Photography [PIC-A-Day Thread] Post your daily shots here! V5, A Pictar A Day Keeps Da Fungus Away! (:
|
|
 Apr 3 2010, 05:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
 
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA   
|
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Apr 2 2010, 11:15 PM) Should follow up with a closeup of her eyes... should look nice. That pic is already cropped, 105mm was my limit   |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2010, 11:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
 Nikon D90 | 50mm | f/1.8 | 1/50 sec | ISO 800 |
|
|
Apr 8 2010, 01:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
QUOTE(ReturnOfTheJedi @ Apr 8 2010, 12:44 PM) actually iso 800 suitable in what situation? high iso usually used in low light or sports actions (where u wanna freeze the motion but dun have wide enuf aperture) |
|
|
Apr 9 2010, 12:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
 D90 | 300mm | f/5.6 | iso 1600 | 1/500 sec |
|
|
Apr 12 2010, 11:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
 Nikon D90 | f/4.5 | 70mm | iso 200 |1/250 sec  Nikon D90 | f/4.5 | 70mm | iso 200 |1/500 sec This post has been edited by ReeNz: Apr 12 2010, 11:51 AM |
|
|
Apr 13 2010, 04:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
 D90 | f/8 | 1/1250 sec | 70mm | iso 560  D90 | f/8 | 1/1250 sec | 300mm | iso 640 This post has been edited by ReeNz: Apr 13 2010, 04:38 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 20 2010, 09:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
 D90 | 300mm | iso 560 | f/5.6 | 1/200 sec  D90 | 300mm | iso 900 | f/5.6 | 1/200 sec  D90 | 300mm | iso 1000 | f/5.6 | 1/250 sec This post has been edited by ReeNz: Apr 20 2010, 10:42 AM |
|
|
Apr 23 2010, 12:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
  |
|
|
Apr 24 2010, 12:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
D90 | f/8 | 70 mm | 1/100 sec | iso 200 This post has been edited by ReeNz: Apr 24 2010, 10:25 PM |
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 02:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
 D90 | f/8 | 1/1600 sec | iso 720 | 300mm  D90 | f/8 | 1/1600 sec | iso 640 | 210mm  D90 | f/8 | 1/1600 sec | iso 1000 | 300mm |
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 12:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
 Canon S90 | f/8 | 8sec | ISO 80 |
|
|
May 3 2010, 12:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
 Canon S90 | f/4 | ISO 80 | 1/320 sec |
|
|
May 3 2010, 10:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ May 3 2010, 05:09 PM) the subject of the image seems to be 1foot behind the focal point... I was focusing on the snake's head actually..but i admit it should be better if i focus on the lady instead..   |
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2010, 02:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ May 4 2010, 01:28 AM) Camera: Sony DSLR-A700 Sweeeet!! Exposure: 0.017 sec (1/60) Aperture: f/1.4 Focal Length: 85 mm ISO Speed: 800   |
|
|
May 4 2010, 06:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
My first ever HDR attempt
 Hope sifus can give some C&C..thanks! |
|
|
May 4 2010, 09:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ May 4 2010, 08:35 AM) job very well done.. u made it pretty natural looking.. Really? thanks for the comment, i really have a little clue on how to judge an HDR pic |
|
|
May 4 2010, 02:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ May 4 2010, 12:07 PM) its very subjective.. i like HDRs that are natural looking without the comic book Armageddon looks.. with no or barely visible halos around trees and contrast edges. I was thinking the same too, but any lower than that it will show a line of cars parking in front of the building although the framing could use a bit more tilt to the bottom, the bottom of the house seems cut off. there are still space to spare on the skies above for you to push the frame lower.  @badtrans2020: i think your pics will be much better if u use a tripod for such exposures..just my 2 cent  This post has been edited by ReeNz: May 4 2010, 02:33 PM |
|
|
May 4 2010, 09:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ May 4 2010, 04:54 PM) for me, a good HDR pic is a photo that i wont notice it's HDR in the 1st place Many2 thanks.. juz like yours |
|
|
May 5 2010, 03:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Awesome as alwiz dude This post has been edited by ReeNz: May 5 2010, 03:12 AM |
|
|
May 9 2010, 01:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
|
Senior Member
1,467 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA
|
 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by ReeNz: May 9 2010, 02:07 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0233sec
 0.68
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 07:51 PM |
Quote
