QUOTE
Please stop comparing overseas with malaysia. We are not overseas. I already said it is not fair to compare between us and other country.
Did you remember Malaysia wants to compete with ivy league universities? Did you know Malaysia want to be a top education hub?

I'm intrigued that one could be the top without comparing overseas with Malaysia. What a "Inin Malaysia" mentality you have there.

QUOTE
You keep saying that you have gold medal and whatever stuff and seems to be very proud of that. I respect you for being able to achieve that as I know that it is not something anyone can achieve.
Everyone should receive due recognition, and I do NOT need extra recognition or respect.

QUOTE
If you have the confidence, do contribute to our country by being the person who will bring Malaysia to the so called top tier conferences.
It's meaningless if I bring Malaysia to top tier conferences without being rewarded in due recognition. Without a proper point system, how does Malaysia gauge my achievement? You can't compare high quality publications with the low quality ones. High quality publications have very low acceptance rate. For instance, out of 100 papers submitted by the ivy league Unis, only 20-30 papers accepted in the good conferences, compared to 100 papers submitted by local Unis, and up to 70 papers accepted. In fact, no one bothers to read and cite those low quality publications as we know the publication avenues are money making.

QUOTE
If everybody starts to compare and go overseas, malaysia will not stand a chance to advance. SOmebody has to initiate the process for better future
Refer to the Poisson process for a single person like me. A single car won't congest the street.


Added on March 1, 2010, 6:02 am
QUOTE(azarimy @ Mar 1 2010, 05:54 AM)
1. like i said, it was what the applicants agreed upon. it depends on the availability and what the candidate themselves want. if they applied for permanent post, they wont be offered a contract.

2. err... promotion IS based on meritocracy. if u have evidence that it is not, then i suggest taking it up to MACC. i'm sure they'll love a field trip to the universities. and i'm not being sarcastic here. help us weed out the dumbasses.

that aside, we do use point system. that's what they yearly review are for.
*
Show me the ranking system then. Show me the meritocracy system too. Why are there Head of Department without list of publications in their homepage, even in Universiti Malaya website?

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 06:04 AM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 06:35 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(azarimy @ Mar 1 2010, 06:19 AM)
dude, if u can name one IPTA lecturer who have a complete publication list ONLINE, do share with us.

information in websites are managed by IT handler in individual faculties. the reliability and accuracy of the information highly depends on that particular person. we're not there yet. so instead of relying information on websites, i recommend contacting the individual faculties directly and acquire the information first hand.

so how do u want me to show the rating system? u wanna come to my place or should i come to yours? these information are not available online. if u havent stumbled upon it doesnt mean it doesnt exist, right? isnt that a fundamental rule in research? biggrin.gif
*
dude, I'm intrigued how inefficient is the Malaysian way in its quest to be one of the top education hub.

Publication homepage is maintained by the lecturer, NOT by the IT staff. See the lecturers at overseas:

Japan: Japan publication list
UK:
Singapore: Singapore publication list
Australia: Australia publication list

and Malaysia: malaysia publication list

azarimy, do compare the others as well and be prepared to LYAO. haha... ranking system in Malaysia is NOT online yet. LMAO.

Singapore: Ranking in Singapore
Australia: Ranking in Australia

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 06:36 AM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 06:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(pinkdevil88 @ Mar 1 2010, 06:35 AM)
Cool down guys. Let's see what do I have here.

Chong Kwai Fatt's profile and all his publication list. He is a very famous tax lecturer and accounting students in Malaysia will know him as his text is used as the main text in our courses. Very impressive profile!!!
http://umexpert.um.edu.my/papar_cv.php?id=AAAJxnAAQAAAGEgAAC
*
Yeah, impressive, but in Malaysia only. All I see are publications in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Nan Yang Siang Pau. to be honest, I wonder how difficult it is to publish there. Please compare him with the lectures that I suggested and you know how well the others perform at overseas.

I'm NOT bragging here. I'm NOT superior. But, I'm telling the fact that our lecturers are mostly jaguh kampung. At overseas, most have NO standing at all.


Japan: Japan publication list
UK:
Singapore: Singapore publication list
Australia: Australia publication list

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 06:40 AM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 06:55 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(pinkdevil88 @ Mar 1 2010, 06:51 AM)
Someone is expecting wall street journal to publish something on Malaysian Tax!
*
You got me wrong. Malaysian tax is published in Malaysia. New findings that could tackle the tax issues at large are published at overseas.

I put it that you are giving lame excuse to avoid publishing at top tier international conferences and journals.

Read the Japanese publication site, there is a section on Research Community Paper:

Japan Publication List

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 06:57 AM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 10:13 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(pinkdevil88 @ Mar 1 2010, 09:30 AM)
http://staff.utar.edu.my/eweht/

http://staff.utar.edu.my/gohyk/

Look at a few more profiles i have found here. We have professors from MIT and Imperial College currently serving in Malaysia and they don't complain a thing about discrimination, salary and other stuff.
*
For Prof. Ewe Hong Tat, I'm NOT qualified to evaluate as he is much more experience than I am. I suppose he is 15 years my senior.

For Dr. Goh Yong Kheng, he is about 5 years my senior, so I'll evaluate his achievement. I'm intrigued he is a deputy dean at this young age, probably at 34 years old (I'm 29 years old).

Firstly, he obtained a scholarship from UK to pursue PhD. His scholarship "ORS (Oversea Research Students Awards), 2001-2003, by Universities UK for studying PhD at Imperial College London" was sponsored by the UK government to cover the DIFFERENCE between UK student and Overseas student tuition fees, that's about 6,000 quid per annum. Thus, Dr. Goh either covered his living expenses and UK student tuition fees (up to 10,000 quid per annum) himself, or he worked as tutor, research assistant, waiter, or salesman to support himself while in UK. He indeed had struggled a lot in UK.

Secondly, I evaluate his publications. There are 7 peer-reviewed publications (excluding PhD thesis). he has 5 journals and 3 conference research papers) and the publication avenues are as follows:

New J. Phys. 4, 81.1-81.9 (2002), 5-year Impact Factor = 3.544) = Excellent
Granular Matter, 6, 39-46, (2004), (refereed) 5-year Impact Factor = 1.618) = Excellent
Computational Science - ICCS2004, Ranked A by Australia = Excellent
ERAD 2004, vol. 2, 35-40, 6 pages, (2004). Acceptance rate <20% = Excellent
NHESS 5-year Impact Factor = 1.345) = Good
J. of Sci. & Tech. in the Tropics, vol. 1, no. 1, page 131 – 134, (2005)
Very Poor because First volume and First edition
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 6, 285 – 291, (2006) 5-year Impact Factor = 1.345) = Good

Based on the evaluation, he has 4 good journals and 2 good conferences publications, all international. Those are top-tier publications. Although the quantity is low, but the quality is excellent. Having said that, as a deputy dean, he should have much more good publications, rather than merely six.

Compared to UK and Singapore, his achievement is rather low at this age and his position as a vice dean.

But in Malaysia, he is one of the top achievers. If you compared to the entire Computer Science department in USM, he is the top. You can compare with USM and Dr. Goh publication impak factor is more than anyone in the entire USM:

USM publication list

All in all, he is someone I salute lah... as his good publications are more than mine tongue.gif. But, we have a 5-year age gap. And, the flip side is he NEVER publish after his PhD graduation. What happens to him? He has stopped publishing since 2006. Slacker? Or the Malaysian Malas culture?

Currently, I have 2 good journals and 3 good conferences publications, and this is enough for me to get good position in UK and Japan.

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 10:44 AM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 11:44 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(gloomberg @ Mar 1 2010, 11:31 AM)
I would need to agree on PhDExpert on this.
Being realistic, look at the job market. Would you hire a local grad or foreign grad, ceteris paribus (same qualification, experience, etc)? Needless to say, foreign grad would get the upper hand? Why? Well, the are too many reasons for that.

Malaysia is now lacking of a high quality human capital (well, u guys should know why), so paying a bit more for ppl such as PhDExpert is totally fine. Considering that the quality of education in our country is below par, hiring one that is good would entail better remuneration, and this is be practiced if we want to our country to improve. Well, face the reality, who would want to work for you, if the pay's low? Unless there's sth in it for them, for example research funds and etc.
*
Malaysia population: 27,000,000
Singapore population: 5,000,000
Australia population: 21,000,000

If one compares the high impact publications among these countries, it is appalling that our high impact publications comprised not even 5% of those in the countries with population way less than us!

Wake up! Jaguh Kampung!


PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 11:59 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(jchong @ Mar 1 2010, 11:38 AM)
PhDExpert, I have read your various posts and your comments about the local higher learning environment.

It is commendable that you're thinking of teaching locally but I do think you must prepare yourself for the culture shock. Yes, you are dismayed at the situation here regarding publication by lecturers, you want to work in a top flight uni environment and get your intellectual challenge, etc. Unfortunately, many places in Malaysia are not there yet. Academia in Malaysia is still a long way off from the overseas examples you quoted. It is changing though (albeit too slowly in my opinion). Anyway, the point is that the situation in Malaysia needs to be improved, but at the moment it is what it is. You will need to adapt to it otherwise you will be quite disappointed and eventually quit and teach overseas.
*
Thanks.

Yes, you are right, the culture shock to work in my own country. This is rather amusing. As I have mentioned, starting remuneration of RM6,000-7,000 is absolutely acceptable for me. I could only hope for the best in terms of research funds distribution and promotion. After all, I have been studying at overseas for long, where FAIRNESS and Equal Opportunity are rather commonplace. If you happened to work at overseas before, I'm sure you could feel, deep down, the disappointment to get back to Malaysia only to endure the discrimination and to survive the office politics.

It does NOT matter whether Malaysia is a top notch research and education hub. The bottom line is, be fair and square. To attain this state, the meritocracy system must be transparent. All information that azarimi suggested are yet to be available online, so where is the transparency?

Azarimi stated that lecturer's publications are managed by the IT department. I'm sick of it! I could not find the USM Head of Department's list of publication while she has been working there for many years! Blatant ignorance!

And why non Malays are hired under contract, while Malays are full time lecturers? Why non Malays have to discuss and negotiate during employment, and why not grant them permanent position in the first place?

There are a host of questions!


Added on March 1, 2010, 12:01 pm
QUOTE(attahun @ Mar 1 2010, 11:49 AM)
i'd just like to say at the end of the day, its doing what you like and getting the means to live on..don't like it? move on..

whats the purpose of getting a PHD? to get better pay? to get recognition? to contribute back to society? go figure.. then u can decide better..

i never liked academics..the brother selling burgers next to my house has no academic achievement but is making more than me and he drives a bigger car, and i'm the engineer.. luckily i love my job..at least for now.. haha..

who knows, i might end up selling burgers one day? now, how to 'kill' the competition? hmm.gif  tongue.gif
*
This is another quote from a typical Malaysian with "Ini Malaysia" mentality. You do what you like.

Oh yeah, Malaysia should stick to this mentality. Then, please don't mention any Apex University. To me, it's syok sendiri. Forget about getting into Ivy League... we do what we like mah... why compare with other Unis?

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 12:02 PM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 01:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(ThanatosSwiftfire @ Mar 1 2010, 12:56 PM)
Weak relative to the foreign countries highlighted by PhDExpert aka Australia and Singapore. What measure do I say is weak? GDP per capita, in USD. GDP I feel is a very decent approximation of the salary anyone will get, and when your GDP overall is low, tax revenue per person is on average lower. Therefore, you get less money to spend on each individual person. What happens when you have less to spend on each person? You get poor quality education as a result of being unable to pay higher salaries for better qualified educators.

On top of that, we have, as u mentioned, money flowing into the wrong hands, which is what I implied by my euphemism on bureaucratic red tape (which u gladly missed). People willing to do it, no, of course not. But you see, the questions and statements you make is, "why cna't they.." instead of "what can I do?". It's very easy to blame everyone else, but why don't you think of your own avenues to make yourself stand out?

On your matter of SPMs many As, that element I agree is misguided. HOWEVER, primary and secondary education's purpose is still to build a well rounded individuals, not specialists in maths, or biology, or linguistics. Tertiary education is where you're supposed to learn your specialization.. You may feel it is unnecessary, but these things have a purpose?
*
Congratulations ThanatosSwiftfire! You have remained the same in the old past, not knowing that we are only 10 years south of 2020 to be a 'developed' country. Never mind, you can still preach what you like, as long as we adopt the third world mentality, we are still better off than Vietnam, Philippine, and Myanmar, right?

As of today, we should be close to 'developed', sorry, I don't think I'm harsh to compare Malaysia with tinny Singapore. Who is the bully here, the tinny Singapore? rclxms.gif

Why our lecturers publish in obscure publication avenues, while Singapore publish in top tiers? The entire Malaysia could NOT even produce 5% of Singapore's good publications! Anyway, I think you should celebrate we have got such a poor performance! Stunning achievement for the infamous reason. Well done!


Added on March 1, 2010, 1:54 pm
QUOTE(Lord_Ashe @ Mar 1 2010, 12:49 PM)
ex IPTA "lecturer" reporting in.

Reading the first post, I was so tempted to write a lot of things, but I decided against ranting, so let me put it simply:

1) Malaysia doesn't have a tradition of scholarship excellence - i don't mean "biasiswa" but as in being a "Scholar".
Lack of Equal Opportunity. The EO is adopted by MOST developed countries.

QUOTE
2) IPTAs in Malaysia have a very weird grading system when it comes to lecturers - there's no distinction between a lecturer and a researcher. Very few people can be excellent at both.
As I have mentioned, there isn't transparency at all. The lecturers hide their list of publications somewhere otherwise, it's a shame!

QUOTE
 
3) IPTAs in Malaysia also thrive on getting published in obscure journals and conferences.
+1000000000000000000

QUOTE
4) internal politics are hell. many young lecturers I know just accept the status quo even tho they are capable of more.
Malaysia never learns! Learn to appreciate human capital please!

QUOTE
5) most IPTA lecturers i know use their free time to make money via side businesses


Sure you could say all the above are generalisations - but this was what I faced. Because of item 1, and the fact that everything has to toe the political line, you can't be truly "out of the box" or adventurous. You will likely be told to join several jawatankuasas to organise this and that event, and then suddenly be told you aren't doing enough "research".

So whatever you may feel, it's ultimately your decision, just don't say we didn't warn you.
*
+100000000000000
You should have groused way long ago smile.gif

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 01:57 PM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 02:29 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(ThanatosSwiftfire @ Mar 1 2010, 02:11 PM)
There's a difference between whether subjects have a purpose, and finding fault in the implementation. What your problem with the subjects is, is how they are implemented, isn't it?

Yes, purchasing power and all that makes a difference, however, when you're dealing with highly mobile professionals, PPP loses most of it's point and absolute amounts is what matters.
Right!
Wow, you resort to insults? Such academic behavior!
I'm preaching? Hmm...  I didn't know the roles have switched!
Perhaps you can take a look at our GDP/per capita compared to Singapore/Per capita, and also do some reading on economics. We're NOWHERE clsoe to developed in terms of GDP, productivity numbers in US$ and the quality of tertiary education.
I reiterate: "You have remained the same in the old past, not knowing that we are only 10 years south of 2020 to be a 'developed' country." Period!

Insult of what? Then, how about you remark "or someone with a Ph.D, your thinking sure is simple"????? Is this insult? Tell me!

QUOTE
Am I celebrating the poor performance? Wow, I really appreciate how my meaning is misconstrued. I'm saying we should attempt to make improvements, step by step, and whilst we may use the developed nations as a target, it is unfair to use them as a benchmark. There is a difference between what is POSSIBLE to be achieved in the time frame of 10 years, and what's IMPOSSIBLE to be done in the same 10 years.
You think I'm being unfair to compare Malaysia with Singapore, what more can I say? We compare Malaysia with Indonesia, shall we? We are only 10 years away from 2020, what's wrong with a developed country as benchmark. Now, tell me, which country should we use as benchmark? LMAO...

QUOTE
And yes, we never learn. Great! So uh, why don't you do something to make us be able to appreciate our human capital? What do you get out of this?
*
I'm intrigued you need me to teach you how to appreciate other's achievement. You know, I appreciate every profession on earth, be it janitor or prime minister. After all the discussion, you fail to understand transparency and fairness are the key! whistling.gif whistling.gif whistling.gif

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 02:39 PM
PhDExpert
post Mar 1 2010, 02:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(ThanatosSwiftfire @ Mar 1 2010, 02:44 PM)
And your point is? I know we have 10 years left, and I know we're in deep shit. What I'm asking is, what is your point? You keep talking about it on the internet, and somehow magically we're gonna change into a developed nation? No great kingdom is a built in a day, and certainly not by people who talk like they deserve the world, but have yet to do anything to contribute to the improvement of the country.
Did I say Malaysia could become developed country in one day?
My points have been clear. There is an urgent need to promote transparency and MERITOCRACY that is FAIR and SQUARE.

QUOTE
Start contributing, and maybe we'll see some good a few years down the future.
Our best benchmark is ourselves. An honest assessment of where we are, and given the circumstances that occured specifically to us, have we, as a nation, made the best choices for the country.
Do you understand what is benchmark? I have never stumbled upon any scientific fact that tells "Compare yourself against yourself, and that's the benchmark"... Come on, ThanatosSwiftfire! Do you know what you are telling us? As a reminder, forumers are NOT simple minded.

QUOTE
I agree that fairness and transparency is important, but what does TALKING about it in an internet forum, do to change it?
*
At last, ThanatosSwiftfire understands how to appreciate human capital. I'm glad someone from Sunway College learned about fairness and transparency. But wait a minute, ThanatosSwiftfire does NOT know how to walk the talk... sigh... ThanatosSwiftfire is talk the talk too in the forum. As I said, the Poisson Process model applies well.

Hmmm... this is the first day of Autumn in Australia =) ThanatosSwiftfire, could you do me a favour? I'm too far away to contribute back home, and this forum is the only channel. You might want to walk the talk. Thanks!

This post has been edited by PhDExpert: Mar 1 2010, 03:02 PM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0320sec    0.28    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 12:00 AM