Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Inbreeding and Accelerated Evolution, prev: Incest, Inbreeding & Evolution

views
     
ThanatosSwiftfire
post Jan 11 2010, 05:29 PM

Irregular
*******
Senior Member
2,787 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


If you want to accelerate evolution, science & society needs to stop creating processes/services that gives room and allow for the average/weak to live and thrive.

Evolution happens, when nature is allowed to function, Our society today is overriding natures role, in every way possible. Even the trait that everyone wants to think as the main trait for success today isn't really actively promoted. Society want smart/intelligence/knowledgeable people, yet it creates systems for the underperforming, for the useless, and refuses to eliminate the weak.

So, it's not inbreeding or whatsover. It's just science f***ing with what nature was supposed to do.

If nature really was about survival of the fittest, get rid of medicine. That would help get rid of alot of weaklings in the human race.
ThanatosSwiftfire
post Jan 11 2010, 06:55 PM

Irregular
*******
Senior Member
2,787 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Dickson Poon @ Jan 11 2010, 06:12 PM)
Edited, need to put some proper thought into response.
*
I feel honored. biggrin.gif take your time.
ThanatosSwiftfire
post Jan 12 2010, 08:00 AM

Irregular
*******
Senior Member
2,787 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 12 2010, 02:18 AM)
I disagree.

Modern medicine has increased human life expectancy by leaps and bounds. That, surely, must mean an increase in survivability? Living longer will allow a longer period for reproduction as well as nurturing the young. How can that not increase survivability?

Furthermore, many diseases can affect almost every human given the chance, regardless of how strong the individual is. And a car can hit anyone, even Arnold Schwarzenegger will need a orthopod when a bus hits him (or a funeral parlour).
*
Point 1. Modern medicine increase life expectancy is an ARTIFICIAL augmentation of our lifespan. It doesn't IMPROVE our basic genetic pool, our our fundamental health. We've grown so reliant on it, I would go as far to say it has HINDERED natural selection of those who have better genes.

Point 2. Yes. But the stronger immune system has a higher chance to survive (if under no medical intervention), and on a macro level when a higher percent of those with stronger immune system survives, the overall quality of immune systems in human improve (FYI, this is before any medical intervention)

I'm not saying medicine is bad per se, but when discussed in the context of evolution, medicine&science is meddling with what evolution should be doing.

This post has been edited by ThanatosSwiftfire: Jan 12 2010, 08:01 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0178sec    0.21    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 08:08 PM