Celeron E3200 2.4Ghz OC to 4.0Ghz, Another Budget Proc
Celeron E3200 2.4Ghz OC to 4.0Ghz, Another Budget Proc
|
|
Nov 23 2009, 11:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,321 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Freaking good overclocking there for a budget processor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 10:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,321 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
500Mhz FSB can but the multiplier doesn't allow
Normally those 500Mhz FSB and above uses x8 multiplier unless you go liquid cooling This post has been edited by shinjite: Nov 25 2009, 10:57 AM |
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 12:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,321 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
It depends on the CPU:DRAM ratio
but if compare 1:1, with the same speed, of course the higher FSB 1 wins in performance for CPU if its like 4:5, whereby the RAM is clocked higher, the RAM is able to perform better than 1:1 ratioed RAMs It all depends on the overclocker and also the chip & RAM, if no choice have to use 4:5, then fully utilise the RAM frequency and etc etc |
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 03:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,321 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Anyway kimtee, your proc performance in SuperPI 1MB also good
15 seconds range for a Celeron is darn good What the proc lacks is in its L2 cache The E7400 I have here OCed to 3.61Ghz 1:1 get around 14 seconds, and that is with 3MB L2 cache |
|
|
Dec 14 2009, 12:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,321 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
If scared high volt, upgrade CPU cooler
|
| Change to: | 0.0134sec
0.84
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 12:38 PM |