336 FSB ?
for a dual core and 45nm architecture, i think can OC up to 500FSB .
can anyone confirm this ?
quite good but i can see that the vID is quite high for a 45nm proc .
Celeron E3200 2.4Ghz OC to 4.0Ghz, Another Budget Proc
Celeron E3200 2.4Ghz OC to 4.0Ghz, Another Budget Proc
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 04:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,196 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
336 FSB ?
for a dual core and 45nm architecture, i think can OC up to 500FSB . can anyone confirm this ? quite good but i can see that the vID is quite high for a 45nm proc . |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 12:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,196 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
im just asking maa , possible or not reach 500+ FSB .
i do know the fact that only 6-8 multiplier will be used . if 500x12 use LN2 already la . |
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 12:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,196 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
ow well, 533x8 running along with DDR2-1066 ram with 1:1 ratio is good enuf for me ^^,
|
|
|
Dec 15 2009, 03:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,196 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
so now that's d proven facts we all need to know .
the difference with higher end proc mainly the FSB wall . damn damn ! could have been nice if at least could reach 400FSB . |
| Change to: | 0.0198sec
0.48
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 03:36 AM |