Should this matter to be posted at the Main Site/Forum Feedback and Helpdesk? Anyway, I had some jovial times in "dihydrogen monoxide" thread. Science is not always right.

Regards, Joey

p.s: Are you proposing that there should be a more "rightful" and "knowledgable" individual to moderate this section?

This post has been edited by Joey Christensen: Jan 2 2010, 11:11 AM

There's nothing much I can say. I understood your questioning but it would be under the authoritative personnel to review and consider your alleged recommendation, right?

I stand corrected.

It should be addressed as "liberal" instead of "rightful" or "knowledgeable". A moderator whom is "open minded" should be chosen to moderate this specific section. Let's just see how they want to go about this.

Regards, Joey

This post has been edited by Joey Christensen: Jan 2 2010, 11:46 AM

I had my fair share of contributing and creating a few threads here in PhD section when it first materialised for us. However, as time goes by, it has become on a downslope trend in the quality of PhD.

The very last of my contribution came in a thread discussing about Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) whereby one can understand the concepts of his or her personality type and cognitive style. To be honest, if fellow forummer "dreamer101" were not posting there and brought the sense of seriousness and sensibility in posting, I wouldn't even bother to post in the beginning.

We need not Moderator(s) to keep things in tabs here in PhD section. All we need is some sense and sensibility in posting from everyone that wishes to participate in this said section.

Regards, Joey

This post has been edited by Joey Christensen: Apr 9 2010, 09:38 AM