tips: invite us all to eat together, then we teach u

very nice colors in the pic, apart from the distracting watermark

This post has been edited by lwliam: Feb 9 2010, 12:52 AM

Dilarang kencing di sepanjang pagar...

nico, somehow i prefer his version, gives a more dreamy feel. not that yours' bad either

absolutely stunning! I love the telephoto effect. do include your exif next time bro thx

over-tilting sometimes can kill a nice photo. try about 15-30 degrees of tilt as a starting point. (does not apply to all photos) but i love your lomo-ish PP style.

PP here 99% of the time would mean post processing as not everyone would use photoshop for their editting work.

This post has been edited by lwliam: Feb 13 2010, 01:47 PM

paiseh paiseh... my bad... quoted wrongly.. hehe..

---

Added on February 13, 2010, 1:49 pmthe white balance a bit too much on the warm + greenish side.. or is it deliberate

This post has been edited by lwliam: Feb 13 2010, 01:49 PM

really nice clouds, but u said original without editing, how come there's no EXIF at all? what camera did u use? even most handphone cameras have EXIF

if someone's too smart for this place, go play other place la... smartass

i like the way you bumped up the levels and color on the girl, but try not to clip the highlights at the same time as well, this is to keep the details in the snow. that's one of the purpose camera IQ tends to underexp bright pics. i'd normally look at the histogram and pull the slider right till the edge, then stop. if the subject's still insufficient, use masking with a 3-4px feathered edge

on 2nd thought, i think that edited pic is alright, i did still manage to see details in the snow ^^ earlier viewed the pic from an angle on my lcd screen

Camera Model - Sony Alpha A700
Lens - Minolta 35-70 @ 70mm
Exposure - 1/125 s, f/9 @ 100 ISO



wireless flash on wall at the back.

Utada, how come left 2 packets only? where the 3rd one went?

i dont understand, why is it nice bokeh?

@achew, yeah, i understand that theory... its just that i wish to know what do ppl judge when they say so, and if i agree with it, then why dont i see it in that point of view in the 1st place. i do not wish to intimidate or anything

i think you got me wrong, that photo isnt mine. i didnt say i like it, neither do i dislike it. its just that the photo doesnt say anything. just a head and a lot of spots at the back, which in many cases, would be quite a distraction away from the subject matter. if those were lights at night, then that would be another case altogether, but then it would still need proper framing to get the effect right.

HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHA... wonder who has a 72" plasma hooked up to his comp

awesome!

Camera Model - Sony Alpha A700
Lens - Tokina 28-70 F2.8@ 70mm
Exposure - 1/20s, f/10@ 200 ISO

totally awesome!

IMHO, its better to mask the gradient along the river bank, dont let the lower color spill onto the trees, coz the whites on the leaves are what making the pic stands out in terms of IR photos. i'd probably leave out the foreground and let the treeline grab the attention from the viewer. but kudos to you anyway

dust dust here, dust dust there, dust dust dust dust everywhere... O_o

This post has been edited by lwliam: Mar 5 2010, 12:47 AM

Camera Model - Sony Alpha A700
Lens - Tokina 28-70 F2.8 @ 28mm to +/- 50mm
Exposure - 1 s, f/3.5 @ 640 ISO



flash + zoom