Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Panasonic Screen Burn

views
     
lightning69
post Dec 30 2009, 10:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,298 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri, Sarawak


QUOTE(azbro @ Dec 30 2009, 11:18 AM)
Seriously, I'm never bothered about IR or Logos by implementing White noise wash when I off the Plasma before going to bed..takes only 2~3 minutes.
*
What exactly is "implemanting White noise wash"? Is it in the 50S10 itself?
lightning69
post Jan 21 2010, 04:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,298 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri, Sarawak


I am loving my plasma screen, but i think my next purchase will not be a plasma anymore. In fact I feel plasma tv will be dead too in the future. But before any plasma fans start to attack me, here are my reasons why I feel plasma will be extinct in the future..

1. LED LCD tvs are getting more common and cheaper by the days and the boast picture quality and black levels as good as the plasma. So why buy plasma and risk getting burn-in on your screens.

2. With Astro Beyond here now, HD tv will be getting more popular than ever and the truth is most HD channels will have permanent logo that is famous for causing burn-in on plasma screen.

3. Plasma suck power so much more than LCD tv adn even the latest plasma from pana with neo-pdp have no match for the LED tv now.

4. Plasma tv have not really improve much over the years as compare to LCD tv. A few years back, plasma rule in terms of picture quality and black and contrast level, but these differences is almost gone with the LCD tv improvements over the last few years.

5. I thought burn-in are a thing of the past for current plasma tv but they are not.
lightning69
post Jan 22 2010, 01:29 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,298 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri, Sarawak


i think plasma eventually will lose out because no matter how, plasma will consume more power than the LED because of the nature of the plasma tech vs LED tech.

But the main concern for consumers is the Burn-in thing. Imagine if you are going to spend 5K on a TV and you heard people like your friends who bought plasma tv before and have screen burn-in, would you take the risk and still choose plasma even if it have slightly better blacks?

Most of the consumers who buy HD Tv now will likely wanna watch Astro Beyond had most HD programs will have big bright logo just to remind you're watching their channel. Are you gonna buy a tv that says "please don't watch the same channel for too long or risk getting burn-in?" Why bother with a tech that give so much hassle.

Now i'm in a difficult situation whether to subscribe to Astro HD because of the risk of getting burn-in on my 50"plasma. And I don't think I want to buy another tv where I feel so restricted as to how long can I watch a channel. To me ...I just forget about plasma Tv as LED tv can provide just as pretty picture as the plasma.
lightning69
post Jan 22 2010, 08:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,298 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri, Sarawak


QUOTE(anfieldude @ Jan 22 2010, 01:56 PM)
Just mode stretches progressively not horizontally (vertical and horizontal). The stretching starts abt 2/3 on each side from the centre.
*
Why need to stretch...LCD no need to do that. Another restriction for plasma screen
lightning69
post Feb 21 2010, 01:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,298 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri, Sarawak


IR is not a problem as it is only temporary. However IR might becomes permanent burn-in if you keep the same static image on for prolong period like days.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0143sec    0.72    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 01:32 AM