"And at one point inbreeding stopped and that is what caused the human population to become larger than it should be. Allowing genes of weak members of the species to thrive, is probably human species worst mistake."
I think this statement is wrong. When inbreeding stop. Only human population thrive. Any species that practise inbreeding are heading to extinction(proven). Example: Tasmania tiger, Black Rhino.
"Proof of that is found when livestock breeders perform selective breeding and culling. This process produces the "best" livestock based on the criteria that the breeder has chosen."
Selection Breeding is different from Inbreeding. Selection breeding is to chose the best stock to breed with another different stock. Which means, selection breeding is to avoid inbreeding.
Inbreeding only works on stock/ornamental pet. Which also proven to create more undesire offspring that usually deform. Which end up more culling.
Inbreeding also reduce the gene pool which will wipe out the whole species if disease strike.
For example: HIV kill Human. But due to the large gene pool in Human. Scientist already found a minority of human actually immune to HIV. Therefore, If whole world infected with HIV. Most probably african will survive.
This post has been edited by 100n: Dec 21 2009, 05:10 PM
Inbreeding and Accelerated Evolution, prev: Incest, Inbreeding & Evolution
Dec 21 2009, 05:09 PM
Quote
0.0168sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled