The best University/College for pre-u engineering course ?
Engineering Simple Guide to Engineering, Read here first before posting new topic
Engineering Simple Guide to Engineering, Read here first before posting new topic
|
|
Apr 7 2012, 03:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
The best University/College for pre-u engineering course ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2012, 02:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
Sorry I didn't mean that ..
I mean like foundation/diploma in engineering .. |
|
|
Apr 7 2012, 03:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
Friend asked me
'where is the best place for engineering ?????'' |
|
|
Apr 7 2012, 05:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
Local U I think .. He has MMU in his list only as his sister studied there before
|
|
|
Apr 7 2012, 05:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
How about private U ?
|
|
|
Jan 3 2014, 10:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
What major in engineering is in high demand now ? or at least average, anyone care to give some insights ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 4 2014, 12:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2014, 11:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2014, 05:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
|
Feb 18 2014, 08:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
Any recommendation of IPTA to opt for Engineering (Degree) with CGPA 3.5 to 3.7 ?
|
|
|
Feb 18 2014, 08:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
|
Feb 18 2014, 09:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
|
Feb 18 2014, 09:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(quovadis123 @ Feb 18 2014, 09:13 PM) You can check this website first Heard from senior that we've to buy the pin separately for UPU and USM, is it true for now ?http://www.eng.usm.my/v3/ If you not able to get USM during your application, your application will move to UPU. So, if you skip USM, then you will move to UPU directly. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18 2014, 09:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(quovadis123 @ Feb 18 2014, 09:20 PM) Yup. Because USM is APEX status need different application. PIN for USM can be bought in BSN too ? My advice is better you choose USM application and prepare UPU too just in case. Alright. If I got chosen to USM, do I still have the chance to choose UPU ? (in case I reject the offer) |
|
|
Feb 18 2014, 10:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(quovadis123 @ Feb 18 2014, 09:48 PM) Normally people get USM will not choose UPU anymore. Because you choose distinct choice in USM. Asking for my friend actually. I believe it will be a future-question .. haha You need go through a test and interview for USM. I'm not sure where to get the pin. Sorry about this. Googled and found it, BSN Thanks a alot ~ |
|
|
Mar 25 2014, 01:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
Is it true that engineering requires STRONG mathematical skills ?
|
|
|
Mar 25 2014, 03:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
|
Mar 26 2014, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Mar 26 2014, 03:36 PM) A good understanding of Math is required to READ several highly theoretical engineering books. When it comes to design, engineers apply the principle and let the computer solve it. Now, let's do a little test and see to what extent you can understand it. Only a small portion of simple SPM/STPM Math is required. The rest is theoretical logic. Firstly, really thanks so much for your effort !!!!When engineers are to improve the design of a system, or to design a new system, a performance index must be chosen and measured. A system is considered an optimal system when the system parameters are adjusted so that the performance index reaches an extremum, commonly a minimum value. The purpose of design is to realize a system with practical components that will provide the desired time-domain operating performance, x(t), with minimal error. In many designs, we are also concerned with the expenditure of the control action/energy, u(t). For example, in electric vehicles and aircraft, the expenditure of battery energy and fuel and must be restricted to conserve the energy for long periods of travel. Our goal is to find an optimal control u* that minimizes the following performance index (a.k.a. cost function): ![]() where t is the initial time, T is the terminating time, x = x(t) is the current performance state, and L(x,u) characterizes the cost objective. The Principle of Optimality states, if a control u* is optimal from some initial state, then it must satisfy the following property: after any initial period, the control u* for the remaining period must also be optimal with regard to the state resulting from the control of the initial period. Now let us consider the current time t and a future time t+Δt closed to t and the control during the interval [t, t+Δt]. Clearly, we can rewrite J(x,t) as ![]() Let J* denote the optimal (minimum) cost under optimal control action u*, then by applying the principle of optimality, we have ![]() In the above equation, the first term, ∫ L(x,u) dτ can be approximated as , and the second term, J*(x+Δx, t+Δt) can be approximated by its first-order Taylor expansion:![]() where O(Δt²) denotes the remainder high-order terms (H.O.T.) in the Taylor expansion, which can be omitted if Δt → 0. Therefore, ![]() Since J*(x,t) and (∂J*/∂t) Δt are independent of u(τ) @ interval [t, t+Δt], the above equation can be written as ![]() Rearranging the equation gives ![]() Letting Δt → 0, then . Therefore, we obtain the following Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation:![]() All the symbols are making me confused .. but I still can understand some of it .. This derivation looks like Differential Equation in STPM By the way, I was actually worrying about my friend. His Physics is really good, but his maths is just so-so. He has improved a lot in STPM compared to his SPM .. Hoping that he can cope with it if he is to choose Engineering |
|
|
Mar 27 2014, 02:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,222 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Mar 27 2014, 02:05 PM) Just like the first time you were introduced to x, y, z in geometry and f(x), g(y), h(z) in functions. Once you get used to the math symbols, its not so terrible. Not all engineering books are written in such readable manner. Some authors assume the engineering students have adequate knowledge and backgrounds in Math and Calculus, and so they present only the Performance Index J(x,u), and the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation. And you'll have no idea how they are related to each other. Some students would argue weakly that, Really have to take time to comprehend the symbols ..![]() which is erroneous. Therefore, like I emphasized in previous post, a good understanding of Math is required to READ engineering books. And you must NOT refer to only one book but several, so that you can evaluate and select the authors that suit your taste. Are you into medical or engineering? Yeah, one book is not enough, learned this in STPM I'm not into both, but will prefer engineering as I'm good(not sure whether I like) in Maths and like Physics(discovered this when SPM is just around the corner) Anyway, I've chosen my path though, I'm going for Liberal Arts |
| Change to: | 0.0243sec
0.18
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 01:51 AM |