Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ASTRO on HD, LCD TV or Plasma TV ???

views
     
TSufo91919
post Dec 14 2009, 01:09 AM, updated 17y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
136 posts

Joined: Sep 2009



Given that Astro is on HD (though on few channels), which to buy i.e. LCD or Plasma ???

icon_idea.gif icon_idea.gif icon_idea.gif
MrM
post Dec 14 2009, 06:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
50 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


Also LED lately
DarkNite
post Dec 14 2009, 07:13 AM

ФĻĐ ИΞШB!Ξ
********
All Stars
11,058 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
As I know, it is more of a personal preference and the size of your wallet as most Plasma are > 40".
Me? I prefer Plasma.
azbro
post Dec 14 2009, 08:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Johor Bahru


QUOTE(DarkNite @ Dec 14 2009, 07:13 AM)
As I know, it is more of a personal preference and the size of your wallet as most Plasma are > 40".
Me? I prefer Plasma.
*
Plasma..but if got more money..LED smile.gif
The7thSaint
post Dec 14 2009, 09:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
165 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Plasma (: but i think its not worth it to susb. Astro HD now , its luke you're paying rm20 for just 5 channels :/ maybe you cn wait till next year biggrin.gif
apexg2
post Dec 14 2009, 09:22 AM

Lotus F1 Fans..haha
******
Senior Member
1,241 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Kl, Putrajaya


depends on ur budget...
danieloo
post Dec 14 2009, 10:50 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,434 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


already bought Plasma....so, I choose Plasma.
SiriuslyCold
post Dec 14 2009, 11:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,976 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: 55100


QUOTE(danieloo @ Dec 14 2009, 10:50 AM)
already bought Plasma....so, I choose Plasma.
*
nooo LCD is much better

rclxm9.gif
ssyam
post Dec 14 2009, 11:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
110 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Terengganu



plasma.. coz also hav plasma
art6969
post Dec 21 2009, 12:41 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,519 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: Are Lock Stuck, France
lcd much better
ar188
post Dec 21 2009, 12:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
LCD or LED cant beat plasma on performance of blu-rays still want to recommend for astro HD ar?
MR_alien
post Dec 21 2009, 01:36 AM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,581 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



HD-ready LCD is enough cuz it's 720p
but full HD LCD and plasma is a plus
LED is you have a fat wallet

if u ask me...i'll go with full HD LCD...becuz a TV isn't just use to watch astro only
sometime need DVD, BD as well

This post has been edited by MR_alien: Dec 21 2009, 01:37 AM
beguiler
post Dec 21 2009, 02:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
145 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
full HD LCD
cause i have it
low98944
post Dec 21 2009, 09:43 AM

...oooOOOooo...
*******
Senior Member
5,533 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Area 51
Plasma. More value for money than LCD or LED if compared their performance. cool.gif
pirateguy
post Dec 21 2009, 10:34 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Plasma consume more electricity, no? And i think seeing vertical lines for plasma is more obvious, yes?
eone
post Dec 21 2009, 10:38 AM

Prime
*******
Senior Member
2,678 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PutraCyberjaya



QUOTE(pirateguy @ Dec 21 2009, 10:34 AM)
Plasma consume more electricity, no? And i think seeing vertical lines for plasma is more obvious, yes?
*
yup.. the pixels are obvious.. if you are watching too close compared to lcd.. anyway lcd vs plasma got their pros and cons, but for me.. go lcd!!! icon_rolleyes.gif
putih
post Dec 21 2009, 10:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
293 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(pirateguy @ Dec 21 2009, 10:34 AM)
Plasma consume more electricity, no? And i think seeing vertical lines for plasma is more obvious, yes?
*
I think Plasma TVs consume less electricity even though the power rating is higher i.e 42 inch plasma @300w and LCD @150w. The reason is Plasma TVs power consumption is variable depending on what to display (@300w is when showing all whites) whereas LCD power consumption is constant at the rated power i.e. 150w all the way. But I think power consumption is negligible unless you watch 24/7. And resolution wise, if you watch from 8 feet up for 42incher, the lines are invisible... in fact, the great contrast easily make up for it if you still see the pixels.

On the original question, I prefer plasma TV... but for 32 inch and below, LCD can still cope pretty well. If you have RM1500 to spend, buy a Sharp 32incher and that is enough.


pirateguy
post Dec 21 2009, 10:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Plasma has no ghosting, so response time is very good compared to LCD.

But watching it I still can see the vertical lines which annoys me a lot. Also I think its a lot heavier than LCD tvs.

Also the issue with burn-in.
low98944
post Dec 21 2009, 11:00 AM

...oooOOOooo...
*******
Senior Member
5,533 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Area 51
QUOTE(pirateguy @ Dec 21 2009, 10:57 AM)
Plasma has no ghosting, so response time is very good compared to LCD.

But watching it I still can see the vertical lines which annoys me a lot. Also I think its a lot heavier than LCD tvs.

Also the issue with burn-in.
*
How far you are sit when you watch movie?
pirateguy
post Dec 21 2009, 11:24 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(low98944 @ Dec 21 2009, 11:00 AM)
How far you are sit when you watch movie?
*
That really depends on where I see it. I've been thinking about plasma for my room, and I would probably sit about 5-6 feet away. I think always stand at that distance if I go see a demo plasma tv. I still notice a bit of the vertical lines.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0225sec    0.66    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:53 AM