why give denilson more chances to start a game when he doesnt bring anything to our game....we are better off with ramsey....at least his work rate is really high....i miss diaby(i never imagine i gonna say this)....will diaby be back for the chelsea game??

so you all are ok if you get thrashed in stamford bridge jsut as long you guys play beautiful football?

Last match against MU arsenal did get forward and attacked and just lacking the finishing touch. the reluctance to adjust the playing style is the downfall. you said no such thing beautifully and lose but is there such thing as playing ugly and lose? no right. end of the day you need 3 pts and not 10 pts for style. would you reckon playing fluid passing will win chelsea? barca failed to beat chelsea last year they only got thru with an away goal and drogba busy rolling on the floor.

I think most people has mistaken the meaning of "beautiful game".

It's not that I know-it-all but personally, I think the beautiful game should contain both physical and mental attributes. No doubt, the way Arsenal has been playing is considered high technically and you can "see" the movement of the ball and passes are all "nice to watch" but like beauty pageants, it requires "inner attributes" to shine. What's lacking in Arsenal way is the "drive" to score. The drive I meant here are on both tactically, we should be driven to score - and mentally, the players should be motivated and strong enough (mentally) to play against bigger players, teams.

It's really frustrating to see our attacks are ended up in a 'Y' shape.
We starts our attack through the middle, then instead of bringing it further through the middle to score (or at least shoot to score), what we have is the ball will be played on the sides and the next thing we know is we will repeat the the same way.
Another bright youngster in his "revolution" age? He was alone during the accident. It's either a pure accident or the boy is disturbed.