QUOTE(hazril @ Jan 6 2010, 09:27 AM)
Thanks albnok .. nope .. it was with photoskool gang ..
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V35!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Jan 6 2010, 10:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6 2010, 10:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2010, 01:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2010, 03:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(finejava @ Jan 6 2010, 03:23 PM) weixuan: thx for the idea...will try that out... damn sharp .. ieR: zeiss power... soket: thx... Seng_kiat: yeap, 85mm F1.4 zeiss neo_lam: indeed poisonous...regretted that i even touch a zeiss...now my mind is all zeiss...nothing else...haih... |
|
|
Jan 7 2010, 08:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 7 2010, 10:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(achew @ Jan 7 2010, 09:05 PM) some sample from 70200G for ya... why ur pics so smooth? any tips on pp?[img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/4166512720_0639799d92_b.jpg[/img [img]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4039/4164890769_d7946a8dfe_b.jpg[/img but take note its my first time using this lens...so might not know how to get the best out of it yet..lol.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 8 2010, 08:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
Morning guys ..
pic sepam abit .. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Jan 11 2010, 10:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Jan 10 2010, 09:53 PM) sony 70-200mm 2.8G la... u back to sony bro? .. i just tried it today...... I wasn't quite happy with performance of 70-300 i tried earlier so i decided to try the 2.8 version this time. Quiet, speedy, SHARP....thats all i can say... Nonetheless, i would like to try out the famous canon 2.8 IS too i own 70-300G. I like the sharpness and color of it but not the speed .. It is damn slow if compared to whitey .. |
|
|
Jan 11 2010, 11:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2010, 09:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 13 2010, 08:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 13 2010, 11:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(deadangel @ Jan 13 2010, 11:05 AM) I am not pro but i am pro wannabe .. hahaha .. to get what ever picture u want, u have to understand 3 things, shutter speed, aperture and ISO .. master these 3, u will get what ever u want .. using any brand of camera .. that is my opinion .. about the color, play arround with picture style, software, etc .. Added on January 13, 2010, 11:47 am QUOTE(albnok @ Jan 13 2010, 10:37 AM) Thanks albnok. This post has been edited by Seng_Kiat: Jan 13 2010, 11:47 AM |
|
|
Jan 13 2010, 12:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(deadangel @ Jan 13 2010, 11:53 AM) nothing much i can help you unless u help yourself by practicing more .. read mr. google what is ISO, aperture and shutter speed .. Understand these 3 and practical training is the best way to develop yourself .. not just reading, etc .. I was shooting 10k in 1st two months i bought camera .. This post has been edited by Seng_Kiat: Jan 13 2010, 12:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 13 2010, 06:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 13 2010, 09:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Jan 13 2010, 07:09 PM) oh no .. looks i have to sell everything except 70300G .. ermm .. unlikely .. i prefer to wait and work harder to get another set of FF .. A850+1635 would be enough to pair with my current gear .. there goes another 10k .. |
|
|
Jan 13 2010, 10:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
lol .. so fast la u guys poisoning .. hehe .. if i go, i would go for a850 with 1635 for wide .. i would keep current gear .. so, i would not in shopping spree in this year .
|
|
|
Jan 14 2010, 07:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 14 2010, 12:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 14 2010, 11:21 AM) Actually for an even more budget concious wedding setup you could go like: lol .. poison never stops you .. A850 - RM 6k HVL-F58AM - RM1050 KM 17-35mm F2.8-4 - RM1300 Sony 50mm F1.4 RM1100 Optional : HVL-F20AM - RM350 Total : RM9800 inclusive of the F20AM flash. You could forego the tele lens and replace it with A PARTNER that has : A700/A550/A7x0 HVL-F58AM SAL16105 KM 70-210mm F4 beercan With this setup, you can save your wallet a bit and cover the event better because you have 2 persons shooting. With the 17-35mm and a 50mm on a FF you do not really need the 28-75mm lens. ![]() is it still seems harsh (the light)? Added on January 14, 2010, 12:19 pm QUOTE(Banzai_san @ Jan 14 2010, 11:43 AM) lor .. I bought it at Nike Store at The Curve..This post has been edited by Seng_Kiat: Jan 14 2010, 12:19 PM |
|
|
Jan 14 2010, 01:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(Banzai_san @ Jan 14 2010, 01:19 PM) Not that harsh for me, just the flash reflection bothers me haha .. u noticed it .. i just used a piece of black paper .. the other area not covered by it, i use photoshop to make it black .. The back shoe looks slightly duller color than the front IMHO. But looks nice... I like Ayo, kat nike store in KKinabalu belum ada nampak lagi la that shoe. I guess must be around RM180+ to RM230+ right? Thanks for sharing the photo yup .. rm199 to be exact .. very new model i think .. it was not there in pass 1-2 weeks .. |
|
|
Jan 14 2010, 11:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Jan 14 2010, 08:39 PM) ND is mainly use in landscape shooting to block lights in and make a few stop for the camera... 1 question here .. i dont really understand .. the bold part .. why dont we use faster shutter to compensate the overexpose? I am not really sure what is the effect of slow or fast shutter when shooting landscape because there is no moving object .. any clarification on this?means like i wanna shoot in f22 5 secs but without ND the shots will be overexposed...so ND will do us a favor by reducing the lights coma into the camera... then allow us to shoot in small aperture but long exposure time and will not overexposed the shot.... so if a ND on a 50mm means u need to shoot ppl using tripod every time...quite tedious.. i think CPL should do the job for u... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0479sec
0.20
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 03:00 AM |