Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Discussion 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

views
     
air_mood
post Jun 24 2010, 03:37 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Pretty much spot on there by Lou Macari.
air_mood
post Jun 25 2010, 12:23 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(aw13 @ Jun 25 2010, 11:00 AM)
Spain overrated? Nah.  Far from it.  Good teams suffer occasional blips and the Swiss game was one of Spain's. 

Round of 16 for Hol v Svk and Par v Jap should be interesting, to see which of the 'smaller' teams go through.  For groups G and H, now that'd be a cracker.  Por to maybe face Spa, while Spa v Bra is still a possibility.  Interesting stuff.
*
That Spain team is ridiculous to be honest. On paper, quality all over, from top to bottom. Keyword being on paper though. It's just a question whether they'd be able to click as a unit and Del Bosque employing a tactic and formation that would suit his playing staff.

That being said though, it would be fun to see Spain lose. Then again I'm not a fan of any particular National team. Although that would screw me up badly in my office WC pool. Already screwed up quite badly thanks to France, Italy, Nigeria, Serbia and England and the US swapping positions.

This post has been edited by air_mood: Jun 25 2010, 12:24 PM
air_mood
post Jun 25 2010, 02:36 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(aw13 @ Jun 25 2010, 02:01 PM)
ridiculously good? haha

I'd be very surprise if Spain does not make it far.  Heck, I've my vote for Germany, but I'd think Spain v Brazil would be the perfect final as far as this WC goes. 

Holland?  Looks ok on paper, but they have the tendency to implode during KO rounds.
*
That's what I have down on my office WC pool as the final. Not really impressed with Holland's squad to be honest.
air_mood
post Jun 25 2010, 03:26 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


I can't watch that in the office. Who is it?? De Rossi?
air_mood
post Jun 25 2010, 03:43 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


The only other ridiculous dive I can think of was Quaglirellaakjjhajhdahkas yesterday. so who is that??
air_mood
post Jul 12 2010, 02:48 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


user posted image

As the maker of the gif states, Dutch Norris.
air_mood
post Jul 12 2010, 03:31 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(robertngo @ Jul 12 2010, 03:18 PM)
i believe several zidane mashup gif are in the work at this very moment  biggrin.gif
*
Zidane's head vs De Jong's boot??

Winner will clearly be Mame Biram Diouf.
air_mood
post Jul 12 2010, 03:47 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(lilredridinghood @ Jul 12 2010, 03:36 PM)
A pull or muscling out each other? After watching the video, there was no signs that Puyol pulled him. Pure pressure plus hand tangling so it was 50 50. Okay, so Robben did not get a 2nd yellow for time wasting, deliberately playing on after the whistle, double standards? Ok, Heitinga's sent off was harsh, but then again, he had no intention to play the ball, not a red, but not a sporting behaviour as well.

By the way, Van Bommel's tackle was harsh, 2 foot from behind and no touch on the ball, no red? Fine....constant harassing and fouling? No 2nd yellow? It makes me wonder if you did really watch the match.

Though I do think that Iniesta should have gotten a yellow much earlier before his goal celebration as well as Xavi for his revenge tackle, maybe a red?

Though I hate to make assumptions, but since you like to assume so much and play the blame game, eat this. "I doubt that the game would be this ugly if De Jong got sent off in the early minutes."
*
To be fair Puyol had no intention playing the ball as well as his hands was across Robben. His intention was to try and stop Robben who managed to wriggle out of it. Just because he managed to wriggle out of it, does not make it a non-foul.

Puyol and De Jong should have both gone, no two ways about that. That cynical trip, who was it?? Xavi or Iniesta?? Beckham got sent off for something similar didnt he??

As I said in another thread, Spain without question was the better team on the day but very, very poor winners throughout. Disgrace of a final littered with cynical foulings and dives by both sides.
air_mood
post Jul 12 2010, 04:11 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(lilredridinghood @ Jul 12 2010, 03:55 PM)
Fair enough on Puyol's part, hence I said 50 50, up to personal point of view as well as one's level of partiality towards the teams.

Sorry it was Iniesta, should have gotten a yellow card at the very least. It was no trip, haha, it was a push in fact.

The final score is up 1-0 to the Spain, one can whine however much they want, but in the end it wouldn't have mattered as De Jong's red card would only benefit the Spaniards
*
It's an assumption though ain't it?? Didn't work that way for Barca didn't it as Busquets playacting got Motta sent off yet Inter still managed to go thru. These what-if's, it's never a foregone conclusion. One could even go and say then had the ref caught Ramos' last man foul on Ozil, gave the peno and sent him off in the semis Spain wouldn't have even been in the final?? Who's to know though.

On the partiality matter, I think I've explained it in one of the threads. I'm impartial towards neither. It's just a case of the lesser of 2 evils for me. Robben and Van Bommel vs Busquets, Capdevila and Torres. So Holland edges it for me, just a little more likeable. Given the choice I would have preferred if both teams lost and the Cup be given to New Zealand.
air_mood
post Jul 12 2010, 04:29 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(lilredridinghood @ Jul 12 2010, 04:22 PM)
Assumptions, yes, but as I've said earlier, some people prefer to lay blames entirely on the referee, hence my tendency to assume. I would very much prefer De Jong to be sent off by any means. The game against Germany, I have no idea as I did not watch the game so it would be unfair to justify it.
*
My principles states that Busquets should be sent off for being Busquets. Won't happen though. The ref was partially to blame, no doubt he missed some decisions which would have been definite game-changers. But both teams were crap and cynical though. If I was FIFA, I would declare the German-Uruguay game as the final. Now, that was a game.
air_mood
post Jul 12 2010, 05:00 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(robertngo @ Jul 12 2010, 04:53 PM)
thumbup.gif

now that loser final is the game that worthy to be the final, but you really cannot aspect both team in final to go all out attacking in the final, the player are just too afraid to make mistake to will lose the game. unlike the loser final where there is not such burden.
*
Well there wasn't cringeworthy play-acting, dives and cynical fouling as well was there?? At least non that I managed to notice or that really stood out unlike Iniesta, Puyol, Van Bommel and De Jong this morning.
air_mood
post Jul 13 2010, 12:54 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(matyrze @ Jul 12 2010, 06:26 PM)
I wonder what is exactly you point actually, especially when you say the bold part. That's like a joke, but you sound like serious. What are you trying to discuss here?

First of all, why should there any other team who deserve to be playing the final more than the finalists? Did you watch the semis? Uruguay and Germany were defeated resoundingly in their respective matches no? In Spain's case, even Lowe acknowledged that the better team won their match.

When the final was played out, one of the team set up their tactics only to stop their opponent from playing. But Spain still won, albeit not with their free flowing style. How could they? They were kicked all over the pitch. This definitely doesn't degrade Spain achievement as poor winner. Neiither can Webb, both teams benefited from him.

Finally, not many previous champions won the WC that convincingly. Sid Lowe wrote this piece:
Why should anyone now disregard Spain achievement and hard-works?
*
Both teams were poor in the finals. That was my point. I have no question at all that Holland were dirty and De Jong should have been sent off without question. Then again so did Puyol. The final was littered with cynical fouling by the Dutch and flopping around by the Spanish. Both teams were a disgrace. And I thought it was funny as hell that Spain managed to get the Fairplay award. They should have gotten more yellow cards than they actually did, Puyol should have been off and Ramos as well for his last man foul on Ozil. So I can see where most people are coming when they say that refs looks like they are afraid to book Spanish players. The flopping around in the final itself should have probably gotten them a fair few bookings.

The fact remains that Spain were poor winners, the 8 goals in 7 matches clearly shows that yet still managed to win the title. Shows the standard of this particular WC.

With all due respect, Sid Lowe has been up the Spanish teams bung hole for quite a while now. It's like watching Alan Hansen write for Liverpool. No impartiality whatsoever.
air_mood
post Jul 13 2010, 04:08 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Nah, I've already stated that the Spanish were clearly the better team on the day. They were poor winners of the cup though. The fact that they were a lot of play-acting and diving by the Spanish, that bothered me. I can't remember where I read it but I thought the description was apt. This final was like 94 one, but with loads more diving.

The playacting bit, it was in this final game where it really, really stood out didnt it?? Iniesta going down repeatedly and what really, really surprised me was Xavi. Never pegged him as that sort of player. But this final game was where the playacting really, really stood out. Although I did recall seeing a very, very funny video of Torres going down when there was no one around him at all. Can't recall which game it was though. And recall Villa being blasted for going down easily in some other game as well.

Ozil was complaining asking for the peno, which was a very clear one. You mentioned one peno turned down doesn't effect anything. Let's play the what if game where you stated that it would have been a different game had De Jong been sent off earlier. You think it wouldn't have been the same case had the Germans got the peno and Ramos sent off?? It would have been very, very different and it happened in the 1st half as well if I recall correctly.

As I mentioned as well, not really a supporter of any of the teams in the final. Hell, didn't really care who won. No attachment whatsoever to National teams, only to United. What bothered me was the amount of cynical tackling and playacting that was going on in the game hence why I said it was a shame that this was the final match determining who was winning the Cup.


Added on July 13, 2010, 4:09 pmNah, I've already stated that the Spanish were clearly the better team on the day. They were poor winners of the cup though. The fact that they were a lot of play-acting and diving by the Spanish, that bothered me. I can't remember where I read it but I thought the description was apt. This final was like 94 one, but with loads more diving.

The playacting bit, it was in this final game where it really, really stood out didnt it?? Iniesta going down repeatedly and what really, really surprised me was Xavi. Never pegged him as that sort of player. But this final game was where the playacting really, really stood out. Although I did recall seeing a very, very funny video of Torres going down when there was no one around him at all. Can't recall which game it was though. And recall Villa being blasted for going down easily in some other game as well.

Ozil was complaining asking for the peno, which was a very clear one. You mentioned one peno turned down doesn't effect anything. Let's play the what if game where you stated that it would have been a different game had De Jong been sent off earlier. You think it wouldn't have been the same case had the Germans got the peno and Ramos sent off?? It would have been very, very different and it happened in the 1st half as well if I recall correctly.

As I mentioned as well, not really a supporter of any of the teams in the final. Hell, didn't really care who won. No attachment whatsoever to National teams, only to United. What bothered me was the amount of cynical tackling and playacting that was going on in the game hence why I said it was a shame that this was the final match determining who was winning the Cup.

This post has been edited by air_mood: Jul 13 2010, 04:09 PM
air_mood
post Jul 13 2010, 04:56 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Duke Red @ Jul 13 2010, 04:41 PM)
To say that Howard Webb was "inconsistent" is an understatement if you ask me. I think he has had a poor season by his standards. When I say, "his standards", I refer to the earlier part of his career where he had an almost umblemished record, making calls that were spot on. I'm surprised that he dished out so many yellow cards especially since he is a Premiership ref.

I have to agree. I hate all the playacting. I simply cannot bring myself to respect a player, regardless of club, who feigns injury or dives. Such acts can tarnish the image of the greatest players. People may remember Maradona for being a brilliant player, which he was but still, he cheated on the biggest stage and saw nothing wrong in it. This to me speaks volumes of a person. You'll note that it is in high pressure situations that a person's true colours come to the fore. Anyone remember Rivaldo's incident? Ball hit his knee and he went down clutching his face. What a disgrace. Yes, Iniesta was fragile but not more so than Robben who looked like he got hit by a sledgehammer each time he went down. I think it's a matter of pride more than anything. If one wants to be known as a cheater or diver, then it's his perogative. I just hope it isn't a true reflection of one's character is all.

In my opinion, Spain deserved the title. So what if they didn't score that many goals? I really enjoyed watching them pass the ball around with relative ease. There isn't a doubt in my mind that they dominated almost everyone they played with in that department. Even the Germans couldn't match them after having obliterated Argentina's non-existent midfield. In the end, I won my pool so I'm a happy camper smile.gif
*
Which was why I was surprised when he didn't go down after Puyol fouled him. The Robben we all knew would have and it was a clear foul anyway as Puyol has his hands across Robben.

QUOTE(verx @ Jul 13 2010, 04:41 PM)
You have your opinions and I respect them but I just want to comment about this incident. If Ramos was sent off it would have been extremely harsh. There was contact but only because Ozil made a sudden turn and stuck his left foot out. Ramos didn't even make any attempt to tackle him. The only way he could have avoided contact was if he completely stopped running which is frankly ridiculous as he had to deal with that particular situation. Should a pen have been given? Maybe. But I can also understand why the ref waved it away.
*
Might have been harsh. but the rules states that Ramos prevented him from a goalscoring opportunity did he?? It was barge into Ozil's leg. Irregardless, it should have been a peno at the very least, that is definite. A sending off, well it can go either way.

You can't say that Ramos could only avoid it if he had completely stopped. Just because he didn't mean it, doesn't mean it wasn't a foul. Let's take for an example the fleet footed wingers. Robben at his best for Chelski had a very bad injury because he got caught by Aaron Mokoena. Mokoena of course apologised afterwards saying that he mistimed as Robben was too quick for him. Mokoena's fault not Robben for being too quick. Same case for Ramos here. Because Ozil made a sudden turn which collided with Ramos' current momentum, it's still a foul as he was denying Ozil a goalscoring opportunity. He probably didn't mean it but just because he had good intentions and didn't mean it, doesn't mean it was a non foul.

air_mood
post Jul 13 2010, 05:23 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


It doesn't have to be a clear cut goal scoring opportunity though, just a goal scoring opportunity, which that was, hence foul.

Anyways, why I mentioned the incident was because there was some talk on ho if De jong was sent off, which he should have been btw, the game's outcome would have been sown up much earlier which of course, I argued against, citing the Barca-Inter game this season as a reference.

For the record, I'm glad for players like Casillas and Pique to have won it whom I happen to see as OK guys. Hell, even Alonso who was probably the only Liverpool player I can stand. Thought Xavi was admirable at one point what with being very low key and all, very Scholes like if you will, just goes on with his business on the field not bothered about what happens off it but the finals change my opinion a bit though. The likes of Iniesta, Busquets, Capdevila, Silva can f off though.

Oh..and I have also always maintained that Sergio Busquets, the play-acting prick should be sent off and banned from football for being Sergio Busquets, so make what you will of that.


Added on July 13, 2010, 5:26 pmCrap, why does my post has to have the same tone as lilredridinghood...now people will start to think that I copied her post off. Hahaha.

Ohh by the way. I didn't just point fingers at the Spanish's playacting did I?? I repeatedly pointed out the Dutch's cynical fouling. Why did you think I said that neither deserved to win the WC?? Well, morally at least.

This post has been edited by air_mood: Jul 13 2010, 05:28 PM
air_mood
post Jul 14 2010, 02:12 AM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(verx @ Jul 13 2010, 08:30 PM)
You get a dozen physical contacts in the penalty box every game. If a pen was to be given for every one of them it would be ridiculous. If Ramos stuck his foot out I would put up my hand and say it's a surefire pen. But he didn't and the ref let it go. Doesn't mean the ref got it wrong. It's a 50-50 call.
How can that game be a reference? Inter brought a 3-1 lead from the first leg. Totally different circumstances when compared to a 1-off game tied at 0-0 still. Mourinho could just set up not to concede and still win the tie. Holland needed to win unless they were willing to try their luck on penalties.
Well it's easy to take the moral high ground but to claim they are undeserving winners is a little rich even for you. Since when was it whoever dived the least gets to win the WC?
And it isn't like Spain were the only team engaging in a little playacting throughout the WC. Busquets is someone I despise as well but he's kept his diving to a minimum in this tournament. To be singled out like that when there have been far worse examples, you just come off as someone extremely bitter. And let's not pretend that United players have never dived before in their lifetime. I hate playacting as much as anyone but players will continue to do it. You might as well quit watching football now if it irks you so much laugh.gif
*
Where oh where in my posts did I mention United players did not dive?? I blasted Nani when he pretended as if he got hit after he headbutted Lucas Neill 3 years back. I blasted Ronaldo when he went down all to easily in the early stages of his career here. Hell. I even blasted Giggsy when he was in a stage of his career where he liked to put his hand on his hips and go "Eh, eh...ref??". So don't go mentioning that I play the holier than thou attitude when it comes to United players playacting.

As for the pen, my view was which as the replay shows is that Ramos barged into Ozil, denied him a goalscoring opportunity and which according to the letter of the law is a foul, hence a peno. That is my view. You have yours, fine. but in my book it's a stonewall penalty and possibly a sending off what with him being the last man and all.

As for the dives and playacting I can on and mention Torres against Chile or Capdevila against Portugal but don't really give a crap about those. It's the amount of diving and playacting in the final which bothered me the most since it was the game that mattered most.

And the Barca-Inter game mentioned, my point is that just because is down a man or two, doesn't really mean they have to roll over and die?? It's not a foregone conclusion. Hence the argument that even if De Jong had been sent off, it's no certainty that Spain would have won. I could state other games, ours against Spurs away when Scholesy got sent off would probably be one. Another one which I think would be best is Chelski's few years back where Maniche got sent off, against West Ham I think. They managed to win 4-0 and Maniche got sent off fairly early. Hence, not a foregone conclusion.

Ehh?? Just because I don't acknowledge diving I should stop watching the game?? Roughly 90% of my friends smokes, around 75% or so drinks and about 30 or 40% does recreational drugs. I don't do either of the things mentioned and don't agree with it. So should I stop befriending them?? I don't agree with them doing it nor can they force me to agree with them doing it. Ditto the diving thing. Just because a lot of people are starting to accept as it being part of the game, doesn't mean I have to. It's still wrong anyways otherwise there wouldn't be rules and punishments put into place to prevent simulations.

air_mood
post Jul 14 2010, 10:52 AM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(verx @ Jul 14 2010, 10:41 AM)
So were United deserving winners then when Ronaldo was throwing himself to the ground whenever a defender got close to him?
Agree to disagree then wink.gif
So just because of this one game in which the opposition were overzealous and almost criminal going into their tackles, you judge that the other team doesn't deserve to win because they dived? Ok I get it now rolleyes.gif
And I can probably come up with another dozen examples of instances where teams took advantage of having an extra man. As you said it's not a foregone conclusion but knowing Spain's ability to keep possession it would have made it even harder for Holland to press as they did.
Exactly. You're tolerating your friends when they do all that. You don't go over your head bashing them saying they don't deserve to be your friends rolleyes.gif
*
Just because I tolerate it, doesn't mean I have to establish that it's right though. And my friends know better then to expect me to accept that what they are doing is right anyways.

The playacting from Capdevila which got the Portugal sent off didn't bother me that much. Nor did the dive from Torres which got the Chilean player sent off. but it's started to become a bit of a pattern didn't it? What bothered me was the amount of diving, in a WORLD CUP FINAL, the pinnacle game of the tournament or football even. And for the WC to be won in a game of that manner, that's what bothered me the most just as much as it would bother me if United won the Champions League if Rooney dived to win a peno in the 90th minute and got an opponent sent off. While it's always nice to win, it's just not right. That's the point I'm trying to put across and what I feel abut this Spanish win.
air_mood
post Jul 14 2010, 10:59 AM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Duke Red @ Jul 14 2010, 10:30 AM)
I for one cannot understand the appeal behind American sports like 'Football', where you use your hands more than your foot. Also a baseball game can last half the bloody day, and I'm not a fan of watching fat guys scratch their balls. I agree that 'Football' is a cleaner game but in comparison to rugby, it's like watching a chess match. I don't like stop and start games and that is exactly what 'Football' is.

*
Americans generally like sports that are played with hands hence baseball, basketball, american football and hockey.

In regards to rugby though, trust me when I say it's much harder than it looks. Used to play it up to the age of 23, Hurts much, much more too compared to American Football what with the no padding and all. And fun to play when you're pissed. Legal way to channel the anger.
air_mood
post Jul 14 2010, 01:31 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Duke Red @ Jul 14 2010, 01:12 PM)
You mean ice hockey right? smile.gif

I agree with the rugby. Friend of mine used to play in Singapore and he's said the same thing. Dudes generally like to puff their chests out, and wrestle a little every now and then. It's natures design. I used to like watching Aussie rules as well. I may be wrong but it strikes me that by and large, American fans watch sports more for entertainment whilst football fans in particular do so for more personal reasons. Like if you watch a football game, the pre-game barbeque, and generally the whole days atmosphere is taken in, which is why I reckon they don't mind that baseball games take so long. Thinking out loud here.
I completely agree. I mean it's ridiculous to think that you can get booked for over celebrating. What the heck does that mean anyway? So a cheat gets away scott free, and someone gets booked for being happy he scored? Makes no sense to me.
*
The Yanks only refer to them as hockey but yeah, ice hockey. I generally used rugby as a way to let out whatever anger I had pent up in me at that point in time. It's legal, so why not make full use of it. It's very much obvious American's watch sports for entertainment. Why do you think then there's a need for cheerleaders, half time shows or fireworks displays?? Not that I mind the cheerleaders bit. Hahaha.
air_mood
post Jul 14 2010, 02:03 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Nelson Mandela did it for South Africa with the Rugby World Cup.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0302sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 04:23 AM