Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Astro B.yond V3.0, HD Content Available

views
     
writesimply
post Jan 30 2010, 05:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(Bishop @ Jan 30 2010, 03:48 PM)
nope still the same. The AVR detecting a higher vol feed (+4).  rclxub.gif
*
Nice receiver. Not many receivers can show DD/DTS metadata.

The History HD channel use the UK feed, at least for Cities Of The Underworld. In the SD version, the host that goes underground always narrates the VO (two different guy hosts). For the HD version, a woman with a British accent narrates the VO. It makes the series feel cheap and lack credibility, since the woman didn't go through the trouble of going underground.

Two things about HDTVs:
1) if your HDTV have a picture mode that can show the full 1080 pixel, use that. Or at least use it to compare how many pixels you are losing out.
2) Calibrate your HDTV to the best of your ability. None of the presets give you the best that your TV can do.


fuad
writesimply
post Jan 30 2010, 10:32 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(kaspersky-fan @ Jan 30 2010, 06:37 PM)
i would love to disable the picture overscan function too, but once done, other channels have those annoying white running lines on top of the picture... and dang... my dad will start to make noise lol... so i had to enable it  doh.gif
*
I don't think you can see the scan lines on all channels. None of the SD Learning channels have that. But then again, that's what I mostly watch.


Added on January 30, 2010, 10:36 pm
QUOTE(angalc557 @ Jan 30 2010, 07:37 PM)
hey guys.....does any of u got the coaxial to optical converter ...????

or HDMI splitter with optical out..... LOCALLY...???
*
Not that I've seen. If you're in the market for a new receiver, get one with DTS HDMA and Dolby TrueHD. With those receiver (the cheapest is about RM1999), you can use HDMI to deliver DD audio to your receiver and make it act as a HDMI switcher as well.


QUOTE(ah_chak @ Jan 30 2010, 10:05 PM)
BYOND -> HDMI AVR -> HDMI HDTV in living room.
BYOND -> Composite AV-RF -> COAX HDTV in bedroom.

With this setup, if i set the audio to Digital Only, i can get DD5.1 from my AVR but no sound on the TV upstairs.

If i set it to Digital and Analog, there's sound on both but i lost the DD5.1 on my AVR.

Any workaround on this?
No. The best you can do is to get a HTiB for the bedroom and split the coax digital into two and hope that the signal doesn't degrade.

Another option is to get a HDMI HTiB and a HDMI splitter.

QUOTE
And did u guys face the problem on the audio level? HD channels the sound is ok with -20db on my AVR, but when i watch SD channels, i need to increase until -10 - -5 on my AVR to get the same loudness..
*
Right now the HD channels are louder. It's the Astro setting.


fuad

This post has been edited by writesimply: Jan 30 2010, 10:36 PM
writesimply
post Feb 1 2010, 10:38 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(THEALB10N @ Feb 1 2010, 10:24 AM)
Why isn't espn HD a 24 hour channel? They only seem to show a few programmes randomly throughout the day...
*
The HD broadcast rights haven't been finalized yet.

Too bad the Grammy's is not in HD. Astro should try to record HD feeds of certain musical events and air it on a channel that can highlight HD PQ and sound.


fuad
writesimply
post Feb 1 2010, 11:37 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(cyberkoh88 @ Feb 1 2010, 10:47 AM)
but the HDMI cable quite cheapo, can see sometimes the picture stop for a while.
Are you sure it's not your TV or the decoder or your receiver?

QUOTE
saw astro montly magazine advertise abt monster audio cable, that advertisement also list the bad features of current HDMI cable provided free by astro.
Scan the ad and post the pic here. I'm using the cheap HDMI cable and it's fine.

QUOTE
i think need to upgrade the HDMI cable liao to see whether really got big different.
*
Upgrade if you want but don't spend more than RM50 on a HDMI cable.


fuad
writesimply
post Feb 1 2010, 11:58 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(Qash-M @ Feb 1 2010, 11:40 AM)
Random question: If i just subscribe sports package last night, usually how long 'till my decoder receive sports channel? Been 12 hours now... cry.gif
*
Anything after 12 hours, don't wait. Call.


fuad
writesimply
post Feb 4 2010, 10:52 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(iceggy @ Feb 4 2010, 10:47 AM)
I notice that HBO HD don't sound 5.1 to me as compare to Nat Geo HD.
As noted before, some HD channels will have 5.1 audio while others will be in 2.0 but BOTH will be in Dolby Digital.

QUOTE
I was watching the show "Eagle Eye" the other day and the move just sound stereo but my HT does show 5.1.
*
I watched that too and I got the full 5.1 effect.


fuad
writesimply
post Feb 6 2010, 10:16 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(zwanvedder @ Feb 6 2010, 10:02 AM)
can i use my pc LCD to connect with beyond... rclxub.gif
*
Only if it's DVI/HDMI port is HDCP compliant.


fuad
writesimply
post Mar 23 2010, 10:21 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(AjkR06 @ Mar 22 2010, 07:55 PM)
Astro actually should remove Astro Ceria which is very boring to me... only have nonsense story like "gang Bas sekolah".., "kapten boleh"...oh my ....
*

Actually, Astro Ceria is the highest rated kids channel in Malaysia. Meaning a lot of Malaysian kids actually watch it. So I don't think they'll cancel Ceria.

What Astro can do, with any one of its channel that is on down time a lot, say ESPN HD, is to run calibration programs so that people can properly calibrated their TVs.


fuad
writesimply
post Mar 24 2010, 01:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(whatsupbro @ Mar 23 2010, 05:39 PM)
HD world is just so damn expensive... to get a HD Beta Camera alone can buy me at least 2 proton cars.. biggrin.gif
*
Somebody else said it before. The equipment outlay is a one-time cost (sans maintenance and tape costs). The real cost of HD is in fixing the makeup, wardrobe and sets. That's because the production has to be of movie-set quality. You made me look at the HDW790. Yeah, it costs US$60,000.

But if you're a production house or starting one, I think investing in about 4-6 RED One cameras are better at US$18,000 per body. You do have to rent the lenses but at least your footage can be up to 4K and higher than 4K Digital Cinema standards; of course you can shoot in HD too with RED One. Lots of films were shot with RED One cameras, including The Informant, The Book Of Eli, Knowing and District 9. So practically, you're shooting your project at a very high quality. AND you could buy a mount that, combined with two RED Ones, will enable you to shoot in 3D.

QUOTE(AjkR06 @ Mar 23 2010, 07:47 PM)
wah... HD facilities are so expensive! What type of Proton car is it? Saga, Persona, Waja, Exora or Perdana  tongue.gif
how about handycam that is HD ready? I saw so many handycam now that have HD resolution.. even in FULL HD for just if i'm not mistaken, around RM3000 something....  blink.gif  or HD camera for television are different from that
*
Anybody who's thinking of buying a Betacam HD is thinking about quality issues. Handycams are great for non-professionals or when you want a HD footage but not having the insurance to put a BetaHD cam in the danger zone. There's a slew of settings you can play with on the more expensive cameras than you could with a consumer grade camera. You get what you pay for.

By the way, I heard that the Astro site visit was canceled because of lack of attendance. I would suggest that the organizers ask Astro for a rescheduling prior to the World Cup HD broadcast can be scheduled. That way people can see how they handle live and taped feeds.


fuad
writesimply
post Mar 24 2010, 11:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(aressandro10 @ Mar 24 2010, 12:30 PM)
wonder which one is worse... pillarbox in 16:9 tv or letterbox in 4:3 tv ? hmm.gif
*
Resolution-wise, it's the latter. 4:3 TV would be SD while 4:3 EDTV (Enhanced Definition TV available only in the US) wouldn't give you the full HD resolution. As far as aspect ratio is concerned, both are acceptable so long as the content is shown in its OAR.


Added on March 24, 2010, 11:37 pm
QUOTE(silbii @ Mar 24 2010, 10:59 PM)
...and didn't know that it's in HBO HD alrady coz i followed it from the SD versions...awesome awesome...
*
I don't follow True Blood but I saw a bit of it on HBO HD yesterday. Unfortunately, the master tape that HBO use is not in HD so True Blood on HBO HD is upscaled. There are several movies that are upscaled on HBO HD include Made of Honor.

Hopefully when they air The Pacific it would be in HD and they would minimize the censorship and have correct 5.1 audio. If not, it'd be a long wait until I get my hands on the BD box set later this year.

Good to hear about Discovery Channel. I do hope that we get the US feed like NGC. Really dislike History HD because of how the UK version destroys the feel of Cities Of The Underground. Too bad we'll miss out on the broadcast of Life, which is something like Planet Earth, Discovery's co-pro with BBC.


fuad

This post has been edited by writesimply: Mar 24 2010, 11:48 PM
writesimply
post Mar 25 2010, 12:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(jeffdnp @ Mar 24 2010, 11:46 PM)
is it real?
*
No it isn't, lazy bones. Resolution wise, they should be exactly the same; a 1080p plasma would have the same resolution as a 1080p LCD. It is about how comfortable you are with the picture of LCD/plasma. Some older plasmas have pixel structure that is visible within 2 feet and some people don't like that; the solution to that is get the higher end plasmas. LED LCDs give comparable black levels to that of good plasmas but of course, that also affects the price.

Buy a TV that fits your budget, gives great quality picture (when all the enhancements are turned off), and has a design that you like.


fuad
writesimply
post Mar 25 2010, 11:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(minimize @ Mar 25 2010, 07:14 PM)
user posted image

Good news.. Hope they broadcast Discovery HD next month.  thumbup.gif
Mythbuster in HD..  haha can't wait..
*
I think Mythbusters start shooting in HD in Season 4. The earlier seasons were in SD so if you see those on Discovery HD, just know that they are upconverted. The same thing happened with Dirty Jobs. I also hope that the agreement means that Discovery Science HD would be part of the HD channels included.


fuad
writesimply
post Mar 26 2010, 08:29 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(AjkR06 @ Mar 26 2010, 08:11 AM)
I'm still wondering when Astro wanna add all the HBO packs on their package... hmm.gif
*
I'm quite surprised when I saw that link. HBO Signature, Hits and Family are also available in HD but not on StarHub.

Great news on Discovery.


fuad
writesimply
post Mar 28 2010, 10:44 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(ccschua @ Mar 28 2010, 10:35 AM)
i dun know why when using hdmi to my lcd tv, the image is bigger than usual and I can t see the head! using component is no problem. why ah. how to update firmware
*
You may have set your Zoom setting to "Zoom" or "Zoom 2". Try turning it to "16:9". Of course, we assume you have B.yond.

By the way, let's keep HSBB talk in its proper thread. This is about b.yond.


fuad

This post has been edited by writesimply: Mar 28 2010, 10:45 AM
writesimply
post Mar 29 2010, 08:20 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
933 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
OFF TOPIC discussion...

QUOTE(Arlington @ Mar 28 2010, 08:22 PM)
When Astro says they need to buy HD cameras etc... they're not talking about buying the cheap H.264 codec cameras, like Ex3, P2 or RED,
I don't know about the other two but REDcode is not H.264. It's a form of wavelet codec though it is lossy.

QUOTE
they're talking about buying broadcast level CineAlta HDCam cameras such as those used to film the new Star Wars.

It's older technology, but the codecs are truly lossless...
*
Buying CineAltas for studio shoots is a rather waste of money but it's their money. If they are buying a bunch of them for feature shoots, then I understand. But then again, Japanese studios have been using HD cameras including HDCAMs, tweaked specifically by the OEM, to shoot their movies as a cheaper alternative than 35mm, for example the Death Note trilogy.


fuad

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0678sec    0.58    8 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 02:43 PM