I have chat with the Dell Malaysia Online Chat.. Looks like the agent said 5th Febuary for the pre-orders

Added on February 2, 2010, 11:35 amNow it comes to an issue of
Intel Pentium Processor SU4100 1.3GHz, 800MHz FSB, 2MB L2 Cache
vs
Intel Core 2 Duo Processor SU7300 1.3GHz, 800MHz FSB, 3MB L2 Cache
Now the specs they have in common are the:
-1.3GHz Clock Speed
-Dual-Cores
-FSB Speed
The Difference are:
SU4100:
-only 2MB L2 Cache
-No Intel Virtualisation (VT-x) support
SU7300:
-3MB L2 Cache
-Has Intel Virtualisation(VT-x) support
Do you guys think its worth it spending USD$100 on the Intel C2D SU7300?? Which is about RM350 ??
on another note, here are some mobile CPU scores as reference:
PassMark CPU BenchmarkProcessor - PassMark CPU MarkIntel Core2 Duo SU7300 @ 1.30GHz -
1007Intel Celeron 743 @ 1.30GHz -
481 (lowest spec V13)
Intel Core2 Solo U3500 @ 1.40GHz -
483 (mid spec V13)
Intel SU4100 @ 1.30GHz -
970 (Acer Timeline 1810TZ/4810TZ)
Intel SU2300 @ 1.20GHz -
920 (Acer Timeline 1410TZ)
Intel Core2 U7500 @ 1.06GHz -
568 (current/2008-9 HP Compaq 2510p)
AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-75 2.2Ghz -
1106 (Asus K40/50AB)
Intel Atom N280 @ 1.66GHz -
316 (Dell Mini 10v, Lenovo S10-2)
Intel Atom N450 @ 1.66GHz -
321Intel Atom Z550 @ 2.00GHz -
351Intel Core Duo T2300 @ 1.66GHz -
760 (2006 Inspiron 6400)
Intel Core Duo T2600 @ 2.16GHz -
905Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4400 @ 2.20GHz -
1442 (Lenovo G450)
Intel Core2 Duo T5670 @ 1.80GHz -
1011Intel Core2 Duo T7200 @ 2.00GHz -
1130 (2006 XPS 1210)
Intel Core2 Duo T6600 @ 2.20GHz -
1571 (Toshiba L510-4314, Lenovo G450)
Intel Core2 Duo P7450 @ 2.13GHz -
1573 (Lenovo Y450)
Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz -
1792 (BenQ S42)
Intel Core i3 M 330 @ 2.13GHz -
2114 (Inspiron 1464/1564, Acer 4740G)
Intel Core i5 M 430 @ 2.27GHz -
2491 (Studio 14/15)
Intel Core i7 720QM @ 1.60GHz -
3338 (SXPS 16)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The score are relative (in that there is no unit of measurement). But non the less a score of 3000 would indicate that the CPU is about 3 times faster than a CPU with a score of 1000.
The unit of measurement, if there was one, would be a scaled average of operations performed per sceond.
But real life might not always reflect the CPU Mark:
1) Most PC are not CPU bound, they are disk bound. So speeding up you hard drive will make your PC seems faster and have more impact, than a adding a new CPU. (Windows boots much quicker, apps start quicker and execute quicker).
2) CPU mark will use all CPUs and all CPU cores available. Not may real worlds apps can fully load 16, 8, or even 4 cores.
not much difference i assume? still i would prefer the SU7300, currently on my Vostro V13. in terms of processing power, much better than my old T2300 Core Duo 1.66Ghz. running 4GB RAM in Win 7 and i would say it's pretty responsive and no issues when comes to multitasking. not sure about gaming-wise though, since that's the main functions of M11x.