Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V36!, The Orange Legion

views
     
shootkk
post Jan 22 2010, 09:25 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


kysham : No need to put any filter on the 50mm f1.7 lah! It is so recessed that it's hard to touch the front elements. Plus flare can sometimes be artistic also mah... hehehehehehe....
shootkk
post Jan 26 2010, 09:41 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Jan 25 2010, 10:35 PM)
im thinking of upgrading my camera for my bday...

but i was wondering... should i stick to sony or jump to another ship..
can some of u loyal sony users here tell me why u stuck with sony for a long time.. smile.gif

i know finejava said because he is a sony fan.. haha.
*
I see that you have the A100. If you can live with that then any of the newer Alpha bodies will be great boost in performance for you.

What is the reason for jumping ship? Is there anything in the alpha mount that you want but cannot be provided for by Sony? If not then there's really no reason to jump.

Why I stuck to Sony:

1. I am not a high ISO pixel peeper thus all the Sony has poor high ISO performance crap does not affect me. With the A550, that argument is getting real old, real fast anyway.

2. The F58 flash - it is cheaper than the canikon's counterpart. It is more versatile and real fast in usage. Turning from landscape to portrait orientation is a SNAP, literally!!! I challenge any 580EXII and SB-900 users to beat the F58's speed in turning from landscape to portrait orientation without the use of any brackets. Problem is you will only miss it when it's not there.

3. Steady Shot Inside - all mountable lens (except for unchipped, manual focus lenses) stabilized! 'Nuff said.


braindead_fr3ak
For APS-C bodies you will need 16mm for a proper wide angle. 18mm is like 28mm on a FF - acceptable but some of you would wish it was wider at times. 24mm on APS-C is cramped! 28mm? DO NOT even go there!

The 24mm and 28mm are for FF. I like 24mm better than 28mm - that's why the new 28-75mm F2.8 lens holds no interest for me. I would rather they have a 24-70mm F4 or even a 24-85mm f3.5-4.5 for a budget alternative to the 24-70mm f2.8 Zeiss.
shootkk
post Feb 4 2010, 09:43 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(albnok @ Feb 3 2010, 06:29 PM)
Guys there is the Sony World Photography Awards (WPA) in Galeri Petronas.

http://www.alphanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=14649

What: Sony World Photography Awards (SWPA) launch
Where: Galeri Petronas, KLCC
When: Thursday 4th February 2010 (5pm launch, maybe 7pm can TT)
How Much: Free!
Who:

1. albnok
2. lauyamonk
3. lwliam (bringing 28mm F2.8)
4. Silencers (bringing 30mm F1.4)
5. Zicron
6. yuslers?
7. Kul | Mo0?
8. e-jump? (bring the Sigma 28mm F1.8!)
9. shootkk (not bringing any gears!)
10.

There will be a TT after that. We will compare 3 affordable 'normal' primes for APS-C. Also looking for somebody to bring the Sony 30mm F2.8 DT Macro SAM and Sony/Minolta 35mm F1.4G if possible. biggrin.gif

I will be there early because I took leave. biggrin.gif

I'll be coming from Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia for Steve McCurry's Exhibition. Will be there at 3pm.

MechaHerc: I'm confused now - don't you have an A700 userbar?
*
I'll be there after 6pm

shootkk
post Feb 9 2010, 02:13 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


TrutH_SeeKeR : You could do this:

Sell off your 10-20mm and your 18-200mm and buy

1. Tamron 17-35mm to cover the wide angle
2. Second hand SAL 75-300mm to cover tele range (it's a bit slow but should be ok on the A850)

You already have a 50mm and the 105mm which means you're pretty much covered all the way to 300mm
shootkk
post Feb 9 2010, 04:07 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(jdreamer @ Feb 9 2010, 03:15 PM)
Nah, actually I really like the Alpha line-up that Sony has been releasing. Especially A900 and A850 but they're FF and too expensive. The macho look and built in image stabilizer. Very interesting indeed. However, still new to Sony DSLR. Need to find out more. smile.gif
*
On the contrary, the A900/A850 are the cheapest FF cameras you can find out there! Although the price is nowhere near the entry or mid levels category but if you compare FF to FF, you will know Sony has the lowest priced ones! biggrin.gif


shootkk
post Feb 9 2010, 04:59 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(TrutH_SeeKeR @ Feb 9 2010, 04:51 PM)
oh my..this is really poisoning me bad. i'm already confused..n now he is tempting me again with that A850  rclxub.gif
*
No worries lah dude... I have ONLY ONE LENS on my A850 and that is the cheapo Minolta 50mm f1.7 but that alone also can shoot many things already. 50mm on a FF is quite versatile.

If you want the FF, just get it. You are not gonna find any other FF 24MP camera out there for the price of the A850. You can collect your lens later slowly... Besides you got sponsor mah. whistling.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0176sec    0.50    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 01:18 PM