Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Add Reply RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Science travel in the speed of light, make you younger? true?

views
     
hunter1012
post Dec 19 2009, 01:29 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
85 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(thken @ Dec 19 2009, 12:56 AM)
i have another theory idea
everybody move in the speed of light

there is no such things as if a transport that can make us travel as fast or faster than light, then we will moving back in time
like the twin paradox which proposed by Einstein

my idea:
we see everything moving in the speed of light
when a car move faster than us, the the car is moving in a different velocity, but still travel in the speed of light. agree?
if we ever created a rocket that can move faster than light, then we see the rocket moving in the speed of light, but in the passenger in the rocket also see us moving in the speed of light.

just my idea........any1 can convince my idea is wrong?
*
What do you mean by that?? Everybody moves in the speed of light??

Quote
we see everything moving in the speed of light

I thought that we only see because the object reflects the wavelenght of a certain speed (balance of all wavelenght is the speed of light)

Hence if we're travelling at a speed of light?? Which I think is humanly impossible.. (Think of the G-Force we have endure first) Won't you think that we see... nothing???

No??
hunter1012
post Dec 19 2009, 03:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
85 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(thken @ Dec 19 2009, 02:08 AM)
even when we idle, we move too, because the earth moves

if even the earth and whole solar system is moving in the universe, and we dont know the speed of it
therefore c=f(landa) can't be used when calculating object moving in the speed of light. no?
*
Yea... Thanks for clarifying though...

But don't you think by making that statement you're saying that nothing can be calculated in terms of speed... For example, a proton traveling at 300kmph, if the earth is moving, and so is the universe, then it's not actually moving at 300kmph??

What I think speed of light means, it's that it's roughly 30,000km/sec which is comparaitve to an unmoving object... Lol... Not too sure how better can I define that...

And how do you assume that everything moves in the speed of light when you are not sure what speed are we moving at?? I do believe that no MASS can travel the speed of light... Only energy can... ( Do correct me if I'm wrong though)

Added on December 19, 2009, 3:46 am
QUOTE(nice.rider @ Dec 19 2009, 02:55 AM)
First of all, if you subscribes to relativity theory, things with mass can only approach the speed of light, can never be equal or exceeds it even both things are traveling in opposite direction.

Anyway, if you are referring to the twin paradox, where a sister (A) stays on earth and another (B) travel in a spaceship in near c speed, which one will stay younger? The answer is the one in spaceship.

From velocity perspective, if B is moving away from (A) by using A as a reference point, it is equal to A is moving away from B in opposite direction by using B as a reference point, why B is younger? Why not A? Is that your question?

I believe it is something to do with the accceralation impact and also the impact on the biological clock that B is experiencing as she is traveling in high speed.
*
What do you mean by staying younger though.. I do understand that she gains more time because of that but gaining more time, doesn't mean that she'll stay younger..

Be reminded that aging is not a passage of time, but an accumulation of biological events that occur over a period of time.

This post has been edited by hunter1012: Dec 19 2009, 03:47 AM
« Next Oldest · PhD School · Next Newest »
 

Add ReplyOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0169sec    0.44    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 10:54 PM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.