Progressive withdrawal is based on developement stages as per your schedule in your SNP.... At each stage of development, bank will disburse payment to the developer and usually first 10% will be disbursed for foundation work... later depending on your unit level.. the higher it is, the later it will be....

if they belum withdraw from your bank is even more scary, it could be no progress at all.... that's common sense...

well, i tot the downpayment is discounted and only RM500 booking fee?

Its up to your interpretation... I rather see bank disbursement every now and then at least I know at what stage it is progress according to the schedule... the thing is 1120 had been so long but some owner said no 1st drawdown yet ... maybe there is development, maybe the progress is slow...

sure bro... chill

This is serious shit as i also dont hope this to happen as a fren of mine had bought a unit there...

But i think as long as no disbursement from bank to developer yet, at most also rugi the the booking and downpayment...

Anyone of us doesn't really understand what is the story behind, thus it is unfair to judge the 20 families just like that.. as buyers of cos we would want to protect our interest but the developer and government should hav settle the dispute among themselves..

This post has been edited by twincharger07: Jun 5 2011, 10:35 AM

It is humanitarian issue.. this is where "human's true colour" reveal when ppl place self interest above other ppl's well being.. they might be squatters, but might not be criminal.. it is a basic human needs to hav a shelter above their head.. Hey.. these are HUMAN BEINGS.. HUMAN BEINGS like you and me..

Despite having court order, it could be "legally right" but that does not mean "morally right" .. what had our long years education had taught us about sympathy and compassion..

We had never stand in their shoes and understand from their position, they do not need us to treat them as criminal but they want us to understand that we are all human beings who have equally rights to have access to basic necessities..

Government should hav stepped in to resolve this issue.. WTH with the motto "Person First" where they chase ppl out from their basic needs.. WTH with all the developer's "Coporate Social Resposibility" where they just show their face in orphanage but kick other ppl out from their shelter.. Their acting is even better than Hollywood.... something for us to ponder..

This post has been edited by twincharger07: Jun 5 2011, 11:24 AM

Its a choice to uphold or leave our morality behind..
As mentioned.. no one knows what is the actual story behind (do you?).. no one stand on their side and understand what is the actual story.. too much here say and everyone has their own stories and assumption.. looking back at their post, it seems that the indian family are the victims..
They want a house, not 30k.. maybe they are given what they are not promised..
Only 1 truth, they are forced to leave their shelter..

---

Added on June 5, 2011, 1:13 pm

More stories..
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=...0676&sec=nation

They sign up for LOW COST FLAT.. are they greedy??
Block E Buyers action committee chairman M. Sugumaran said the residents had vowed not to budge until the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) and Selangor Govern­ment provided them with rent money and ex-gratia payments for the low-cost flats they signed up to buy in 2004.

They were place intentionaly in PPR Lembah Subang and PJS1 longhouses.. what can they do if their promised flats were not built? Citizen shouldn't pay for the dispute and mistakes done by either government or developer..
The residents are part of a group of squatters who were moved to PPR Lembah Subang and PJS1 longhouses eight years ago with the offer of low-cost flats. The flats have not been built.


This post has been edited by twincharger07: Jun 5 2011, 01:21 PM

Read my previous post again with the news article..

Dont get me wrong as no one wants an abandone project, I m also worried for a fren of my who owns a unit and I am sure you will get your PA1120 in 2 to 3 years time.. I am just sadden how the whole situation is being handled by the G, court and developer.. and I believe the indian families are victims rather than wrongly accused..

This post has been edited by twincharger07: Jun 5 2011, 01:28 PM

We are not rich.. they are not rich either.. my point is.. they dont deserve to be finger pointed as they are also victim same as the rest of the buyers..

The major issue here is how the authority and developer handle the issue .. both side has to win.. no one wants to see one side winning, one side losing..

The issue is getting the right authority to resolve the dispute rather than getting 1 side win and getting to other side lose..

What I see most of your post are the way to solve this issue is by forcing them to leave the land.. We should know who to pressure, its the G, authority and developer to solve the dispute rather than forcing them to live without a shelter.. they are equally victimized like you.. understand??

---

Added on June 5, 2011, 1:55 pmThank you for ur understanding.. sometimes when we are in their shoe, we can know how vulnerable they are as i think they are poorer than anyone of us.. approaching the right party to resolve issue, helping to each other will be a better way than accusing them illegally occupying the space.. they are human, they need shelter too .. PA1120 have 2 to 3 more years to get your shelter, but they need it even badly right here right now..

This post has been edited by twincharger07: Jun 5 2011, 01:55 PM

It is quite endless discussion... anyway... I do hope both parties are able to settle this issue in a good term... everyone has different views on this .. i do read all post including news articles online and offline.. as I mention, I am also concern for a fren..

I rest my case here...