QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Feb 17 2010, 11:53 PM)
Of course, no deadline is ABSOLUTE.
to you and me, maybe. others will go missed deadlines=underperforming/overpromising=bad
QUOTE
For a HIRING MANAGER, it is useful to figure out what kind of personality type that a person is. And, how does it fits in within existing group. And, why does a person need to administer a formal MBTI test to figure out a person's MBTI to begin with??
given that usually the hiring manager knows next to nothing about the applicant, how would he know that person's MBTI-type? the interview process is too brief to judge - given that nowadays "interview skill/tip/trick" is commonly used. (i know of people who has sample best answers to common interview question" memorized). even probation period (3 months, typically) is too short of a time to judge properly if that person is skilled enough to show a false "model employee" act.
QUOTE
You are asking the WRONG question. In general, a DIVERSE MBTI types in a team works a lot better than a group with ONLY one type.
Diversity is good.
not necessary, diversity in a team is good, but for certain position, you may want a certain personality fit. eg. putting a "big picture" guy in a position that requires precise detailing might not be correct.
which also brings another thought in my mind. given that upper management is generally "big picture" and operations is generally "small details" and both are important in a team, is it justified to pay more salary to management?
i'm of course refering to the common mantra of "technical skill will only get you so far" and Es are given more value in general than Is