haha..give the lil guy a break~

ok..i admit..i ran out of idea ages ago..

whoa .. nice macro shot bro !
mind sharing how ur light setup looks like ? ..

but ur night shoot (the bulb-skyline) is nice mah...

Got New Toys from the office Today!!!


Also played with today...


And others!


And the best part is,


This post has been edited by Braynumb: Feb 10 2010, 06:52 PM

haha..
♥ YUI..

normal macro sure perform better,
if not nobody will buy those few k macro lens d..

world's easiest and cheapest diffuser.



porno #2

hahahaha~ another scandal~ nice one~

Ic ... Thanks lehtung

cjlai: how u get the fly shot? i mean.. wont it fly away if u approach?

hey gus... im officially looking for a 17-50 ...i think....ziess dont wrk fr me d...ehehheheh

busy doing things ma, all the fly sees is the many many eyes of the partner.. hahhaha

how come?

hmm... i tried the ziess....feels............small... O_O...not comfy la

small??try 135 or 2470 lo... =p

you means 1680cz?

hahahaha~ small?

braindead_fr3ak : You get lens because of the size? Not IQ? Zzzzzz.

Just get my another Tammy 28-200 F4~F5.6 ... old zoom lens?
Haha like the superzoom very much as it pair well on either my A550 and A350

Here's some shots


This post has been edited by wingster: Feb 10 2010, 10:43 PM

hahaha.. ok guys....lemme explain my decision...

iq wise according to the reviews... the ziess is VERY dasyat... it exceeds the sensors resolution ...but only in the centre...

the 17-50 tammy...does not differ MUCH...from the ziess... the tammy how ever is a f2.8 lens..which i really like as i prefer street and also portrait phots..

the tammy is soft at f2.8 but EXtremely sharp at f4..... whereas the ziess STARTS at f3.5 which is 2/3 stops lower...

i dont really like harsh flash photos so...im going with the tammy...

furthermore...i got big palms....the ziess..is slightly bigger than a kittie only....i feel larh...not comfy
wheras the tammy.. ehhehe..... 62mm vs 67mm no?..

then comes the price range...the tammy will cost me arnd 1k plus where the ziess will be 2k plus....although i know the range is different... but when i played with the zeiss... it didnt "ngam" with me....maybe i play with tammie then i know the diff..so now..target tammy... ahahahah

This post has been edited by braindead_fr3ak: Feb 10 2010, 11:00 PM

in my personal opinion ... CZ1680 was much better color compared to Tammy 1750 ... where else Tammy 1750 has some vignetting issue also at F2.8
in terms of sharpness and bokeh CZ1680 looks great much better than Tammy 1750.... XD

But yeah Tammy 1750 was much fatter and tough look (built quality not so assuring), loving the F2.8 shooting XD ......... just the range :/ wasn't so telephoto enough....

This post has been edited by wingster: Feb 10 2010, 11:05 PM