3DTV<--(Glass on)Our eyes
3DTV(wear Glass)<--- our eyes.
As far as my understanding, it is the SAME THING.
3D Technology, Come n share
|
|
Nov 7 2010, 07:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,209 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
I am kinda question/puzzled. Why cant they make the TV/cinema screen wear glass for us, instead of we wear it.
3DTV<--(Glass on)Our eyes 3DTV(wear Glass)<--- our eyes. As far as my understanding, it is the SAME THING. |
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 08:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,209 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(writesimply @ Nov 8 2010, 03:54 AM) Physically, what you suggest can work. The problem is the cost. Instead of costing RM10-20,000 for the 3D HDTV, it's going to cost 1.5 to 2.0 times that for your approach. The reason is that now the HDTV has TWO LCD panels - one acts as the imager while the other as the circular/linear polarizer. The LCD polarizer must not only match the size of the imager, both panels must also work together to create the right L-R image for each eye. Everything start at a cost first, the requirement to wear a glass to watch 3D turns down a lot of people that have common sense. (yes people who buy 3D TV have no common sense, no offence)This approach is currently being explored by RealD Digital. They announced it at the last 3D Entertainment Summit where their Z-screen circular polarizer technology will be licensed to CE manufacturers. It is basically a failure overprice product as long as it have physical limit such as wearing glass. This post has been edited by Boldnut: Nov 8 2010, 08:26 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0211sec
0.65
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 09:10 PM |