Ive read all the posts so allow me to share my 2 cents worth (which could be a long read).
I am a Toyota Vios 2003 model owner. I have family members who own Kia's and Honda's so i think ill be able to provide you with a general overview of the different brands. But its a personal view but based on my experience driving and servicing these cars.
But i do not think i will leave Toyota because of of these reasons:
1) build quality
2) low maintenance
3) high resale value
4) good after sales service
In my almost 7 years of driving a Vios, the car has not given me any problems despite its age. I was very particular when i bought the car. After a bad experience with Proton (as most of us have probably had) i didnt want to repeat the same mistakes. I test drove the Vios 7 times in different locations from JB to Penang to experience different driving conditions before i settled for it and i have not regretted since.
There isnt a single squeak or rattle in the car even on very uneven roads. The car has done about 125,000 km to date and the engine is still going strong with good pick up and excellent fuel economy. I can easily drive from KL to Penang and back on 1 full tank (120kmph). I have not changed any major parts except the usual wear and tear. I havent done any modifications on the car as well and everything is original.
I have no reason to service my car outside as Toyota provides excellent service standards. Ive serviced my car in JB, KL and Penang and all provide exemplary & affordable service. They have gone out of their way to provide me with good service plus even changed wipers, brake pads and washed the car for free when i had to wait long for my car to be ready on occasions. All this done in the name of customer satisfaction. Even when my seat belt started giving me trouble last year, they replaced it FOC for me since they said this part shouldnt give any trouble in the 1st place. That was the only problem i faced with my Vios in 7 years. The aircon is still good and cold. The brakes are good and very effective as well.
Ive asked around at dealers for the resale value of my car since im looking to upgrade and ive been told its in the region of RM 48K which is a drop of only 27K from the sale price of RM 74,700. Thats only a 36% drop in resale value over 7 years.
Kia
My family members who drive Kia's (CBU models) all say the same thing: NEVER AGAIN. All that crap about CBU being better than CKD is really just crap and over generalisation. Just go over to any Kia service centre and see just how many new Kia's are in there for major problems and defects. 2 weeks back when i was at a Kia SC in KL, i saw a 2yr old Kia Sorento coming in for a engine overhaul. Ive also seen 3 yr old Kia Picanto's having the gearbox changed. The Kia SA told me that Kia's have problematic gearboxes. You need to change the ATF every 20K just to prolong the lifespan of the gearbox. We all know about the older Kia models like the Spectra and Rio having major issues. I was also told by another SA that Kia's have problems with the master brake pump and can cause loss of braking power due to prolonged use in traffic jams.
Plus dont bother about selling your car. Ure better off giving it away free. A 7 yr resale value for most Kia models will probably drop 70%. Yes Kia sells cars cheap but do you know why? Cuz they know they will get back their 'losses' using high service maintenance costs. I have serviced a Kia Picanto 1.1CC for RM 700 which was a minor service with only a ATF change as a major component. My Vios also costs RM 700 but for a major service with a full aircon service. Normal services rarely go beyond RM 250.
Honda
Read the numerous online posts about Honda and ull see just how many quality issues have come up even with the new Honda City and Civic. But i do agree that no car is spared from defects and small ones will always exist. But the worst thing about Honda is their after sales service. Step into any Honda SC and ull immediately feel the difference if uve been a Toyota customer. Honda may be better than Kia and Proton in the after sales service section, but they are years behind Toyota. There are numerous news reports about Honda owners complaining about their service standards. Other than that i think Honda's are good cars too.
Summary
Buying a car is NOT merely about specs and physical looks. Its also about quality, maintenance costs and after sales service standards. You may get better specs in the Forte but no way will you get the service standards and quality that Toyota (or even Honda) has. There's alot of hype about the Forte currently but i bet you all those getting excited about it are NOT current Kia owners. There was alot of hype when the Spectra came out but what has happened to all that hype and excitement now? Most ppl wont even go near a Kia Spectra now. I have yet to meet a Kia owner who has said he/she will buy a Kia again. Most Kia owners are stuck with their cars because of the low resale value. Do you want to join this group?
If you want to compare engine power dont compare the CC only. It doesnt mean that a 1.6L car is more powerful than a 1.5L. You have to look at the horsepower and compare it to the weight of the car. A Honda City IDSI 1.5L is about 1100kg and has 88 HP. But a Vios 1.5E (03 model) is only 942kg and has 109HP. So which is more powerful? A Nissan Sentra 1.6L is about 1180kg and has about 110hp. How can that be more powerful compared to a Vios for instance?? You need to look at the power to weight ratios and also the torque to decide which is more powerful. So please dont say that a 1.6L Forte is more powerful than any 1.5L car cuz it may not be the case.
Yes the Forte is a good value buy for the specs it has. Plus the physical outlook is great too for that price. But should you buy one be prepared to pay through your nose for the maintenance once the free service is up. Also be prepared for some major expense after about 3 years e.g gearbox, engine overhaul, brake system, etc. Buying a car is a long term (loss) but the idea is to limit your losses. I agree that Toyota's and Honda's are overpriced and its good to have some competition from other manufacturers but i think Kia and Hyundai have a long way to go before reaching the standards Toyota has set.
My views above are mostly my own based on my own experience plus some input from Kia's service personnel. Most ppl will bash and praise certain cars based on what other ppl say. But i would trust the views of those who have actually driven and maintained all the makes in discussion. I have and hence my contribution today.
For those who want some extra info, feel free to check out the International Vehicle Dependability Survey by JD Power 2009 which lists the number of problems per 100 vehicles. This official survey is based on owner reported problems based on the engine, transmission, brakes, vibrations, wind noise, water leaks, interior finish, paint quality and accessories. Toyota is ranked at No 4 while popular makes like BMW and Mercedes are Ranked No 17 and 20 respectively. Kia is somewhere at the bottom i think.
J.D. Power and Associates: 2009 Vehicle Dependability Study
Problems per 100 vehicles
Jaguar 122
Lexus 126
Toyota 129
Honda 148
Porsche 150
Audi 159
Ford 159
Hyundai 161
Subaru 162
BMW 166
Industry Average 170
Mercedes-Benz 184
Chevrolet 185
Mitsubishi 185
Volvo 186
Nissan 199
MINI 205
Kia 218
Mazda 227
Volkswagen 260
Suzuki 263
But at the end of the day, choose a car you really like and dont regret after that. Do your own research even if it takes months. The Forte is a newcomer. My advise for any new models would be to wait at least 6 months before purchasing. That will give you enough time to read reviews and comments about the cars.
Cheers!
Kia Forte / Nissan Latio or Toyota Vios?, Buying a new car
Mar 2 2010, 02:59 PM
Quote
0.0216sec
0.54
6 queries
GZIP Disabled