QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 28 2009, 06:13 PM)
Like my essay huh, Well, I think we are in tune at some level but why must you define who is better? Which religion do you think is in control of the world economy and who are those in our country or in your cluster? Indirectly, they influence our way of lives, directly, they classified us by race. Believers don't question god and free thinker just wonder about the creations not to say non believer, I do believe are created by something and it could be random occurrence under natural law but what / who is in control of the law or better known as "purpose".
Are scientist going against the natural law by cloning human / animal? A scientist with religious believes would not trespass this law, according to the evolution pattern, it will take a long time to develop intelligence and animal brain will not suddenly have it, if animal species were to evolve with intelligence, they will share our features not remain as chicken or dog, the sense of shame to begin with and won't copulate in public and how to invent or use tools with claws and paws?
I don't get what you mean by "Various" offenses, you mean slaughter and eat them? In case you forgot, the animal world is either eat or be eaten. Look into the mirror and see your animal physiology, it is your mind that make you think you are a human and the real difference between you and others. Fighting, killing, performing sexual act is when you act like animal
I like to think that we reflect the creator, at this point in time we are relatively smarter than people 100 years ago by ratio because of science where emotions / animal instinct remain the same. I am powered by a neutral "god" player came to tell you in simple perspective so we all can be more considerate.
just to clarify something. the choice by scientists whether to follow/break the "nature's law" is not just based on religious reasons.Are scientist going against the natural law by cloning human / animal? A scientist with religious believes would not trespass this law, according to the evolution pattern, it will take a long time to develop intelligence and animal brain will not suddenly have it, if animal species were to evolve with intelligence, they will share our features not remain as chicken or dog, the sense of shame to begin with and won't copulate in public and how to invent or use tools with claws and paws?
I don't get what you mean by "Various" offenses, you mean slaughter and eat them? In case you forgot, the animal world is either eat or be eaten. Look into the mirror and see your animal physiology, it is your mind that make you think you are a human and the real difference between you and others. Fighting, killing, performing sexual act is when you act like animal
I like to think that we reflect the creator, at this point in time we are relatively smarter than people 100 years ago by ratio because of science where emotions / animal instinct remain the same. I am powered by a neutral "god" player came to tell you in simple perspective so we all can be more considerate.
an atheist scientist may also decide to NOT approve human cloning because of various other ethical reasons which are entirely secular.
so just to shout out: just because somebody ain't religious doesnt mean he'll do bad things
QUOTE(slacker @ Dec 28 2009, 11:44 PM)
then by this logic, no human definition of god whatsover may be applied to god. this includes all religious definitions of god.
any attempt to defy this assumed logic contradicts the two premises, therefore that statement is a logical fallacy
This post has been edited by -Adrian-: Dec 30 2009, 12:28 AM
Dec 30 2009, 12:23 AM

Quote
0.0214sec
0.26
6 queries
GZIP Disabled