Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 16 17 18 19 20 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Hobbies The Bright Side V3, Malaysian Flashaholic Community!

views
     
TSpseudoblue
post Dec 17 2009, 04:39 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(damonlbs @ Dec 17 2009, 04:32 PM)
i will b using 14500 li-on for my RRT-0

coz

16340 - 16x34=544
14500 - 14x50=700

bigger li-on battery more power! longer runtime!

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Heys, the numbers represents the sizes la,
16mm (diameter), 34mm (height), 0 means it's cylindrical format. Btw, the AW 16340 and 14500 rated at 750mAH wor, can't see the pic yet, but both Quark 123 and AA should be doing the same current draw on high rclxub.gif

damonlbs
post Dec 17 2009, 05:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
487 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(pseudoblue @ Dec 17 2009, 04:39 PM)
Heys, the numbers represents the sizes la,
16mm (diameter), 34mm (height), 0 means it's cylindrical format. Btw, the AW 16340 and 14500 rated at 750mAH wor, can't see the pic yet, but both Quark 123 and AA should be doing the same current draw on high  rclxub.gif
*
i m talking abt the SIZE not the capacity lah whistling.gif

dont believe me ah

see here again



NiteCore D10
http://www.light-reviews.com/nitecore_d10/
user posted image

NiteCore EX10
http://www.light-reviews.com/nitecore_ex10/
user posted image
hoongern
post Dec 17 2009, 05:04 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(pseudoblue @ Dec 17 2009, 02:12 PM)
Okay, thanks for the update, hope it'll arrive by next week. If not still okay la, I think the wait is still worth it. Do you have any detail info on the updated RRT-0?
user posted image
Hehe, source for your LifePO4s to release their energy? laugh.gif
Btw, I'm just thinking about this first, no confirmation of buying... yet. For my SP-9 incan powpow upgrade, thinking of getting 1.5 extender + D36 Mini Turbo Head + IMR-13 Module + 1x IMR 18500 (3x total) = 1000 Lumens + est. total 16 mins runtime.  hmm.gif Worth it?
*
FiveMega D26-G4 Sunlight bi-pin adapter + WA1185 on 3x18500s =) More flexible - many lamps to choose from.

Really depends if you want to carry around a D36. I like to be able to fit mine in my pocket, so I'm opting to stay with the D26 and 2x18500s (WA1111, ~ 800 bulb lumens)/3x16340s. I also prefer huge flood. And 1185s are only USD5 a piece. But the IMR-13's probably safer, plus more 'heatsinking'.
Philightsophy
post Dec 17 2009, 05:19 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Johor Bahru
QUOTE(alantch @ Dec 17 2009, 12:57 PM)
I think I will wait for their SST-90 head.
*
Yup, estimated to arrive in February 2010 smile.gif
TSpseudoblue
post Dec 17 2009, 05:25 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(damonlbs @ Dec 17 2009, 05:03 PM)
i m talking abt the SIZE not the capacity lah whistling.gif

dont believe me ah

see here again
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
yawn.gif okay

Hey im gonna bug u again abt our gathering biggrin.gif ahem.. user posted image

QUOTE(hoongern @ Dec 17 2009, 05:04 PM)
FiveMega D26-G4 Sunlight bi-pin adapter + WA1185 on 3x18500s =) More flexible - many lamps to choose from.

Really depends if you want to carry around a D36. I like to be able to fit mine in my pocket, so I'm opting to stay with the D26 and 2x18500s (WA1111, ~ 800 bulb lumens)/3x16340s. I also prefer huge flood. And 1185s are only USD5 a piece. But the IMR-13's probably safer, plus more 'heatsinking'.
wow alright, thanks for the info.
damonlbs
post Dec 17 2009, 05:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
487 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(Philightsophy @ Dec 17 2009, 05:19 PM)
Yup, estimated to arrive in February 2010 smile.gif
*
Wohooo 2000lm ....? flex.gif thumbup.gif

GB GB GB...? laugh.gif


QUOTE(pseudoblue @ Dec 17 2009, 05:25 PM)
yawn.gif okay

Hey im gonna bug u again abt our gathering biggrin.gif ahem.. user posted image

*
and i m going to ignore you again on that ph34r.gif
hoongern
post Dec 17 2009, 05:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
721 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Boston, PJ


QUOTE(pseudoblue @ Dec 17 2009, 05:25 PM)
wow alright, thanks for the info.
*
If you are interested in this, make sure you do your research! I just bought the FM-G4-D26 and FM-T15-D26 adapters and WA1111, WA1185, TL3 bulbs, made some expensive and silly mistakes along the way =S
TSpseudoblue
post Dec 17 2009, 06:41 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(hoongern @ Dec 17 2009, 05:41 PM)
If you are interested in this, make sure you do your research! I just bought the FM-G4-D26 and FM-T15-D26 adapters and WA1111, WA1185, TL3 bulbs, made some expensive and silly mistakes along the way =S
Yea, still new to these incan setups. The customization for these FiveMega's are awesome.



susuman
post Dec 17 2009, 06:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(pseudoblue @ Dec 17 2009, 04:39 PM)
Heys, the numbers represents the sizes la,
16mm (diameter), 34mm (height), 0 means it's cylindrical format. Btw, the AW 16340 and 14500 rated at 750mAH wor, can't see the pic yet, but both Quark 123 and AA should be doing the same current draw on high  rclxub.gif
*
I agree, run time should be depends on the mAH, more correct way is multiply the voltage to get Wattage.
let say
RCR123 3.7V x 750mAH = 2.775W
14400 3.7V x 750mAH = 2.775W Should be same, unless

1.2V x 2000mAH = 2.4 W
so a AA NiMH would have less juice than the RCR123 at 750mAH.

But according to the runtime graph, 1 thing we need to consider is the output, Quark123 and AA has same brightness?? I checked 4sevens side, the Quark123 and AA has different brightness and current draw. So if one is using RCR123 3.7V x 750mAH and the other using 14400 3.7V x 750mAH , the AA using 14400 3.7V x 750mAH will have longer runtime due to less lumens or current draw (brightness), not the physical size though.

My humble opinion lar, don't bug me. I already got hard time to explain to my another half why my name is in the 9th Jan gathering liao.. sweat.gif (wakakakaaka)

This post has been edited by susuman: Dec 17 2009, 07:01 PM
ggMing
post Dec 17 2009, 07:05 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
535 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
pseudo, could i suggest you to post "the welcome mat" at the 1st page?
damonlbs
post Dec 17 2009, 07:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
487 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(susuman @ Dec 17 2009, 06:59 PM)
I agree, run time should be depends on the mAH, more correct way is multiply the voltage to get Wattage.
let say
RCR123 3.7V x 750mAH = 2.775W
14400 3.7V x 750mAH = 2.775W Should be same, unless

1.2V x 2000mAH = 2.4 W
so a AA NiMH would have less juice than the RCR123 at 750mAH.

But according to the runtime graph, 1 thing we need to consider is the output, Quark123 and AA has same brightness?? I checked 4sevens side, the Quark123 and AA has different brightness and current draw. So if one is using RCR123 3.7V x 750mAH  and the other using 14400 3.7V x 750mAH , the AA using 14400 3.7V x 750mAH  will have longer runtime due to less lumens or current draw (brightness), not the physical size though.

My humble opinion lar, don't bug me. I already got hard time to explain to my another half why my name is in the 9th Jan gathering liao.. sweat.gif (wakakakaaka)
*
susuman

in that case can u make sense of the data here on the nitecore EX10 & D10? blink.gif blink.gif

14500 and 16340

http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=202436
TSpseudoblue
post Dec 17 2009, 08:03 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(susuman @ Dec 17 2009, 06:59 PM)
I agree, run time should be depends on the mAH, more correct way is multiply the voltage to get Wattage.
let say
RCR123 3.7V x 750mAH = 2.775W
14500 3.7V x 750mAH = 2.775W Should be same, unless

1.2V x 2000mAH = 2.4 W
so a AA NiMH would have less juice than the RCR123 at 750mAH.

But according to the runtime graph, 1 thing we need to consider is the output, Quark123 and AA has same brightness?? I checked 4sevens side, the Quark123 and AA has different brightness and current draw. So if one is using RCR123 3.7V x 750mAH  and the other using 14400 3.7V x 750mAH , the AA using 14400 3.7V x 750mAH  will have longer runtime due to less lumens or current draw (brightness), not the physical size though.

My humble opinion lar, don't bug me. I already got hard time to explain to my another half why my name is in the 9th Jan gathering liao.. sweat.gif (wakakakaaka)
Your concept is correct. The website showed measured the Quark AA with NiMH though (350ma on max).

The Quark 123 and AA has the same head, if run on Li-ION 16340 and 14500 it will eat 700mA at Max.. so the output should be the same. Buttttt..... Selfbuilt's review, showed that the 123 and AA has slight difference output in the lightbox.

user posted image

user posted image

That little -3 difference gave 10mins+ more runtime rclxub.gif Or perhaps, damon was right. Size does matter. user posted image


Your other-half worried you going into the jungle? or take up family time sweat.gif


QUOTE(ggMing @ Dec 17 2009, 07:05 PM)
pseudo, could i suggest you to post "the welcome mat" at the 1st page?
Yeap, i'll get to it later.

There's a new Battery & Charger section @ Post #3.

This post has been edited by pseudoblue: Dec 17 2009, 08:04 PM
surefire v LED
post Dec 17 2009, 08:06 PM

Never Say Never But Say Never 2 Proton
*******
Senior Member
4,349 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
out of topic for a second - Malaysia 1 - 0 Vietnam
Malaysia football team get the Gold medal after 20 years of waiting.
CONGRATULATIONS!!
ggMing
post Dec 17 2009, 08:06 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
535 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
i bet they "blind" their opponent for the title... =D

This post has been edited by ggMing: Dec 17 2009, 08:11 PM
damonlbs
post Dec 17 2009, 09:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
487 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: KL


its not size matters,

its the volume blush.gif




------------------------------------

iTP A1 EOS


http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=253274

do they belong to the same parents?
user posted image
strinq
post Dec 17 2009, 09:41 PM

PhD in Philosophy of Head Damages
****
Senior Member
602 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Everywhere and Nowhere


Seems that the A1 has the same brightness as the mini 123.
Hmmm...
jmaguire
post Dec 17 2009, 09:56 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(strinq @ Dec 17 2009, 09:41 PM)
Seems that the A1 has the same brightness as the mini 123.
Hmmm...
*
i'm curious to know .........
i think mini 123 should produce more brightness than the A1
* i hope so ............ laugh.gif
strinq
post Dec 17 2009, 10:05 PM

PhD in Philosophy of Head Damages
****
Senior Member
602 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Everywhere and Nowhere


QUOTE(jmaguire @ Dec 17 2009, 09:56 PM)
i'm curious to know .........
i think mini 123 should produce more brightness than the A1
* i hope so ............  laugh.gif
*
Check the link provided by damon. Seems that the mini is just very slightly brighter.
3 things i can think of that might make someone go for the more expensive mini:

1. Floodier beam
2. Has SOS and Beacon.
3. Able to tailstand.

Brightness wise is i think negligible. Maybe 170 lumens vs 190 lumens?
damonlbs
post Dec 17 2009, 10:26 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
487 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: KL


if ever 4sevens come out with Mini AAA most likely it will look like iTP A3 whistling.gif

iTP A1(xp-e) = MINI 123 (xp-g)
iTP A2(xp-e) = MINI AA (xp-g)


TSpseudoblue
post Dec 18 2009, 12:55 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(damonlbs @ Dec 17 2009, 09:32 PM)
iTP A1 EOS
http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=253274

do they belong to the same parents?
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Twins!!! shocking.gif

This post has been edited by pseudoblue: Dec 18 2009, 12:59 AM

124 Pages « < 16 17 18 19 20 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0296sec    0.28    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 08:42 AM