Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Philosophy No evil in this world, just your perception., No good though

views
     
TSjianee89
post Jan 24 2010, 04:20 PM, updated 16y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: UK Bristol

What do you think? Everyone living based on Yin Yang , only the person who can strive between the Good and Evil side will thrive , see how successful ppl succeed in life.

Evil is all based on your perception,

even goodness too.
SUSslimey
post Jan 24 2010, 04:47 PM


*******
Senior Member
6,914 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
true enough. good or bad is based on the norm of the society. go with norm= good. against norm= bad.

that's why people from different society don't always agree with each other on some values.

about the ying yang thing and juggle between good and evil it all depends on how the society works.
communist892003
post Jan 24 2010, 04:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
550 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


flaw statement dude.....Perhaps u are talking about dualism??


Added on January 24, 2010, 4:54 pmAnd i could see what u wrote is nothing more than an observation....Knowledge based on observation is not really knowledge at all

This post has been edited by communist892003: Jan 24 2010, 04:54 PM
ZeratoS
post Jan 24 2010, 08:07 PM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


Both good and evil are defined by society, and then there further is a degree of good and evil. But unfortunately the irony is karma doesn't always work the way you want it to, and bad people get away with things.


Our political hoo-ha is a testament to that smile.gif
teongpeng
post Jan 24 2010, 11:12 PM

Justified and Ancient
*******
Senior Member
2,003 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


harm others = bad

Whats so difficult to understand?
bhamophet
post Jan 24 2010, 11:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Nov 2006



QUOTE(teongpeng @ Jan 24 2010, 11:12 PM)
harm others = bad

Whats so difficult to understand?
*
harm others = more people get saved. see the conflict? ur mind needs to see beyond wad ur eyes show u
teongpeng
post Jan 24 2010, 11:33 PM

Justified and Ancient
*******
Senior Member
2,003 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


QUOTE(bhamophet @ Jan 24 2010, 11:30 PM)
harm others = more people get saved. see the conflict? ur mind needs to see beyond wad ur eyes show u
*
Are u retarded? what has harming others gotta do with saving ppl?
SUSgarytong
post Jan 25 2010, 12:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
203 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
QUOTE(teongpeng @ Jan 24 2010, 11:33 PM)
Are u retarded? what has harming others gotta do with saving ppl?
*
Kill other 'useless eaters' so the remaining resources can be conserved and shared among more deserving and intelligent people.

teongpeng
post Jan 25 2010, 01:29 AM

Justified and Ancient
*******
Senior Member
2,003 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


QUOTE(garytong @ Jan 25 2010, 12:41 AM)
Kill other 'useless eaters' so the remaining resources can be conserved and shared among more deserving and intelligent people.
*
ok that falls under the BAD category. So obvious.

Anything else?
SUSDeadlocks
post Jan 25 2010, 04:18 AM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(jianee89 @ Jan 24 2010, 04:20 PM)
What do you think? Everyone living based on Yin Yang , only the person who can strive between the Good and Evil side will thrive , see how successful ppl succeed in life.

Evil is all based on your perception,

even goodness too.
*
Successful people, succeed in life?

What are you REALLY trying to ask?

Are you completely HONEST?

This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Jan 25 2010, 04:21 AM
SUSslimey
post Jan 25 2010, 04:36 AM


*******
Senior Member
6,914 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(teongpeng @ Jan 25 2010, 01:29 AM)
ok that falls under the BAD category. So obvious.

Anything else?
*
how about utilitarian principle where some must be harmed for the good of the majority?
solemn_86
post Jan 25 2010, 01:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Putar Jaya


Just avoid the SEVEN DEADLY SINS and you'll be fine....trust me
teongpeng
post Jan 25 2010, 02:58 PM

Justified and Ancient
*******
Senior Member
2,003 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


QUOTE(slimey @ Jan 25 2010, 04:36 AM)
how about utilitarian principle where some must be harmed for the good of the majority?
*

Bad.

thesupertramp
post Jan 25 2010, 08:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(teongpeng @ Jan 25 2010, 02:58 PM)
Bad.
*
So all dead better than one dead?
teongpeng
post Jan 25 2010, 08:28 PM

Justified and Ancient
*******
Senior Member
2,003 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 25 2010, 08:27 PM)
So all dead better than one dead?
*
in that case, lesser of 2 evil.

common sense.
CloudyEx
post Feb 1 2010, 09:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
49 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(teongpeng @ Jan 24 2010, 11:12 PM)
harm others = bad

Whats so difficult to understand?
*
He killed 100 people. I killed him before he kill 100 people. Bad or good?
SUSseller009
post Feb 1 2010, 10:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
457 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
----

This post has been edited by marsalee: Nov 13 2010, 09:24 PM
hazairi
post Feb 1 2010, 10:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,694 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: KL


If you have to kill a person without his own permission, in order to save millions, for me that is still evil.
CloudyEx
post Feb 1 2010, 10:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
49 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(hazairi @ Feb 1 2010, 10:23 PM)
If you have to kill a person without his own permission, in order to save millions, for me that is still evil.
*
I agree but still it needs to depends on the situation
teongpeng
post Feb 2 2010, 08:18 AM

Justified and Ancient
*******
Senior Member
2,003 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


QUOTE(CloudyEx @ Feb 1 2010, 09:33 PM)
He killed 100 people. I killed him before he kill 100 people. Bad or good?
*

Do you sacrifice 100 or do u sacrifice 1.

Either way its still sacrifice, if there is no other way to save all, then pick lesser of 2 evil.

Here's a pop quiz for you: What if 100 ppl intend to kill 1 ppl. Which group shall we sacrifice?

This post has been edited by teongpeng: Feb 2 2010, 08:21 AM

4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0291sec    0.49    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 11:11 PM