Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Philosophy Define your God even if It was absurb to define it, Close-minded backoff

views
     
TScommunist892003
post Dec 8 2009, 03:45 AM, updated 16y ago

On my way
****
Senior Member
550 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


Mind tell us what is God, Or Who is god??? Siapa tuhan?? Law of physics?? A old wise huge Man?? Intangible?? What is God for you?? thumbup.gif



cloud007jerry
post Dec 8 2009, 03:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


god=religion=food for the soul=something we believe in. rclxub.gif
anthrax33
post Dec 8 2009, 03:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
244 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


he's just a figment of imagination to me.
all of his powers are given by us if you know what i mean.
SUSslimey
post Dec 8 2009, 04:11 AM


*******
Senior Member
6,914 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
God is a concept or symbol created by man to represent absolute power.

anti-informatic
post Dec 8 2009, 08:44 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
902 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
Why create another thread when there are several out thr for u to talk about?

Im free thinker, i wont say i believe absolutely no god although i see no sign of his existence
Provided that if god is exist, i would say he is a merciful god,
he dont do as much as what ppl say but just a creator of everything
The everything i mean is not things that created by human,
building, science, law, machine are all human creation, invent by some outstanding idea of human themselves,
which is no god who conrol it, but god make human has such ability call knowledge that create unlimited possibility
After all, creating human being is like developing an automated machine that process everything once it is developed and let it run on own process, everything is out of control by anyone out there
God maybe almighty, and if he is, our worship means nothing to him
It's like i employ unlimited amount of employee to work for me, but i dont expect them to have full respect and do everything i wan until they die for me
Ultima
post Dec 8 2009, 10:20 AM

KiRiSuTe GoMeN
*******
Senior Member
5,197 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Muor....



GoD is sumthing tht cant b expressed by words..

but GoD provide everything basic to us, n its up to us how to improvise it to use it for our own use..


sameer27
post Dec 8 2009, 10:23 AM

PlanTheFutureForABetterPast
****
Senior Member
684 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


God are known to be the creator of mankind who has supernatural powers.

This topic is very subjective, you can hear all sorts of comments regarding this.
ZeratoS
post Dec 8 2009, 10:33 AM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


God is, well God. How do you define something you've never seen or understood. In Christian faith, the bible says that God has created us in his image, so next best guess as to what he looks like?



...
lin00b
post Dec 8 2009, 11:40 AM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
whats with this obsession with god?
arthurlwf
post Dec 8 2009, 02:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(cloud007jerry @ Dec 8 2009, 03:51 AM)
god=religion=food for the soul=something we believe in. rclxub.gif
*
Awesome point stated !!!
Religion = Intangible food for the soul
SUSb3ta
post Dec 8 2009, 04:10 PM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


another God topic sleep.gif funny how this is popping up in pHd section, supposedly a subforum for scientific subjects.

anyway, God = Love.
SUSjoe_star
post Dec 8 2009, 08:39 PM

Serving the Servants
******
Senior Member
1,810 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 8 2009, 04:10 PM)
another God topic sleep.gif funny how this is popping up in pHd section, supposedly a subforum for scientific subjects.

anyway, God = Love.
*
If someday we develop tools to detect and quantify God, then i believe it will become a scientific field. At the moment, I'm inclined to agree with you, although this question does have philosophical characteristics
fenzodahl512
post Dec 8 2009, 11:01 PM


Group Icon
Elite
1,089 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(communist892003 @ Dec 8 2009, 03:45 AM)
Mind tell us what is God, Or Who is god??? Siapa tuhan?? Law of physics?? A old wise huge Man?? Intangible?? What is God for you??   thumbup.gif
*
Jawapan dari orang Islam..

user posted image

Terjemahan:
QUOTE
Dengan nama Allah Yang Maha Pemurah lagi Maha Penyayang.

   1. Katakanlah (wahai Muhammad): (Tuhanku) ialah Allah Yang Maha Esa.
   2. Sesungguhnya Allah kekal.
   3. Dia tiada beranak dan Dia pula tidak diperanakkan
   4. Dan tidak ada sesiapapun yang serupa denganNya.



Answers from Muslims

Translations:
QUOTE
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

1. Say: He is Allah (The God), the One and Only;
2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute;
3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;
4. And there is none like unto Him.
This post has been edited by fenzodahl512: Dec 8 2009, 11:02 PM
ZeratoS
post Dec 9 2009, 12:22 AM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(b3ta @ Dec 8 2009, 04:10 PM)
another God topic sleep.gif funny how this is popping up in pHd section, supposedly a subforum for scientific subjects.

anyway, God = Love.
*
In a way, it is a philosophy and a science, no harm in discussing this. As long as extremists stay out, or people who get offended by such open discussions, then we're fine.
TScommunist892003
post Dec 9 2009, 12:22 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
550 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


God doesn't mean it had to do with religion....Recent research in US on DNA tell us something different but i forgot what it is...Non of the researchers could conclude the complexity of design of DNA but conclude it was just somewhat intelligent design

"Intelligent design" in the words could mean GOD...
spursfan
post Dec 10 2009, 09:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
110 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(slimey @ Dec 8 2009, 04:11 AM)
God is a concept or symbol created by man to represent absolute power.
*

nice 1
hazairi
post Dec 10 2009, 11:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,694 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: KL


When a software programmer writes a program, will the software has a same characteristic with it's creator? No right?
Same as the relationship between 'the creator' and us.
You can't define 'the creator' in physics.

ThanatosSwiftfire
post Dec 10 2009, 04:35 PM

Irregular
*******
Senior Member
2,787 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


god is a sequence of random chance that culminated to our existence today.
ZeratoS
post Dec 10 2009, 06:17 PM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(hazairi @ Dec 10 2009, 11:48 AM)
When a software programmer writes a program, will the software has a same characteristic with it's creator? No right?
Same as the relationship between 'the creator' and us.
You can't define 'the creator' in physics.
*
How the code is written is up to the programmer, and as such different programmers write their codes differently, no matter how they function. Your analogy is fail.
goodfella
post Dec 11 2009, 09:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
44 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
He it is Who enables you to travel through the land and the sea, till when you are in the ships and they sail with them with a favorable wind, and they rejoice, then comes a stormy wind and the waves come to them from all sides, and they think that they are encircled therein, they invoke him, making their faith pure for Him alone, saying: "If You deliver us from this, we shall truly be of the grateful
SevenTwentyOne
post Dec 12 2009, 01:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
352 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


God is a image created by human to represent things that he cannot explain, origins that he cannot yet determine and to ease the mind knowing that someone should be responsible for stuffs that go on in the universe
kazuka
post Dec 12 2009, 06:27 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: May 2006
God is one who surpassed every capabilities of human being.
ametzer
post Dec 12 2009, 06:37 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Planet Earth


God is One
pizzaboy
post Dec 12 2009, 12:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,495 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
QUOTE(slimey @ Dec 8 2009, 04:11 AM)
God is a concept or symbol created by man to represent absolute power.
*
Word
+2


tineagle
post Dec 12 2009, 12:27 PM

The Animal Within
******
Senior Member
1,276 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: PJ


God is a label put to describe the fundamental laws of the universe way back when there wasn't sufficient scientific knowledge to explain the unseen.
netmatrix
post Dec 12 2009, 01:01 PM

The machine... it sees everything.
*******
Senior Member
6,726 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Zion


Gods is there,
to help you get started,
to give you a push on your day.

Gods is there,
to turn you around,
get your feet on the ground,
for a brand new day.

To pick you up when you're down.
Help you swallow your pride,
When somethings inside,
to break on through,
on the other side!

Gods is someone you can open up to,
If you think you are ready to flip,
When you got the world on your shoulders,
Gods is there to give you a tip!

Gods is there when you need them,
There're even there when you don't,
For a walk in the park,
or a shout in the dark,
Gods are there,
i don't care,
But Gods will care for you!

wink.gif
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 12 2009, 04:30 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(communist892003 @ Dec 8 2009, 03:45 AM)
Mind tell us what is God, Or Who is god??? Siapa tuhan?? Law of physics?? A old wise huge Man?? Intangible?? What is God for you??   thumbup.gif
*
God is what you will believe even if it's not there. Scientists call it delusion, but they can't provide an explanation of how deluding they were when they realized they can't prove the existence of their very own intangible emotions in which they themselves believed in, since science requires tangible and quantifiable characteristics.

This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Dec 12 2009, 04:31 PM
thesupertramp
post Dec 12 2009, 09:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(tineagle @ Dec 12 2009, 12:27 PM)
God is a label put to describe the fundamental laws of the universe way back when there wasn't sufficient scientific knowledge to explain the unseen.
*
And the currently as yet unexplainable. Eg: The previous post to mine.

QUOTE(netmatrix @ Dec 12 2009, 01:01 PM)
to break on through,
on the other side!
I love the Doors. thumbup.gif

EDIT: Sorry, forgot my definition. God is a bragging right in the game of DoTA.

This post has been edited by thesupertramp: Dec 12 2009, 09:57 PM
bashir3
post Dec 13 2009, 07:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
82 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


God is something that man has created so he can believe in an after life. Humans cannot except turning into nothingness after death. Its better to go to hell then turning into nothing.
meksis
post Dec 14 2009, 09:51 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
Gos is everywhere!
Awakened_Angel
post Dec 14 2009, 09:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,703 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: where you need wings and awakened to reach
QUOTE(netmatrix @ Dec 12 2009, 02:01 PM)
Gods is there,
to help you get started,
to give you a push on your day.

Gods is there,
to turn you around,
get your feet on the ground,
for a brand new day.

To pick you up when you're down.
Help you swallow your pride,
When somethings inside,
to break on through,
on the other side!

Gods is someone you can open up to,
If you think you are ready to flip,
When you got the world on your shoulders,
Gods is there to give you a tip!

Gods is there when you need them,
There're even there when you don't,
For a walk in the park,
or a shout in the dark,
Gods are there,
i don't care,
But Gods will care for you!

wink.gif
*
everything happens in your mind.....

SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 15 2009, 02:05 AM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


You pseudo-intellectual-wannabes.

Not only you post cliches, but are so ever critically incompetent. Bring in more pointless one-liners and y'all get it.
3dassets
post Dec 15 2009, 12:20 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


My interpretation of god is; each one of us is a game character to a player “god” like Yamaguchi, the name of the game is “descendant”. Each god sends influence in the form of dream. Some people dream about the future and it happen, since it is a dream, it can be coincident or just the brain playing tricks so it was never an issue to us.

Our player “god” can only influence not by instruction and we the “characters” are subject to the influence of other characters, the game point is “power” in the form of “religion & wealth”. So we are driven by either and tend to form our own mini empires / dynasties with such power, even alter the religion to our own standards that gave advantages to followers so that they preserve it such as life after death and number of wives.

As a non believer, my “god-player” wants me to be independent and “play life” for the trophy “emotion”. The game point to my “god-player” is happiness versus misery. My “god-player” is experienced playing my ancestor and don’t play the descendant game anymore, I could not defy the sex urge and got married but am divorced with no children, I understand now that I can have sex without a marriage and love without condition.

Some “god-player” broke the rules by going against the law and ethics and turns their “characters” into criminals, robbing the “trophy” from others and game over if caught, on the contrary, decent “god-players” could loose their “characters” to anything we known as accident “rules of the game”.

When our “god-players” restarts the game, a child is born “reincarnation” or starts a new live from scratch. Some of them continue to rule as “sultan / king / queen” even take turn to be the Prime Minister and other “god-players” overthrow them with a revolution or invade and occupy and make it legal by religious rights.

Smart “god-players” exist long ago, they created religion and then became scientist / philosopher such as Newton, Einstein, Charles Darwin, Confucius… Animals & plants are accessories to sustain our live also to make the game interesting or else we will suspect the existing of “god-players” and the game will self destruct like mass suicide.

So, does your “god-player” know my “god-player”? We are being played.

SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 15 2009, 06:06 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 15 2009, 12:20 PM)
My interpretation of god is; each one of us is a game character to a player “god” like Yamaguchi, the name of the game is “descendant”. Each god sends influence in the form of dream. Some people dream about the future and it happen, since it is a dream, it can be coincident or just the brain playing tricks so it was never an issue to us.

Our player “god” can only influence not by instruction and we the “characters” are subject to the influence of other characters, the game point is “power” in the form of “religion & wealth”. So we are driven by either and tend to form our own mini empires / dynasties with such power, even alter the religion to our own standards that gave advantages to followers so that they preserve it such as life after death and number of wives.

As a non believer, my “god-player” wants me to be independent and “play life” for the trophy “emotion”.  The game point to my “god-player” is happiness versus misery. My “god-player” is experienced playing my ancestor and don’t play the descendant game anymore, I could not defy the sex urge and got married but am divorced with no children, I understand now that I can have sex without a marriage and love without condition.

Some “god-player” broke the rules by going against the law and ethics and turns their “characters” into criminals, robbing the “trophy” from others and game over if caught, on the contrary, decent “god-players” could loose their “characters” to anything we known as accident “rules of the game”.

When our “god-players” restarts the game, a child is born “reincarnation” or starts a new live from scratch. Some of them continue to rule as “sultan / king / queen” even take turn to be the Prime Minister and other “god-players” overthrow them with a revolution or invade and occupy and make it legal by religious rights.

Smart “god-players” exist long ago, they created religion and then became scientist / philosopher such as Newton, Einstein, Charles Darwin, Confucius… Animals & plants are accessories to sustain our live also to make the game interesting or else we will suspect the existing of “god-players” and the game will self destruct like mass suicide.

So, does your “god-player” know my “god-player”? We are being played.
*
What if a "God" is only as real as how you believe as something so unquantifiable as "feelings", such as "sincerity, and "frustration"?
SUSb3ta
post Dec 15 2009, 08:48 PM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(SevenTwentyOne @ Dec 12 2009, 04:59 AM)
God is a image created by human to represent things that he cannot explain, origins that he cannot yet determine and to ease the mind knowing that someone should be responsible for stuffs that go on in the universe
*
hello there, old chap. laugh.gif so what is it exactly, that is responsible for the "stuffs that go on in the universe"?
uglytwinkle
post Dec 15 2009, 09:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
188 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Between Two Hills



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


rclxms.gif Perfect

God is the only one who plan everything for me.
God helps me whenever I've problem. I just close my eyes, Remember HIM, and ask for help, HE will definitely help me.
God administers this world and HE just want to test us, to know whether we obey on HIS order.
God fulfills HIS promises and No ONE could challenge HIS power.
God is the only one who remains unchanged.

I can't see my God. But I can feel HE always with me.
I can't touch my God. But I can feel how HE helps me.

This post has been edited by uglytwinkle: Dec 15 2009, 09:04 PM
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 16 2009, 01:07 AM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(uglytwinkle @ Dec 15 2009, 09:04 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


rclxms.gif Perfect

God is the only one who plan everything for me.
God helps me whenever I've problem. I just close my eyes, Remember HIM, and ask for help, HE will definitely help me.
God administers this world and HE just want to test us, to know whether we obey on HIS order.
God fulfills HIS promises and No ONE could challenge HIS power.
God is the only one who remains unchanged.

I can't see my God. But I can feel HE always with me.
I can't touch my God. But I can feel how HE helps me.
*
What if your "feels" are described as "delusions" by atheists?
3dassets
post Dec 16 2009, 09:33 AM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 15 2009, 06:06 PM)
What if a "God" is only as real as how you believe as something so unquantifiable as "feelings", such as "sincerity, and "frustration"?
*
Does it matter what or who and why is "god"? Human can live the life cycle with or without apparent reason, what matter the most is what achievement, how happy or contented we feel in a lifetime not by choice. Memory is our trophy and emotion is the meaning, since we will never know at this time of why "god" keep a planetary zoo we call Earth and begin to harvest neighboring moon and then intergalactic travel in the name if science or continuation of our species.

We have come this far living for the reasons we gave ourselves, many people cannot accept the fact that we could be just a random occurrence and that is why they need religion.
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 16 2009, 12:45 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 16 2009, 09:33 AM)
Does it matter what or who and why is "god"? Human can live the life cycle with or without apparent reason, what matter the most is what achievement, how happy or contented we feel in a lifetime not by choice. Memory is our trophy and emotion is the meaning, since we will never know at this time of why "god" keep a planetary zoo we call Earth and begin to harvest neighboring moon and then intergalactic travel in the name if science or continuation of our species.

We have come this far living for the reasons we gave ourselves, many people cannot accept the fact that we could be just a random occurrence and that is why they need religion.
*
Probably because the opposing idea against determinism under-values the experience of existentialism.

This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Dec 16 2009, 12:46 PM
Boolean
post Dec 16 2009, 06:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
219 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
My God is the only one whom i can confide all my secrets and innermost feelings, knowing that he understands each of my flaws and loves me in spite of them, my source of strength in the worst of moments, and the purpose of my existence.

whether God is a delusion, oh well, i'm not bothered since nobody can prove it/ disprove it. heh heh.
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 16 2009, 06:31 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(Boolean @ Dec 16 2009, 06:29 PM)
My God is the only one whom i can confide all my secrets and innermost feelings, knowing that he understands each of my flaws and loves me in spite of them, my source of strength in the worst of moments, and the purpose of my existence.

whether God is a delusion, oh well, i'm not bothered since nobody can prove it/ disprove it. heh heh.
*
This is where atheists will catch you.

Use this:

QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 12 2009, 04:30 PM)
God is what you will believe even if it's not there. Scientists call it delusion, but they can't provide an explanation of how deluding they were when they realized they can't prove the existence of their very own intangible emotions in which they themselves believed in, since science requires tangible and quantifiable characteristics.
*
Boolean
post Dec 16 2009, 06:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
219 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
Well... i know some people who say emotions are the byproduct of biochemical reactions in our body. Like love, its nothing more than a biochemical release to feed our human instinct to procreate.
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 16 2009, 06:48 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(Boolean @ Dec 16 2009, 06:43 PM)
Well... i know some people who say emotions are the byproduct of biochemical reactions in our body. Like love, its nothing more than a biochemical release to feed our human instinct to procreate.
*
LOL! And how is the "feeling" and "epiphany" that "God is with us" isn't too, the by product of biochemical reactions? And if science actually proved that the chemical reactions = truth, aren't they telling that those who believed in God with their "feelings" are true as well?

This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Dec 16 2009, 06:52 PM
3dassets
post Dec 17 2009, 10:10 AM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


My player-god told me last night that each one of us is piece of representation of god, the living cycle is just an entertainment like we like to watch movie and play.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Dec 17 2009, 10:11 AM
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 17 2009, 10:17 AM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 17 2009, 10:10 AM)
My player-god told me last night that each one of us is piece of representation of god, the living cycle is just an entertainment like we like to watch movie and play.
*
Your player-god?
3dassets
post Dec 17 2009, 12:41 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


I am just the puppet in flesh & blood, thought I am independent but actually I am only fooling myself like everyone else who think they are clever or dumb.

In my limited vocabulary, player-god rather than the ism, ist, sts... my life is a game and I play along, I am creative with trained skills that categorized me as the minority rather than the ordinary people, though far from being a genius, I made my player-god proud who also play many other human characters that will interact with me.
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 17 2009, 01:50 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 17 2009, 12:41 PM)
I am just the puppet in flesh & blood, thought I am independent but actually I am only fooling myself like everyone else who think they are clever or dumb.

In my limited vocabulary, player-god rather than the ism, ist, sts... my life is a game and I play along, I am creative with trained skills that categorized me as the minority rather than the ordinary people, though far from being a genius, I made my player-god proud who also play many other human characters that will interact with me.
*
What if these strings that are controlling you are cut off from you all of a sudden?
3dassets
post Dec 17 2009, 02:25 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 17 2009, 01:50 PM)
What if these strings that are controlling you are cut off from you all of a sudden?
*
That is when I go crazy lah, without "guidance" I will likely to go extreme and got myself killed and take some people with me tongue.gif If I am abandoned.
My interpretation of my own god has been around for years and you ask me the questions I already thought of, see if you can think of what I missed.

SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 17 2009, 03:12 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 17 2009, 02:25 PM)
That is when I go crazy lah, without "guidance" I will likely to go extreme and got myself killed and take some people with me  tongue.gif If I am abandoned.
My interpretation of my own god has been around for years and you ask me the questions I already thought of, see if you can think of what I missed.
*
Hasn't that situation is already happening?

This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Dec 18 2009, 04:25 AM
Boolean
post Dec 17 2009, 10:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
219 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 16 2009, 06:48 PM)
LOL! And how is the "feeling" and "epiphany" that "God is with us" isn't too, the by product of biochemical reactions? And if science actually proved that the chemical reactions = truth, aren't they telling that those who believed in God with their "feelings" are true as well?
*
lolz.... u got me thumbup.gif
cyloh
post Dec 18 2009, 10:13 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
894 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 16 2009, 06:31 PM)
This is where atheists will catch you.

Use this:

God is what you will believe even if it's not there. Scientists call it delusion, but they can't provide an explanation of how deluding they were when they realized they can't prove the existence of their very own intangible emotions in which they themselves believed in, since science requires tangible and quantifiable characteristics.
*
Scientists don't care to explain or prove the existence of their own intangible emotions. They hardly believe in it themselves too. Their work and research is based on fact and findings. They label God as a delusion because for them it is intangible.

Then again they can try to prove their own emotions if they wanted to. The study of psychology.
goserto
post Dec 18 2009, 10:21 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
448 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


God is just another being created by humans as a way to fall back onto when all else fails.

However, I don't believe there's such a thing as god. What happens just happens. Its all about science, coincidence and maths. The rest are all thrown in with a bunch of human-created factors created to influence human as a way to unite and be under 1.
cyloh
post Dec 18 2009, 10:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
894 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(goserto @ Dec 18 2009, 10:21 AM)
God is just another being created by humans as a way to fall back onto when all else fails.

However, I don't believe there's such a thing as god. What happens just happens. Its all about science, coincidence and maths. The rest are all thrown in with a bunch of human-created factors created to influence human as a way to unite and be under 1.
*
Such statements can be a fallacy.

You say God is created by humans as a fall back when all else fails. If you say God does not exists then surely everything will still keep failing when people look upon God. Of course if that is the scenario then they will eventually stop believing in God. I don't see that happening anything soon.

Influence human as a way to unite and be under one is also a poorly conceived idea. Why are they so many Gods then? We even have people believing in the same God yet they clash with each other.

If you don't believe in God, you will need better debunking theories.
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 18 2009, 10:43 AM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(cyloh @ Dec 18 2009, 10:13 AM)
Scientists don't care to explain or prove the existence of their own intangible emotions. They hardly believe in it themselves too. Their work and research is based on fact and findings. They label God as a delusion because for them it is intangible.

Then again they can try to prove their own emotions if they wanted to. The study of psychology.
*
LOL! BULL SHITE!

If psychology can ACTUALLY prove the existence of intangible "feelings", wouldn't they also proved the existence of God of those having the epiphany of "feeling God", and the feeling of "God is with us"?

And if scientist claimed that those feelings are merely delusion, how then, it is any different of a delusion from their own emotions which are "felt"?

QUOTE(goserto @ Dec 18 2009, 10:21 AM)
God is just another being created by humans as a way to fall back onto when all else fails.

However, I don't believe there's such a thing as god. What happens just happens. Its all about science, coincidence and maths. The rest are all thrown in with a bunch of human-created factors created to influence human as a way to unite and be under 1.
*
Then you might wanna read my previous post below.

QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 12 2009, 04:30 PM)
God is what you will believe even if it's not there. Scientists call it delusion, but they can't provide an explanation of how deluding they were when they realized they can't prove the existence of their very own intangible emotions in which they themselves believed in, since science requires tangible and quantifiable characteristics.
*
This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Dec 18 2009, 10:45 AM
cyloh
post Dec 18 2009, 10:49 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
894 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 18 2009, 10:43 AM)
LOL! BULL SHITE!

If psychology can ACTUALLY prove the existence of intangible "feelings", wouldn't they also proved the existence of God of those having the epiphany of "feeling God", and the feeling of "God is with us"?

And if scientist claimed that those feelings are merely delusion, how then, it is any different of a delusion from their own emotions which are "felt"?
*
Why is it bullshit? They are just selective on what they want see as tangible or intangible. Hence "feeling God" and the feeling of "God is with us" is a delusion to them.
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 18 2009, 11:05 AM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(cyloh @ Dec 18 2009, 10:49 AM)
Why is it bullshit? They are just selective on what they want see as tangible or intangible. Hence "feeling God" and the feeling of "God is with us" is a delusion to them.
*
And the basic emotions of "feeling sincerity" is LESS THAN a delusion all of a sudden?

Come on. That is just plain ignorance from those scientists.
cyloh
post Dec 18 2009, 11:17 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
894 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 18 2009, 11:05 AM)
And the basic emotions of "feeling sincerity" is LESS THAN a delusion all of a sudden?

Come on. That is just plain ignorance from those scientists.
*
If I'm not mistaken not all scientists are non-believers. Those who dabble in science and also has faith, I do wonder what is their stand.
SUSseller009
post Dec 18 2009, 11:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
457 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
----

This post has been edited by marsalee: Nov 13 2010, 08:24 PM
SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 18 2009, 12:31 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(cyloh @ Dec 18 2009, 11:17 AM)
If I'm not mistaken not all scientists are non-believers. Those who dabble in science and also has faith, I do wonder what is their stand.
*
I'll rephrase then.

"Atheists who uses science against the believe of the intangible, in this case, God."
SUSb3ta
post Dec 18 2009, 05:50 PM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


food for thought

user posted image
fenzodahl512
post Dec 20 2009, 01:30 PM


Group Icon
Elite
1,089 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
If our sciences and technology is soooo high, I wouldn't need to clean your computer viruses.. And we should already have colonies in Moon or Mars..

Science is a necessity but not everything.. Our science still not able to replicate human emotions onto robots let alone to prove the existence or non-existence of God.. We're still not able to travel further than moon, let alone to look where is Nirvana or Heaven.. We can only speculate what's inside our earth's core through thermal detectors.. Human can speculate anything about God referring to their Holy Books..

Its you to choose whether to be a believer or not.. For centuries, people die for their beliefs, and things will go the same until the end..
seiken
post Dec 20 2009, 09:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(fenzodahl512 @ Dec 20 2009, 01:30 PM)
If our sciences and technology is soooo high, I wouldn't need to clean your computer viruses.. And we should already have colonies in Moon or Mars..

Science is a necessity but not everything.. Our science still not able to replicate human emotions onto robots let alone to prove the existence or non-existence of God.. We're still not able to travel further than moon, let alone to look where is Nirvana or Heaven.. We can only speculate what's inside our earth's core through thermal detectors.. Human can speculate anything about God referring to their Holy Books..

Its you to choose whether to be a believer or not.. For centuries, people die for their beliefs, and things will go the same until the end..
*
It might not be possible now but you can't say the same about the future. Anything is possible. From "animals" who used to hunt for food, we've become so advanced today.
SUSseller009
post Dec 20 2009, 10:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
457 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
----

This post has been edited by marsalee: Nov 13 2010, 08:24 PM
3dassets
post Dec 22 2009, 11:51 AM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


human is intriguing and begin to doubt the creator's purpose and looking back to where we come from.
I don't think it is cycle but more likely in other system than Earth because we don't know if the sun burn constantly forever and will worn out, when one cycle is over, I think it will remain dead like those inhabitable planets. Civilization may damage the environment permanently and become like Mars or even moon where there are ice.

Animal without intelligence hunt for food and reproduce and that is their life cycle, they are non destructive to the environment, We become human and civilization is a cancer to nature even to the galaxy / Universe if we reach the "Star Trek" era.

*How old is the earth?
Carbon dating is the reliable method that determines the age of fossil remains, so it is not speculation that the dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, the question of cycle is as if the environment heal itself to allow a new cycle but so far no evidence of unknown technology, unless the earth is completely shuffled and these evidence are buried deep.

However mysterious the pyramid is, it is still made of stone. My own theory is that sand is the mode to drag the stones instead of lifting with crane like us today, easy enough to build sand dune.

Still, it does not offer any leads to the "purpose" of us being created and this thread is to tell your interpretation and test your state of mentality not for people to debunk with science or emotion.

SUSDeadlocks
post Dec 24 2009, 11:47 AM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 17 2009, 02:25 PM)
That is when I go crazy lah, without "guidance" I will likely to go extreme and got myself killed and take some people with me  tongue.gif If I am abandoned.
My interpretation of my own god has been around for years and you ask me the questions I already thought of, see if you can think of what I missed.
*
Hasn't that situation, already happening to people?
3dassets
post Dec 24 2009, 01:01 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


So, it has happen and that is my perception based on events and documented histories, we tell ourselves to look for purpose not hardwired into our brain because we can choose to have a religion or not. The fact that born Muslim has no choice is to grow their population if not to maintain the (Power to protect the poor) that are the majority and religion came when there are humanity crisis.

I gave myself an answer to define my purpose and live to achieve the goal, it makes me feel more considerate otherwise I don't know why I continue to play the descendant game like an animal with sexual urge.

We are born into the “game” and seek our role, who do you want to play is the person you are and that can change by knowing and learning, I felt silly and stupid looking back to what I have done and didn’t do because I have changed but many people remain stagnant, perhaps it is their purpose.

Human lives is expectable, at different age we are likely to do certain things by social standards even the job we do has ceiling / market value. Those who dare to challenge reality are the bosses and business owners or someone who have followers by any influential means.

So, who are you today and who will you be tomorrow or what is your mission?

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Dec 24 2009, 01:03 PM
blacktortoise
post Dec 27 2009, 11:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
134 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
God is a comfort for the souls who are rejected by the society in different ways. God keeps the needy strong and going.
kubing
post Dec 27 2009, 05:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
god is god.cant define in such a manner things.
3dassets
post Dec 28 2009, 10:55 AM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


We know about life cycle, we are somewhere in the cycle and will die one of these days, when it happen, nothing else matters to you only those who know and remember you.

If you die without achieving anything and in vein, you’ll probably have more regrets than rejoice. What if you are given a chance to re-live a life from this age onwards and do things differently? I am sure you would be more appreciative and try to do better because you have experienced the end perhaps change your narrow and selfish perception.

We also know about living pattern doing what others have done, doing a job making a living and attend to all matters as it happen, most people forgot that it is a repetitive pattern dealing with complicated emotions and emotion dictate our lives that over power our ability to ration.

Opinion about our existence shows the level of mentality based on knowledge and emotional state that fluctuate though out our lives unless you adopt and hold on to a religion. I have seen videos of some people convert from one to another and make a better living with it / in it among different community.

As a whole, religions is just a way of life according to a pattern and balance the political power across continent, you can choose to be nobody with nothing significant (ordinary consumer) or somebody that contribute something to your kind / community regardless of your believes and be a follower, the expectable pattern of life.

SUSseller009
post Dec 28 2009, 01:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
457 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
----

This post has been edited by marsalee: Nov 13 2010, 08:29 PM
netmatrix
post Dec 28 2009, 05:04 PM

The machine... it sees everything.
*******
Senior Member
6,726 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Zion


If animals suddenly grow intelligent ala Planet of the apes, they would surely go after us for 'various' offences.
3dassets
post Dec 28 2009, 06:13 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE
So, who do you think is better in this?
People who believe in God, or non-believers? Heee..hee.heee....
*
Like my essay huh, Well, I think we are in tune at some level but why must you define who is better? Which religion do you think is in control of the world economy and who are those in our country or in your cluster? Indirectly, they influence our way of lives, directly, they classified us by race. Believers don't question god and free thinker just wonder about the creations not to say non believer, I do believe are created by something and it could be random occurrence under natural law but what / who is in control of the law or better known as "purpose".

QUOTE(netmatrix @ Dec 28 2009, 05:04 PM)
If animals suddenly grow intelligent ala Planet of the apes, they would surely go after us for 'various' offences.
*
Are scientist going against the natural law by cloning human / animal? A scientist with religious believes would not trespass this law, according to the evolution pattern, it will take a long time to develop intelligence and animal brain will not suddenly have it, if animal species were to evolve with intelligence, they will share our features not remain as chicken or dog, the sense of shame to begin with and won't copulate in public and how to invent or use tools with claws and paws?

I don't get what you mean by "Various" offenses, you mean slaughter and eat them? In case you forgot, the animal world is either eat or be eaten. Look into the mirror and see your animal physiology, it is your mind that make you think you are a human and the real difference between you and others. Fighting, killing, performing sexual act is when you act like animal brows.gif


I like to think that we reflect the creator, at this point in time we are relatively smarter than people 100 years ago by ratio because of science where emotions / animal instinct remain the same. I am powered by a neutral "god" player came to tell you in simple perspective so we all can be more considerate.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Nov 13 2010, 08:52 PM
slacker
post Dec 28 2009, 11:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: May 2005
God is not meant to be conceivable by human thought. Talking about it is meaningless.
3dassets
post Dec 29 2009, 10:23 AM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


The topic here is:
Define your God even if It was absurb to define it, Close-minded backoff (Philosophy)

So your parent gave birth to you and you don't care why, they just "F" every day and you came out after 9 months. Now is your turn to do the same and you call that meaning?
netmatrix
post Dec 29 2009, 10:45 AM

The machine... it sees everything.
*******
Senior Member
6,726 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Zion


If God is so easy to describe then everyone would have paid dearly for their sins. Then earth would not be inhabited by anyone. Everyone taken away just like that. And babies no matter how innocent they are are left to rot. The scheme of things than humans would not change. And probably a recycled plot of God sending someone to guide everyone into being good and how to run their lives.

Few thousand years later, they come to this age again of self destructing. Then they are taken away again like a big reset button.

Even further than God something sees it like God is having a blast playing God!

But i just treat God as someone who is there. Whether i like it or not.
3dassets
post Dec 29 2009, 11:51 AM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


Reset button, like playing video game. So you too share my interpretation that we are just game characters?

Believers cannot accept that and there must be a purpose otherwise they will loose direction and the will to live, the feeling of insecurity will lead to chaos. Religion is created to suppress this group of people (the majority) from going crazy, sorry if you are offended.

A life need money & affection and love is what we all live for, memories is what we get which is the trophy of a lifetime regardless of how long we live. The disabled tends to think that life or “god” is not fair to them and it is our responsibility to pay more attention to them. Between human, it is ideology that separate us if not mental strength based on knowledge and experience.

The person we are today is not the same if we learn something new today.

thesupertramp
post Dec 29 2009, 09:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 29 2009, 11:51 AM)
Reset button, like playing video game. So you too share my interpretation that we are just game characters?

Believers cannot accept that and there must be a purpose otherwise they will loose direction and the will to live, the feeling of insecurity will lead to chaos. Religion is created to suppress this group of people (the majority) from going crazy, sorry if you are offended.

*
Why must there be an extrinsic reason to life? Why can't the meaning of life be the meaning we give it?

The philosophical theory called absurdism describes it best. From Wikipedia:
"Absurdism is a philosophy stating that the efforts of humanity to find meaning in the universe ultimately fail (and hence are absurd), because no such meaning exists, at least in relation to the individual."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absurdism

But this isn't the end of the world. Absurdists believe that once you have embraced the notion of absurdity, you can then define the meaning to your own life.

I personally subscribe to this philosophy, and have never been happier since I've embraced absurdity. Much like believers "seeing the light".
-Adrian-
post Dec 30 2009, 12:23 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
826 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: New York, Afghanistan


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 28 2009, 06:13 PM)
Like my essay huh, Well, I think we are in tune at some level but why must you define who is better? Which religion do you think is in control of the world economy and who are those in our country or in your cluster? Indirectly, they influence our way of lives, directly, they classified us by race. Believers don't question god and free thinker just wonder about the creations not to say non believer, I do believe are created by something and it could be random occurrence under natural law but what / who is in control of the law or better known as "purpose".
Are scientist going against the natural law by cloning human / animal? A scientist with religious believes would not trespass this law, according to the evolution pattern, it will take a long time to develop  intelligence and animal brain will not suddenly have it, if animal species were to evolve with intelligence, they will share our features not remain as chicken or dog, the sense of shame to begin with and won't copulate in public and how to invent or use tools with claws and paws?

I don't get what you mean by "Various" offenses, you mean slaughter and eat them? In case you forgot, the animal world is either eat or be eaten. Look into the mirror and see your animal physiology, it is your mind that make you think you are a human and the real difference between you and others. Fighting, killing, performing sexual act is when you act like animal  brows.gif
I like to think that we reflect the creator, at this point in time we are relatively smarter than people 100 years ago by ratio because of science where emotions / animal instinct remain the same. I am powered by a neutral "god" player came to tell you in simple perspective so we all can be more considerate.
*
just to clarify something. the choice by scientists whether to follow/break the "nature's law" is not just based on religious reasons.

an atheist scientist may also decide to NOT approve human cloning because of various other ethical reasons which are entirely secular.

so just to shout out: just because somebody ain't religious doesnt mean he'll do bad things

QUOTE(slacker @ Dec 28 2009, 11:44 PM)
God is not meant to be conceivable by human thought. Talking about it is meaningless.
*
then by this logic, no human definition of god whatsover may be applied to god.

this includes all religious definitions of god.

any attempt to defy this assumed logic contradicts the two premises, therefore that statement is a logical fallacy

This post has been edited by -Adrian-: Dec 30 2009, 12:28 AM
mindstorm
post Dec 30 2009, 12:56 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
900 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
God as a creator.
Quantum forces as a creator.
Any difference?

This post has been edited by mindstorm: Dec 30 2009, 12:57 AM
InFe_eD
post Dec 30 2009, 02:48 AM

Can you imagine?
*****
Senior Member
929 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Earth, just like you


God or not, nothing can change the masterplan.
kubing
post Dec 30 2009, 06:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
"The person we are today is not the same if we learn something new today.". i like this
+3kk!
post Dec 30 2009, 10:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,275 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 28 2009, 10:55 AM)


If you die without achieving anything and in vein, you’ll probably have more regrets than rejoice. What if you are given a chance to re-live a life from this age onwards and do things differently? I am sure you would be more appreciative and try to do better because you have experienced the end perhaps change your narrow and selfish perception.

*
your arguments carry a huge dose of the afterlife, but really what happens when you die and nothing really happens

if you ask me, god is a fag. everyone tells me he has a grand scheme in the whole clockwork, he looks at it at a marco level, but after reading heaps of economic reports and global politics i feel hard to believe the existance of a supreme being that is looking after everyone.


3dassets
post Dec 30 2009, 11:03 AM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Dec 30 2009, 10:36 AM)
your arguments carry a huge dose of the afterlife, but really what happens when you die and nothing really happens

if you ask me, god is a fag. everyone tells me he has a grand scheme in the whole clockwork, he looks at it at a marco level, but after reading heaps of economic reports and global politics i feel hard to believe the existance of a supreme being that is looking after everyone.
*
Assuming I am living a second live changed my perspective completely, I would do more for others than myself. Ever ask yourself if you are given a second chance to do the same thing again and you would do it differently? We make mistakes to learn but we should not repeat the same mistakes others have made because it is our responsibility to avoid and tell.

Japan recorded 30,000 suicide cases in 2009, what ever the reasons, its a pattern and every country has a statistic and some choose to hide it to avoid / encourage, local news paper were advised to keep this kind of news low profile. Does it mean religion is loosing ground?
+3kk!
post Dec 30 2009, 11:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,275 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 30 2009, 11:03 AM)
Assuming I am living a second live changed my perspective completely, I would do more for others than myself. Ever ask yourself if you are given a second chance to do the same thing again and you would do it differently? We make mistakes to learn but we should not repeat the same mistakes others have made because it is our responsibility to avoid and tell.

Japan recorded 30,000 suicide cases in 2009, what ever the reasons, its a pattern and every country has a statistic and some choose to hide it to avoid / encourage, local news paper were advised to keep this kind of news low profile. Does it mean religion is loosing ground?
*
if you ask me honestly, i would not repeat the same mistakes but i will not change my course. i will not go about being a nice guy and do it, its just not my nature.

well religion is not losing ground, suicides are common in japan and its in their culture they even have traditional suicides. but while that happens one has to look at the larger picture, birth rates are increasing and the overall human population is growing rapidly, thus the numbers in % will naturally increase. the overall human race however is till triving well


kubing
post Dec 30 2009, 01:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 30 2009, 11:03 AM)
Assuming I am living a second live changed my perspective completely, I would do more for others than myself. Ever ask yourself if you are given a second chance to do the same thing again and you would do it differently? We make mistakes to learn but we should not repeat the same mistakes others have made because it is our responsibility to avoid and tell.

Japan recorded 30,000 suicide cases in 2009, what ever the reasons, its a pattern and every country has a statistic and some choose to hide it to avoid / encourage, local news paper were advised to keep this kind of news low profile. Does it mean religion is loosing ground?
*
do you have a prove on it? to you life just like mineral bottle. recyclable. I hope your wife is not a recond product...haha.
maranello55
post Dec 30 2009, 02:42 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



Cant we accept that we are just like other energy in the universe - Laws of Thermoynamics.

When we dies, the energy will be transfered and tranformed into other things. Our body will decomposed as soil and the fosil minerals will be used for fauna growth. The energy from it might be used to grow some trees and fruits. Then got eaten and tansfered as energy again.
lin00b
post Dec 30 2009, 03:18 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
us? same with those lowly animals and plants and everything else? the very idea is unthinkable!
3dassets
post Dec 30 2009, 03:27 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(kubing @ Dec 30 2009, 01:45 PM)
do you have a prove on it? to you life just like mineral bottle. recyclable. I hope your wife is not a recond product...haha.
*
What is wrong with your English? Make it habit to improve your English if you want to learn something from the (acting) PHDs here, tongue.gif Don't worry, I was like that before.
Don't take my essay like a statement, I only imply if we treat our current life like a second chance, we would be doing things differently and perhaps more appreciative or extreme. I am divorced and we are both second hand now, I can marry someone even if she is third hand because we are only human.

QUOTE(maranello55 @ Dec 30 2009, 02:42 PM)
Cant we accept that we are just like other energy in the universe - Laws of Thermoynamics.

When we dies, the energy will be transfered and tranformed into other things. Our body will decomposed as soil and the fosil minerals will be used for fauna growth. The energy from it might be used to grow some trees and fruits. Then got eaten and tansfered as energy again.
*
Good one, I don't believe in recycle soul, our brain is a giant AV and sense recorder though not all memories are intact but it does store enormous amount of info / energy and when we die, it may be absorbed by gravity or insignificant to the amount of other wave lengths. Whether it is natural law, religious law or governing legislative law, we are made to abide to rules in everything we do because we are like stray animal without it.

You feel irk compare to other animals & plants only if you put a human mind in an animal body or as plant. If you are thinking from their point of view, you won’t feel the same. Chilli is hot and some plant grow thorn to deter from being eaten by animal, how do they know animal will eat them shows that we are living things at different speed of time.

We are superior being because we have intelligence and can choose to be happy or sad by fantasizing or recalling memories, there is so much we can experience & learn and one lifetime is often not enough to experience it all so some people say live “life to the fullest” just to reap as much as possible but don’t play like there is no tomorrow or you will regret if you are still alive the next day.

I think I am getting long breath...

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Dec 30 2009, 03:58 PM
maranello55
post Dec 30 2009, 05:27 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(lin00b @ Dec 30 2009, 03:18 PM)
us? same with those lowly animals and plants and everything else? the very idea is unthinkable!
*
Its not an idea...its a fact. U die and get buried down under, ur body decomposed by tiny2 insects and organism that break us down into the elements for the use of nature. We are basically fertelizer when we die.

Lowly? I think if u compare the state of humans and animal today, u might see that humans do what animals couldnt even think of doing.
kubing
post Dec 30 2009, 05:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 30 2009, 03:27 PM)
What is wrong with your English? Make it habit to improve your English if you want to learn something from the (acting) PHDs here, tongue.gif  Don't worry, I was like that before.
Don't take my essay like a statement, I only imply if we treat our current life like a second chance, we would be doing things differently and perhaps more appreciative or extreme. I am divorced and we are both second hand now, I can marry someone even if she is third hand because we are only human.

*
hahaha, cant imagine how it happen. recycling human like a bottle. i dont have PHD in polymer chemistry... do u believe in god?
3dassets
post Dec 30 2009, 06:28 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


If I have to choose, I think we are created by alien and they gave us intelligence among all animals on planet zoo just like we keep animals in the zoo. Why do we do that is the same as they do to us.

Whoever created us is our creator and they may not be the creator of the Universe under the zoo theory, so which is god to you? I don't believe in the god created by human or through a human, why the hassle? Declare holly war again and again or we came from a male & a female that means we are incest descendants.

So who or what is watching us like characters in the theater or zoo?

thesupertramp
post Dec 30 2009, 07:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 30 2009, 11:03 AM)
Assuming I am living a second live changed my perspective completely, I would do more for others than myself. Ever ask yourself if you are given a second chance to do the same thing again and you would do it differently? We make mistakes to learn but we should not repeat the same mistakes others have made because it is our responsibility to avoid and tell.
*
Even if we are living a second life, there is no way to know. Neither will we know what our past mistakes were. So why does it matter? If I were to live again, knowing what I did wrong this life, I certainly wouldn't repeat my mistakes. But phrase it differently, do I regret my past mistakes? No, not at all. If I did not make the mistakes I made, I wouldn't have known what my mistakes were.

Learning from others is indeed an important thing. It is what drove the evolution of language. One reason why our species is so much more advance than the other species is that our species has gain the ability to communicate through language. It is therefore imperative to our survival that we keep learning from one another. Hence why debating should not be seen as an hostile act, but rather as a means of learning from one another.
kubing
post Dec 30 2009, 09:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 30 2009, 06:28 PM)
If I have to choose, I think we are created by alien and they gave us intelligence among all animals on planet zoo just like we keep animals in the zoo. Why do we do that is the same as they do to us.

Whoever created us is our creator and they may not be the creator of the Universe under the zoo theory, so which is god to you? I don't believe in the god created by human or through a human, why the hassle? Declare holly war again and again or we came from a male & a female that means we are incest descendants.

So who or what is watching us like characters in the theater or zoo?
*
okey then who create alien? just exist like that or they create themselves...
+3kk!
post Dec 31 2009, 07:32 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,275 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(kubing @ Dec 30 2009, 09:20 PM)
okey then who create alien? just exist like that or they create themselves...
*
but then why can god just create himself?
lin00b
post Dec 31 2009, 10:13 AM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
god is super duper powderful and can do everything, including creating herself.
kubing
post Dec 31 2009, 10:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008

Translation: Surah 112: Al-Ikhlas (The Unity, Sincerity, Oneness Of God)


In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only;

2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute;

3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;

4. And there is none like unto Him.
lin00b
post Dec 31 2009, 11:12 AM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
replace allah with existence/universe
3dassets
post Dec 31 2009, 11:44 AM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Dec 30 2009, 07:03 PM)
Even if we are living a second life, there is no way to know. Neither will we know what our past mistakes were. So why does it matter? If I were to live again, knowing what I did wrong this life, I certainly wouldn't repeat my mistakes. But phrase it differently, do I regret my past mistakes? No, not at all. If I did not make the mistakes I made, I wouldn't have known what my mistakes were.

Learning from others is indeed an important thing. It is what drove the evolution of language. One reason why our species is so much more advance than the other species is that our species has gain the ability to communicate through language. It is therefore imperative to our survival that we keep learning from one another. Hence why debating should not be seen as an hostile act, but rather as a means of learning from one another.
*
Let our imagination fly free and life is a story, many of us like to watch movie to see the drama where ordinary life is less interesting or bizarre. Having said that, imagine second chance like watching movie, lets say you were chosen to be given a chance to re-live life again and at the age you prefer with memory fragments of the first life in the form of dream / de ja vue.

So every now and then, you feel like you have the experience of recurrence and to the extent where you remember the dream that come true or expecting things to occur like predictable scenario. Of cause, it sounds absurd today but that is what started Islam, Prophet Mohammad dream of god and it became a religion.

How does Einstein formulate atomic reaction and other theories? He must have simulated it in his mind and the same goes to other prominent figures in history, we simply call them geniuses, messenger / son of god or just brutal mastermind like Hitler.

Then again, if you have no regrets and have done nothing wrong or just killed in an accident, you can choose the end because it is as if there is a second chance, live goes on with or without us we only play the descendants game. laugh.gif


QUOTE(kubing @ Dec 30 2009, 09:20 PM)
okey then who create alien? just exist like that or they create themselves...
*
God may create alien and alien create us is just an example, we could be created indirectly or the by-product of by-product, I think you are very young or have very little imagination to pick this up from what I imply earlier because you seems to read only words rather than the rationale. If you already submitted to one god, everything else is wrong. notworthy.gif

When we ask who created god, it could be a higher god and the higher, in our term “infinity”. But why go count the numbers of zeros in trillion / zillion, if it won’t matter to people like us rclxub.gif
lin00b
post Dec 31 2009, 11:49 AM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
movie is movie. real life is real life. i mean it is possible that there is some metallic based aliens that can transform into earth based vehicles too, right?
3dassets
post Dec 31 2009, 04:16 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(lin00b @ Dec 31 2009, 11:49 AM)
movie is movie. real life is real life. i mean it is possible that there is some metallic based aliens that can transform into earth based vehicles too, right?
*
You have to find the rationale in such discussion not the meaning of words, I don't find Transformers have anything to do with us being created or did they just transform into cars and truck to please us? Movies triggers our thought & emotion and influential enough to reap millions in business and is a part of our lives in reality, read English the English grammar way not translate to your language word by word otherwise will make you sound silly if not stupid to offer opinions in a hasty manner.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Dec 31 2009, 04:18 PM
kubing
post Dec 31 2009, 05:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 31 2009, 11:44 AM)

When we ask who created god, it could be a higher god and the higher, in our term “infinity”. But why go count the numbers of zeros in trillion / zillion, if it won’t matter to people like us  rclxub.gif
*
GOD is the creator of universe.. Sky above to deep ocean and everything in between...no doubt. And we are the special species among of his creation. only human have MIND to question the existence of our creator. smile.gif
3dassets
post Dec 31 2009, 05:55 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Dec 31 2009, 07:32 AM)
but then why can god just create himself?
*
Try to answer the question above. In case you don't understand the question, you agree that we are created by god but who created god in the first place? Where does god came from? something must have created something according to our logic and why are we created or what is the purpose of us believing in god?

If I am created by the same god as yours, convince me that I should stop being stubborn and follow your god. So in your terms, people who don't have religion are lost and god send people like you to cast your words of wisdom, if so, the other serious thread is more appropriate for you because we can talk nonsense here.

God is indeed beautiful, he made many customers so willing to buy from the minority, so I must produce products related to religion and will definitely be rich no doubt from believers point of view, good inspiration there and I think I found my path, thank you so much $$$$$$$$ icon_idea.gif
kubing
post Dec 31 2009, 09:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 31 2009, 05:55 PM)
Try to answer the question above. In case you don't understand the question, you agree that we are created by god but who created god in the first place? Where does god came from? something must have created something according to our logic and why are we created or what is the purpose of us believing in god?

If I am created by the same god as yours, convince me that I should stop being stubborn and follow your god. So in your terms, people who don't have religion are lost and god send people like you to cast your words of wisdom, if so, the other serious thread is more appropriate for you because we can talk nonsense here.

God is indeed beautiful, he made many customers so willing to buy from the minority, so I must produce products related to religion and will definitely be rich no doubt from believers point of view, good inspiration there and I think I found my path, thank you so much $$$$$$$$ icon_idea.gif
*
1. God is one and only. no others like Him. God did not create other Gods. He is The One. Nobody create him. It cant be create or destroy...
2. You are not stubborn and i never ask you to follow my God. I never said someone lost here. But need a guide to understand deeply.
3. I am not talkin business here. no comment about religious product.
thesupertramp
post Dec 31 2009, 09:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(3dassets @ Dec 31 2009, 11:44 AM)
Let our imagination fly free and life is a story, many of us like to watch movie to see the drama where ordinary life is less interesting or bizarre. Having said that, imagine second chance like watching movie, lets say you were chosen to be given a chance to re-live life again and at the age you prefer with memory fragments of the first life in the form of dream / de ja vue.

So every now and then, you feel like you have the experience of recurrence and to the extent where you remember the dream that come true or expecting things to occur like predictable scenario. Of cause, it sounds absurd today but that is what started Islam, Prophet Mohammad dream of god and it became a religion.

How does Einstein formulate atomic reaction and other theories? He must have simulated it in his mind and the same goes to other prominent figures in history, we simply call them geniuses, messenger / son of god or just brutal mastermind like Hitler.

Then again, if you have no regrets and have done nothing wrong or just killed in an accident, you can choose the end because it is as if there is a second chance, live goes on with or without us we only play the descendants game.  laugh.gif
God may create alien and alien create us is just an example, we could be created indirectly or the by-product of by-product, I think you are very young or have very little imagination to pick this up from what I imply earlier because you seems to read only words rather than the rationale. If you already submitted to one god, everything else is wrong.  notworthy.gif

When we ask who created god, it could be a higher god and the higher, in our term “infinity”. But why go count the numbers of zeros in trillion / zillion, if it won’t matter to people like us  rclxub.gif
*
Is our dream the product of our own thoughts and observations? Or were they put there extrinsically? Does a man with congenital blindness dream in colour? How does green look like to him/her?

Even if we gained experience from our dreams, experience we can never otherwise gain in this life, why think of it as our previous life? It could just be the manifestation of our subconscious.


QUOTE(kubing @ Dec 31 2009, 05:25 PM)
GOD is the creator of universe.. Sky above to deep ocean and everything in between...no doubt. And we are the special species among of his creation. only human have MIND to question the existence of our creator. smile.gif
*
You must not be human then, since you do not question the existence of this so called creator. Way to go in ridiculing all your fellow believers. thumbup.gif
kubing
post Dec 31 2009, 09:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
our car never question us who create them. even most advance robot in the world ASIMO never question that. but we are the most advance creation ever built by God.
3dassets
post Jan 2 2010, 09:23 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Dec 31 2009, 09:18 PM)
Is our dream the product of our own thoughts and observations? Or were they put there extrinsically? Does a man with congenital blindness dream in colour? How does green look like to him/her?

Even if we gained experience from our dreams, experience we can never otherwise gain in this life, why think of it as our previous life? It could just be the manifestation of our subconscious.

*
I am assuming a blind person dream in audio, smell and touch instead of visual and the same discipline apply but I only use the mysteriousness of dreaming to appreciate the one life we currently live in, nothing more.
While god cannot be ration with logic because the question is in circle, so dream is the only logical excuse that god can choose to communicate with us, well, like Prophet Mohammad did, it is not wrong to say that a religion is born from dream and if we were to communicate with god, dream it is.

kubing,
You must be a kid, car or robot is created as a tool not a living thing, therefore does not "think". You fail to explain yourself;

1. God is one and only. no others like Him. God did not create other Gods. He is The One. Nobody create him. It cant be create or destroy...
Your god just create himself? How do you know?

2. You are not stubborn and i never ask you to follow my God. I never said someone lost here. But need a guide to understand deeply.
Where is the guide? Don't tell me to read the book.

3. I am not talkin business here. no comment about religious product.
I am very certain that religious product can sell base on your respond

kubing
post Jan 2 2010, 09:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
1. Im not speaking Tamil here. (I just state that and read again if u miss some)

2. what kind of books r you reading? find 'someone' to help you. reading are not enough.

3. give me examples please... i never used Doll,candle thingy to be in touch with my God.just pray n feel it with my heart..
maranello55
post Jan 3 2010, 02:11 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(kubing @ Dec 30 2009, 05:52 PM)
hahaha, cant imagine how it happen. recycling human like a bottle. i dont have PHD in polymer chemistry... do u believe in god?
*
U out of many ppl here dont seem to have any problem with 'imagination'. if u get what i mean. And no one here put an example of cycle of life to the likes of plastic bottles.

If u want ppl to take ur belief seriously, u got to take others the same way as well. Dont be dissapointed when others ridicule ur beliefs when they are just returning u the favour.


Added on January 3, 2010, 2:22 pm
QUOTE(kubing @ Dec 31 2009, 05:25 PM)
GOD is the creator of universe.. Sky above to deep ocean and everything in between...no doubt. And we are the special species among of his creation. only human have MIND to question the existence of our creator. smile.gif
*
I doubted God created those things. Because the same God created a perfect and logical, scientifical universe (or multiverse) can not have a split personality being so clumsy and fickle minded about updating his revelation to mankind in a span of 4000 years and with little results! Even my Norton updates faster than that? Doesnt really sound like a work of a supreme being to me. Not to mention he forgot to takeout our foreskin before sending Adam down to earth fr heaven no?

God do this, God do that, ironically he needs YOU to talk in his All powerful behalf. Very powerful of Him indeed. All u have is ur say, and few verse in a book as a prove, which can also be applied to UFOs. At least in UFOs case, ppl actually saw it!

Bolded - Im not too sure abt that...There are probability of advance civilization out there. They wouldnt have advanced to far if they stick to a shallow premise of religion now can they? Just look at ur religion now. All ure waiting is the end of the world. How do u expect to advance if such?


Added on January 3, 2010, 2:27 pm
QUOTE(kubing @ Dec 31 2009, 09:35 PM)
our car never question us who create them. even most advance robot in the world ASIMO never question that. but we are the most advance creation ever built by God.
*
Then ure just as good as ASIMO and the car. Dont question.

We? Most advance??? Without the help of oxygen tank, we can go to deep water and space. Without cables, we cant climb the rocks, without night vision we cant see thru the night. Without planes we cant fly. We are perfect if everything above is built in within us. Without that, we cant even go head to head with a group of dogs. We will lose. Remember, no weapons, just Gods creation.

This post has been edited by maranello55: Jan 3 2010, 02:27 PM
thesupertramp
post Jan 4 2010, 04:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(3dassets @ Jan 2 2010, 09:23 PM)
I am assuming a blind person dream in audio, smell and touch instead of visual and the same discipline apply but I only use the mysteriousness of dreaming to appreciate the one life we currently live in, nothing more.
While god cannot be ration with logic because the question is in circle, so dream is the only logical excuse that god can choose to communicate with us, well, like Prophet Mohammad did, it is not wrong to say that a religion is born from dream and if we were to communicate with god, dream it is.
But why must the mysteriousness of our dreams be put down as "from god?" Why can't it be a manifestation of our own subconscious? Many of us dream of perfect things. The perfect spouse, a Utopian society, A in exams etc. So who is to say your Utopian dream is heaven, while mine isn't?

I have just borrowed Freud's Interpretation of Dreams from the library. Yet to read it, but my current understanding is that dreams are just the manifestation of our subconscious. Which is why humans think God created us in his image, and heaven is eternal (because we fear death), among other things. So you are right when you said that the notion of religions stem from dreams, but that in no way shows that God does exist.

We all have dreams. What makes Prophet Mohammad's dream more worthy than mine. Why isn't God a version of Megan Fox that stays 25 forever? Why must we meet God at the gates of heaven? Why can't we meet Megan Fox instead? That is my dream. Daydream. Still a dream.
kubing
post Jan 4 2010, 07:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(maranello55 @ Jan 3 2010, 02:11 PM)
U out of many ppl here dont seem to have any problem with 'imagination'. if u get what i mean. And no one here put an example of cycle of life to the likes of plastic bottles.

If u want ppl to take ur belief seriously, u got to take others the same way as well. Dont be dissapointed when others ridicule ur beliefs when they are just returning u the favour.


Added on January 3, 2010, 2:22 pm

I doubted God created those things. Because the same God created a perfect and logical, scientifical universe (or multiverse) can not have a split personality being so clumsy and fickle minded about updating his revelation to mankind in a span of 4000 years and with little results! Even my Norton updates faster than that? Doesnt really sound like a work of a supreme being to me. Not to mention he forgot to takeout our foreskin before sending Adam down to earth fr heaven no?

God do this, God do that, ironically he needs YOU to talk in his All powerful behalf. Very powerful of Him indeed. All u have is ur say, and few verse in a book as a prove, which can also be applied to UFOs. At least in UFOs case, ppl actually saw it!

Bolded - Im not too sure abt that...There are probability of advance civilization out there. They wouldnt have advanced to far if they stick to a shallow premise of religion now can they? Just look at ur religion now. All ure waiting is the end of the world. How do u expect to advance if such?


Added on January 3, 2010, 2:27 pm

Then ure just as good as ASIMO and the car. Dont question.

We? Most advance??? Without the help of oxygen tank, we can go to deep water and space. Without cables, we cant climb the rocks, without night vision we cant see thru the night. Without planes we cant fly. We are perfect if everything above is built in within us. Without that, we cant even go head to head with a group of dogs. We will lose. Remember, no weapons, just Gods creation.
*
keep ridicule bro. no one bother you then. tongue.gif


Added on January 4, 2010, 7:31 pm
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 4 2010, 04:05 PM)
But why must the mysteriousness of our dreams be put down as "from god?" Why can't it be a manifestation of our own subconscious? Many of us dream of perfect things. The perfect spouse, a Utopian society, A in exams etc. So who is to say your Utopian dream is heaven, while mine isn't?

I have just borrowed Freud's Interpretation of Dreams from the library. Yet to read it, but my current understanding is that dreams are just the manifestation of our subconscious. Which is why humans think God created us in his image, and heaven is eternal (because we fear death), among other things. So you are right when you said that the notion of religions stem from dreams, but that in no way shows that God does exist.

We all have dreams. What makes Prophet Mohammad's dream more worthy than mine. Why isn't God a version of Megan Fox that stays 25 forever? Why must we meet God at the gates of heaven? Why can't we meet Megan Fox instead? That is my dream. Daydream. Still a dream.
*
Sigmund Freud is Jews and Carl Mark too... don't follow them. if you want your path guide you to heaven smile.gif

This post has been edited by kubing: Jan 4 2010, 07:34 PM
lin00b
post Jan 4 2010, 10:56 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 2 2010, 09:45 PM)
3. give me examples please... i never used Doll,candle thingy to be in touch with my God.just pray n feel it with my heart..
prayer mat, quran, holy scripture decorations, prayer videos, surau in buildings, haji trips, etc. etc.


Added on January 4, 2010, 10:57 pm
QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 4 2010, 07:25 PM)
Sigmund Freud is Jews and Carl Mark too... don't follow them. if you want your path guide you to heaven smile.gif
such arrogance. dont follow muslims, if you want your path guide you to heaven smile.gif

This post has been edited by lin00b: Jan 4 2010, 10:58 PM
SUSDeadlocks
post Jan 5 2010, 01:14 AM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 12 2009, 04:30 PM)
God is what you will believe even if it's not there. Scientists call it delusion, but they can't provide an explanation of how deluding they were when they realized they can't prove the existence of their very own intangible emotions in which they themselves believed in, since science requires tangible and quantifiable characteristics.
*
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 15 2009, 06:06 PM)
What if a "God" is only as real as how you believe as something so unquantifiable as "feelings", such as "sincerity, and "frustration"?
*
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 16 2009, 06:48 PM)
LOL! And how is the "feeling" and "epiphany" that "God is with us" isn't too, the by product of biochemical reactions? And if science actually proved that the chemical reactions = truth, aren't they telling that those who believed in God with their "feelings" are true as well?
*
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 18 2009, 10:43 AM)
LOL! BULL SHITE!

If psychology can ACTUALLY prove the existence of intangible "feelings", wouldn't they also proved the existence of God of those having the epiphany of "feeling God", and the feeling of "God is with us"?

And if scientist claimed that those feelings are merely delusion, how then, it is any different of a delusion from their own emotions which are "felt"?
*
maranello55
post Jan 5 2010, 02:30 AM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 4 2010, 07:25 PM)
keep ridicule bro. no one bother you then. tongue.gif
*
Nothing to say? Dont post. This is PhD thread. No space for meaningless one-liners pls.

Ridicule? I saw u comment something abt someone's wife up there. And ridicule others post with 'recycled bottle'? Im just returning the favour. Im not here to get attention. Im here to debate, with anyone willing to do so. I dont mind if no one bother. Theres always other place to go.

Ur replies are typical of a moslem posters here. Ive seen it too many times by to many ppl. Cant counter-argue? no problem. Post a one-liner - Or a verse or two. Yeah that helps.
3dassets
post Jan 5 2010, 12:38 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 4 2010, 04:05 PM)
But why must the mysteriousness of our dreams be put down as "from god?" Why can't it be a manifestation of our own subconscious? Many of us dream of perfect things. The perfect spouse, a Utopian society, A in exams etc. So who is to say your Utopian dream is heaven, while mine isn't?

I have just borrowed Freud's Interpretation of Dreams from the library. Yet to read it, but my current understanding is that dreams are just the manifestation of our subconscious. Which is why humans think God created us in his image, and heaven is eternal (because we fear death), among other things. So you are right when you said that the notion of religions stem from dreams, but that in no way shows that God does exist.

We all have dreams. What makes Prophet Mohammad's dream more worthy than mine. Why isn't God a version of Megan Fox that stays 25 forever? Why must we meet God at the gates of heaven? Why can't we meet Megan Fox instead? That is my dream. Daydream. Still a dream.
*
I agree with all the non believers, thought I would prefer free thinker for my self. I could not believe in the "messenger" or representatives of god who are human, end of the story. I have had some weird dreams, I die a few times, I thought of something that has happen before I was told are some that is too freaking to be coincidences and I remain neutral in this respect than to declare myself as non believer.

This topic is about getting creative with our personal interpretation of god / creator not to promote 1 god, your god or their god, we could be the result of multiple byproducts. The fact that so many people willing to submit themselves to a religion and never doubt the origin of the story shows that human are generally followers of ideology, regardless of the religion, we all abide to constitution law in our daily conducts and that is the supreme product of humankind except religious matters.

Ordinary people need god, those who don't may be preoccupied by something else such as science over god.

*Kubing, a publisher I work with reproduce a series of religious books for the past 8 years and are making millions, I had to thank his god too otherwise my job don't exist. Though it promote the religion but it "exploit" in business term, who pay for it? The believers in this country who praises and a sin to doubt.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Jan 5 2010, 12:44 PM
kubing
post Jan 5 2010, 08:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


to far from my sight. I dont know what PhD you have but im too slow to catch you all. huhu.. keep asking who create GOD is the motif this thread was create. at least from my point of views. When someone come out to explain then more question come out(tat good).But I dont see someone try to understand but build formation n keep firing people with ignorance idea. Dont know which book did you guys read but i can see it far from the truth. keep it up guys coz no one in this planet care. except me.. if you r looking for God debating is not enough. Heaven and hELL IS way beyond from that. Is heaven exist to you all ? iF its exist then who is The Creator of heaven. dont say alien again..
thesupertramp
post Jan 5 2010, 08:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 4 2010, 07:25 PM)
Sigmund Freud is Jews and Carl Mark too... don't follow them. if you want your path guide you to heaven smile.gif
*
You need to stop trolling these threads if you have nothing constructive to add. We are trying to learn here. By the way, it's Karl Marx, not Carl Mark. You wouldn't like me calling your God 'Elloh', do you?

Just to forewarn you, I will be clicking the 'report' button on your next insensible post. After a while, the humour is lost.

QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 5 2010, 08:08 PM)
to far from my sight. I dont know what PhD you have but im too slow to catch you all. huhu.. keep asking who create GOD is the motif this thread was create. at least from my point of views. When someone come out to explain then more question come out(tat good).But I dont see someone try to understand but build formation n keep firing people with ignorance idea. Dont know which book did you guys read but i can see it far from the truth.  keep it up guys coz no one in this planet care. except me.. if you r looking for God debating is not enough. Heaven and hELL IS way beyond from that. Is heaven exist to you all ? iF its exist then who is The Creator of heaven. dont say alien again..
*
What you have is English problem. You need to read more English books and articles. Start with English language newspapers. You don't need a Phd to understand most of what have been said here.

As for ignorance, I think the person who claims humans came from blood clots is the ignorant one. Which book have YOU been reading? Oh, that's right, the Quran. Just to let you know, I did not ridicule the Quran, you did. Since you were the one that made outrageous claims from it.

Think twice.
noveus
post Jan 6 2010, 02:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
I have a question.
I am not trying to make a point about religion here.
I just want to ask, how many people here have the knowledge of different religion? I mean does some of you here, have finish the Quran and the Bible (just to name a few) for a sake of argument. Or just taking religion/god as a whole itself (without considering of any specific religion ). But isn't that too bias? I mean how can you judge something even before understanding it?

How do you make your judgement? Books or articles or just pure opinions.

I am stupid. Just asking questions around. Sorry for the troubles, and thanks for the answers.
noveus
post Jan 6 2010, 12:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
I understand that, people doesnt have to decipher the whole holy scripture to form their opinion. Thats why i am asking, isn't that, a bit too bias?

Please read again.

Yue
post Jan 6 2010, 08:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
387 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
God is something that is "undefined", if human able to define "god" doesn't that make human god? we can't define His look, we can't define his location, we can't define the essence of his existence. But this doesn't mean He does not exist, if God exist in front of our eyes then nobody would be afar from His religion.

If one can define God, the "God" you define isn't The One True God, its just a manifestation of a being you called God. He is Exist but He purposefully make us doubt of his Existence. So this "Doubtful" being can try to find the correct path or stay astray. Those "He" favor will be guide by His Path.

If say scientology's that the world is created by an atom, does that mean the atom is The God? If not, what created the Atom?

Defining God is meaningless, if you can "define" god. Thats mean you just finish the game, He is undefined. Your mind will go crazy trying to define Him. You can define his existence, but you can never Define God as Himself. Be it a being or manifestation.
LanEvo7
post Jan 6 2010, 09:37 PM

Hmmm... what to put for title?
******
Senior Member
1,838 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Shah Alam, USJ


I just had this conversation with a christian cousin.

God is something you believe in. It is recognition that we humans are not almighty and despite all our valiant effort to try to fix or chart a course in many things in life, we still somehow fail and stumble. It will show if u you have done enough self introspection and be brutally honest with yourself. And you will then have to admit your failure and incompetence and submit a Higher self, trusting that He will lead you to where you want.

How I came to discover his existence is - I sunk very low in life, heading into depression, and got into addiction to booze and smoke, and doing a lot of things without regards to people and consequence, and things where I just tell my moral feelings to shut up.

Then one day I woke up, I realized, yeah life sucked, tried hard to fix things, yet things just don't change and f***ed up events keep happening. Then for the first time, I made a sincere prayer. Time to tell myself, my methods sucked, stop trying hard and banging walls and getting nowhere, just go with the flow and let go of trying to control everything and believe that things will turn out ok.

So, God is just something you believe in.

Then instead of beating urself up over screwed up events in ur life because u think what u did sucked, u'll be able to start asking perhaps God wanted it to happen to teach u a lesson, or to bring up some unresolved issues in childhood that u need to resolve before u can move on to better life etc.

This is similiar to the attempt to "stop judging yourself and start observing your feelings" kind of thing that self-help guru and books teach, so you can also say that the better way to achieve that is to put a name to a higher entity and surrender the right of judgement to Him (because He knows better), and you just stay put as an observer.

This post has been edited by LanEvo7: Jan 6 2010, 09:38 PM
kubing
post Jan 6 2010, 10:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 5 2010, 08:08 PM)
to far from my sight. I dont know what PhD you have but im too slow to catch you all. huhu.. keep asking who create GOD is the motif this thread was create. at least from my point of views. When someone come out to explain then more question come out(tat good).But I dont see someone try to understand but build formation n keep firing people with ignorance idea. Dont know which book did you guys read but i can see it far from the truth.  keep it up guys coz no one in this planet care. except me.. if you r looking for God debating is not enough. Heaven and hELL IS way beyond from that. Is heaven exist to you all ? iF its exist then who is The Creator of heaven. dont say alien again..
*
mark to marx. i know. malas nak tekan backspace .kind of weak guy...fight like a girl... small matter bro.


Added on January 6, 2010, 10:05 pm
QUOTE(lin00b @ Jan 4 2010, 10:56 PM)

Added on January 4, 2010, 10:57 pm
such arrogance. dont follow muslims, if you want your path guide you to heaven smile.gif
*
what about this thesupertramp? dont you dare to report too.. biggrin.gif


Added on January 6, 2010, 10:27 pm"Define your God even if It was absurb to define it" good thread but most of the poster is non believer person n very close minded. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by kubing: Jan 6 2010, 10:30 PM
maranello55
post Jan 6 2010, 11:43 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 6 2010, 10:01 PM)
"Define your God even if It was absurb to define it" good thread but most of the poster is non believer person n very close minded.  biggrin.gif
Im sorry....ur understanding of closed mindedness is wrong.


thesupertramp
post Jan 7 2010, 12:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(noveus @ Jan 6 2010, 02:10 AM)
I have a question.
I am not trying to make a point about religion here.
I just want to ask, how many people here have the knowledge of different religion? I mean does some of you here, have finish the Quran and the Bible (just to name a few) for a sake of argument. Or just taking religion/god as a whole itself (without considering of any specific religion ). But isn't that too bias? I mean how can you judge something even before understanding it?

How do you make your judgement? Books or articles or just pure opinions.

I am stupid. Just asking questions around. Sorry for the troubles, and thanks for the answers.
*
QUOTE(noveus @ Jan 6 2010, 12:59 PM)
I understand that, people doesnt have to decipher the whole holy scripture to form their opinion. Thats why i am asking, isn't that, a bit too bias?

Please read again.
*
I have not read the Quran but I am in the process of reading The Holy Bible. I am also planning to read Homer's masterpieces soon. I am not reading these books for the sake of argument, I am reading them as I am truly interested in religion. Not in believing in it, but in understanding it. I believe the history of religion tells a great deal about "The Human Condition".

That said, one does not need to have read any scriptures to argue for or against religions. Understanding religion can come from a wide array of sources. Newspaper, opinion pieces, blogs, talking to people, and, of course, thinking. My ideas so far are formed from what religions have done and what ideologies they stand for, as well as how they stand up against science and reasoning. I can elaborate on this if you like, but only if you will read it, as it will be rather lengthy.

Hence, not having read scriptures does not make ones opinions biased. It could be, but not necessarily, as like I said before, understanding religion can come from many different sources.

QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 6 2010, 08:14 PM)
God is something that is "undefined", if human able to define "god" doesn't that make human god? we can't define His look, we can't define his location, we can't define the essence of his existence. But this doesn't mean He does not exist, if God exist in front of our eyes then nobody would be afar from His religion.

If one can define God, the "God" you define isn't The One True God, its just a manifestation of a being you called God. He is Exist but He purposefully make us doubt of his Existence. So this "Doubtful" being can try to find the correct path or stay astray. Those "He" favor will be guide by His Path.

If say scientology's that the world is created by an atom, does that mean the atom is The God? If not, what created the Atom?

Defining God is meaningless, if you can "define" god. Thats mean you just finish the game, He is undefined. Your mind will go crazy trying to define Him. You can define his existence, but you can never Define God as Himself. Be it a being or manifestation.
*
I find this ironic. Don't take offence. Maybe it is just a misunderstanding. But if one cannot define God, how is one suppose to understand God? Subsequently, without understanding God, how does one know that God "purposefully make us doubt of his existence?" That, to me, seems like putting words in God's mouth (if he has one). And I know if I'm God I wouldn't like that.

To me that is pure speculation.

QUOTE(LanEvo7 @ Jan 6 2010, 09:37 PM)
Then instead of beating urself up over screwed up events in ur life because u think what u did sucked, u'll be able to start asking perhaps God wanted it to happen to teach u a lesson, or to bring up some unresolved issues in childhood that u need to resolve before u can move on to better life etc.

This is similiar to the attempt to "stop judging yourself and start observing your feelings" kind of thing that self-help guru and books teach, so you can also say that the better way to achieve that is to put a name to a higher entity and surrender the right of judgement to Him (because He knows better), and you just stay put as an observer.
*
Don't get me wrong, if religion makes you happy, stick with it. However, why does a failure have to be attributed to God? Why can't we realise that we made a mistake and rectifying that mistake will put us in better stead for the future? Your rationale is not far from -- blaming God for your failures.

Personally, I don't see "thinking what you did sucked" as a bad thing, as long as you do not repeat the same mistakes. To the contrary, if you attribute your failure to God, and fail to recognise your mistakes, you will no doubt fail again.

To put it bluntly, I see this as human's ego being unable to accept failure and hence push it onto someone else, in this case, a supernatural entity. Humans, after all, are famous for their blame game.

QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 6 2010, 10:01 PM)
mark to marx. i know. malas nak tekan backspace .kind of weak guy...fight like a girl... small matter bro.


Added on January 6, 2010, 10:05 pm

what about this thesupertramp? dont you dare to report too.. biggrin.gif


Added on January 6, 2010, 10:27 pm"Define your God even if It was absurb to define it" good thread but most of the poster is non believer person n very close minded.  biggrin.gif
*
Not a small matter, it is disrespectful to mutilate someone's name. FYI, 'k' and 'x' are pretty far apart. Don't seem like a typo.

If you want to report, go ahead. But to make sense of doing that, you would have to report the post he quoted too, as he was merely saying the opposite of what that post said, which it seems, was a post of yours. Your choice.

Close mindedness is when someone refuses to learn something altogether. I would think anyone reading these posts wouldn't be close minded. A denialist, maybe.
noveus
post Jan 7 2010, 12:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 7 2010, 12:12 AM)
I have not read the Quran but I am in the process of reading The Holy Bible. I am also planning to read Homer's masterpieces soon. I am not reading these books for the sake of argument, I am reading them as I am truly interested in religion. Not in believing in it, but in understanding it. I believe the history of religion tells a great deal about "The Human Condition".

That said, one does not need to have read any scriptures to argue for or against religions. Understanding religion can come from a wide array of sources. Newspaper, opinion pieces, blogs, talking to people, and, of course, thinking. My ideas so far are formed from what religions have done and what ideologies they stand for, as well as how they stand up against science and reasoning. I can elaborate on this if you like, but only if you will read it, as it will be rather lengthy.

Hence, not having read scriptures does not make ones opinions biased. It could be, but not necessarily, as like I said before, understanding religion can come from many different sources.
I find this ironic. Don't take offence. Maybe it is just a misunderstanding. But if one cannot define God, how is one suppose to understand God? Subsequently, without understanding God, how does one know that God "purposefully make us doubt of his existence?" That, to me, seems like putting words in God's mouth (if he has one). And I know if I'm God I wouldn't like that.

To me that is pure speculation.
Don't get me wrong, if religion makes you happy, stick with it. However, why does a failure have to be attributed to God? Why can't we realise that we made a mistake and rectifying that mistake will put us in better stead for the future? Your rationale is not far from -- blaming God for your failures.

Personally, I don't see "thinking what you did sucked" as a bad thing, as long as you do not repeat the same mistakes. To the contrary, if you attribute your failure to God, and fail to recognise your mistakes, you will no doubt fail again.

To put it bluntly, I see this as human's ego being unable to accept failure and hence push it onto someone else, in this case, a supernatural entity. Humans, after all, are famous for their blame game.
Not a small matter, it is disrespectful to mutilate someone's name. FYI, 'k' and 'x' are pretty far apart. Don't seem like a typo.

If you want to report, go ahead. But to make sense of doing that, you would have to report the post he quoted too, as he was merely saying the opposite of what that post said, which it seems, was a post of yours. Your choice.

Close mindedness is when someone refuses to learn something altogether. I would think anyone reading these posts wouldn't be close minded. A denialist, maybe.
*
Yes yes im indeed very interest. I have been reading articles and books bout religion. Just finished "God Part of the Brain". Superb reading. Give it a try. =)
Okie, back to the question. I still feels that its too bias to judge or whole and opinion bout it.
Take for an example, you make a review about food, without tasting it. Only judging by the way it cooked, its looks or what others had mention bout it. But in the end, you could only give your best opinion, after only you tasted it.

PS: Do PM if you think it is too lengthy. ><
Yue
post Jan 7 2010, 01:36 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
387 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Open minded human being does not exist, everybody is a closed minded... those who is open minded is somebody who can absorb any information and able to give information.

rebuttal is not an information, there are no such human exist with such term as open minded. If he is, he would have accept the concept of God existence and able to talk about it and deliver satisfying information to all others. so the term Open Minded exist only to make you felt better, the real "open minded" does not exist.

I am a muslim but i do study christianity and jewish for the sake of comparison, it is funny that i come across such a silly testament (both bible and the old testament) which seems very much "humane" compared to Quran. Quran does not deny the existence of Christianity and Jewish, heck we even share the same prophet, Quran tell what is told in the "real" bible and old testament. And it is better for you to learn the language of the Quran rather than reading only the translation.

Quran is written isn't in all truly arabic, the rhythm is "in-humane", thats why muslim 'sang" the Quran in its original form, not in its translated form. The translated form is to give understanding to the reader. Quran does state and warn to not to "define" His existence, not because He is afraid that his cloak shall be removed. It's because he knows the limit of our own mind, he is the creator that make us... thats why when people/human failed to define God, they turn around and start making a statement to put themselves to ease.

We are unable to define God not because we can't, it's because He didn't let us to. Our mind is limited to his essence of existence and thats about it.

lin00b
post Jan 7 2010, 04:42 AM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 01:36 AM)
rebuttal is not an information, there are no such human exist with such term as open minded. If he is, he would have accept the concept of God existence and able to talk about it and deliver satisfying information to all others. so the term Open Minded exist only to make you felt better, the real "open minded" does not exist.
so again, someone changed the meaning of "open minded" to acceptance of god while i was asleep?

seriously, are you open minded enough to see the other side of the argument that despite your belief, god may not exist (at least not in the form described in your religion)?
SUSRaikkonen
post Jan 7 2010, 06:54 AM

I'll be your ♡ ☁ ☼ ☂
*******
Senior Member
8,635 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Jeonju/Jeollabuk-do



God would never be absurd.
Yue
post Jan 7 2010, 11:04 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
387 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(lin00b @ Jan 7 2010, 04:42 AM)
so again, someone changed the meaning of "open minded" to acceptance of god while i was asleep?

seriously, are you open minded enough to see the other side of the argument that despite your belief, god may not exist (at least not in the form described in your religion)?
*
Im am implying the "concept" of open minded in relation with this thread, Like i said, open minded being does not exist... because we stand in believes, open minded being does not have believe, be it themselves or in god.
maranello55
post Jan 7 2010, 12:21 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 11:04 AM)
Im am implying the "concept" of open minded in relation with this thread, Like i said, open minded being does not exist... because we stand in believes, open minded being does not have believe, be it themselves or in god.
*
Wrong, again u define 'open mindedness' as 'agreeing with you'.

Not everybody stand in beliefs. Its not even a necessity for some. If everything is crystal clear infront of ur eyes as evidence, theres no need for belief.

Like a belief that a plane would fly or not with u on board? U dont have to believe because u know the plane will fly (im talkign abt physics - dont give me final destinationi examples).

And Science is not a belief.
Yue
post Jan 7 2010, 12:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
387 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(maranello55 @ Jan 7 2010, 12:21 PM)
Wrong, again u define 'open mindedness' as 'agreeing with you'.

Not everybody stand in beliefs. Its not even a necessity for some. If everything is crystal clear infront of ur eyes as evidence, theres no need for belief.

Like a belief that a plane would fly or not with u on board? U dont have to believe because u know the plane will fly (im talkign abt physics - dont give me final destinationi examples).

And Science is not a belief.
*
i don't ask for agreement in statement, there are way too many philosophy that none of it would share the same outcome. Open minded-ness is a behaviour of which a person would be able to comprehend all information and giving away satisfactory information to others. Open Minded-ness does not exist, because when you are in belief and believes, whether in yourself or other being. you are implying a mind-thinking attitude of one persona, when it was restricted. It was never open.

Science is there for a reason, its to provide truth that god is exist, not contradicting his existence. Atoms vibrate, but what make the atoms vibrate, far too many factorial including the universe movement, then come the next question... What moves the universe? people able to gave conceptual ideas of the how universe moves then come again a new question, how, where and when does the universe start to move? what trigger the movement? It come back to the basic of how Atoms vibrate... but what created the Atoms?

Human can only Question and Answer question made by their own, but they can't never question basic of basics.
noveus
post Jan 7 2010, 02:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 12:45 PM)
i don't ask for agreement in statement, there are way too many philosophy that none of it would share the same outcome. Open minded-ness is a behaviour of which a person would be able to comprehend all information and giving away satisfactory information to others. Open Minded-ness does not exist, because when you are in belief and believes, whether in yourself or other being. you are implying a mind-thinking attitude of one persona, when it was restricted. It was never open.

Science is there for a reason, its to provide truth that god is exist, not contradicting his existence. Atoms vibrate, but what make the atoms vibrate, far too many factorial including the universe movement, then come the next question... What moves the universe? people able to gave conceptual ideas of the how universe moves then come again a new question, how, where and when does the universe start to move? what trigger the movement? It come back to the basic of how Atoms vibrate... but what created the Atoms?

Human can only Question and Answer question made by their own, but they can't never question basic of basics.
*
Oh okie, does is means that, as long as there is still unanswered question,(atoms vibrate) then God existence is secured?
If thats what you meant then, science is taking over God day by day.
Yue
post Jan 7 2010, 05:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
387 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Science is God's knowledge as in Religion is God's faith. It's his knowledge that we are so desperately trying to prove here. And my base deduction isn't about how the Atoms vibrated, its already been solve with way to many factorial contributing to why it is vibrating, it's the basic of all basics question... what created the atom, which until now human failed to answer. if you are trying to say the thread theory and things, that was never proven and it's too flawed to be taken into consideration.

All those science related found are all derivative of the basic of all basics question and equation, still there are no answers to all basic of all basics question. As to Why blood? Where did Atom originated from? What created it? its all those thing that human unable to answer.

I don't ask you to believe in my belief, stay with yours. What am I trying to prove here is those people who so called "open minded" whilst those being never existed, same goes for Shang-Ri La and Euforia. It's all myth to put our own "limited" mind to ease, its all just a self indulgence and self proclaimed title and myth.
dopodplaya
post Jan 7 2010, 05:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 05:16 PM)
Science is God's knowledge as in Religion is God's faith. It's his knowledge that we are so desperately trying to prove here. And my base deduction isn't about how the Atoms vibrated, its already been solve with way to many factorial contributing to why it is vibrating, it's the basic of all basics question... what created the atom, which until now human failed to answer. if you are trying to say the thread theory and things, that was never proven and it's too flawed to be taken into consideration.

All those science related found are all derivative of the basic of all basics question and equation, still there are no answers to all basic of all basics question. As to Why blood? Where did Atom originated from? What created it? its all those thing that human unable to answer.

I don't ask you to believe in my belief, stay with yours. What am I trying to prove here is those people who so called "open minded" whilst those being never existed, same goes for Shang-Ri La and Euforia. It's all myth to put our own "limited" mind to ease, its all just a self indulgence and self proclaimed title and myth.
*
What if the knowledge about GOD is unknown? Something that we can't prove or even prove?
Ever think about that? If you have faith (not knowledge) about GOD, go ahead. Don't go tell everybody that you are the righteous one. Maybe the other people who don't share your faith in GOD could be the right one?

If faith in GOD is higher than the knowledge we know is "higher", then why we need to pening-pening kepala thinking of GOD's existence. We are just mere mortal. Be humble and live life as it is. Tolerate others' opinions but don't try to suppress yours to others.

Could we just be a bit more rational and not to think of think that may or not exist (depends on your definition of "exist"). That's where the problem lies, both religionists and atheists are fighting/arguing/have a war about the existence of GOD. This is going nowhere and the issue debate is still going in the circle.

Science cannot prove GOD existence and non-existence and religious faith alone can't prove so either. Science does not take over your faith to GOD. It could even be a balance to your faith to GOD.

And having a faith doesn't mean you are believing in myths and legends. Some part of your faith could be true, who knows.
thesupertramp
post Jan 7 2010, 06:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(noveus @ Jan 7 2010, 12:54 AM)
Yes yes im indeed very interest. I have been reading articles and books bout religion. Just finished "God Part of the Brain".  Superb reading. Give it a try. =)
Okie, back to the question. I still feels that its too bias to judge or whole and opinion bout it.
Take for an example, you make a review about food, without tasting it. Only judging by the way it cooked, its looks or what others had mention bout it. But in the end, you could only give your best opinion, after only you tasted it.

PS: Do PM if you think it is too lengthy. ><
*
No no, I'll do it in a post, but not this one. And since it seems we are going a little off topic here, as this is about God, and that is about religion, I'll post it in the "All About Religion" thread. Check there.

As for bias, I don't think the comparison is accurate. If you have not tasted the food, you certainly should not comment on the taste of the food, but if you have seen it, commenting on its aesthetics is fine. Religion is completely different. You can read food reviews, but it still wouldn't beat tasting the food first hand. However, in religion, there is no hard and fast rule as to what it really is. The Bible itself has several hundred different interpretations. Same for the Quran and other scriptures. Some say they should be taken literally, some say metaphorically, some say it is entirely up to the individual. They are often contradictory to one another.

Therefore, one can say that religions are much more complex than "the taste of food." Hence, it is not uncommon for an individual to be against certain aspects of religion, but not entirely. I, for example, mainly oppose religion because it undermines rationality. That means, I do not oppose someone visiting church for its socialising aspect, but I do oppose someone who thinks that by visiting the church, God will "take care of them." I know what rationality is, I have a fair understanding of science, and I have seen how religions have opposed certain aspects of science. So, I don't see how not having read the Bible will make my stance on rationality biased. If your argument is to hold, believers would have a VERY biased view too if they don't understand rationality. Which means, even if my views are biased, it would be no more biased, in fact far less, than those arguing against me.

Furthermore, many illiterate people are believers. And many Christians have not read the Bible even once. It shows that reading scriptures is not essential to understanding religions.

So once again, if you are arguing without any understanding of religions, yes, it would be biased. But not having read scriptures does not equal no understanding of religion.
(This does not mean I fully understand religions, or I wouldn't be here!)

And also, debating is a good way of furthering one's understanding of the topic. It allows one to realise flaws in their own arguments, and to rethink them. Hence full understanding is not essential at all!

Thanks for the book recommendation, I'll check it out.

QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 01:36 AM)
Open minded human being does not exist, everybody is a closed minded... those who is open minded is somebody who can absorb any information and able to give information.

rebuttal is not an information, there are no such human exist with such term as open minded. If he is, he would have accept the concept of God existence and able to talk about it and deliver satisfying information to all others. so the term Open Minded exist only to make you felt better, the real "open minded" does not exist.

I am a muslim but i do study christianity and jewish for the sake of comparison, it is funny that i come across such a silly testament (both bible and the old testament) which seems very much "humane" compared to Quran. Quran does not deny the existence of Christianity and Jewish, heck we even share the same prophet, Quran tell what is told in the "real" bible and old testament. And it is better for you to learn the language of the Quran rather than reading only the translation.

Quran is written isn't in all truly arabic, the rhythm is "in-humane", thats why muslim 'sang" the Quran in its original form, not in its translated form. The translated form is to give understanding to the reader. Quran does state and warn to not to "define" His existence, not because He is afraid that his cloak shall be removed. It's because he knows the limit of our own mind, he is the creator that make us... thats why when people/human failed to define God, they turn around and start making a statement to put themselves to ease.

We are unable to define God not because we can't, it's because He didn't let us to. Our mind is limited to his essence of existence and thats about it.
*
Open-mindedness is one's willingness to listen and comprehend different viewpoints. This does not equal acceptance. Most of us here are reading and trying to understand the viewpoints of each side. This, to me, means that most of us here are open minded. You might be referring to denialism. Different thing.

As for your final sentence there, if God cannot be defined, and all you know about him is his existence, how do you know what he "let you" and didn't "let you" define about him? Is that pure speculation again?

QUOTE(Raikkonen @ Jan 7 2010, 06:54 AM)
God would never be absurd.
*
If he is not, then how do you explain the absurdity of the world? Earthquake kills bad people just as it do good ones. That would imply that the non-absurd God had nothing to do and, in fact, no power, over an earthquake. Believers isn't going to like this.

QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 12:45 PM)
Science is there for a reason, its to provide truth that god is exist, not contradicting his existence. Atoms vibrate, but what make the atoms vibrate, far too many factorial including the universe movement, then come the next question... What moves the universe? people able to gave conceptual ideas of the how universe moves then come again a new question, how, where and when does the universe start to move? what trigger the movement? It come back to the basic of how Atoms vibrate... but what created the Atoms?

Human can only Question and Answer question made by their own, but they can't never question basic of basics.
*
Wrong. Science is to help us understand things around us, not to prove God exist. To the contrary, it has shown that prayers do not work. And prophets' prediction of the end of the world is wrong. And that the world is not 10,000 years old like your prophets claim it is. The list goes on.

FYI, atoms vibrate due to forces around it. If you ask who created the forces, then I would have to ask who created God. And if your retort is God is never created, he was always there, then I can say the same for forces, it was always there, why does it need to be created? First law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed.
Unless you say energy IS God. Then I would have nothing left to say, except, that explains why prayers doesn't work.


Added on January 7, 2010, 6:19 pm
QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 05:16 PM)
Science is God's knowledge as in Religion is God's faith. It's his knowledge that we are so desperately trying to prove here. And my base deduction isn't about how the Atoms vibrated, its already been solve with way to many factorial contributing to why it is vibrating, it's the basic of all basics question... what created the atom, which until now human failed to answer. if you are trying to say the thread theory and things, that was never proven and it's too flawed to be taken into consideration.

All those science related found are all derivative of the basic of all basics question and equation, still there are no answers to all basic of all basics question. As to Why blood? Where did Atom originated from? What created it? its all those thing that human unable to answer.

I don't ask you to believe in my belief, stay with yours. What am I trying to prove here is those people who so called "open minded" whilst those being never existed, same goes for Shang-Ri La and Euforia. It's all myth to put our own "limited" mind to ease, its all just a self indulgence and self proclaimed title and myth.
*
Like I said above, then what created God?

And how sure are you that what we don't know today won't be answered in 500 years?
200 years ago The Big Bang Theory would probably be the name of a chilli pepper sauce, not a Phd research topic.

QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jan 7 2010, 05:34 PM)
Science cannot prove GOD existence and non-existence and religious faith alone can't prove so either. Science does not take over your faith to GOD. It could even be a balance to your faith to GOD.

And having a faith doesn't mean you are believing in myths and legends. Some part of your faith could be true, who knows.
*
I disagree. (Not your entire post, just that quoted bit). Believing in the notion of an interventionist God itself is counter-productive to science. Science attempts to explain things with evidence and reasoning, something we can see or comprehend. Believing in an interventionist God directly opposes the notion of science, as it explains things with a, like you said, non-provable, supernatural entity.

Why do we die when there is a shortage of inhaled oxygen? Because it is God's will.
Not exactly useful in treating acute asphyxiation.

This post has been edited by thesupertramp: Jan 7 2010, 06:20 PM
Yue
post Jan 7 2010, 06:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
387 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 7 2010, 06:08 PM)

1. As for your final sentence there, if God cannot be defined, and all you know about him is his existence, how do you know what he "let you" and didn't "let you" define about him? Is that pure speculation again?

2. If he is not, then how do you explain the absurdity of the world? Earthquake kills bad people just as it do good ones. That would imply that the non-absurd God had nothing to do and, in fact, no power, to control an earthquake. Believers isn't going to like this.  Wrong. Science is to help us understand things around us, not to prove God exist. To the contrary, it has shown that prayers do not work. And prophets' prediction of the end of the world is wrong. And that the world is not 10,000 years old like your prophets claim it is. The list goes on.

3. FYI, atoms vibrate due to forces around it. If you ask who created the forces, then I would have to ask who created God. And if your retort is God is never created, he was always there, then I can say the same for forces, it was always there, why does it need to be created? First law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed.
Unless you say energy IS God. Then I would have nothing left to say, except, that explains why prayers doesn't work.
*
1. "sang" the Holy Quran, read the translation. "read" the Holy bible (any version you like). "read" the translation of old testament (any version you love) [it's in hebrew unless you understand it]. The inability of non-believers to shove their face away from religion is what making them funny, I am a believer and i study (still in study) of religion, Take the Holy Quran (since its the only testament i was able to finish till now). It's stated that God doesn't want you to think beyond what your mind has to offer, All of Holy Quran is one large poem full of metaphor. God is Kind, yes. but He ain't going to give all knowledge to human by saying it straightforwardly.

2. Nobody like the fury of mother earth, be it believer or non-believer, It's stated in The Quran that the world is going to end, God wasn't too all kind to state date inside the Holy Quran, that just going to make human being selfishly idiotic with 'oh mai, we still haz teh time". But He stated the sign, there are both small and large sign. And it happen to be accurate all this while, please state your source upon this statement of yours so i may overlook it prophets' prediction of the end of the world is wrong. And that the world is not 10,000 years old like your prophets claim it is Our prophet (Muhammad), never gave a date. He just state the end of time, and there are no-where in any verse of Holy Quran nor his hadith stated that Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) say that earth is 10k years of age. During the event of Israq and Mikraj, Phophet Muhammad saw what he state is the resemblance of the earth, he state in one of his hadith (this never appear in the Quran mind you) that the earth look like an elderly woman, almost at the end of her age. He never stated age nor date. state your source. i beg of you.

3. Why the first law ever existed then? the question about energy being unable to be destroyed nor created is the basic of all basics question, same as what created atom etc. (the list goes on). we all failed to answer basic of most basics question after even soo long not because it was there and it was there, its because those being can't accept the existence of a Creator. and and if science help us to understand the things around us, what is it to understand? did we finally able to understand the "universe?" all i see what science has done is killing the universe. what is the most important understanding human trying to unseal? Science are there originally to prove the existence of God. After soo long it has been astrayed as human is selfish being, and take things upon themselves.

Q&A:
1. Understand means? science understand our surrounding? what has science done to our surrounding all this time? be honest.
thesupertramp
post Jan 7 2010, 09:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 06:43 PM)
1. "sang" the Holy Quran, read the translation. "read" the Holy bible (any version you like). "read" the translation of old testament (any version you love) [it's in hebrew unless you understand it]. The inability of non-believers to shove their face away from religion is what making them funny, I am a believer and i study (still in study) of religion, Take the Holy Quran (since its the only testament i was able to finish till now). It's stated that God doesn't want you to think beyond what your mind has to offer, All of Holy Quran is one large poem full of metaphor. God is Kind, yes. but He ain't going to give all knowledge to human by saying it straightforwardly.


If I am "shoving myself away from religion," I wouldn't be here. I am here to learn, but so far believers don't seem to be very good at teaching, as my stance against religion seems to be growing stronger.

If it is full of metaphor, who decides which interpretation is correct? Educate me. I have never read the Quran. But if you can make it seem worth my while, I will. By the way, if I went to a mosque to borrow a Quran, will they lend it to me (as a non-Muslim)? Is that offensive?

QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 06:43 PM)
2. Nobody like the fury of mother earth, be it believer or non-believer, It's stated in The Quran that the world is going to end, God wasn't too all kind to state date inside the Holy Quran, that just going to make human being selfishly idiotic with 'oh mai, we still haz teh time". But He stated the sign, there are both small and large sign. And it happen to be accurate all this while, please state your source upon this statement of yours so i may overlook it prophets' prediction of the end of the world is wrong. And that the world is not 10,000 years old like your prophets claim it is Our prophet (Muhammad), never gave a date. He just state the end of time, and there are no-where in any verse of Holy Quran nor his hadith stated that Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) say that earth is 10k years of age. During the event of Israq and Mikraj, Phophet Muhammad saw what he state is the resemblance of the earth, he state in one of his hadith (this never appear in the Quran mind you) that the earth look like an elderly woman, almost at the end of her age. He never stated age nor date. state your source. i beg of you.


So you don't like the "fury of mother earth" too? But I thought it was God's doing? Isn't that blasphemy?

I wasn't referring to Islam specifically. I wouldn't do that as I have never read Islamic scriptures. There are plenty of religions around that have made those claim. (Spare me your "Islam is the only true religion" nonsense here. Thanks.)

QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 06:43 PM)
3. Why the first law ever existed then? the question about energy being unable to be destroyed nor created is the basic of all basics question, same as what created atom etc. (the list goes on). we all failed to answer basic of most basics question after even soo long not because it was there and it was there, its because those being can't accept the existence of a Creator. and and if science help us to understand the things around us, what is it to understand? did we finally able to understand the "universe?" all i see what science has done is killing the universe. what is the most important understanding human trying to unseal? Science are there originally to prove the existence of God. After soo long it has been astrayed as human is selfish being, and take things upon themselves.


This is majorly wrong. This is the epitome of ignorance.

I have already stated, and will state it again. If you want to ask who created the natural laws, you would have to ask who created God too. So, tell me, who is the creator of your creator? If natural laws are the basic of the basic, and God created them, wouldn't God be the most basic of them all?

"Science are there originally to prove the existence of God."
Prove please.
And does that mean, science not being able to prove God exist, God does not exist?

Science has definitely improved our understanding of things around us. Without science, we wouldn't have electricity, your fellow religious friends would not have bombs to use, there would not be a single cancer treatment out there. These things arise from our understanding of how electricity works, how chemical works, and how cancer kills. If man attributed everything to God, they wouldn't know any of these.

Now, I would like you to say it again, "science did not help our understanding of this world." Go ahead, please. Then proceed to go back into the jungle, stop using that computer, stop using that car to go to work (or train), and don't take the Quran. Paper came about from scientific discovery too. Naked, no tree leaves either. Using tree leaves was thanks to rationality.

Science does not have the explanation for natural laws does not mean it is created by God. Let me ask you again, since you ignored it previously, how sure are you that in the future science will not have the answer? Let me remind you 500 years ago humans think the sun revolves around the earth. Only 500 years.

Please use some common sense. Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot, logic is not the strength of God's followers.


QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 06:43 PM)
Q&A:
1. Understand means? science understand our surrounding? what has science done to our surrounding all this time? be honest.
*
Refer above. Be honest. Don't use science's invention to ask that question. Makes you look stupid.

This post has been edited by thesupertramp: Jan 7 2010, 09:04 PM
noveus
post Jan 7 2010, 09:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 7 2010, 06:08 PM)
No no, I'll do it in a post, but not this one. And since it seems we are going a little off topic here, as this is about God, and that is about religion, I'll post it in the "All About Religion" thread. Check there.

As for bias, I don't think the comparison is accurate. If you have not tasted the food, you certainly should not comment on the taste of the food, but if you have seen it, commenting on its aesthetics is fine. Religion is completely different. You can read food reviews, but it still wouldn't beat tasting the food first hand. However, in religion, there is no hard and fast rule as to what it really is. The Bible itself has several hundred different interpretations. Same for the Quran and other scriptures. Some say they should be taken literally, some say metaphorically, some say it is entirely up to the individual. They are often contradictory to one another.

Therefore, one can say that religions are much more complex than "the taste of food." Hence, it is not uncommon for an individual to be against certain aspects of religion, but not entirely. I, for example, mainly oppose religion because it undermines rationality. That means, I do not oppose someone visiting church for its socialising aspect, but I do oppose someone who thinks that by visiting the church, God will "take care of them." I know what rationality is, I have a fair understanding of science, and I have seen how religions have opposed certain aspects of science. So, I don't see how not having read the Bible will make my stance on rationality biased. If your argument is to hold, believers would have a VERY biased view too if they don't understand rationality. Which means, even if my views are biased, it would be no more biased, in fact far less, than those arguing against me.

Furthermore, many illiterate people are believers. And many Christians have not read the Bible even once. It shows that reading scriptures is not essential to understanding religions.

So once again, if you are arguing without any understanding of religions, yes, it would be biased. But not having read scriptures does not equal no understanding of religion.
(This does not mean I fully understand religions, or I wouldn't be here!)

And also, debating is a good way of furthering one's understanding of the topic. It allows one to realise flaws in their own arguments, and to rethink them. Hence full understanding is not essential at all!

Thanks for the book recommendation, I'll check it out.

*
Isn't that weird? I mean its like you are saying "Yeah im wrong, but at least , others are even wrong-er."
Reading scriptures is not essential to understanding religion, just because MOST of the believers are illiterate?
Im still not convinced. I cant see the whole point here.
Opinions are bias, but yet acceptable. Scripture is the main source of information, yet it is rejected. sad.gif
dopodplaya
post Jan 7 2010, 10:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
Why do we die when there is a shortage of inhaled oxygen? Because it is God's will.
Not exactly useful in treating acute asphyxiation.
*

By implying "it's GOD's will" is simply faith. I hope you read my statement again. Neither science or faith can prove the non-existence or the existence of GOD.

But the process of dying can be explain by science, but not the death itself. May faith can explain death, perhaps.

We mere mortals cannot explain GOD or even GOD's will with either faith or science. It is better to see it as unknown, mysterious. Why bother thinking about something that cannot be explained with either faith or science?

My point is you believe in GOD simply by faith, go ahead. Just do not oppress people who does not share the same faith by saying "this is GOD's will" etc...

For me, personally, I do not know if there is a more powerful force call GOD. My reasoning is limited and I do not have the measure to explain either GOD existence or non-existence. I'll just leave this case as unknown. Whether GOD's will (just using your term) intervene with science, I just do not know.

Isn't it more humble just to say "I do not know"? It does not make you an idiot (according to science) or less religious. It just make you more humble. Human just can't explain the "powerful force" called "GOD".

For people who have faith, isn't GOD himself teaches human to be humble? Why there is the need to tell that your faith is righteous? Why the need for non-believers to say that GOD doesn't exist and they can prove it with science? We mere mortals simply do not have the answer to this GOD issue. Live with that fact.

Faith cannot give all the answers to scientific findings and science cannot explain most of the tenets of faiths.
Hence GOD existance is merely unknown to the level of all the human knowledge. It could be just a simple need for human to believe in something more powerful than himself.
maranello55
post Jan 7 2010, 10:44 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 7 2010, 12:45 PM)
i don't ask for agreement in statement, there are way too many philosophy that none of it would share the same outcome. Open minded-ness is a behaviour of which a person would be able to comprehend all information and giving away satisfactory information to others. Open Minded-ness does not exist, because when you are in belief and believes, whether in yourself or other being. you are implying a mind-thinking attitude of one persona, when it was restricted. It was never open.

Science is there for a reason, its to provide truth that god is exist, not contradicting his existence. Atoms vibrate, but what make the atoms vibrate, far too many factorial including the universe movement, then come the next question... What moves the universe? people able to gave conceptual ideas of the how universe moves then come again a new question, how, where and when does the universe start to move? what trigger the movement? It come back to the basic of how Atoms vibrate... but what created the Atoms?

Human can only Question and Answer question made by their own, but they can't never question basic of basics.
*
Bolded - When I am thinking critically and open myself to all possibilities, there is no beliefs involved. I deduce using pre-existing facts. And facts does not requires beliefs.
If open-mindedness, in ur definition, is to follow a persona thus being closed minded - Then what is closed minded?
I know that I am open enough to look at both sides of the story and deduce. Biased and closing urself from the other side of the story is closed-minded. Be it taking after any free-thinkers or ur collegues who are open-minded, to me its just takign from examples and there is nothing wrong with dat. Close-mindedness and indoctrination works the same way within the same closed group. Both open and closed-minded have different goals, which separated them apart.

Your second paragraph tries to link Godship and Science. Ur last question was 'what created the Atoms?' What, does not necessarily means Who. If u are willing to take scientific method in proving Godship, then u will have to be prepared to ask scientific questions like ' What created God?'. Because science does not recognise blasphemy.
thesupertramp
post Jan 7 2010, 11:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(noveus @ Jan 7 2010, 09:54 PM)
Isn't that weird? I mean its like you are saying "Yeah im wrong, but at least , others are even wrong-er."
Reading scriptures is not essential to understanding religion, just because MOST of the believers are illiterate? 
Im still not convinced. I cant see the whole point here.
Opinions are bias, but yet acceptable. Scripture is the main source of information, yet it is rejected. sad.gif
*
Hang on, I am not rejecting scriptures! I wouldn't attempt to read them otherwise. What I was saying is scriptures are not the only source of information about religion. Before Christianity and Islam (Judaism etc as well), there were many other religions. Not all of them had scriptures. If scriptures are the only source of information, why do people preach?

I am not saying it isn't essential just because there are illiterate believers. What I'm saying is, if there are illiterate believers, it means understanding religion can happen through means other than scriptures. Unless you are telling me all illiterates have misunderstood their religion.

The "wronger" line was perhaps a little out of place. It was meant to ask, why do you single out non-believers for being bias but not believers?

In the end of the day, I'd say it depends on how you define bias. If you expect someone to have 100% understanding of both sides, it would be impossible, and it would be pointless debating him/her. After all, debating is suppose to raise questions we previously have not thought about. And as I believe I have enough knowledge of religious believes, perhaps more than some believers themselves (note: "some" does not equal "most", or, "all"), and I am constantly increasing it, I do not consider my views, well, "uninformed". Uninformed would probably be a better word than bias for the points I was making.

QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jan 7 2010, 10:25 PM)
Why do we die when there is a shortage of inhaled oxygen? Because it is God's will.
Not exactly useful in treating acute asphyxiation.
*

By implying "it's GOD's will" is simply faith. I hope you read my statement again. Neither science or faith can prove the non-existence or the existence of GOD.

But the process of dying can be explain by science, but not the death itself. May faith can explain death, perhaps.

We mere mortals cannot explain GOD or even GOD's will with either faith or science. It is better to see it as unknown, mysterious. Why bother thinking about something that cannot be explained with either faith or science?

My point is you believe in GOD simply by faith, go ahead. Just do not oppress people who does not share the same faith by saying "this is GOD's will" etc...

For me, personally, I do not know if there is a more powerful force call GOD. My reasoning is limited and I do not have the measure to explain either GOD existence or non-existence. I'll just leave this case as unknown. Whether GOD's will (just using your term) intervene with science, I just do not know.

Isn't it more humble just to say "I do not know"? It does not make you an idiot (according to science) or less religious. It just make you more humble. Human just can't explain the "powerful force" called "GOD".

For people who have faith, isn't GOD himself teaches human to be humble? Why there is the need to tell that your faith is righteous? Why the need for non-believers to say that GOD doesn't exist and they can prove it with science? We mere mortals simply do not have the answer to this GOD issue. Live with that fact.

Faith cannot give all the answers to scientific findings and science cannot explain most of the tenets of faiths.
Hence GOD existance is merely unknown to the level of all the human knowledge. It could be just a simple need for human to believe in something more powerful than himself.
*
Sorry, I did not mean to quote that line. I do agree science cannot prove the existence or non-existence of God. I was disagreeing with believing in God can be complementary to science.

Science may not have the answer to death, but there are theories. Theory of evolution for one. If there is no birth and death, there would be no evolution, which also means we wouldn't even be here. On the contrary, religions do not "explain" death. Afterlife, heaven, hell, are all speculations. And they aren't even logical speculations. Why do I say so? Because, how do you decide which one is more plausible than the other? There is nothing to base that decision on. No evidence, nor reasoning.

I get your point of not pushing believes onto anyone else, and I agree. But I also believe, to make an informed choice, one has to understand both sides of the story.

I strongly disagree to saying "I don't know". Yes, when you don't know, say you don't know. But if you leave it at that, it is wrong. Science say it is ok to say you don't know, as it will spur you to find out about what you don't know, instead of making up an answer, which seems to be what religions are doing. If humans made no attempt to find out what they don't know, there would be no progress. Questioning and thinking is important for new discoveries. And believing in an interventionist God is counter productive to that. If you believe there is an all powerful God, when do we decide if something is "done by God" or when something can be understood by research?

As a side note, there is no evidence to suggest that God has ever communicated directly with humans. This leaves a high probability that this all powerful God was created by humans. If it is, wouldn't it be good to understand why? It is based on this that I am interested in understanding religions, as I believe it is the key in understanding "The Human Condition".

Not questioning it is similar to saying "If you get cancer, you die. Don't bother with new drugs. Live with the fact."

This post has been edited by thesupertramp: Jan 7 2010, 11:22 PM
maranello55
post Jan 7 2010, 11:25 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


1. Quoting back what u wrote
QUOTE
Open Minded-ness does not exist, because when you are in belief and believes, whether in yourself or other being. you are implying a mind-thinking attitude of one persona, when it was restricted. It was never open.

U can apply the same thing on ur case. In ur case, the limit that u have posed on urself is of ur own making, taking from ones persona, perhaps, a religious figure in ur religion.

2. The world is going to end. It is a premise where religion put its stock on faith, and expect submission.
A progressive deity would oversee a period of peace (within this world, not afterlife please) and advancement rather than a gloomy outlook on the future.
The signs that God gave is an encouragement for humans to do as the signs say. They will do more destruction regardless with or without knowing the date. So the prophecy of the end of the world is, useless.
Earthquakes, volcanic activities are not signs of the end of the world. The earth had endured more violent seismic activities, worldwide fire, flood, meteor bombardment, but the Earth is still here. The earth has a correcting mechanism which will correct itself. Restore the balance. Even the worst scenario of asteroid collision do not include the annihilation of the Earth. Just the living things on it. And thats the end of the life, not the world.

3. Killing the universe? How?
Science is not there to prove God. If God existed, the prove would be all around us already.

1. Science is responsible of u reading this very text thru a copper wire. And not to mention the mass production printing of ur Holy Book Koran.
Thats my claim and proof. What have God done to our surrounding all this time. Proof? be honest.
noveus
post Jan 8 2010, 12:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 7 2010, 11:16 PM)
Hang on, I am not rejecting scriptures! I wouldn't attempt to read them otherwise. What I was saying is scriptures are not the only source of information about religion. Before Christianity and Islam (Judaism etc as well), there were many other religions. Not all of them had scriptures. If scriptures are the only source of information, why do people preach?

I am not saying it isn't essential just because there are illiterate believers. What I'm saying is, if there are illiterate believers, it means understanding religion can happen through means other than scriptures. Unless you are telling me all illiterates have misunderstood their religion.

The "wronger" line was perhaps a little out of place. It was meant to ask, why do you single out non-believers for being bias but not believers?

In the end of the day, I'd say it depends on how you define bias. If you expect someone to have 100% understanding of both sides, it would be impossible, and it would be pointless debating him/her. After all, debating is suppose to raise questions we previously have not thought about. And as I believe I have enough knowledge of religious believes, perhaps more than some believers themselves (note: "some" does not equal "most", or, "all"), and I am constantly increasing it, I do not consider my views, well, "uninformed". Uninformed would probably be a better word than bias for the points I was making.

*
Words can be fooling if it is not expressed properly. rclxub.gif
Well, I am not single out only non-believers, but both. Im asking a question in general. As to, what people gives their opinion based on.
Im not taking only scriptures (sorry for not mentioning it earlier), but any others form of information regarding that religion itself.
What I am trying to say here, how can one judge even without experience/understanding it? How can you judge religion as a whole when it is so diversified.

Im not saying, someone should have 100% understanding, but at the very least, understand what they are going to judge. It seems like many people tend to judge by just gathering information, and makes the opinion themselves, without understanding it first. Like what i mention, saying what the food taste, without tasting it.

But i do get your point. I think you tend judge religion as a whole. You judge by logics, from looking outward into inward. As for myself, i think one should judge from inward to outward. To step into their shoes, before making any judgement. It would not be bias free, but at the very least reduces it.
Thanks for your answers and your time. blush.gif

maranello55
post Jan 8 2010, 12:48 AM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


What i do is simple. If religion does not deliver what it claim it can, eventhough with proper implementation - its a sign of a failure. And say what religion wants, it has failed.
That is a deduction from and observer, in a way i experience some of it. I do however have to understand the claim religion made and the results it supposed to give to deduce.
dopodplaya
post Jan 8 2010, 02:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 7 2010, 11:16 PM)
Science may not have the answer to death, but there are theories. Theory of evolution for one. If there is no birth and death, there would be no evolution, which also means we wouldn't even be here. On the contrary, religions do not "explain" death. Afterlife, heaven, hell, are all speculations. And they aren't even logical speculations. Why do I say so? Because, how do you decide which one is more plausible than the other? There is nothing to base that decision on. No evidence, nor reasoning.

I get your point of not pushing believes onto anyone else, and I agree. But I also believe, to make an informed choice, one has to understand both sides of the story.

I strongly disagree to saying "I don't know". Yes, when you don't know, say you don't know. But if you leave it at that, it is wrong. Science say it is ok to say you don't know, as it will spur you to find out about what you don't know, instead of making up an answer, which seems to be what religions are doing. If humans made no attempt to find out what they don't know, there would be no progress. Questioning and thinking is important for new discoveries. And believing in an interventionist God is counter productive to that. If you believe there is an all powerful God, when do we decide if something is "done by God" or when something can be understood by research?

As a side note, there is no evidence to suggest that God has ever communicated directly with humans. This leaves a high probability that this all powerful God was created by humans. If it is, wouldn't it be good to understand why? It is based on this that I am interested in understanding religions, as I believe it is the key in understanding "The Human Condition".

Not questioning it is similar to saying "If you get cancer, you die. Don't bother with new drugs. Live with the fact."
*
And why there must be two sides of the story? One thing. Because human just cannot be humble or think rationally.
Why we mere mortals must act like we know everything like we know "GOD" personally or even deny the existence of "GOD"?
Why must we question everything regarding something that may not or may exist? It (GOD) doesn't really involve our lives in fact.
We make the changes and we progress our civilization to a higher level.

We as mere mortal, sure, we can progress even without debating the non-existence or existence of GOD. Mind you again, that progress has been made with science by experimentation and usage of science (what we called technology) - both non believers and believers benefit from progress of technology. The issue here, why bother proving that something that cannot be prove or denied like "GOD". Science can literally take out this "GOD" debate. I just don't understand why some "atheismo" use science as tool to deny GOD existence, just like religulous people use faith to prove "GOD" existence. Can't we stop arguing and progress to something more useful?

BTW cancer can be cured at the right stage with the right treatment and this is called science, not faith. However, the debate about GOD has been longed since the existence of us, mere human mortal. Are we trying to play "GOD" ourselves by trying to put up proves that we created ourselves regarding this "GOD" phenomenon?

The real human condition is not "GOD". It's pride and the inability not to be humble, and it's killing humanity. Both non-believers and believers are just mere mortals who cannot understand their own nature and limit of thinking. "GOD" is delusional. Either you believe or do not believe it, you have been delusional in the first place by thinking of it. That goes to both atheismo and religulous people.
Yue
post Jan 8 2010, 06:01 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
387 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 7 2010, 09:01 PM)
1. If I am "shoving myself away from religion," I wouldn't be here. I am here to learn, but so far believers don't seem to be very good at teaching, as my stance against religion seems to be growing stronger.

If it is full of metaphor, who decides which interpretation is correct? Educate me. I have never read the Quran. But if you can make it seem worth my while, I will. By the way, if I went to a mosque to borrow a Quran, will they lend it to me (as a non-Muslim)? Is that offensive?

2.So you don't like the "fury of mother earth" too? But I thought it was God's doing? Isn't that blasphemy?

I wasn't referring to Islam specifically. I wouldn't do that as I have never read Islamic scriptures. There are plenty of religions around that have made those claim. (Spare me your "Islam is the only true religion" nonsense here. Thanks.)
This is majorly wrong. This is the epitome of ignorance.

3.I have already stated, and will state it again. If you want to ask who created the natural laws, you would have to ask who created God too. So, tell me, who is the creator of your creator? If natural laws are the basic of the basic, and God created them, wouldn't God be the most basic of them all?

"Science are there originally to prove the existence of God."
Prove please.
And does that mean, science not being able to prove God exist, God does not exist?

Science has definitely improved our understanding of things around us. Without science, we wouldn't have electricity, your fellow religious friends would not have bombs to use, there would not be a single cancer treatment out there. These things arise from our understanding of how electricity works, how chemical works, and how cancer kills. If man attributed everything to God, they wouldn't know any of these.

Now, I would like you to say it again, "science did not help our understanding of this world." Go ahead, please. Then proceed to go back into the jungle, stop using that computer, stop using that car to go to work (or train), and don't take the Quran. Paper came about from scientific discovery too. Naked, no tree leaves either. Using tree leaves was thanks to rationality.

Science does not have the explanation for natural laws does not mean it is created by God. Let me ask you again, since you ignored it previously, how sure are you that in the future science will not have the answer? Let me remind you 500 years ago humans think the sun revolves around the earth. Only 500 years.

Q&A Please use some common sense. Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot, logic is not the strength of God's followers.
Refer above. Be honest. Don't use science's invention to ask that question. Makes you look stupid.
*
1. Try Masjid Negara, as to borrow the Quran, you might not be able to bring it away from the mosque due to ethic reason. you are not shoving away from religion, you are just being pure ignorance. You want education, being spoonfed into your mouth. You did not do research about religion, you just "hear" about them. and you been hearing wrong. be it Islam, Christianity, jew, Buddhist, Hindu or whatever kind of religion are there. You are not being convince, you just being pure ignorance. You are willing to study science but unwilling to study religion proved just that. Why am i able to do so but you can't?

2. In Islam, there are teaching called Qadq and Qadr. Which stated whatever happen in this world happen for a reason, and to never question the reason but to take it as an endurance from God. We can grieve over death, the "fury of mother nature" but we can't never question it and blame it. And i ask for your source not your reason. and you kept giving me reason, stated your source so i can overlook. neither of the three teaching (Islam, Christianity and Jew) that their prophet (Muhammad, jesus and Moses) stated the date of the end of the world and gave the "age" of the earth. in Islam, there are over 3000 human being "whisper by God", 724 of them is Prophet, and 25 of the Prophet gifted by god with their own testament. And Muhammad is the last prophet. Jesus and Moses is in the "25". and i ask you again, please stated your source of claim about end of time and the age of the earth so i may overlook, or unless you want to confirm me that you made the claim yourself and agree that you are being ignorant.

3. Time for some prove aye? how about biology?

Sura - 23 The Believers (Al-Mu'minun); verse 14
"Then we developed the drop (sperm) into a hanging (embryo), then developed the hanging (embryo) into a bite-size (fetus), then created the bite-size (fetus) into bones, then covered the bones with flesh. We thus produce a new creature. Most blessed is GOD, the best Creator."

Source of translation: http://www.submission.org/

Mind you that Quran was brought down to earth during the year 6xx A.D. Thats around 1400 years ago. Also, in the quran stated how the earth is moving in its own system and rotating by the sun. Muslim have two part of guidance they would follow, The Quran; in which is God Word to the human. and Hadith; in which is God Whisper to Prophet Muhammad, in which he preach and being "recorded" in wording form by trusted resources. being his best followers during those time.

how do you explain in science (since you are being all great about it) that a mere "religious book" are able to state about phases of Human reproduction so early in 6xx A.D. When during those time, human only know how to "fcuk" " kill their baby because its blasphemy" and "trade goat for a bunch of vegetables with no currency". Science is the reason and brought me near to God, you who preach otherwise never took the chance to study religion in its whole, how can you convince yourself God is there when you can't even convince yourself in faith? Science is not faith, its knowledge, God's knowledge and the verse is my prove... whats yours?

Q&A: You sir, are indeed being ignorance. Why human of the western world (since you look so fond of them) come back to eating "organic" food, when deemed that bio-engineered food are indeed superior? and readily available? Why, since science has been blooming all this time, there are more disease than there are cure? with more and more of them emerging every moment? This is what backfired upon us for being ignorant that not to try and step foot into "God's region" and try to play God. like i said, people can't question basic of basics not because they can't... but because God didn't let them to.



This post has been edited by Yue: Jan 8 2010, 09:39 AM
kubing
post Jan 8 2010, 09:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 7 2010, 06:08 PM)

Like I said above, then what created God?

And how sure are you that what we don't know today won't be answered in 500 years?
200 years ago The Big Bang Theory would probably be the name of a chilli pepper sauce, not a Phd research topic.

*
God cant be created bro. we cannot call him God if he was a creation.

The Big Bang Theory remain theory till now. smile.gif

This post has been edited by kubing: Jan 8 2010, 09:04 AM
maranello55
post Jan 8 2010, 12:06 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 8 2010, 09:04 AM)
God cant be created bro. we cannot call him God if he was a creation.

The Big Bang Theory remain theory till now. smile.gif
*
Yes it can. If u want to insert science into religion, u have to allow that possibility.

Theory is not mere guess or assumption. To get to the status 'Theory', one have to go through stringent scientific filter and also must include other support from existing science. A scientist cant just say something and label it a theory.

You believe the Koran mentioned the Big Bang to support ur beliefs, but to discredit Science, u say Big Bang is just a theory. Make up ur mind.


Added on January 8, 2010, 12:15 pm
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


2. 'Fury of nature' is a poetic way to describe the balancing act of the Earth's climate mechanics. Earth doesnot share human prejudice towards other living being. Nor can it have humanly perks like revenge or retaliation.

3. Rig Veda predates Koran by 2000 years and contains much more science, including the beginnings of the Universe. Nothing in Koran is special. One verse in Koran is being described in paragraphs in Rig Veda.

That verse u quoted is a striking example how Koran gets Science totally wrong. What happens during embryonic period is not a creation process. Its reproduction. Embryonic stages are also described in details in the Rig Veda.

Apparently u havent gone outside ur religion to consider all sources yet. Theres alot more ancient wisdom that predates the Koran. Koran is far from being a miracle.


This post has been edited by maranello55: Jan 8 2010, 12:15 PM
Yue
post Jan 8 2010, 03:26 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
387 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(maranello55 @ Jan 8 2010, 12:06 PM)
Yes it can. If u want to insert science into religion, u have to allow that possibility.

Theory is not mere guess or assumption. To get to the status 'Theory', one have to go through stringent scientific filter and also must include other support from existing science. A scientist cant just say something and label it a theory.

You believe the Koran mentioned the Big Bang to support ur beliefs, but to discredit Science, u say Big Bang is just a theory. Make up ur mind.


Added on January 8, 2010, 12:15 pm
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


2. 'Fury of nature' is a poetic way to describe the balancing act of the Earth's climate mechanics. Earth doesnot share human prejudice towards other living being. Nor can it have humanly perks like revenge or retaliation.

3. Rig Veda predates Koran by 2000 years and contains much more science, including the beginnings of the Universe. Nothing in Koran is special. One verse in Koran is being described in paragraphs in Rig Veda.

That verse u quoted is a striking example how Koran gets Science totally wrong. What happens during embryonic period is not a creation process. Its reproduction. Embryonic stages are also described in details in the Rig Veda.

Apparently u havent gone outside ur religion to consider all sources yet. Theres alot more ancient wisdom that predates the Koran. Koran is far from being a miracle.
*
2. poetic or not, i never disapprove the earth very own system of climatic control over seismic balance happen in the ring of fire across the pacific. I never deny science because there was me stating that science was God's Knowledge, but there are certain things in science that contradicting Religion, and those said things never end up as a fact... they stay as wavery theory up till now, unsolved and un-approved. but comes the next question, why there are more natural Disaster within these 15 years alone in comparison to 100 years before that? Why do earth so desperately trying to balance itself far too many times if it was just a mechanic? Its because the balance was way off that it went beyond "repair". Why do the balancing happen soo too many times if the earth itself wasn't showing to us human that it was about to gave up and end itself? science never be able to prove this but these were stated in the religion, be it Islam, Christianity or Judaism.

3. Your statement show naiveness my friend, never ever make such statement without proper evaluation and research. Its a translation of the Quran, as i were saying the whole Quran is a poem full of metaphor. It makes people question and wonder what it meant. A typo in the translation equate failure? so you wanted me to paste out the true writing of the Quran knowing you would understand nothing about it? good god you are weak. Lets retake Human reproduction alone, again. against Rig Veda said you; That wasn't the only verse in the Quran regarding Human Reproduction, they were scattered all over the Quran again to intrigue human very nature to wonder and question why is this thing keep popping out? so human could study and find out the truth.

Source of Translation: http://www.islam-guide.com/bqs/20human.htm

"O Man! Who deceives you about your Lord the Noble, Who created you and fashioned you in due proportion and gave you any form He willed."
"(God) fashioned you in (different) stages."
"(God) fashioned man from a small quantity (of sperm)."
"Was (man) not a small quantity of sperm which has been poured out?"
"Then We placed (man) as a small quantity (of sperm) in a safe lodging firmly established."
"(God) made his progeny from the quintessence of a despised liquid."
"We cause whom We (God is speaking) will to rest in the womb for an appointed term."
"We have fashioned you from . . . something which clings."
"We have fashioned the small quantity (of sperm) into something which clings."
"Was (man) not a small quantity of sperm which has been poured out? After that he was something which clings; then God fashioned him in due proportion."
"We fashioned the thing which clings into a chewed lump of flesh and We fashioned the chewed flesh into bones and We clothed the bones with intact flesh."
"(God) fashions you inside the bodies of your mothers, formation after formation, in three (veils of) darkness."

That was some of the verse stated in Quran about Human Reproduction, like i stated "some" since you like to take advantages of things so small questioning em without reasoning, and if you question a mere translation? i ask you to search for others, as translation are vague from human to human.

I have been providing verse from the Quran, now its your turn to post the "paragraph" of Rig Veda, i won't take google for an answer. And do bear in mind that Muslim's prophet Muhammad is illiterate, he couldn't even read his whole life and never was educated, and all of the sudden after "bertapa" in a cave he is preaching God's word. Thats enough for miracles.

edited: extra information and some typo

This post has been edited by Yue: Jan 8 2010, 03:30 PM
maranello55
post Jan 8 2010, 03:54 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


2. Simple. Because we build on land far more than the last 100 years. And the population is way more. So a natural disaster of the same magnitude 100 years ago will have much worse impact if it happens today.

The earth will not just give up balancing. The more it go off balance, the more it will try to balance itself again. Until everything is back in balance. It will not end. Human civilizations will. Religion stock on that for submission.
Earth mechanics has been studied and its due to human industrial by-products. Earth balancing acts reoccuring time to time is as signal for us to look into our own wrongdoings to the environment, not as a signal that the world is gonna end.

3. 'Creation' to 'Reproduction' is not a typo. Its wrong hypothesis. And its not 'small' either. Theres big difference between 'creation' and 'reproduction', scientifically. In Koran it says 'creation' to support its own notion of a creator. While it is just an act of reproduction of a species, not only human. If Koran wants to be recognised as a book of science, it needs to be more specific.

U can provide all the verse of 'reproduction' in Koran, but the fact remains that RigVeda predates Koran. It cancel out the claim that Koran is the first to claim these scientific finds and took a status of a miracle.

I wont paste any Rig Veda verse here since u do not except Google as an answer. U adviced others to do some researche before claiming anything, why dont u do it.

Mohammed didnt have to be literate to tell others to write what he says. Someone obviously taught him something back in the cave no doubt. I go to school illiterate knowing nothing and got out knowing lots of things.....miracle indeed.

Simple explainable events in religion blown out of proportion to a different level while it is actually very simple.
lin00b
post Jan 8 2010, 05:38 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 8 2010, 06:01 AM)
3. Time for some prove aye? how about biology?

Sura - 23 The Believers (Al-Mu'minun); verse 14
"Then we developed the drop (sperm) into a hanging (embryo), then developed the hanging (embryo) into a bite-size (fetus), then created the bite-size (fetus) into bones, then covered the bones with flesh. We thus produce a new creature. Most blessed is GOD, the best Creator."

Source of translation: http://www.submission.org/

Mind you that Quran was brought down to earth during the year 6xx A.D. Thats around 1400 years ago. Also, in the quran stated how the earth is moving in its own system and rotating by the sun. Muslim have two part of guidance they would follow, The Quran; in which is God Word to the human. and Hadith; in which is God Whisper to Prophet Muhammad, in which he preach and being "recorded" in wording form by trusted resources. being his best followers during those time.

how do you explain in science (since you are being all great about it) that a mere "religious book" are able to state about phases of Human reproduction so early in 6xx A.D. When during those time, human only know how to "fcuk" " kill their baby because its blasphemy" and "trade goat for a bunch of vegetables with no currency". Science is the reason and brought me near to God, you who preach otherwise never took the chance to study religion in its whole, how can you convince yourself God is there when you can't even convince yourself in faith? Science is not faith, its knowledge, God's knowledge and the verse is my prove... whats yours?
quite a leap to equate "drop" as "sperm" and "hanging" as "embryo" as well as other terms. barring that, the bone does not form before flesh. flesh to rot before bones, so mayhaps some creative guy just go, hmm... rotting is opposite of forming, so maybe the events goes in reverse too.

QUOTE
Q&A:  You sir, are indeed being ignorance. Why human of the western world (since you look so fond of them) come back to eating "organic" food, when deemed that bio-engineered food are indeed superior? and readily available? Why, since science has been blooming all this time, there are more disease than there are cure? with more and more of them emerging every moment? This is what backfired upon us for being ignorant that not to try and step foot into "God's region" and try to play God.  like i said, people can't question basic of basics not because they can't... but because God didn't let them to.
genetically engineered food is not fully proven to be superior or safe. and people are often scared of new things. and speaking of bio engineered, does seedless grape and watermelon count? cause those are very popular

and scientist is very much keen to "play god" with stem cell research and cloning etc, if not for many religion roadblocks.

has disease become more prevalent? or have we eliminated the low hanging disease and the more complicated ones that are harder to cure cropping up? hard to suffer cancer at are of 60 when your average expectancy is 30 and major cause of death is cholera.
thesupertramp
post Jan 8 2010, 06:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(noveus @ Jan 8 2010, 12:13 AM)
Words can be fooling if it is not expressed properly. rclxub.gif
Well, I am not single out only non-believers, but both. Im asking a question in general. As to, what people gives their opinion based on.
Im not taking only scriptures (sorry for not mentioning it earlier), but any others form of information regarding that religion itself.
What I am trying to say here, how can one judge even without experience/understanding it? How can you judge religion as a whole when it is so diversified.

Im not saying, someone should have 100% understanding, but at the very least, understand what they are going to judge. It seems like many people tend to judge by just gathering information, and makes the opinion themselves, without understanding it first. Like what i mention, saying what the food taste, without tasting it.

But i do get your point. I think you tend judge religion as a whole. You judge by logics, from looking outward into inward. As for myself, i think one should judge from inward to outward. To step into their shoes, before making any judgement. It would not be bias free, but at the very least reduces it.
Thanks for your answers and your time.  blush.gif
*
Well, each to their own. But since there are so many different religions, it'd be difficult to start from the "inside" wouldn't it? I prefer looking at it as a whole before going into the specifics. At this stage, I have pretty good idea of the general picture, which is why it is time to look into the different religions. However, religions somehow involve a supernatural being, that can't be denied. And based on that alone it doesn't appeal to me, though I'm not always against it. Because, so far, I have not faced a question that cannot be answered without a supernatural being. Or at the very least, does not have just as good a theory to explain it that does not involve a supernatural being.

And I do not agree on needing to be a believer before being able to understand the religion. Because if so, then people will be converting to religion prematurely. Usually, it's understand first, then convert. Or so I think it is.

QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jan 8 2010, 02:05 AM)
And why there must be two sides of the story? One thing. Because human just cannot be humble or think rationally.
Why we mere mortals must act like we know everything like we know "GOD" personally or even deny the existence of "GOD"?
Why must we question everything regarding something that may not or may exist? It (GOD) doesn't really involve our lives in fact.
We make the changes and we progress our civilization to a higher level.

We as mere mortal, sure, we can progress even without debating the non-existence or existence of GOD. Mind you again, that progress has been made with science by experimentation and usage of science (what we called technology) - both non believers and believers benefit from progress of technology. The issue here, why bother proving that something that cannot be prove or denied like "GOD". Science can literally take out this "GOD" debate. I just don't understand why some "atheismo" use science as tool to deny GOD existence, just like religulous people use faith to prove "GOD" existence. Can't we stop arguing and progress to something more useful?

BTW cancer can be cured at the right stage with the right treatment and this is called science, not faith. However, the debate about GOD has been longed since the existence of us, mere human mortal. Are we trying to play "GOD" ourselves by trying to put up proves that we created ourselves regarding this "GOD" phenomenon?

The real human condition is not "GOD". It's pride and the inability not to be humble, and it's killing humanity. Both non-believers and believers are just mere mortals who cannot understand their own nature and limit of thinking. "GOD" is delusional. Either you believe or do not believe it, you have been delusional in the first place by thinking of it. That goes to both atheismo and religulous people.
*
You completely missed the point. I am not here to prove or disprove God's existence. That would be playing God. Understanding God does not explain the Human Condition. But understanding why humans need a God does. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_condition

If God was created by humans, why shouldn't we understand it (it not being God, but why humans created God)? What makes it any different from trying to understand how a gun works?

QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 8 2010, 06:01 AM)
1. Try Masjid Negara, as to borrow the Quran, you might not be able to bring it away from the mosque due to ethic reason. you are not shoving away from religion, you are just being pure ignorance. You want education, being spoonfed into your mouth. You did not do research about religion, you just "hear" about them. and you been hearing wrong. be it Islam, Christianity, jew, Buddhist, Hindu or whatever kind of religion are there. You are not being convince, you just being pure ignorance. You are willing to study science but unwilling to study religion proved just that. Why am i able to do so but you can't?


If I am unwilling, why would I read the Bible, and why would I ask where I can get a Quran?
I am willing to learn science. Why aren't you?
Ignorant? That makes two of us. But I'm learning. We'll see who can shed that tag first.

QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 8 2010, 06:01 AM)
2. In Islam, there are teaching called Qadq and Qadr. Which stated whatever happen in this world happen for a reason, and to never question the reason but to take it as an endurance from God. We can grieve over death, the "fury of mother nature" but we can't never question it and blame it. And i ask for your source not your reason. and you kept giving me reason, stated your source so i can overlook. neither of the three teaching (Islam, Christianity and Jew) that their prophet (Muhammad, jesus and Moses) stated the date of the end of the world and gave the "age" of the earth. in Islam, there are over 3000 human being "whisper by God", 724 of them is Prophet, and 25 of the Prophet gifted by god with their own testament. And Muhammad is the last prophet. Jesus and Moses is in the "25". and i ask you again, please stated your source of claim about end of time and the age of the earth so i may overlook, or unless you want to confirm me that you made the claim yourself and agree that you are being ignorant.


Let me ask you, not as an argument, but to understand your religion (since I don't know anything, right?), if we are not to know the reason, then wouldn't life be meaningless? How does that solve the existential question of humanity?

Prove? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_time
Not all have a date, but many do. You want the source, look it up yourself from there. References at the end of the page. I am not interested in proving religions wrong. I am interested in understanding why they do what they do, because not all make sense (for now).

QUOTE(Yue @ Jan 8 2010, 06:01 AM)
3. Time for some prove aye? how about biology?

Sura - 23 The Believers (Al-Mu'minun); verse 14
"Then we developed the drop (sperm) into a hanging (embryo), then developed the hanging (embryo) into a bite-size (fetus), then created the bite-size (fetus) into bones, then covered the bones with flesh. We thus produce a new creature. Most blessed is GOD, the best Creator."

Source of translation: http://www.submission.org/

Mind you that Quran was brought down to earth during the year 6xx A.D. Thats around 1400 years ago. Also, in the quran stated how the earth is moving in its own system and rotating by the sun. Muslim have two part of guidance they would follow, The Quran; in which is God Word to the human. and Hadith; in which is God Whisper to Prophet Muhammad, in which he preach and being "recorded" in wording form by trusted resources. being his best followers during those time.

how do you explain in science (since you are being all great about it) that a mere "religious book" are able to state about phases of Human reproduction so early in 6xx A.D. When during those time, human only know how to "fcuk" " kill their baby because its blasphemy" and "trade goat for a bunch of vegetables with no currency". Science is the reason and brought me near to God, you who preach otherwise never took the chance to study religion in its whole, how can you convince yourself God is there when you can't even convince yourself in faith? Science is not faith, its knowledge, God's knowledge and the verse is my prove... whats yours?

Q&A:  You sir, are indeed being ignorance. Why human of the western world (since you look so fond of them) come back to eating "organic" food, when deemed that bio-engineered food are indeed superior? and readily available? Why, since science has been blooming all this time, there are more disease than there are cure? with more and more of them emerging every moment? This is what backfired upon us for being ignorant that not to try and step foot into "God's region" and try to play God.  like i said, people can't question basic of basics not because they can't... but because God didn't let them to.
*
Tell me, how difficult is it for humans to see white fluid (drop) coming out of a penis, stuck (hanging) inside a vagina, the swell (bite size) in the belly, and bones with flesh after the foetus is born?

How difficult is it to see those things, and make those connections? People in the 600s aren't idiots.
You have successfully called your prophet an idiot because you think he can't make simple connections.

Next "prove" please.

When did I claim fondness of the western world? Sorry, don't recall. Not all non-Muslims are fond of the western world, I can tell you that much.

I'm sorry, sir, but you are wrong again. There are more diseases not because of science, but because human lifestyle changes. Jump down from the third floor and land on your feet. Then, try again but land on your head. I assure you that you will have different injuries. And microbes (bacteria, virus etc) constantly evolve to fight for their survival. If we find a cure, they will evolve. Thanks for raising the fact that evolution is a viable theory, thus again showing that it is unlikely your God created humans.

QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 8 2010, 09:04 AM)
God cant be created bro. we cannot call him God if he was a creation.

The Big Bang Theory remain theory till now. smile.gif
*
So can I call energy God? Energy cannot be created or destroyed. Seems fair to me. Sounds like God too.

God remains a theory too. What is your point?

This post has been edited by thesupertramp: Jan 8 2010, 06:28 PM
kubing
post Jan 8 2010, 10:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
1. energy is not a God.energy created by god to have its own criteria in order to use by us in many ways.

2. what is your prove to say God does not exist? rclxub.gif

This post has been edited by kubing: Jan 8 2010, 10:49 PM
shirley_andy
post Jan 8 2010, 10:51 PM

VR Hardware Solution Provider
*******
Senior Member
2,631 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
In my religion believe, there's not "God", there's alot of "god"s..
lin00b
post Jan 8 2010, 11:12 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 8 2010, 10:48 PM)
1.  energy is not a God.energy created by god to have its own criteria in order to use by us in many ways.

2. what is your prove to say God does not exist? rclxub.gif
*
1. energy cannot be created.
2. because there is no proof god exist.
maranello55
post Jan 9 2010, 01:48 AM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 8 2010, 10:48 PM)
1.  energy is not a God.energy created by god to have its own criteria in order to use by us in many ways.

2. what is your prove to say God does not exist? rclxub.gif
*
Here is a good outlook on arguing about God. It only takes 10 minutes.


thesupertramp
post Jan 9 2010, 02:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 8 2010, 10:48 PM)
1.  energy is not a God.energy created by god to have its own criteria in order to use by us in many ways.

2. what is your prove to say God does not exist? rclxub.gif
*
But energy has no genitals, cannot be created, and cannot be destroyed. That is what you claim your God to be.

I don't have any prove of that. Neither do I intend to find it. But the more important thing is, YOU don't have any prove God exist. When scientist come out with a new hypothesis, they seek evidence to support or refute it. Believers came up with the God Hypothesis, but they have yet to prove it.

As it currently is, they are more evidence to support the Big Bang Theory and the Theory of Evolution than your God Hypothesis. By far.
dopodplaya
post Jan 9 2010, 03:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 8 2010, 06:23 PM)
You completely missed the point. I am not here to prove or disprove God's existence. That would be playing God. Understanding God does not explain the Human Condition. But understanding why humans need a God does. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_condition

If God was created by humans, why shouldn't we understand it (it not being God, but why humans created God)? What makes it any different from trying to understand how a gun works?
*
See, you are thinking about GOD again. This specifically shows that human are delusional and constantly thinking about delusions. GOD isn't a creation or neither GOD creates human. You've been thinking about GOD in the first place.
Why the need to understand GOD in the first place? Only bunch of delusional people who are taking advantages over irrational people do.

The main point here, is to understand GOD itself, is a delusion. Human keep seeking for answers that they know that they could never find. And how a guns work isn't a delusion. It is scientifically proven and even people with faith knows how it works, at least generally. Why you are comparing guns with GOD again? That's simply irrational (refer to what I said above). The analogy of GOD (a delusion) isn't the same as known facts or science.

The exact point here - you've proven most mere mortals like yourself are delusional. GOD is a "mysterious" weapon for you irrational people to kill humanity and our rational minds. Either you're an atheismo or religulous, you are delusional from the start. Please, start thinking rationally and stop disillusioning about something that has been used to start war against humanity in the first place.

For the final joke, may GOD be with you, forever laugh.gif

kubing
post Jan 9 2010, 05:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(lin00b @ Jan 8 2010, 11:12 PM)
1. energy cannot be created.
2. because there is no proof god exist.
*
1. We cant create energy but god smile.gif
2. what about us? who create us? tongue.gif
lin00b
post Jan 9 2010, 05:55 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 9 2010, 05:53 PM)
1. We cant create energy but god smile.gif
2. what about us? who create us?  tongue.gif
*
flying spaghetti monster
kubing
post Jan 9 2010, 05:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
i dont get it. wat do u mean by that
thesupertramp
post Jan 10 2010, 11:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jan 9 2010, 03:42 PM)
See, you are thinking about GOD again. This specifically shows that human are delusional and constantly thinking about delusions. GOD isn't a creation or neither GOD creates human. You've been thinking about GOD in the first place.
Why the need to understand GOD in the first place? Only bunch of delusional people who are taking advantages over irrational people do.

The main point here, is to understand GOD itself, is a delusion. Human keep seeking for answers that they know that they could never find. And how a guns work isn't a delusion. It is scientifically proven and even people with faith knows how it works, at least generally. Why you are comparing guns with GOD again? That's simply irrational (refer to what I said above). The analogy of GOD (a delusion) isn't the same as known facts or science.

The exact point here - you've proven most mere mortals like yourself are delusional. GOD is a "mysterious" weapon for you irrational people to kill humanity and our rational minds. Either you're an atheismo or religulous, you are delusional from the start. Please, start thinking rationally and stop disillusioning about something that has been used to start war against humanity in the first place.

For the final joke, may GOD be with you, forever laugh.gif
*
Firstly, I did not know that I was representative of the general human population. Thank you for the ego boost. But then again, I wonder why so few share the same music and books taste as me. Hmm.

Secondly, you contradict yourself. If God is a delusion, where does that delusion come from, if not imagined up by humans? If it was conceived by humans, my previous argument remains. Unless you mean it is ok to be ignorant, and that we shouldn't understand how computers work either.

QUOTE(lin00b @ Jan 9 2010, 05:55 PM)
flying spaghetti monster
*
QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 9 2010, 05:56 PM)
i dont get it. wat do u mean by that
*
I think he means the One True God.
3dassets
post Jan 10 2010, 09:31 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


Excuse me, I thought this thread is to elaborate our personal interpretation of god instead of proving god's existence. Seems like science vs religion, I am hoping to read about how creative people can get, there is an old topic at Kopitiam about "Believer & Non Believer" that suits debate.

Not fun since we know it will never end and that the world is still at war because of religion and power. Do you guys expect a winner? If not then let the topic run wild.
maranello55
post Jan 11 2010, 12:24 AM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



Not to ferget, closed-minded people back off.

Im was thinking God not as Energy, but Gravity. Since Gravity governs all.
dopodplaya
post Jan 11 2010, 01:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 10 2010, 11:09 AM)
Firstly, I did not know that I was representative of the general human population. Thank you for the ego boost. But then again, I wonder why so few share the same music and books taste as me. Hmm.

Secondly, you contradict yourself. If God is a delusion, where does that delusion come from, if not imagined up by humans?  If it was conceived by humans, my previous argument remains. Unless you mean it is ok to be ignorant, and that we shouldn't understand how computers work either.
I think he means the One True God.
*
Again... you just don't get the point. Delusion is an illness. Where it comes from? Obviously from human. What point of arguments that you need to stand up for? Go ahead biggrin.gif

Imagination is good when it leads to a positive development, but not when it turns into delusion.

You posted Human Condition article to me, yet do you understand what the article is trying to express?

It is not being ignorant. IT IS ABOUT BEING RATIONAL. Keep debating delusional matter like "GOD, who-how-why, defining" etc. shows that you are having the classic case of disillusion.

Again, I would express you are comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science. You will always do so, if you can't think rationally.
thesupertramp
post Jan 12 2010, 02:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jan 11 2010, 01:54 AM)
Again... you just don't get the point. Delusion is an illness. Where it comes from? Obviously from human. What point of arguments that you need to stand up for? Go ahead biggrin.gif

Imagination is good when it leads to a positive development, but not when it turns into delusion.

You posted Human Condition article to me, yet do you understand what the article is trying to express?

It is not being ignorant. IT IS ABOUT BEING RATIONAL. Keep debating delusional matter like "GOD, who-how-why, defining" etc. shows that you are having the classic case of disillusion.

Again, I would express you are comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science. You will always do so, if you can't think rationally.
*
I don't think you even know what you are talking about anymore. By any chance are you a member of this Facebook group?

The Human Condition has nothing to do with rationality. (And I am against religion mainly because of it undermines rationality. So, me, irrational? Ha.) The Human Condition concerns mostly with human psychology. I don't know if you have read the page, but I can say you have very, very limited understanding of psychology. Try reading about Existentialism. It is a main subject in The Human Condition.

Humans don't create something out of the blue, for no reason, and without purpose. Even if they do, it wouldn't exist for long if it serves no purpose. So if humans created the notion of God, which you admitted so, then there must be a reason for it. THAT, is what I am interested in: Why humans created this so-called God?

How is that irrational? Or delusional? Are you saying all studies into humans are delusional?

Next thing. If believing in God is delusional, why is arguing that God does not exist delusional? Are you saying a psychiatrist is delusional for diagnosing a patient with dementia, and trying to treat said patient? When you witness a crime, do you report it, or ignore it?

Finally, you speak of rational, but you are against "comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science." Do you even know what rational means?

You ought to give more thought to your posts. It is difficult to take your posts seriously if it is filled with paradox and hypocrisies. Thinking is the main pillar of rationality. Think first, before you write.
dopodplaya
post Jan 12 2010, 03:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 12 2010, 02:50 AM)
I don't think you even know what you are talking about anymore. By any chance are you a member of this Facebook group?

The Human Condition has nothing to do with rationality. (And I am against religion mainly because of it undermines rationality. So, me, irrational? Ha.) The Human Condition concerns mostly with human psychology. I don't know if you have read the page, but I can say you have very, very limited understanding of psychology. Try reading about Existentialism. It is a main subject in The Human Condition.

Humans don't create something out of the blue, for no reason, and without purpose. Even if they do, it wouldn't exist for long if it serves no purpose. So if humans created the notion of God, which you admitted so, then there must be a reason for it. THAT, is what I am interested in: Why humans created this so-called God?

How is that irrational? Or delusional? Are you saying all studies into humans are delusional?

Next thing. If believing in God is delusional, why is arguing that God does not exist delusional? Are you saying a psychiatrist is delusional for diagnosing a patient with dementia, and trying to treat said patient? When you witness a crime, do you report it, or ignore it?

Finally, you speak of rational, but you are against "comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science." Do you even know what rational means?

You ought to give more thought to your posts. It is difficult to take your posts seriously if it is filled with paradox and hypocrisies. Thinking is the main pillar of rationality. Think first, before you write.
*
Again, you continue to argue a delusion with the real thing. If you lost me, then I could not help you. I am not asking you to take me seriously.
Just a simple thoughts for yourself.

The basic point - if you read my post again and compare it to your posting of human condition, human psychology and existentialism is related to the way human not to think rationally. Human wants to compare, compare and compare even the subjects to compare are not compatible to each other, even for a reason that doesn't really make sense. They just want their explanations to be righteous and even want it to be the law.

The subject GOD can never be justified unless you are up to something. The atheismos are denying the existence because they want to prove the religulous people wrong and vice versa. IT is as simple as that.

Imagination is good when it leads to a positive development, but not when it turns into delusion. >> this is answer to you question "Why humans created this so-called God?"
Since when technology we know now is based on believing/disbelieving in GOD? From the world history, the only thing came out of religion/irreligion is war.

BTW it is being rational is the pillar of thinking, not the other way around. It is not totally about logic, but it is about something acceptable and of course most of the things that acceptable by our mind is logical. As long as the concrete reason to explain a question is acceptable and consistent, it is RATIONAL.

Did you get the acceptable and consistent reason behind this defining GOD question? It never had a consistent reason. Hence, it irrational to even discuss the rationality of defining GOD. It just bunch of mortals trying to sell their idea of invisible product called GOD. And you know what, it is very easy to sell and you bought it.

And since when I am against "comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science."? Delusional illness can be explained with science but you cannot compare how true a delusion is against scientific facts. >> Read what i posted again >> Again, I would express you are comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science.

Take mathematical equation for example.

3 + 1 = 4
4 + 0 = 4

The result for both equations is 4. The rational explanation is you can add any numbers in anyways as long as the result is the same.
Even the concept of real number is rational because it have the explanatiosn and the reasons why it is acceptable in math.

So does how a gun works, cancer can be cured and similar questions that you were comparing to this "defining GOD" and its related issue.

But how to define "GOD"? You'll get different results and different answers explaining the definitions. No one on each side will accept each other's answers. This is when the delusion begins when everyone thinks they are the right one. There will never be a unified answer of defining "GOD", cause one will say GOD doesn't exist (so, how to define it? it doesn't exist) and the other says it's a powerful force and so many other definitions for GOD. IT shows defining GOD never will be consistent and it has no acceptable reasoning for each answers. Isn't that what we called irrational?
When it is not rational, it means human are into the delusional state because he can't think rationally with his reasoning and explanations.



This post has been edited by dopodplaya: Jan 12 2010, 04:16 AM
SUSDeadlocks
post Jan 12 2010, 07:55 AM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


Dopodplaya, if you think God is mere delusion, answer this:

QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 12 2009, 04:30 PM)
God is what you will believe even if it's not there. Scientists call it delusion, but they can't provide an explanation of how deluding they were when they realized they can't prove the existence of their very own intangible emotions in which they themselves believed in, since science requires tangible and quantifiable characteristics.
*
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 15 2009, 06:06 PM)
What if a "God" is only as real as how you believe as something so unquantifiable as "feelings", such as "sincerity, and "frustration"?
*
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 16 2009, 06:48 PM)
LOL! And how is the "feeling" and "epiphany" that "God is with us" isn't too, the by product of biochemical reactions? And if science actually proved that the chemical reactions = truth, aren't they telling that those who believed in God with their "feelings" are true as well?
*
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 18 2009, 10:43 AM)
LOL! BULL SHITE!

If psychology can ACTUALLY prove the existence of intangible "feelings", wouldn't they also proved the existence of God of those having the epiphany of "feeling God", and the feeling of "God is with us"?

And if scientist claimed that those feelings are merely delusion, how then, it is any different of a delusion from their own emotions which are "felt"?
*
thesupertramp
post Jan 13 2010, 12:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jan 12 2010, 03:53 AM)
Again, you continue to argue a delusion with the real thing. If you lost me, then I could not help you. I am not asking you to take me seriously.
Just a simple thoughts for yourself.

The basic point - if you read my post again and compare it to your posting of human condition, human psychology and existentialism is related to the way human not to think rationally. Human wants to compare, compare and compare even the subjects to compare are not compatible to each other, even for a reason that doesn't really make sense. They just want their explanations to be righteous and even want it to be the law.

The subject GOD can never be justified unless you are up to something. The atheismos are denying the existence because they want to prove the religulous people wrong and vice versa. IT is as simple as that.

Imagination is good when it leads to a positive development, but not when it turns into delusion. >> this is answer to you question "Why humans created this so-called God?"
Since when technology we know now is based on believing/disbelieving in GOD? From the world history, the only thing came out of religion/irreligion is war.

BTW it is being rational is the pillar of thinking, not the other way around. It is not totally about logic, but it is about something acceptable and of course most of the things that acceptable by our mind is logical. As long as the concrete reason to explain a question is acceptable and consistent, it is RATIONAL.

Did you get the acceptable and consistent reason behind this  defining GOD question? It never had a consistent reason. Hence, it irrational to even discuss the rationality of defining GOD. It just bunch of mortals trying to sell their idea of invisible product called GOD. And you know what, it is very easy to sell and you bought it.

And since when I am against "comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science."? Delusional illness can be explained with science but you cannot compare how true a delusion is against scientific facts. >> Read what i posted again >> Again, I would express you are comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science.

Take mathematical equation for example.

3 + 1 = 4
4 + 0 = 4

The result for both equations is 4. The rational explanation is you can add any numbers in anyways as long as the result is the same.
Even the concept of real number is rational because it have the explanatiosn and the reasons why it is acceptable in math.

So does how a gun works, cancer can be cured and similar questions that you were comparing to this "defining GOD" and its related issue.

But how to define "GOD"? You'll get different results and different answers explaining the definitions. No one on each side will accept each other's answers. This is when the delusion begins when everyone thinks they are the right one. There will never be a unified answer of defining "GOD", cause one will say GOD doesn't exist (so, how to define it? it doesn't exist) and the other says it's a powerful force and so many other definitions for GOD.  IT shows defining GOD never will be consistent and it has no acceptable reasoning for each answers. Isn't that what we called irrational?
When it is not rational, it means human are into the delusional state because he can't think rationally with his reasoning and explanations.
*
We seem to be going around in circles here. I think the fault lies in your definition of delusion.

QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jan 12 2010, 03:53 AM)
And since when I am against "comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science."? Delusional illness can be explained with science but you cannot compare how true a delusion is against scientific facts. >> Read what i posted again >> Again, I would express you are comparing delusion with a concrete fact and proven science.


So, how do you define delusion?
If a man walked in to a psychiatrist office claiming he works for the secret service, everything else about him seems normal, how would you know if he is delusional?
Simple, call up secret service and ask for confirmation or ask him for prove of identity. Is that not using facts and evidence to prove a delusional case?
Since when you are against that? Well, I interpreted that sentence there to mean I am comparing them, and I should not. Plus, there again you just stated "you cannot compare how true a delusion is against scientific facts." So are you, or aren't you against it? You seem confused about your own stance. If you are a member of that Facebook group, do say so, so I'm not wasting my time.

FYI, science require evidence, not just anything that is acceptable. In fact, it is ALL ABOUT evidence. If not, it will only be a hypothesis. The generally accepted consensus is that God created the world in 6 days, and the earth is 10,000 years old. So is that what you believe? Since that is what majority thinks. Science disagree.

Acceptable is subjective. Facts are not.

Back to your first sentence, if we do not compare a delusion to a real thing, how do we know if it is a delusion?
Delusion (from Wikipedia): A delusion, in everyday language, is a fixed belief that is either false, fanciful, or derived from deception.
If Nike does not exist, there will be no fake Nikes. So how is something a delusion if it cannot be compared to something real?

In your second paragraph, are you suggesting that the study of existentialism and Human psychology is irrational? If you are, I would say you are seriously deluded. If not, I don't understand the paragraph, please rephrase.
Existentialism does not compare anything, neither does psychology. It attempts to explain several questions about humanity.

You seem to be against ignorance, yet you seem to think some questions should not be asked at all because there is no single definitive answer.

QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jan 12 2010, 03:53 AM)
Imagination is good when it leads to a positive development, but not when it turns into delusion. >> this is answer to you question "Why humans created this so-called God?"

Yes, imagination, but why did they imagine up something like God. That is what I want to know. Good or bad, humans invented things for a reason. Good or bad happens after the conception of that idea. Nikola Tesla did not invent the AC motor for no reason, he saw its potential and knew it would be extremely useful.

As for asking if I have found a consistent answer, of course not, or I wouldn't be trying to understand it, would I?
There are however many suggestions as to why, and many seems very RATIONAL.
The most common one being humans need a sense of security, and believing there exist such a supernatural entity voids them of that insecurity. To me, that seems rational, what do you think? Another theory for The Bible's concept of Heaven and Hell is that it would help humans overcome one of their greatest fear: Death. You may say that this is another delusion, but death is not a delusion. Hence fear of death is no more a delusion than fear of being eaten alive by a lion.

I realise this thread is about "defining God", but from the start, I have stated, and I will state it again, I am not interested in the definition of God. I am interested in why so many humans embraced the notion of God. God's hair colour does not interest me (though it would be helpful for trivia night), but why so many people believe in God does. And stating they are merely delusional does not explain it, because there is a conscious or subconscious reason behind a delusion.

QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 8 2010, 06:23 PM)
You completely missed the point. I am not here to prove or disprove God's existence. That would be playing God. Understanding God does not explain the Human Condition. But understanding why humans need a God does.


PS. You seem to have no understanding of psychology, and hence not what I am getting at. Please, please read something about it before replying to this post, or it will go back in circles. Here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychoanalysis to start you off.


Added on January 13, 2010, 1:14 am
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 18 2009, 10:43 AM)
LOL! BULL SHITE!

If psychology can ACTUALLY prove the existence of intangible "feelings", wouldn't they also proved the existence of God of those having the epiphany of "feeling God", and the feeling of "God is with us"?

And if scientist claimed that those feelings are merely delusion, how then, it is any different of a delusion from their own emotions which are "felt"?
Then you might wanna read my previous post below.
*
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 15 2009, 06:06 PM)
What if a "God" is only as real as how you believe as something so unquantifiable as "feelings", such as "sincerity, and "frustration"?
*
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 12 2009, 04:30 PM)
God is what you will believe even if it's not there. Scientists call it delusion, but they can't provide an explanation of how deluding they were when they realized they can't prove the existence of their very own intangible emotions in which they themselves believed in, since science requires tangible and quantifiable characteristics.
*
As some already suggested, emotions are a result of chemical and electrical stimulation in the brain. The exact mechanism is still unknown, as neuroscience is a relatively new field. Which scientist claimed emotion is a delusion? Emotion is an important part of our evolutionary survival.

QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Dec 16 2009, 06:48 PM)
LOL! And how is the "feeling" and "epiphany" that "God is with us" isn't too, the by product of biochemical reactions? And if science actually proved that the chemical reactions = truth, aren't they telling that those who believed in God with their "feelings" are true as well?
*
Which leads to this, which is simple. Anger, love, happiness are all feelings, we acknowledge them to be feelings. God, is claimed by believers to be all powerful, omnipotent and omniscient. Is anger omnipotent? Are you so angry reading this post now your anger can kill catering with a thought? If believers claim God to be a feeling, then it would be a different argument. Can it be an emotion? Possibly. But then, what actions provoke this "God feeling"? I sure haven't heard anyone say "I feel Godly." Godlike maybe. Not Godly. There is no common consensus in any actions provoking a Godly feeling.

This post has been edited by thesupertramp: Jan 13 2010, 01:14 AM
SUSDeadlocks
post Jan 13 2010, 10:00 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 13 2010, 12:49 AM)
Which leads to this, which is simple. Anger, love, happiness are all feelings, we acknowledge them to be feelings. God, is claimed by believers to be all powerful, omnipotent and omniscient. Is anger omnipotent? Are you so angry reading this post now your anger can kill catering with a thought? If believers claim God to be a feeling, then it would be a different argument. Can it be an emotion? Possibly. But then, what actions provoke this "God feeling"? I sure haven't heard anyone say "I feel Godly." Godlike maybe. Not Godly. There is no common consensus in any actions provoking a Godly feeling.
*
The problem is, why do you even acknowledge the existence these of unquantifiable, intangible, absurdity you called as "feelings"?

What is this "feeling" you're talking about?

If, you wanted to prove to me that, this thing called "feelings" exist, how will you do that?


This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Jan 13 2010, 10:11 PM
witchx
post Jan 14 2010, 01:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
my definition of god is... god is only human (or was if it passed away), but he/she/it can do what humans can't. That's if god is a human.

And also believe GOD was created for propoganda and was created by humans. Therefore GOD did not create humans but humans created GOD

Unfortunately, I have not met god and I gave a thought whether if God has the same form as a human. Maybe god has the form of a dinosaur!

Just my thought and do not wish to provoke any religion at all. I sincerely apologize if I have offended anyone in my post. Cheers
aurora97
post Jan 14 2010, 02:30 PM

八方來財
*******
Senior Member
3,789 posts

Joined: Aug 2007



QUOTE(anti-informatic @ Dec 8 2009, 08:44 AM)
Why create another thread when there are several out thr for u to talk about?

Im free thinker, i wont say i believe absolutely no god although i see no sign of his existence
Provided that if god is exist, i would say he is a merciful god,
he dont do as much as what ppl say but just a creator of everything
The everything i mean is not things that created by human,
building, science, law, machine are all human creation, invent by some outstanding idea of human themselves,
which is no god who conrol it, but god make human has such ability call knowledge that create unlimited possibility
After all, creating human being is like developing an automated machine that process everything once it is developed and let it run on own process, everything is out of control by anyone out there
God maybe almighty, and if he is, our worship means nothing to him
It's like i employ unlimited amount of employee to work for me, but i dont expect them to have full respect and do everything i wan until they die for me
*
If you have not seen this, than its a must see.

Interesting thoughts from a young boy.

SOS

maranello55
post Jan 14 2010, 04:39 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(aurora97 @ Jan 14 2010, 02:30 PM)
Interesting thoughts from a young boy.
*
Ahaks...Come on...u fall for that too?

The boy uses the flawed reasoning of the professor and use it against him to proof the existance of God? Not good enough, try again, i would say to the vid maker.


Added on January 14, 2010, 4:41 pmIts easy to expose the flaw when someone claims that God exists. The existance claim itself is a flawed in reasoning. Dont have to go further to the real question really.


Added on January 14, 2010, 4:51 pm
QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Jan 13 2010, 10:00 PM)
If, you wanted to prove to me that, this thing called "feelings" exist, how will you do that?
*
As simple as looking at someones expression perhaps? Its all there to see.

This post has been edited by maranello55: Jan 14 2010, 04:51 PM
SUSDeadlocks
post Jan 14 2010, 07:29 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(maranello55 @ Jan 14 2010, 04:39 PM)
As simple as looking at someones expression perhaps? Its all there to see.
*
But just because an expression shows a certain shape with lines here and there, and all of a sudden "feelings" exists?

Is that even logical?

What does science have to say about this?
maranello55
post Jan 14 2010, 07:59 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Jan 14 2010, 07:29 PM)
But just because an expression shows a certain shape with lines here and there, and all of a sudden "feelings" exists?

Is that even logical?

What does science have to say about this?
*
Why resort to complication when theres a simple indication of something?

If u see a crying mother, what else u need as a proof that she has a sad?

If u need it to be verified scientifically, u can MRI the brain activity during that and the pattern will match those who are in mourning, OR with existing database, one can tell whether one is faking it or not.
shadowglow
post Jan 14 2010, 08:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
462 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Ampang


well lets c, if this planet has more than 2 moon or 2 suns, i can say almost all the religion will be void as everything is too dependent on it
e.g. if there's 2 suns, 1 rises from the north, another rises from the west
thesupertramp
post Jan 14 2010, 09:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Jan 14 2010, 07:29 PM)
But just because an expression shows a certain shape with lines here and there, and all of a sudden "feelings" exists?

Is that even logical?

What does science have to say about this?
*
QUOTE(maranello55 @ Jan 14 2010, 07:59 PM)
Why resort to complication when theres a simple indication of something?

If u see a crying mother, what else u need as a proof that she has a sad?

If u need it to be verified scientifically, u can MRI the brain activity during that and the pattern will match those who are in mourning, OR with existing database, one can tell whether one is faking it or not.
*
Yes. Certain emotions trigger activity in certain parts of the brain. And likewise, certain actions trigger certain emotions almost all the time. Feelings are not something random.
SUSDeadlocks
post Jan 14 2010, 11:37 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 14 2010, 09:39 PM)
Yes. Certain emotions trigger activity in certain parts of the brain. And likewise, certain actions trigger certain emotions almost all the time. Feelings are not something random.
*
And epiphanies relating to God? Is that not a feeling as well?
maranello55
post Jan 15 2010, 12:42 AM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Jan 14 2010, 11:37 PM)
And epiphanies relating to God? Is that not a feeling as well?
*
Of course. But I can cry for Santa Claus wont make him real.
kubing
post Jan 15 2010, 10:31 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(maranello55 @ Jan 14 2010, 07:59 PM)
Why resort to complication when theres a simple indication of something?

If u see a crying mother, what else u need as a proof that she has a sad?

If u need it to be verified scientifically, u can MRI the brain activity during that and the pattern will match those who are in mourning, OR with existing database, one can tell whether one is faking it or not.
*
sometime people cry when they happy...
maranello55
post Jan 15 2010, 02:36 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 15 2010, 10:31 AM)
sometime people cry when they happy...
*
Apparently......im just stating one of the examples.
teh tarik satu
post Jan 15 2010, 05:22 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: JB
I can't define something whose power is beyond comprehension- something that's undefinable. It's like trying to divide by zero.
maranello55
post Jan 15 2010, 05:25 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(teh tarik satu @ Jan 15 2010, 05:22 PM)
I can't define something whose power is beyond comprehension- something that's undefinable. It's like trying to divide by zero.
*
Yet u claim that it exists. Thats the flaw of reasoning.

To make ur existance claim valid, u have got to have a proof.
3dassets
post Jan 15 2010, 05:27 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


I am god and I can say it because this thread allow so.
thesupertramp
post Jan 15 2010, 06:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(Deadlocks @ Jan 14 2010, 11:37 PM)
And epiphanies relating to God? Is that not a feeling as well?
*
Epiphany is a feeling. But "to God"? Not quite, it can be anything, how do you know it's God? The epiphany is the feeling, what it is towards is the object. The object can be something real, or it can be a fantasy. Either way, doesn't make the epiphany fake, neither does it make the object real.

QUOTE(3dassets @ Jan 15 2010, 05:27 PM)
I am god and I can say it because this thread allow so.
*
I am God too. My father told me I was the only one. I was speshal. hmm.gif tongue.gif

But I guess this thread does let you make that claim. I just have to change my title to Supergod.
kubing
post Jan 15 2010, 07:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(3dassets @ Jan 15 2010, 05:27 PM)
I am god and I can say it because this thread allow so.
*
can you prove that bro..


Added on January 15, 2010, 7:09 pm
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 15 2010, 06:22 PM)
But I guess this thread does let you make that claim. I just have to change my title to Supergod.
*
how come we have too many God... what for hmm.gif
more than enough to have one n only

This post has been edited by kubing: Jan 15 2010, 07:11 PM
teh tarik satu
post Jan 15 2010, 11:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: JB
QUOTE(maranello55 @ Jan 15 2010, 05:25 PM)
Yet u claim that it exists. Thats the flaw of reasoning.

To make ur existance claim valid, u have got to have a proof.
*
Dearest maranello55:

I am quite certain that claiming the existence or non-existence of something entails more than just merely COMPREHENDING it for the sake of defining it.

I can't define love. Nor can I define morality. Or virtue. Or beauty- can YOU define any of those for me? You cannot. No one can, because they are abstract, subjective terms. Yet we all wield our own notions of what defines it and of course, use them as freely as we wish. That means it exists, but we just are unable to fully define them because we aren't able to fully comprehend them.. yet.

That, however, does not mean that something that is undefinable cannot exist.

To ask me to prove the existence of God is a debate for another thread on another day. I can't really be bothered to go over this ridiculous, silly argument again because in short, it all boils down to faith. Truth is there if you search for it by yourself, not ask people to define what God is to prove/disprove that God exists.

That's such a silly argument tactic that I'm really tired of and I hope you are not seriously considering asking me that.




maranello55
post Jan 16 2010, 01:09 AM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(teh tarik satu @ Jan 15 2010, 11:24 PM)
Dearest maranello55:

I am quite certain that claiming the existence or non-existence of something entails more than just merely COMPREHENDING it for the sake of defining it.

I can't define love. Nor can I define morality. Or virtue. Or beauty- can YOU define any of those for me? You cannot. No one can, because they are abstract, subjective terms. Yet we all wield our own notions of what defines it and of course, use them as freely as we wish. That means it exists, but we just are unable to fully define them because we aren't able to fully comprehend them.. yet.

That, however, does not mean that something that is undefinable cannot exist.

To ask me to prove the existence of God is a debate for another thread on another day. I can't really be bothered to go over this ridiculous, silly argument again because in short, it all boils down to faith. Truth is there if you search for it by yourself, not ask people to define what God is to prove/disprove that God exists.

That's such a silly argument tactic that I'm really tired of and I hope you are not seriously considering asking me that.
*
I am exposing the flaw in reasoning, in ur existence claim. The base of the argument is already fallacious, trying to build on it will just makes everything shakier, as what u have posted in arguments.

I believe a God that created this PHYSICAL and LOGICAL universe would have made more sense when it comes down to managing the faithful of his worshippers not to fight and ridicule each other.

Love, morality, virtue and beauty are abstract and undefinable YET you compare it to argue about the existance of a being that is supposed to be Omnipotent, All powerful and All mighty being, which is a self-proclaim and self-defining traits that need no more explaination but PROOF of the claims. Otherwise it is just claims.

LOVE is just what it is, that we feel inside when we caress our child, and when we hug our parents. What more definition u need to ensure u that the feeling exists?

Indeed you are correct. For one to believe in something that it is not there, you need faith. 100 debates will not make into 1 valid one. The existance of God, as u claim it, is more of a flaw of reasoning, more than anything else.

It is no tactics. Its a simple question to a claim that u yourself have made. If you are unable to give me the answer, I shall seek elsewhere for it, for I am seeking. Nor shall I be tired, explaining the truth, shall i have it one day.


Added on January 16, 2010, 1:19 amHere what Ive found, about reasoning and how it is that claiming the existance of God is fallacious on the base level. Remember God is the creator of the scientific, logical and physical.





This post has been edited by maranello55: Jan 16 2010, 01:31 AM
SUSb3ta
post Jan 16 2010, 02:41 AM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(teh tarik satu @ Jan 15 2010, 08:22 PM)
I can't define something whose power is beyond comprehension- something that's undefinable. It's like trying to divide by zero.
*
that is the thing with the issue of a Creator. i believe that God can never be proven to exist (until the end of days come, according to predictions).
cos everything would be meaningless if God can be proven. if God can be proven, the next question would be, God of which faith? and then there would be no more religion in this world. humans would have to submit to this God. and the word faith would cease to exist. so does freedom. and this goes against the nature of God (christian God, at least).
shadowglow
post Jan 16 2010, 07:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
462 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Ampang


the fundamental problem with the primitive human race is they only believe when they see one..some of the gods believe to be worship till from 25k years till today based on artifact found..
thesupertramp
post Jan 16 2010, 08:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


I too believe God's existence cannot be proven or disproved. But how then, if it can never be proven or disproved, can one claim such an entity to be omnipotent, listens to prayers, and intervenes with Earthly activities?
SUSb3ta
post Jan 16 2010, 11:19 PM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 16 2010, 11:39 PM)
I too believe God's existence cannot be proven or disproved. But how then, if it can never be proven or disproved, can one claim such an entity to be omnipotent, listens to prayers, and intervenes with Earthly activities?
*
that depends entirely on your personal faith and beliefs. if u want to argue that God does not exist i cannot say anything to disprove your view.
some things only become clear after a person chooses to believe. question is, how do people come to believe?
thesupertramp
post Jan 17 2010, 08:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 16 2010, 11:19 PM)
that depends entirely on your personal faith and beliefs. if u want to argue that God does not exist i cannot say anything to disprove your view.
some things only become clear after a person chooses to believe. question is, how do people come to believe?
*
No, God's existence is not what I was arguing for. I already stated clearly "I too believe God's existence cannot be proven or disproved."

If it is a believe based entirely on faith, then when evidence arise to oppose it, does one still continue to believe. If yes, it would be blind faith, and I will not argue further, as there is nothing to argue. If no, then why aren't people changing their believes based on currently available evidence?
kubing
post Jan 18 2010, 06:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
just follow what currently you believe. wait n see.. hell or heaven only .there is no in between. be too genius is not the solution i think. every one have their own believe. there is no solution only win win competition icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by kubing: Jan 18 2010, 06:15 PM
fujkenasai
post Jan 18 2010, 06:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,137 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 16 2010, 11:19 PM)
that depends entirely on your personal faith and beliefs. if u want to argue that God does not exist i cannot say anything to disprove your view.
some things only become clear after a person chooses to believe. question is, how do people come to believe?
*
Either GOD exist nor do not exist one thing can be proven is that GOD does not choose sides. If not those people of faith would never loose any battles, and events do not occur as what the bibles says if not places like somalia would have earth quake 24/7.
scottlwt
post Jan 18 2010, 07:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
171 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


to support the idea that theres only 1 almighty God,

i suppose all religion is praying the same God.

Jesus = God's only son

Nabi = Prophet

Buddha = Human turn holy figure angellike after supreme enlightenment

Every holy figure above teaches goods n forbids bad (same point/syllabus)

in order to spread God's word efficiently rapid around the world, He appointted above holy figure (i.e. Chosen 1) at different part of the world. this is especially reasonable since travelling n communication barrier exist when technology is not as advance as today.

to sum up, the idea is God = love, He rewards good n punish evils. lol,
SUSb3ta
post Jan 18 2010, 10:48 PM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 17 2010, 11:52 PM)
No, God's existence is not what I was arguing for. I already stated clearly "I too believe God's existence cannot be proven or disproved."

If it is a believe based entirely on faith, then when evidence arise to oppose it, does one still continue to believe. If yes, it would be blind faith, and I will not argue further, as there is nothing to argue. If no, then why aren't people changing their believes based on currently available evidence?
*
there's no conclusive evidence against the existence of God. so now whether people prefer to belief or not depends on their faith.

there is no such thing as blind faith in people who truly believe cos as u said, God cannot be proven of disproven at the moment. there must be a force that propel's people's faith. and if there isnt, and the person is just believing just for the sake of believing i guess u can call it blind faith. religion is highly spiritual.

regarding the force that propel people's faith. it may be the teachings, it may be the life of someone else, it may be spiritual. it can be alot of things.

your question is one that can only be answered the day that God can truly and without a doubt, be proven to not exist.

QUOTE(fujkenasai @ Jan 18 2010, 09:33 PM)
Either GOD exist nor do not exist one thing can be proven is that GOD does not choose sides. If not those people of faith would never loose any battles, and events do not occur as what the bibles says if not places like somalia would have earth quake 24/7.
*
the God in the bible did choose sides. they are the isrealites, the apple of His eye. but things changed after Christ died. we're now living in a period of grace.

QUOTE(scottlwt @ Jan 18 2010, 10:05 PM)

Every holy figure above teaches goods n forbids bad (same point/syllabus)

in order to spread God's word efficiently rapid around the world, He appointted above holy figure (i.e. Chosen 1) at different part of the world. this is especially reasonable since travelling n communication barrier exist when technology is not as advance as today.

*
if that's God's purpose then your 'appointted above holy figures' wont be teaching different teachings causing so much disagreement and even wars in humanity.


This post has been edited by b3ta: Jan 18 2010, 10:54 PM
thesupertramp
post Jan 19 2010, 06:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 18 2010, 10:48 PM)
there's no conclusive evidence against the existence of God. so now whether people prefer to belief or not depends on their faith.

there is no such thing as blind faith in people who truly believe cos as u said, God cannot be proven of disproven at the moment. there must be a force that propel's people's faith. and if there isnt, and the person is just believing just for the sake of believing i guess u can call it blind faith. religion is highly spiritual.
There is no evidence for God's existence or non-existence, yes. And so, yes again, that believing in him is faith and not blind faith. BUT, there are ample evidence that God isn't omnipotent, or if he is, he does not exercise his power on Earth (neither moon nor Mars, but we don't know enough on those). So, believing in things like "God will protect you" or "it is in God's hands" is, in fact, blind faith. There are also plenty of evidence suggesting prayers do not work. So believing in that is blind faith again. Blind and misled, I would say.

So there is a lot of blind faith out there, not on his existence, but on his powers and capabilities, on Earth at least.
witchx
post Jan 19 2010, 06:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
hi in addition to buddha.... i don't really think he is god / part of god or something like that...

he is actually only a teacher and buddhism is a teaching about the way of life if i am not mistaken... used to learn about this in dhamma school
3dassets
post Jan 19 2010, 09:08 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(kubing @ Jan 15 2010, 07:07 PM)
can you prove that bro..


Added on January 15, 2010, 7:09 pm

*
Having a choice to believe or not is something born Muslim cannot understand, my boss converted to Islam and do so much good work and help many people do make me respect him but he only do that because he thought god has been generous to him and repay the favor. On the other hand, he is misleaded by certain people and draining his whelth, now he is hungry for more money than doing good.

Since Prophet Mohammad communicated with god in his dream, and the only thing close to my logic is indeed in dream and I believe we are all played by more than one god like in video game mybe secondary god because it is more dramatic that way than a simple "one god", I don't believe we came from Adam & Eve otherwise, how come there are so many race?

What race is Adam & eve? does it mean if you live in Africa, you will eventually turn into Black? or into English if in England?

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Jan 19 2010, 09:09 PM
SUSb3ta
post Jan 19 2010, 10:04 PM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 19 2010, 09:18 PM)
There is no evidence for God's existence or non-existence, yes. And so, yes again, that believing in him is faith and not blind faith. BUT, there are ample evidence that God isn't omnipotent, or if he is, he does not exercise his power on Earth (neither moon nor Mars, but we don't know enough on those). So, believing in things like "God will protect you" or "it is in God's hands" is, in fact, blind faith. There are also plenty of evidence suggesting prayers do not work. So believing in that is blind faith again. Blind and misled, I would say.

So there is a lot of blind faith out there, not on his existence, but on his powers and capabilities, on Earth at least.
*
there have been exceptional cases in the topic of miracles and such. this boils down to mindset and motives of the believer who prays to God. if someone prays for the sake of obtaining benefits for himself does it justify the fulfilment of the prayer? likewise in christianity, prayer should be used for building relationships and self-edification. it can also be said that prayer should only be a supplement to the work that a person puts in in obtaining something. do your best and God will do the rest, they say.

then again, prayer is also something spiritual, that is part of believing in God. sure it's not like a get out of jail free card, neither does it function like a genie in a bottle, but people pray for many different reasons. not just for obtaining benefits like ur suggesting.


Added on January 19, 2010, 10:09 pm
QUOTE(3dassets @ Jan 20 2010, 12:08 AM)

Since Prophet Mohammad communicated with god in his dream, and the only thing close to my logic is indeed in dream and I believe we are all played by more than one god like in video game mybe secondary god because it is more dramatic that way than a simple "one god", I don't believe we came from Adam & Eve otherwise, how come there are so many race?

What race is Adam & eve? does it mean if you live in Africa, you will eventually turn into Black? or into English if in England?
*
if we are 'played' by multiple gods, then why is the world working like it is? what if 1 god says oh i want my all my people to be able to fly or the other god says oh i want the people living in my land to live on CO2 instead of O2. are u suggesting a collaboration of sorts? laugh.gif

about the race thing. either u believe in something called evolution, that is human adaptation to their environment, or u believe in the tower of babel story.

This post has been edited by b3ta: Jan 19 2010, 10:09 PM
EvanSoon
post Jan 20 2010, 02:52 PM

Young and Sexy!
*****
Senior Member
865 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Melaka/JB/Penang/PJ


God is the human imagination in search of comfort..

god for me = image that some con artist use to gain profit/power from others let it be in the past or present.

but if god really exist i think it would be the same god for all religion..
so i think those conflict in "some" countries are immature and are totally those artist i mentioned previously..

syNzoR
post Jan 20 2010, 03:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
369 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


I belive in every God =D
thesupertramp
post Jan 20 2010, 05:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 19 2010, 10:04 PM)
there have been exceptional cases in the topic of miracles and such. this boils down to mindset and motives of the believer who prays to God. if someone prays for the sake of obtaining benefits for himself does it justify the fulfilment of the prayer? likewise in christianity, prayer should be used for building relationships and self-edification. it can also be said that prayer should only be a supplement to the work that a person puts in in obtaining something. do your best and God will do the rest, they say.

then again, prayer is also something spiritual, that is part of believing in God. sure it's not like a get out of jail free card, neither does it function like a genie in a bottle, but people pray for many different reasons. not just for obtaining benefits like ur suggesting.
How sure are you that those are indeed "miracles"? Can it not be something that can not be explained at that time but will be explained some day in the future? Many ancient tribes thought rain was controlled by God too, but we now know better.

Most of the studies done to test the efficacy of prayers, the prayers were not done for personal gain. Most were double blind studies where the person who prayed did not even know the person being prayed for prior to the experiment.

I can certainly understand those who pray for spiritual purposes or maybe as a method of self reflection. Nothing wrong with that. But would you not agree that the "many reasons" people pray for somehow or other MOSTLY involve personal gain, or the gain of someone they know/like? Things like "May God grant me the strength...", may subconsciously be beneficial for the person's confidence but isn't the reference to God in this case still unjustified? It still is a delusion. Not to mention it still is for personal gain. Why not say "May my tasty spaghetti grant me the strength...?"

To me the premise of prayer lies in that God is omnipotent and hence can help see them through certain periods or events of a person's life. But so far it seems pretty clear that God is either non-omnipotent or he does not like exercising his power on Earth. Or heaven is keeping him very busy. For whatever reason you pray, to me, it is blind faith unless you would continue to pray even if you believe God is non-omnipotent. Or if you are praying to go to heaven when you die (we don't have evidence on whether God can or can't do this).
SUSb3ta
post Jan 20 2010, 09:00 PM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 20 2010, 08:56 PM)
How sure are you that those are indeed "miracles"? Can it not be something that can not be explained at that time but will be explained some day in the future? Many ancient tribes thought rain was controlled by God too, but we now know better.

Most of the studies done to test the efficacy of prayers, the prayers were not done for personal gain. Most were double blind studies where the person who prayed did not even know the person being prayed for prior to the experiment.

I can certainly understand those who pray for spiritual purposes or maybe as a method of self reflection. Nothing wrong with that. But would you not agree that the "many reasons" people pray for somehow or other MOSTLY involve personal gain, or the gain of someone they know/like? Things like "May God grant me the strength...", may subconsciously be beneficial for the person's confidence but isn't the reference to God in this case still unjustified? It still is a delusion. Not to mention it still is for personal gain. Why not say "May my tasty spaghetti grant me the strength...?"

To me the premise of prayer lies in that God is omnipotent and hence can help see them through certain periods or events of a person's life. But so far it seems pretty clear that God is either non-omnipotent or he does not like exercising his power on Earth. Or heaven is keeping him very busy. For whatever reason you pray, to me, it is blind faith unless you would continue to pray even if you believe God is non-omnipotent. Or if you are praying to go to heaven when you die (we don't have evidence on whether God can or can't do this).
*
how sure are u that every single unexplainable occurence that happened so far can be explained by science? this is as vague a topic as the existence of God. and there have been many stories about people receiving what they asked for in prayer without any supernatural occurence. take for an example a person praying for 50 bucks to get through a bad month, the next day he receives 50 bucks from his neighbour or a friend who was suddenly compelled to give him 50 bucks for unknown reasons. things like that have happened, it does not take a supernatural occurence.

people have various motivators, a guy may draw strength from his desire to provide his loved ones with something, or to protect his loved ones from harm. how is it delusional when a guy who is spiritually inclined goes to his God for strength? Is it also delusional to be inspired by people's lives and their devotion? take Jesus, for his sufferings are great, how is it delusional to take an example from his deeds and draw strength from what he went through? this is called inspiration.

if you have closed your book on the matter i guess nothing can make you change your mind on it. but it seems to me that even if you believe in a Creator you dont believe in a Creator that cares for his creations.
lin00b
post Jan 21 2010, 08:00 AM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 20 2010, 09:00 PM)
how sure are u that every single unexplainable occurence that happened so far can be explained by science? this is as vague a topic as the existence of God. and there have been many stories about people receiving what they asked for in prayer without any supernatural occurence. take for an example a person praying for 50 bucks to get through a bad month, the next day he receives 50 bucks from his neighbour or a friend who was suddenly compelled to give him 50 bucks for unknown reasons. things like that have happened, it does not take a supernatural occurence.

people have various motivators, a guy may draw strength from his desire to provide his loved ones with something, or to protect his loved ones from harm. how is it delusional when a guy who is spiritually inclined goes to his God for strength? Is it also delusional to be inspired by people's lives and their devotion? take Jesus, for his sufferings are great, how is it delusional to take an example from his deeds and draw strength from what he went through? this is called inspiration.

if you have closed your book on the matter i guess nothing can make you change your mind on it. but it seems to me that even if you believe in a Creator you dont believe in a Creator that cares for his creations.
*
there are also days when the man dont get that 50 bucks.
syNzoR
post Jan 21 2010, 09:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
369 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


Maybe its luck???
I pray to get money but i dont get any T_______T

vaan321
post Jan 21 2010, 01:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
God for man: a cage to restrict their actions, even though human has the mind to think...but human is worse than animal since most of the humans use
use their brain to think of ways to achieve their "animal" instinct and so the rights and wrongs are self-defined by individual, so the
so-called god which is created by human is/are actually a set of rules of rights and wrongs for ancient(maybe currently also) human to
follow...to make the world in a "controllable" manner.

God for me: "God" is for those who cannot differentiate between right and wrong and to make them fear if they commit the wrongs. For me, i have mine
own set of rules to follows as long as my action does not cause anyone to suffer, there will be no "God" rules for me as i can determine my
way and moral of living my life.

extra question from me:
what if one day, an alien species comes to earth and tell us that they created us, the human-kind. Would you accept them as god? or u insist that your "god" create u? or just admit that "god" is a imaginary figure to control human behavior?

PEACE icon_rolleyes.gif
kubing
post Jan 21 2010, 03:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
you can wait...
3dassets
post Jan 21 2010, 06:07 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 19 2010, 10:04 PM)

if we are 'played' by multiple gods, then why is the world working like it is? what if 1 god says oh i want my all my people to be able to fly or the other god says oh i want the people living in my land to live on CO2 instead of O2. are u suggesting a collaboration of sorts?  laugh.gif

about the race thing. either u believe in something called evolution, that is human adaptation to their environment, or u believe in the tower of babel story.
*
Why not, I can choose to believe or not, people can kill or another and everything independently is the evidence of conflicts not to mention different religions.

The evolution I know does not change the race but the type such as gorilla into human not like a type of dog into the another.
thesupertramp
post Jan 21 2010, 07:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 20 2010, 09:00 PM)
how sure are u that every single unexplainable occurence that happened so far can be explained by science? this is as vague a topic as the existence of God. and there have been many stories about people receiving what they asked for in prayer without any supernatural occurence. take for an example a person praying for 50 bucks to get through a bad month, the next day he receives 50 bucks from his neighbour or a friend who was suddenly compelled to give him 50 bucks for unknown reasons. things like that have happened, it does not take a supernatural occurence.

people have various motivators, a guy may draw strength from his desire to provide his loved ones with something, or to protect his loved ones from harm. how is it delusional when a guy who is spiritually inclined goes to his God for strength? Is it also delusional to be inspired by people's lives and their devotion? take Jesus, for his sufferings are great, how is it delusional to take an example from his deeds and draw strength from what he went through? this is called inspiration.

if you have closed your book on the matter i guess nothing can make you change your mind on it. but it seems to me that even if you believe in a Creator you dont believe in a Creator that cares for his creations.
*
No, it is not as vague as the existence of God. Many claims such as yours have been debunked over the years by new scientific discovery, and the trend does not seem to be reducing. Personally, I think the only mysteries that will not be one day explained will be the ones that do not garner enough attention by the world-at-large to study it.

Furthermore, you seem confused about the difference between probability and possibility. Something that is improbable does not mean it is impossible. It is impossible for a ball to be thrown upwards from Earth without any technological aid to continue upward forever and ever. But it is not impossible to throw a basketball into a hoop blindfolded without prior knowledge of where the hoop is. It is just improbable. If indeed the person sinks the shot, it does not prove God had a hand in it. So the guy who received the 50bucks after praying for it may just be a coincidence, it does not mean that God had intervened. Such an event is improbable but not impossible.

The only way for such an event to be of significance is if it defies statistics derived from research. I'll try to explain with an example. Let's say the 5 year survival rate for pancreatic cancer is 10%. That does not mean that if a patient survived beyond 5 years it would be a miracle, or that God intervened. However, if 10 out of 10 patients in a randomised study, with no extra factors that could have influenced the survival rate, survived beyond 5 years, except they all used prayers, then you can claim prayers worked. No evidence for that thus far. Plenty of the opposite.

The story if Jesus is a great story. Nobody today knows if it is a real story, but nonetheless, his story is inspirational. Nowhere did I say drawing inspiration from his story is delusional. Is it delusional to draw inspiration from the brave fight of Harry Potter against the dementors? I think not.
But the problem here is, these people are drawing inspiration from a story, a deed, not an imaginary ENTITY. There are no general consensus as to the story of God. Even if there is, it is that he is not human, he is above humans. So how does one draw inspiration from God? I may be ignorant on this, so if I am please enlighten me. But is there a story about God himself, not Jesus, that is possible for humans to draw human parallels from?

From what I understand, people (not all) pray to God only because they think he is omnipotent. That is delusional. This is entirely different from drawing inspiration from the story of Jesus, something I am not against.

To the contrary, I have not closed my book. Believers such as yourself seem to think that just because non-believers do not agree with you then we must be close-minded. In fact, I am searching for a reason to believe. But no one seems to be able to provide me with that reason. Of course, I have to argue against every reason provided, until I am unable to, just to make sure that the reason can hold up to it. So far, every attempt has failed. If you are interested, I think those who based their reasoning on science are actually the ones who are open-minded. Since those people are the ones who reason based on the latest available evidence, rather than 2000 year old dogmas.


Added on January 21, 2010, 7:06 pm
QUOTE(vaan321 @ Jan 21 2010, 01:14 PM)
extra question from me:
what if one day, an alien species comes to earth and tell us that they created us, the human-kind. Would you accept them as god? or u insist that your "god" create u? or just admit that "god" is a imaginary figure to control human behavior?

PEACE icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Then you convert to Scientology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu
biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by thesupertramp: Jan 21 2010, 07:06 PM
kubing
post Jan 29 2010, 12:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
263 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 21 2010, 07:03 PM)
No, it is not as vague as the existence of God. Many claims such as yours have been debunked over the years by new scientific discovery, and the trend does not seem to be reducing. Personally, I think the only mysteries that will not be one day explained will be the ones that do not garner enough attention by the world-at-large to study it.

Furthermore, you seem confused about the difference between probability and possibility. Something that is improbable does not mean it is impossible. It is impossible for a ball to be thrown upwards from Earth without any technological aid to continue upward forever and ever. But it is not impossible to throw a basketball into a hoop blindfolded without prior knowledge of where the hoop is. It is just improbable. If indeed the person sinks the shot, it does not prove God had a hand in it. So the guy who received the 50bucks after praying for it may just be a coincidence, it does not mean that God had intervened. Such an event is improbable but not impossible.

The only way for such an event to be of significance is if it defies statistics derived from research. I'll try to explain with an example. Let's say the 5 year survival rate for pancreatic cancer is 10%. That does not mean that if a patient survived beyond 5 years it would be a miracle, or that God intervened. However, if 10 out of 10 patients in a randomised study, with no extra factors that could have influenced the survival rate, survived beyond 5 years, except they all used prayers, then you can claim prayers worked. No evidence for that thus far. Plenty of the opposite.

The story if Jesus is a great story. Nobody today knows if it is a real story, but nonetheless, his story is inspirational. Nowhere did I say drawing inspiration from his story is delusional. Is it delusional to draw inspiration from the brave fight of Harry Potter against the dementors? I think not.
But the problem here is, these people are drawing inspiration from a story, a deed, not an imaginary ENTITY. There are no general consensus as to the story of God. Even if there is, it is that he is not human, he is above humans. So how does one draw inspiration from God? I may be ignorant on this, so if I am please enlighten me. But is there a story about God himself, not Jesus, that is possible for humans to draw human parallels from?

From what I understand, people (not all) pray to God only because they think he is omnipotent. That is delusional. This is entirely different from drawing inspiration from the story of Jesus, something I am not against.

To the contrary, I have not closed my book. Believers such as yourself seem to think that just because non-believers do not agree with you then we must be close-minded. In fact, I am searching for a reason to believe. But no one seems to be able to provide me with that reason. Of course, I have to argue against every reason provided, until I am unable to, just to make sure that the reason can hold up to it. So far, every attempt has failed. If you are interested, I think those who based their reasoning on science are actually the ones who are open-minded. Since those people are the ones who reason based on the latest available evidence, rather than 2000 year old dogmas.


Added on January 21, 2010, 7:06 pm

Then you convert to Scientology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu
biggrin.gif
*
i think you totally lost... educated Pharaoh shakehead.gif

This post has been edited by kubing: Jan 29 2010, 12:20 PM
robertngo
post Jan 29 2010, 03:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(supertroll @ Jan 22 2010, 06:33 AM)
OK.
I am not going to argue with you guise... I would like to start by answering the thread question.

For me, the existence of GOD is a must. I want HIM to be around me. I need some powerful existence called GOD, who can protect me, my family and everything. Why? I am just a mere human, weak, don't have all the knowledge of the universe.

My thoughts are simple, if you know something, there is someone who knows more than you. Yet, there must be something absolute out there.

Let simply name HIM - GOD.

I pray upon THOU MY LORD for safety, peace and love. Amen.
*
then you are imagining a god that conform to you ideal of a god, you argument about if you know something there must be someone that know more than you, then there is no absolute greatest being since even the greatest being you can find or imagine must have another being that are superior.

This post has been edited by robertngo: Jan 29 2010, 03:15 PM
SUSb3ta
post Jan 29 2010, 09:59 PM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 21 2010, 10:03 PM)
No, it is not as vague as the existence of God. Many claims such as yours have been debunked over the years by new scientific discovery, and the trend does not seem to be reducing. Personally, I think the only mysteries that will not be one day explained will be the ones that do not garner enough attention by the world-at-large to study it.

Furthermore, you seem confused about the difference between probability and possibility. Something that is improbable does not mean it is impossible. It is impossible for a ball to be thrown upwards from Earth without any technological aid to continue upward forever and ever. But it is not impossible to throw a basketball into a hoop blindfolded without prior knowledge of where the hoop is. It is just improbable. If indeed the person sinks the shot, it does not prove God had a hand in it. So the guy who received the 50bucks after praying for it may just be a coincidence, it does not mean that God had intervened. Such an event is improbable but not impossible.

The only way for such an event to be of significance is if it defies statistics derived from research. I'll try to explain with an example. Let's say the 5 year survival rate for pancreatic cancer is 10%. That does not mean that if a patient survived beyond 5 years it would be a miracle, or that God intervened. However, if 10 out of 10 patients in a randomised study, with no extra factors that could have influenced the survival rate, survived beyond 5 years, except they all used prayers, then you can claim prayers worked. No evidence for that thus far. Plenty of the opposite.

The story if Jesus is a great story. Nobody today knows if it is a real story, but nonetheless, his story is inspirational. Nowhere did I say drawing inspiration from his story is delusional. Is it delusional to draw inspiration from the brave fight of Harry Potter against the dementors? I think not.
But the problem here is, these people are drawing inspiration from a story, a deed, not an imaginary ENTITY. There are no general consensus as to the story of God. Even if there is, it is that he is not human, he is above humans. So how does one draw inspiration from God? I may be ignorant on this, so if I am please enlighten me. But is there a story about God himself, not Jesus, that is possible for humans to draw human parallels from?

From what I understand, people (not all) pray to God only because they think he is omnipotent. That is delusional. This is entirely different from drawing inspiration from the story of Jesus, something I am not against.

To the contrary, I have not closed my book. Believers such as yourself seem to think that just because non-believers do not agree with you then we must be close-minded. In fact, I am searching for a reason to believe. But no one seems to be able to provide me with that reason. Of course, I have to argue against every reason provided, until I am unable to, just to make sure that the reason can hold up to it. So far, every attempt has failed. If you are interested, I think those who based their reasoning on science are actually the ones who are open-minded. Since those people are the ones who reason based on the latest available evidence, rather than 2000 year old dogmas.


Added on January 21, 2010, 7:06 pm

Then you convert to Scientology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu
biggrin.gif
*
if u put things into a probability point of view then i guess everything can be dismissed to a matter of probability - even the start of this universe and the whole matter of existence. then why believe in a God? everything is improbable but not impossible, so to say. it is the same kind of choice of whether to believe in a God or in probability and whether to believe in miracles or just dismiss it as an improbable situation. more a matter of principle and personal experience rather than education or lack of thereof.

if you look at the matter from a christian pov, Jesus is God. or rather, God in human form. it is 'improbable' that his stories are folklore given the amount of contributors and witnesses to the books regarding his life and also the amount of people wanting to spot his faults. and this is the truth the whole of christianity is resting on. the term 'what would Jesus do' came from stories of his life and how he chose to handle things, which set an example to the life of modern christians and opened the possibility of having a personal relationship with a God that loves His creations.

the fact that alot of topics can neither be proven or disproven and is in somehow or other related to the existence of a God Himself makes this difficult to draw a firm conclusion. it's a matter of personal conclusion rather than a general conclusion. but what's the point in faith when it's logical to believe in God through scientific and human reasoning? and if ur looking for a reason to believe by proof and reasoning, i can provide none and i believe no one can unless God decides to show himself and organize a debate session.
thesupertramp
post Jan 30 2010, 06:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 29 2010, 09:59 PM)
if u put things into a probability point of view then i guess everything can be dismissed to a matter of probability - even the start of this universe and the whole matter of existence. then why believe in a God? everything is improbable but not impossible, so to say. it is the same kind of choice of whether to believe in a God or in probability and whether to believe in miracles or just dismiss it as an improbable situation. more a matter of principle and personal experience rather than education or lack of thereof.


The probability we speak of here is not random probability. It illustrates cause and event. it shows that an event follows a cause. That is what I meant by God having no power over what happens. There is no such thing as "believing" in probability.

QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 29 2010, 09:59 PM)
if you look at the matter from a christian pov, Jesus is God. or rather, God in human form. it is 'improbable' that his stories are folklore given the amount of contributors and witnesses to the books regarding his life and also the amount of people wanting to spot his faults. and this is the truth the whole of christianity is resting on. the term 'what would Jesus do' came from stories of his life and how he chose to handle things, which set an example to the life of modern christians and opened the possibility of having a personal relationship with a God that loves His creations.


Unfortunately, the amount of contributors do not make his existence likely. Ever heard of mass hysteria? Plus, up till today's knowledge in science, virgin birth is not improbable, it is impossible, for humans.

In fact, I am fairly certain the writers knew that too and capitalised on it to make his birth seem like a miracle so as to increase its appeal. People needed a reason to believe he is the son of God.

QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 29 2010, 09:59 PM)
the fact that alot of topics can neither be proven or disproven and is in somehow or other related to the existence of a God Himself makes this difficult to draw a firm conclusion. it's a matter of personal conclusion rather than a general conclusion. but what's the point in faith when it's logical to believe in God through scientific and human reasoning? and if ur looking for a reason to believe by proof and reasoning, i can provide none and i believe no one can unless God decides to show himself and organize a debate session.
*
It depends on what you mean by "prove". Can one prove green is green?
By that context EVERYTHING is up for personal interpretation and conclusion. But not in science.

I was not searching for a scientific prove for the existence of God. I am looking for a reason. Reason is not the same as proves. You may have been confused there. I stated I have not found a reason not because I have not found proves. It just means that all the reasons I have came across so far seemed to be unnecessary. Why attribute my $30 to God? Why not my own hard work. Why attribute the collapse of the building to God when a review of the structure of the building would be more useful?

Your point on faith is valid. But why does it have to be a supernatural entity? Luck is not based on the supernatural. My faith in my badminton doubles partner is not either. Hope is a very powerful thing. But why does it have to be based on an all powerful supernatural entity? If the major religions of the world do not claim God to be omnipotent, I would likely have embraced its notion.
SUSb3ta
post Jan 30 2010, 07:56 PM

responsible poster stormtrooper
****
Senior Member
685 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: malaysia


QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 30 2010, 09:56 PM)
The probability we speak of here is not random probability. It illustrates cause and event. it shows that an event follows a cause. That is what I meant by God having no power over what happens. There is no such thing as "believing" in probability.
Unfortunately, the amount of contributors do not make his existence likely. Ever heard of mass hysteria? Plus, up till today's knowledge in science, virgin birth is not improbable, it is impossible, for humans.

*
frankly ive had this conversation before somewhere on this forums. cause and effect (the butterfly effect) all boils down to physics and the creation of the universe and the laws of physics. and there are 2 schools of thoughts on this matter. the laws of physics are created, or it has always been there. forever.

now if you are of the opinion of the latter, you would probably not believe in the existence of a God. if you believe in the existence of a God who is a creator, who created these laws. there is no reason why he is not able to manipulate these laws. but if u believe in a God who didnt create these laws, then why is He called God? that will make God no better than us, just a being below the law.

the amount of contributors to the bible is of course limited to the disciples. it's not like wikipedia. but the founding of the new churches post-crucifixion which consisted of many who saw him in the flesh and experienced his teachings is undeniable.

of course it is impossible if he is to be called God. or son of God.

QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 30 2010, 09:56 PM)
In fact, I am fairly certain the writers knew that too and capitalised on it to make his birth seem like a miracle so as to increase its appeal. People needed a reason to believe he is the son of God.
It depends on what you mean by "prove". Can one prove green is green?
By that context EVERYTHING is up for personal interpretation and conclusion. But not in science.

*
and it is not only due to the unnatural circumstances of his birth that led to him being recognised as God. afaik, he did not receive that title from people. do read up more on his life for a better understanding of what you are trying to debunk. it's too much to type here. i suggest the amplified bible for better understanding and linguistic relevance.

you cant prove green is green. it is only after it came to a general agreement between the majority that it is decided and agreed upon that the colour is to be called green.
which is precisely why i said that this is conclusion can only be drawn personally and not generally.

QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 30 2010, 09:56 PM)
I was not searching for a scientific prove for the existence of God. I am looking for a reason. Reason is not the same as proves. You may have been confused there. I stated I have not found a reason not because I have not found proves. It just means that all the reasons I have came across so far seemed to be unnecessary. Why attribute my $30 to God? Why not my own hard work. Why attribute the collapse of the building to God when a review of the structure of the building would be more useful?
*
im sorry if ive misunderstood u. indeed, why attribute everything to God? no one said to do that. personally, i believe faith without works is useless. i do something, and if it goes well, i should credit everyone who helped along the way. that doesnt stop me from being pleased with myself. but i would also like to give thanks that things that are out of my control have been favourable towards me. i find that it keeps me from being too self-righteous. and being humans, i believe it's good to stoop down, smell the roses, and just express gratitude for this life. something bad happens, instead of blaming God, we should instead think about what there is in life to learn about this misfortune.

but hey, im just saying.

QUOTE(thesupertramp @ Jan 30 2010, 09:56 PM)
Your point on faith is valid. But why does it have to be a supernatural entity? Luck is not based on the supernatural. My faith in my badminton doubles partner is not either. Hope is a very powerful thing. But why does it have to be based on an all powerful supernatural entity? If the major religions of the world do not claim God to be omnipotent, I would likely have embraced its notion.
*
i hope u're not digressing to animism. but why put faith in something that isnt absolute? why submit your life and spirit to something that isnt all-powerful? if u want to believe in a God that isnt omnipotent and absolute, u might as well believe that kim jong-il is a God.
thesupertramp
post Jan 31 2010, 09:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 30 2010, 07:56 PM)
frankly ive had this conversation before somewhere on this forums. cause and effect (the butterfly effect) all boils down to physics and the creation of the universe and the laws of physics. and there are 2 schools of thoughts on this matter. the laws of physics are created, or it has always been there. forever.

now if you are of the opinion of the latter, you would probably not believe in the existence of a God. if you believe in the existence of a God who is a creator, who created these laws. there is no reason why he is not able to manipulate these laws. but if u believe in a God who didnt create these laws, then why is He called God? that will make God no better than us, just a being below the law.


Having the ability to create something does not mean you will have absolute power over it. You can create a nuclear bomb and still be blasted away by it. I am no discounting the fact that God does not have power over it, but if he does, he either does not exercise that power or he does not do it on Earth. This conclusion is drawn from there being no evidence whatsoever of it ever occurring.

QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 30 2010, 07:56 PM)
the amount of contributors to the bible is of course limited to the disciples. it's not like wikipedia. but the founding of the new churches post-crucifixion which consisted of many who saw him in the flesh and experienced his teachings is undeniable.

of course it is impossible if he is to be called God. or son of God.
and it is not only due to the unnatural circumstances of his birth that led to him being recognised as God. afaik, he did not receive that title from people. do read up more on his life for a better understanding of what you are trying to debunk. it's too much to type here. i suggest the amplified bible for better understanding and linguistic relevance.


Can I please have your source on those "many who saw him in flesh and experienced his teachings?" I admit I do not have much knowledge on the subject so some readings on these who were lucky enough to have met Jesus would be nice. Thanks.
Of course, this still does not make them immune from the effects of mass hysteria.

And I wasn't debunking his existence. I was debunking the concept of Virgin Birth. Then again, if the Virgin Birth is fictional, who knows what else is made up? After all, there are no evidence for any of it. So it really does not matter if there is more to it or not.

QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 30 2010, 07:56 PM)
you cant prove green is green. it is only after it came to a general agreement between the majority that it is decided and agreed upon that the colour is to be called green.
which is precisely why i said that this is conclusion can only be drawn personally and not generally.


The general consensus exist to aid in our communication. If we all start going against it for no good reason, the whole of human communications will break down.
And the general consensus is something does not exist until it is proven to exist. Not, it exists until its existence is disproved.

QUOTE(b3ta @ Jan 30 2010, 07:56 PM)
im sorry if ive misunderstood u. indeed, why attribute everything to God? no one said to do that. personally, i believe faith without works is useless. i do something, and if it goes well, i should credit everyone who helped along the way. that doesnt stop me from being pleased with myself. but i would also like to give thanks that things that are out of my control have been favourable towards me. i find that it keeps me from being too self-righteous. and being humans, i believe it's good to stoop down, smell the roses, and just express gratitude for this life. something bad happens, instead of blaming God, we should instead think about what there is in life to learn about this misfortune.

but hey, im just saying.
i hope u're not digressing to animism. but why put faith in something that isnt absolute? why submit your life and spirit to something that isnt all-powerful? if u want to believe in a God that isnt omnipotent and absolute, u might as well believe that kim jong-il is a God.
*
Where does animism come into this? I'm not quite sure I even believe there is such a thing as "soul".

Putting faith in something that is not absolute has a lot to do with positive thinking. I'm sure you have heard of the positive thinking cliche especially by motivational speakers. Hoping for a positive outcome gears one towards thinking about the positive outcome. And that can have an immense influence on one's self confidence. The probability of success and failure does not change no matter how much one hopes. But thinking about the good and not the bad, will improve one's performance which would indirectly skew the probabilities.

Using Kim Jong-Il as an example has clearly demonstrated your biased views. If Jesus was proven to exist and to his own admission he is no Son of God, will you still follow his teachings and draw inspiration from his story? And perhaps idolise him? Is there anything wrong with idolising a human and perhaps to your own terms, call him God? Is it wrong to have faith in the guidance of your idol (not literally, but through their teachings)?

I think the question should be, why believe in something you think is omnipotent, but know nothing of? How will that guide you? How will that make you a better person in this here and now?
SUSseller009
post Feb 1 2010, 11:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
457 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
----

This post has been edited by marsalee: Nov 13 2010, 08:07 PM
ZeratoS
post Feb 3 2010, 08:49 PM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(syNzoR @ Jan 21 2010, 09:59 AM)
Maybe its luck???
I pray to get money but i dont get any T_______T
*
As per experience, God (or whatever others choose to believe) seldom grants selfish prayers, if not never.

This post has been edited by ZeratoS: Feb 3 2010, 08:50 PM
thesupertramp
post Feb 3 2010, 10:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(marsalee @ Feb 1 2010, 11:23 PM)
It's a Master Plan.
The scripts are already written.
You're acting without you even realizing it.
You are unaware.
You think you know everything but you don't even know yourself.
Your body, how your mind works, instinct, will, feelings, etc.
Where you come from and to where you are going.
Trapped in space & time, when actually the past, present, future all already exist, somewhere in a secret place.
It's time to watch The Real Movie.

Find your remote control, or manual book.
*
biggrin.gif
Have you read the Time Traveler's Wife?

So I take it you don't believe in Free Will, then?

QUOTE(ZeratoS @ Feb 3 2010, 08:49 PM)
As per experience, God (or whatever others choose to believe) seldom grants selfish prayers, if not never.
*
Studies suggest that God does not grant ANY prayers at all.
SUShako
post Feb 5 2010, 09:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
245 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Malaysia


its just a huge big imaginary friend.
ZeratoS
post Feb 6 2010, 10:45 PM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(hako @ Feb 5 2010, 09:41 PM)
its just a huge big imaginary friend.
*
That is one way to put it. And people these days are children in the playground argueing about who's imaginary friend is better. ayep.
SUSseller009
post Feb 8 2010, 01:31 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
457 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
----

This post has been edited by marsalee: Nov 13 2010, 08:07 PM
thesupertramp
post Feb 9 2010, 08:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


QUOTE(marsalee @ Feb 8 2010, 01:31 AM)
Haven't read that.
What is Free Will? Hurrmmm.

Btw, what studies suggest that God does not grant ANY prayers at all? 
ALL my prayers have been granted, in the future. 
Also included, things that I never prayed for.
*
http://www.ahjonline.com/article/PIIS00028...006496/abstract

That's one of them. There are many more studies. If you do a literature search many more will turn up.
chenwei89
post Feb 19 2010, 01:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Oh, my God is a god of grace, the god of love, and the god of everything...
I find life very GOOD..Fu##### GOOD!! In times of trouble, he is there for me..
He helps me all the time..I love getting into his presence every single day..love communicating with him,
and see miracles that performed by him! In fact, i know my purpose in my life..there are many testimonies out there
that describe the wonderful things that God has done into many lifes..healing, prosperity etc, and the best of all,
He knows me intimately and LOVES me infinately! I love you Jesus! Because you first love me!
abubin
post Feb 19 2010, 05:01 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,429 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



yeah..just because you been living in a shell of your own life does not means GOD is great. Look the the people who died of hunger or some innocent child died from some car accident. Then tell me god love them. You are just living in denial. Wait till you see someone you love dearly pass away. Then feel the sting. And don't give me the crap of god has taken them to a better place.
kip2212
post Feb 22 2010, 08:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
93 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
abubin,

I have felt the sting of losing a loved one. Not once, but three times. Yes, that made me doubt God. And when bad things happen, I wondered if He existed at all.

As a matter of fact, I've led my life in a path that is way beyond what I wanted. Things happen after another and sometimes I look at God with anger.

I'm sure God has been pretty unpopular among people like us, people who have gone through a shit load of life events. After all, it's always easier to blame or be angry at Someone who is supposed to be in charge of everything, who is supposed to make things better.

But, spare me a minute. Have you heard of His son Jesus?

He most certainly did not live in the shell of his own life. Temptation? He's got it straight from the source. Mockery? You have no idea the millions of people who hated him despite his holy identity. Betrayal? By his very own disciple, leading him straight to the hands of enemies. Pain? Look at the cross. Losing a loved one? He was the darling of heaven. God's most precious son. How would you feel if you gave up your one and only Son to save the very people who led him to his death?

Everything you've felt, or have been feeling.. God has felt them too... He knows.

Why do bad things happen? I don't know if I should go any deeper into this. If you are willing to discuss, feel free to message me. =) Peace.

ZeratoS
post Feb 23 2010, 10:59 PM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(kip2212 @ Feb 22 2010, 08:46 PM)
abubin,

I have felt the sting of losing a loved one. Not once, but three times.  Yes, that made me doubt God.  And when bad things happen, I wondered if He existed at all.

As a matter of fact, I've led my life in a path that is way beyond what I wanted.  Things happen after another and sometimes I look at God with anger.

I'm sure God has been pretty unpopular among people like us, people who have gone through a shit load of life events.  After all, it's always easier to blame or be angry at Someone who is supposed to be in charge of everything, who is supposed to make things better.

But, spare me a minute.  Have you heard of His son Jesus?

He most certainly did not live in the shell of his own life.  Temptation? He's got it straight from the source.  Mockery?  You have no idea the millions of people who hated him despite his holy identity.  Betrayal?  By his very own disciple, leading him straight to the hands of enemies.  Pain?  Look at the cross.  Losing a loved one?  He was the darling of heaven.  God's most precious son.  How would you feel if you gave up your one and only Son to save the very people who led him to his death?

Everything you've felt, or have been feeling.. God has felt them too... He knows.

Why do bad things happen?  I don't know if I should go any deeper into this. If you are willing to discuss, feel free to message me. =) Peace.
*
Ah, lets keep the Islam vs Christianity out of this please. A forethought.


Indeed, if we take it into context, Jesus Christ surely has suffered more than anything we can suffer. I believe, one shouldn't refer to deities as "Fix-it" or solutions to life's problems, but rather as inspirations (guides) for people. After all, I don't think many of us have seen a miracle, so just keep living on huh.
kip2212
post Feb 23 2010, 11:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
93 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(ZeratoS @ Feb 23 2010, 10:59 PM)
Ah, lets keep the Islam vs Christianity out of this please. A forethought.
*
Ah, I wasn't intending to go there. Sorry if it seemed like so. No offense. =)
fk2222
post Feb 24 2010, 12:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
258 posts

Joined: May 2009
Guys, you should really check about Enlil and Enki

pls google it and judge by ur own sense
DoubleU
post Feb 24 2010, 06:37 AM

2k yo!~
*******
Senior Member
2,708 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Johor Bahru


Well sticking to the main title. Define your God.
God, a being that transcense our understanding. A being for spiritual support. Thus if one does not have a need that cannot be satisfied, one does not turn to God.
ZeratoS
post Feb 24 2010, 03:33 PM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(kip2212 @ Feb 23 2010, 11:38 PM)
Ah, I wasn't intending to go there. Sorry if it seemed like so.  No offense.  =)
*
No no, it was just a forewarning. People tend to get offended easily.
Empathy
post Feb 24 2010, 05:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,184 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: UEP Subang Jaya
My definition of God : The Universe is God.


.
lin00b
post Feb 24 2010, 05:47 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
pantheism?
g r a p e k e y
post Feb 25 2010, 05:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Apr 2009



Added on February 25, 2010, 5:37 pm
QUOTE(chenwei89 @ Feb 19 2010, 01:12 PM)
Oh, my God is a god of grace, the god of love, and the god of everything...
I find life very GOOD..Fu##### GOOD!! In times of trouble, he is there for me..
He helps me all the time..I love getting into his presence every single day..love communicating with him,
and see miracles that performed by him! In fact, i know my purpose in my life..there are many testimonies out there
that describe the wonderful things that God has done into many lifes..healing, prosperity etc, and the best of all,
He knows me intimately and LOVES me infinately! I love you Jesus! Because you first love me!
*
I'm not sure if I can ask this question here.. let me know if I can't.

May I know which church are you from?.

Besides, I would like to share with you all a story about my dear friend. She is the type of girl that is very gentle and polite, kind hearted and soft spoken but strong at heart (though she doesn't seem like one). And not to mention, her studies. Always scored A's(probably can't afford to fail especially when you're on a scholarship).

Her family are Buddhist.. except herself; One day, she came to know of one church called (the Acts church) ..hmm.. I'm not sure if I get the spelling correct. I remember she told me the church is located inside The Summit. Anyway, she came to know about "Jesus" since 13. And from then on, she is "so into Christianity". Always talks about her God to us at college..Always seeing her distributing weekly flyers from her church at college main entrance!! *till that extend* and always invite us (college friends) to attend her church service on Sundays. Btw, this story happens close to 1 year ago.

So one fine day, a friend of ours organized a food pot luck party gathering at one of our friend's empty house and we were all invited, and was told to bring along our friendsss as well.. *the more the merrier*. During that gathering, she brought along a guy friend and later introduce to us that he is the youth leader from their church(the Acts church). So we tease her with that guy but she denied and said they were just friends. And yes, they were just friends.. but months later, we got the news that they got together.

A few months later, she flew to UK to further her law degree.. (at that period of time, we seldom keep in touch).. but not until one night she ring me up from UK telling me about her situation. She sounded so in fear.

I found out that the guy she was dating wasn't a good person! He slapped her occasionally when my friend couldn't spend time with him when she needs to study for her exams. He is very very hot tempered. So she wanted the break up. *there's so many things that the guy did to her* ..

Anyway, one fine day that guy flew to UK and surprised her at her door step just to patch things up but my friend didn't want to accept him back anymore because of his character. Again that guy slapped her and left. But the next day he return back at her door step and said he was sorry and promised he would not disturbed her anymore. And he flew back to Malaysia. But hours later he text her saying he took her credit card and will come back again to UK to return it back to her. A few days later he turn up in front of her doorstep and return the credit card and left (we do not know where he stays). The next day he return to Malaysia and while he's inside the flight, he text her saying he used her credit card to book the flight ticket to and flow and ends the sms with a smile *wink*. (he must have took it from her when he visits her with housemates). And btw, that guy got her UK contact from her parents. The parents were so against her daughter being a christian at that time. So my friend didn't want her parents to know about this guy's true character.



So people, how can a church Youth Leader behave this way?? very bad impression he portrays.





Another thing I would like to ask all Christians out there who describe about your God smile.gif .. I have a few questions that I would love to know:



1. why do some churches change their bible to suit human needs? . what happens in revelation 22:18-19 ?


2. why some Christians celebrate Christmas? isn't that pageant worship and has nothing to do with Christianity? ..it's a worship of the sun God?


3. Baptism. I saw some churches baptized their going-to-be church members at the swimming pool? or at a tub? . I thought the Bible clearly mentioned that we have to be baptized in living/running water only then we will have a part in him. Living and running water = sea, river. Somewhere in the bible someone was baptized in the desert and he was just sprinkled with water from the desert but hey, those times are in old testament? didn't God asked us to be baptized in running and living water now? . Furthermore, water from the desert is running water as the water travels underneath unlike at the pond, swimming pool, tub..etc. To me, this is serious matter, as the bible clearly mention that if we do not do that accordingly, we shall have no part in him.


4. Easter day. what is that? .. the bible didn't mention?


5. the Holy Spirit. Speaking about the HS, we talk about tongues. Here, I notice some churches needs to practice to speak in tongues. Which means, they need to go for classes with their pastors to practice reading some scriptures repeatably.. and they would read it very fast and after they managed to catch up with the speed, they're considered called having the HS. I thought the HS is given by God? .. somewhere in the bible mention that when a person receives the HS, you will feel warm coming down from your head, a feeling of comfort & glad, and the bible gives many example of how a person receive the HS, but it wasn't in that manner of practicing/ attending training classes to receive the HS.


6. Slain. Some churches practice slain.. I believe the purposes of slain is to make them fall into a deep sleep to be filled with God's grace? please correct me if I'm wrong. And after a person wakes up, one will feel very tired and exhausted (like there's no more strength). I was just wondering why one will feel so unwell after they wake up?


7. the blood & flesh of Jesus. During Holy Communion, I observe some churches use Rebina and flour (which is bought from the supermarket in packet form). I thought the bread must be just made of plain flour mix with water which has been stated inside the bible. And the packet biscuit / bread has contents such as sugar..etc. And why Rebina? . Don't you guys think is a wrong practice? . Where else some churches use red wine. But if you read the bible correctly, we should be using pure grape juice & pure flour.


8. Sabbath Day. Sabbath day should be on the 7th day of the week, for God rested on the 7th day. Which means, the Sabbath day is on a Saturday, and not Sunday. Most churches make it on Sunday for the convenience of the people.. but hey, what are we all busy about in this world? what's our purpose in life? aren't we supposed to keep ourselves in God's grace and wait for his 2nd coming?


no offense all, I am still learning.. Just don't know why some churches don't follow according to what the bible says and wonders if this bible verse applies to those who did not follow according to the bible revelation 22:18-19


ps/ please do not get offended as I am just like everyone else, searching for the truth

This post has been edited by g r a p e k e y: Feb 25 2010, 05:52 PM
Eugene91
post Feb 25 2010, 08:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,109 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Mike India Romeo India


QUOTE(g r a p e k e y @ Feb 25 2010, 05:32 PM)

Added on February 25, 2010, 5:37 pm

I'm not sure if I can ask this question here.. let me know if I can't.

May I know which church are you from?.

Besides, I would like to share with you all a story about my dear friend. She is the type of girl that is very gentle and polite, kind hearted and soft spoken but strong at heart (though she doesn't seem like one).  And not to mention, her studies. Always scored A's(probably can't afford to fail especially when you're on a scholarship).
 
Her family are Buddhist.. except herself; One day, she came to know of one church called (the Acts church) ..hmm.. I'm not sure if I get the spelling correct. I remember she told me the church is located inside The Summit. Anyway, she came to know about "Jesus" since 13. And from then on, she is  "so into Christianity". Always talks about her God to us at college..Always seeing her distributing weekly flyers from her church at college main entrance!! *till that extend*  and always invite us (college friends) to attend her church service on Sundays.  Btw, this story happens close to 1 year ago.

So one fine day, a friend of ours organized a food pot luck party gathering at one of our friend's empty house and we were all invited, and was told to bring along our friendsss as well.. *the more the merrier*. During that gathering, she brought along a guy friend and later introduce to us that he is the youth leader from their church(the Acts church). So we tease her with that guy but she denied and said they were just friends. And yes, they were just friends.. but months later, we got the news that they got together.

A few months later, she flew to UK to further her law degree.. (at that period of time, we seldom keep in touch).. but not until one night she ring me up from UK telling me about her situation. She sounded so in fear.

I found out that the guy she was dating wasn't a good person! He slapped her occasionally when my friend couldn't spend time with him when she needs to study for her exams. He is very very hot tempered.  So she wanted the break up. *there's so many things that the guy did to her* ..

Anyway, one fine day that guy flew to UK and surprised her at her door step just to patch things up but my friend didn't want to accept him back anymore because of his character. Again that guy slapped her and left. But the next day he return back at her door step and said he was sorry and promised he would not disturbed her anymore. And he flew back to Malaysia. But hours later he text her saying he took her credit card and will come back again to UK to return it back to her. A few days later he turn up in front of her doorstep and return the credit card and left (we do not know where he stays). The next day he return to Malaysia and while he's inside the flight, he text her saying he used her credit card to book the flight ticket to and flow and ends the sms with a smile *wink*. (he must have took it from her when he visits her with housemates). And btw, that guy got her UK contact from her parents. The parents were so against her daughter being a christian at that time. So my friend didn't want her parents to know about this guy's true character.
So people, how can a church Youth Leader behave this way??  very bad impression he portrays.


Another thing I would like to ask all Christians out there who describe about your God smile.gif .. I have a few questions that I would love to know:
1. why do some churches change their bible to suit human needs? . what happens in revelation 22:18-19 ?
2. why some Christians celebrate Christmas? isn't that pageant worship and has nothing to do with Christianity? ..it's a worship of the sun God?
3. Baptism.  I saw some churches baptized their going-to-be church members at the swimming pool? or at a tub? . I thought the Bible clearly mentioned that we have to be baptized in living/running water only then we will have a part in him. Living and running water = sea, river.  Somewhere in the bible someone was baptized in the desert and he was just sprinkled with water from the desert but hey, those times are in old testament?  didn't God asked us to be baptized in running and living water now? . Furthermore, water from the desert is running water as the water travels underneath unlike at the pond, swimming pool, tub..etc.  To me, this is serious matter, as the bible clearly mention that if we do not do that accordingly, we shall have no part in him.
4. Easter day. what is that? .. the bible didn't mention?
5. the Holy Spirit.  Speaking about the HS, we talk about tongues.  Here, I notice some churches needs to practice to speak in tongues. Which means, they need to go for classes with their pastors to practice reading some scriptures repeatably.. and they would read it very fast and after they managed to catch up with the speed, they're considered called having the HS.  I thought the HS is given by God? .. somewhere in the bible mention that when a person receives the HS, you will feel warm coming down from your head, a feeling of comfort & glad,  and the bible gives many example of how a person receive the HS, but it wasn't in that manner of practicing/ attending training classes to receive the HS.
6. Slain. Some churches practice slain..  I believe the purposes of slain is to make them fall into a deep sleep to be filled with God's grace? please correct me if I'm wrong. And after a person wakes up, one will feel very tired and exhausted (like there's no more strength).  I was just wondering why one will feel so unwell after they wake up?
7. the blood & flesh of Jesus.  During Holy Communion, I observe some churches use Rebina and flour (which is bought from the supermarket in packet form). I thought the bread must be just made of plain flour mix with water which has been stated inside the bible. And the packet biscuit / bread has contents such as sugar..etc.  And why Rebina? . Don't you guys think is a wrong practice? . Where else some churches use red wine. But if you read the bible correctly, we should be using pure grape juice & pure flour.
8. Sabbath Day.  Sabbath day should be on the 7th day of the week, for God rested on the 7th day. Which means, the Sabbath day is on a Saturday, and not Sunday.  Most churches make it on Sunday for the convenience of the people.. but hey, what are we all busy about in this world? what's our purpose in life? aren't we supposed to keep ourselves in God's grace and wait for his 2nd coming?
no offense all, I am still learning..  Just don't know why some churches don't follow according to what the bible says and wonders if this bible verse applies to those who did not follow according to the bible  revelation 22:18-19
ps/ please do not get offended as I am just like everyone else, searching for the truth
*
Refer to the Roman Catholic Church..

Since it was set up by the diciple St. Peter(The Rock) who was told by Jesus Christ to go and set up Jesus's Church and preach to the world.

Catholic churches use Wine and they make their own Bread..

Easter Sunday, is the day when Jesus Christ accended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the father..

Regarding sabbath day.. It is because we identify Monday as the 1st day of the week.. So definitely 7th day is on Sunday.


RwGlmllhpSX
post Feb 28 2010, 04:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
203 posts

Joined: May 2008
To me God is not an external being, but "The All" which consists of everything.

We're all part of everything so we're also part of God.

Law of Attraction
g r a p e k e y
post Mar 1 2010, 12:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Feb 25 2010, 08:37 PM)
Refer to the Roman Catholic Church..

Since it was set up by the diciple St. Peter(The Rock) who was told by Jesus Christ to go and set up Jesus's Church and preach to the world.

Catholic churches use Wine and they make their own Bread..

Easter Sunday, is the day when Jesus Christ accended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the father..

Regarding sabbath day.. It is because we identify Monday as the 1st day of the week.. So definitely 7th day is on Sunday.
*
the Roman Catholic Church have their *own* bible ? aren't we suppose to use the universal bible which is by God and not by the Roman Catholic? We can't just modify words inside the bible can we?

Easter sunday was not mention in the bible at all.. there's no such practice.

in the calender, the first day is Sunday and not Monday. Please get your facts right. To please God or men?


we can't just deny things which are not written inside the bible.. anyway, we're all countable for everything we bring upon ourselves.

This post has been edited by g r a p e k e y: Mar 1 2010, 12:45 PM
Eugene91
post Mar 1 2010, 02:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,109 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Mike India Romeo India


QUOTE(g r a p e k e y @ Mar 1 2010, 12:45 PM)
the Roman Catholic Church have their *own* bible ? aren't we suppose to use the universal bible which is by God and not by the Roman Catholic? We can't just modify words inside the bible can we?

Easter sunday was not mention in the bible at all.. there's no such practice.

in the calender, the first day is Sunday and not Monday. Please get your facts right.  To please God or men?
we can't just deny things which are not written inside the bible..  anyway, we're all countable for everything we bring upon ourselves.
*
No... Of course they didnt say Easter Sunday exactly..... Otherwise it should be called the Resurection & Accension of Jesus into heaven?

The catholic church just wanted to do it for reminder i assume..

Its the King James Version(KJV)..

What can I say?.... Even the chinese call monday as 1st day..


3dassets
post Mar 1 2010, 03:07 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Mar 1 2010, 02:18 PM)
What can I say?.... Even the chinese call monday as 1st day..
*
Chinese didn't define the name, just number. Although Malay have but a lot are using 1 to 12 months; Bulan 1 - bulan 12 and have our own calenders but we all have to use the English version because they gave us most of our practical knowledge.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Mar 1 2010, 03:16 PM
abubin
post Mar 3 2010, 05:56 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,429 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(RwGlmllhpSX @ Feb 28 2010, 04:04 AM)
To me God is not an external being, but "The All" which consists of everything.

We're all part of everything so we're also part of God.

Law of Attraction
*
god is everything and nothing. Oh what a nice way of putting things into perspective eh? When something is part of everything then god is at the end. When something is part of nothing then god is at the end. God is everywhere and nowhere.

It's only playing with words. God is at extreme of everything.


Added on March 3, 2010, 6:00 pm
QUOTE(g r a p e k e y @ Feb 25 2010, 05:32 PM)

Added on February 25, 2010, 5:37 pm

I'm not sure if I can ask this question here.. let me know if I can't.

May I know which church are you from?.

Besides, I would like to share with you all a story about my dear friend. She is the type of girl that is very gentle and polite, kind hearted and soft spoken but strong at heart (though she doesn't seem like one).  And not to mention, her studies. Always scored A's(probably can't afford to fail especially when you're on a scholarship).
 
Her family are Buddhist.. except herself; One day, she came to know of one church called (the Acts church) ..hmm.. I'm not sure if I get the spelling correct. I remember she told me the church is located inside The Summit. Anyway, she came to know about "Jesus" since 13. And from then on, she is  "so into Christianity". Always talks about her God to us at college..Always seeing her distributing weekly flyers from her church at college main entrance!! *till that extend*  and always invite us (college friends) to attend her church service on Sundays.  Btw, this story happens close to 1 year ago.

So one fine day, a friend of ours organized a food pot luck party gathering at one of our friend's empty house and we were all invited, and was told to bring along our friendsss as well.. *the more the merrier*. During that gathering, she brought along a guy friend and later introduce to us that he is the youth leader from their church(the Acts church). So we tease her with that guy but she denied and said they were just friends. And yes, they were just friends.. but months later, we got the news that they got together.

A few months later, she flew to UK to further her law degree.. (at that period of time, we seldom keep in touch).. but not until one night she ring me up from UK telling me about her situation. She sounded so in fear.

I found out that the guy she was dating wasn't a good person! He slapped her occasionally when my friend couldn't spend time with him when she needs to study for her exams. He is very very hot tempered.  So she wanted the break up. *there's so many things that the guy did to her* ..

Anyway, one fine day that guy flew to UK and surprised her at her door step just to patch things up but my friend didn't want to accept him back anymore because of his character. Again that guy slapped her and left. But the next day he return back at her door step and said he was sorry and promised he would not disturbed her anymore. And he flew back to Malaysia. But hours later he text her saying he took her credit card and will come back again to UK to return it back to her. A few days later he turn up in front of her doorstep and return the credit card and left (we do not know where he stays). The next day he return to Malaysia and while he's inside the flight, he text her saying he used her credit card to book the flight ticket to and flow and ends the sms with a smile *wink*. (he must have took it from her when he visits her with housemates). And btw, that guy got her UK contact from her parents. The parents were so against her daughter being a christian at that time. So my friend didn't want her parents to know about this guy's true character.
So people, how can a church Youth Leader behave this way??  very bad impression he portrays.


Another thing I would like to ask all Christians out there who describe about your God smile.gif .. I have a few questions that I would love to know:
1. why do some churches change their bible to suit human needs? . what happens in revelation 22:18-19 ?
2. why some Christians celebrate Christmas? isn't that pageant worship and has nothing to do with Christianity? ..it's a worship of the sun God?
3. Baptism.  I saw some churches baptized their going-to-be church members at the swimming pool? or at a tub? . I thought the Bible clearly mentioned that we have to be baptized in living/running water only then we will have a part in him. Living and running water = sea, river.  Somewhere in the bible someone was baptized in the desert and he was just sprinkled with water from the desert but hey, those times are in old testament?  didn't God asked us to be baptized in running and living water now? . Furthermore, water from the desert is running water as the water travels underneath unlike at the pond, swimming pool, tub..etc.  To me, this is serious matter, as the bible clearly mention that if we do not do that accordingly, we shall have no part in him.
4. Easter day. what is that? .. the bible didn't mention?
5. the Holy Spirit.  Speaking about the HS, we talk about tongues.  Here, I notice some churches needs to practice to speak in tongues. Which means, they need to go for classes with their pastors to practice reading some scriptures repeatably.. and they would read it very fast and after they managed to catch up with the speed, they're considered called having the HS.  I thought the HS is given by God? .. somewhere in the bible mention that when a person receives the HS, you will feel warm coming down from your head, a feeling of comfort & glad,  and the bible gives many example of how a person receive the HS, but it wasn't in that manner of practicing/ attending training classes to receive the HS.
6. Slain. Some churches practice slain..  I believe the purposes of slain is to make them fall into a deep sleep to be filled with God's grace? please correct me if I'm wrong. And after a person wakes up, one will feel very tired and exhausted (like there's no more strength).  I was just wondering why one will feel so unwell after they wake up?
7. the blood & flesh of Jesus.  During Holy Communion, I observe some churches use Rebina and flour (which is bought from the supermarket in packet form). I thought the bread must be just made of plain flour mix with water which has been stated inside the bible. And the packet biscuit / bread has contents such as sugar..etc.  And why Rebina? . Don't you guys think is a wrong practice? . Where else some churches use red wine. But if you read the bible correctly, we should be using pure grape juice & pure flour.
8. Sabbath Day.  Sabbath day should be on the 7th day of the week, for God rested on the 7th day. Which means, the Sabbath day is on a Saturday, and not Sunday.  Most churches make it on Sunday for the convenience of the people.. but hey, what are we all busy about in this world? what's our purpose in life? aren't we supposed to keep ourselves in God's grace and wait for his 2nd coming?
no offense all, I am still learning..  Just don't know why some churches don't follow according to what the bible says and wonders if this bible verse applies to those who did not follow according to the bible  revelation 22:18-19
ps/ please do not get offended as I am just like everyone else, searching for the truth
*
Your post is long, i only read the top part. Bottom part I don't really care since it is too specified on one religion.

One thing you must learn about human being irrespective of god exist or not is there are always bad apples. Even in police force there are bad police. Same as in churches there are bad pastor or bad iman or bad monk and so on. That is why religion has been twisted for personal gains. That is why I am so against people who follow religions blindly. Especially religions enforced on kids. Follow religion with a brain. Learn to interpret and analyze teachings with a clear conscience and mind.


This post has been edited by abubin: Mar 3 2010, 06:00 PM
g r a p e k e y
post Mar 4 2010, 05:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(abubin @ Mar 3 2010, 05:56 PM)
Your post is long, i only read the top part. Bottom part I don't really care since it is too specified on one religion.

One thing you must learn about human being irrespective of god exist or not is there are always bad apples. Even in police force there are bad police. Same as in churches there are bad pastor or bad iman or bad monk and so on. That is why religion has been twisted for personal gains. That is why I am so against people who follow religions blindly.  Especially religions enforced on kids. Follow religion with a brain. Learn to interpret and analyze teachings with a clear conscience and mind.
*
precisely.

This post has been edited by g r a p e k e y: Mar 4 2010, 05:18 PM
SUSsamteng
post Mar 5 2010, 01:16 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,458 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Klang Valley

God is the sum of all human ignorance. It is like when we don't have a concrete answer for why things are the way they are, we decide to put God as a placeholder for any X-factor that arises. When people say, "well, God knows what caused this". Which figuratively means, no one knows. Guess that explains the gist of it.
anson lee
post Mar 5 2010, 04:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Japan



QUOTE(slimey @ Dec 8 2009, 04:11 AM)
God is a concept or symbol created by man to represent absolute power.
*
nod.gif nod.gif

God is same as human before...
God does good things b4 so ppl respect and workship them n made a statue of them...
till now,we still workship them

so God=Human

correct me if imma wrong. notworthy.gif notworthy.gif
SUSslimey
post Mar 5 2010, 04:54 AM


*******
Senior Member
6,914 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(anson lee @ Mar 5 2010, 04:49 AM)
nod.gif  nod.gif

God is same as human before...
God does good things b4 so ppl respect and workship them n made a statue of them...
till now,we still workship them

so God=Human

correct me if imma wrong. notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
to me, there's no right or wrong. only rational and irrational.
God's existence itself is disputable. hence there's no reason for me to reason with your statement.
lin00b
post Mar 5 2010, 08:01 AM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(anson lee @ Mar 5 2010, 04:49 AM)
nod.gif  nod.gif

God is same as human before...
God does good things b4 so ppl respect and workship them n made a statue of them...
till now,we still workship them

so God=Human

correct me if imma wrong. notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
thats the chinese/indian gods maybe. christian/islam god has no statue.

and how do you account for gods that looked half human, half animal? eg. sun wukong, ganesh, hanuman, etc
abubin
post Mar 5 2010, 10:58 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,429 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



God concept was created long long time ago by human to suppress human when they still not have the concept of science and logic. Then god concept got developed and shaped to more complicated as human society became more complicated. Then some culture bring up statues as a symbol of god or it's representative to make it easier to reference. Some got developed into more wide concept such as chinese deities and some remained only one or two like jesus christ statue or mother mary.

Regardless, all concept of god is still referring to something based on believe.

One good example of early concept of god can be seen from the movie 10,000 BC. Even though the movie is fiction, it's concept of human using god to suppress other "lower class" of human is evidential. Especially the part when eclipse happened. See how the high priest make use of the moment which also caught him by surprise to reinforce the concept of god.

This post has been edited by abubin: Mar 5 2010, 10:59 AM
spursfan
post Mar 5 2010, 01:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
110 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(lin00b @ Mar 5 2010, 08:01 AM)
thats the chinese/indian gods maybe. christian/islam god has no statue.

and how do you account for gods that looked half human, half animal? eg. sun wukong, ganesh, hanuman, etc
*

at least chinese/indian gods are not sadist like the one from abrahamic religions

lin00b
post Mar 5 2010, 04:44 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(spursfan @ Mar 5 2010, 01:24 PM)
at least chinese/indian gods are not sadist like the one from abrahamic religions
*
what does that have to do with this topic? if you want to attack any particular god/religion, bvnb ---> that way
cheecken0
post Mar 5 2010, 05:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
423 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
My god says that I am holier than thou!

But I say god is just a concept for humans to follow.
g r a p e k e y
post Apr 16 2010, 10:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(chenwei89 @ Feb 19 2010, 01:12 PM)
Oh, my God is a god of grace, the god of love, and the god of everything...
I find life very GOOD..Fu##### GOOD!! In times of trouble, he is there for me..
He helps me all the time..I love getting into his presence every single day..love communicating with him,
and see miracles that performed by him! In fact, i know my purpose in my life..there are many testimonies out there
that describe the wonderful things that God has done into many lifes..healing, prosperity etc, and the best of all,
He knows me intimately and LOVES me infinately! I love you Jesus! Because you first love me!
*
Just to explain this sentence where most Christians are using. The bible says, if you love anything more than me(him), you're not worthy of me(him). In the book of Ecclesiastes says: it is the duty of man to love God with all his heart and with all his mind... & that is the first commandment. Because he first love you(us).



C-Note
post Apr 16 2010, 11:17 PM

starry starry night
*******
Senior Member
3,037 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 6-feet under


Im beginning to feel sick of all these threads regarding timeless questions that will NEVER have answers to
TScommunist892003
post Apr 17 2010, 01:06 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
550 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(C-Note @ Apr 17 2010, 12:17 AM)
Im beginning to feel sick of all these threads regarding timeless questions that will NEVER have answers to
*
What is your answer to poke a girl??? what is your answer to the cure of cancer??? WHat is the answer of end of life?? If a question without an answer, mean it is not worth examine?? Only god would said what. blush.gif
lin00b
post Apr 17 2010, 02:20 AM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(C-Note @ Apr 16 2010, 11:17 PM)
Im beginning to feel sick of all these threads regarding timeless questions that will NEVER have answers to
*
you resurrected an old thread just to say you are sick of it? kinda counter productive, no?
C-Note
post Apr 18 2010, 08:36 PM

starry starry night
*******
Senior Member
3,037 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 6-feet under


QUOTE(communist892003 @ Apr 17 2010, 01:06 AM)
What is your answer to poke a girl??? what is your answer to the cure of cancer??? WHat is the answer of end of life?? If a question without an answer, mean it is not worth examine?? Only god would said what.  blush.gif
*
we find scientific solutions that benefit mankind, not further bemusing and creating more meaningless debates

QUOTE(lin00b @ Apr 17 2010, 02:20 AM)
you resurrected an old thread just to say you are sick of it? kinda counter productive, no?
*
since when did I resurrect an old thread that is still active?
CleverDick
post Apr 18 2010, 08:53 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
648 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
del.sorry...

This post has been edited by CleverDick: Apr 18 2010, 09:48 PM
lin00b
post Apr 18 2010, 09:46 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(C-Note @ Apr 18 2010, 08:36 PM)
we find scientific solutions that benefit mankind, not further bemusing and creating more meaningless debates
since when did I resurrect an old thread that is still active?
*
my bad, grapekey resurrected it (dead since mar 5, resurrected on apr 16)
rezareaz
post Apr 20 2010, 10:55 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: shah alam


learn religion thoroughly...relate to ur life or wat not u r doing then u'll find HIM...HE is just everywhere...looking and watching for us
robertngo
post Apr 20 2010, 11:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(rezareaz @ Apr 20 2010, 10:55 PM)
learn religion thoroughly...relate to ur life or wat not u r doing then u'll find HIM...HE is just everywhere...looking and watching for us
*
of God is looking and watching for us that mean God is affect things that happen on earth, then why does God kill all those people in those terrible earth quake.
lin00b
post Apr 20 2010, 11:51 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(rezareaz @ Apr 20 2010, 10:55 PM)
learn religion thoroughly...relate to ur life or wat not u r doing then u'll find HIM...HE is just everywhere...looking and watching for us
*
i think you just described santa claus.....

he has a list of those who are naughty and those who are nice. if you are on the naughty list, no xmas present for you!
CleverDick
post Apr 21 2010, 12:00 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
648 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(rezareaz @ Apr 20 2010, 10:55 PM)
learn religion thoroughly...relate to ur life or wat not u r doing then u'll find HIM...HE is just everywhere...looking and watching for us
*
indeed,it's everywhere.........................................i feel the air,i inhale and exhale it,ain't that amazing?
SUSslimey
post Apr 21 2010, 02:13 AM


*******
Senior Member
6,914 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(rezareaz @ Apr 20 2010, 10:55 PM)
learn religion thoroughly...relate to ur life or wat not u r doing then u'll find HIM...HE is just everywhere...looking and watching for us
*
just like a parent telling the child that the tooth fairy will come if you put the tooth under the pillow eh.....
segaraga
post Apr 21 2010, 02:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
281 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
segala puji bagi tuhan semesta alam
TScommunist892003
post Apr 21 2010, 03:53 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
550 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(C-Note @ Apr 18 2010, 09:36 PM)
we find scientific solutions that benefit mankind, not further bemusing and creating more meaningless debates
since when did I resurrect an old thread that is still active?
*
For the fact that u are talking meaningless stuff that demand answer for every question. Did any discovers ever had any answer on what they would discover?? Or u think the best out of the best way to know anything is through science?? Which science fall under philosophy?? When u're talking to a kid, u don't talk like you, u talk like them.

UFO don't exist, don't believe it assholes!!! Plz stop shitting me with science about UFO. Taste my sarcasm.  doh.gif


This post has been edited by communist892003: Apr 22 2010, 09:06 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1210sec    0.76    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 05:22 PM