Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Freehold VS Leasehold, Gain VS Loss?

views
     
SephirothLee
post May 15 2014, 03:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
546 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(pilotHans @ Feb 26 2010, 06:02 PM)
I think Freehold is overrated  tongue.gif i think anything still 90years + of leasehold is good enough.....imagine 30years from now..........god knows whats the situation or maybe we'll get another hows....I think we can still sell a house with 60years leasehold....the authorities are not going to just kick us from our houses  sweat.gif

the most important thing is cash flow..u guys can continue brag on freehold n so, but in the end the one with the most cash flow enjoys life more  blush.gif
*
i think it makes a big difference, the one who bought sri damansara and BU freehold as investment now laugh like mad as compare to those bought like leasehold in taman bukit maluri. I see my family difference in wealth comes to mils, where they can send their children to study and going for trips.
SephirothLee
post Dec 1 2014, 11:09 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
546 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


if u ask me FH or LH
all my units are FH,
in majority of the cases, FH will increase more capital gain compare to LH,
there are exceptions, but seldom we know which investment we purchase is an exception.
of coz buy LH due to budget constrains,
in fact tats where LH shines... coz capital increment nt high u can buy cheaper subsale lol

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0154sec    0.34    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 10:14 PM