Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion
|
soulfly
|
Nov 27 2009, 11:56 AM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
Pro or not, it is not about the gear, it's the practice. A noob who buys a 1Ds just because he has a lot of money, doesn't mean that he's a pro. Even a good photographer with a 1Ds, also doesn't mean that he's a pro.
A pro is a person who works exclusively in his particular field, with professional ethics and conducts, supported by professional level of support services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
soulfly
|
Dec 1 2009, 09:26 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
QUOTE(Killabee88 @ Dec 1 2009, 09:06 PM) eneloop / maha / imedion how much aaa? shop? what suitable current? 2000mH or 2700mH have any effect? need to replace my rechargeable battery. pic spam  awesome editing. mind teaching a bit to get that look?
|
|
|
|
|
|
soulfly
|
Dec 14 2009, 02:47 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
QUOTE(ronnie @ Dec 14 2009, 02:04 PM) Would having a CZ 85mm F1.4 or CZ 135mm F1.8 be an overkill on A200 body ? no such thing as overkill. at iso 100~400, A200 is awesome with details. but A100 would be much crazier... heheh. Added on December 14, 2009, 2:48 pmQUOTE(v1rtual @ Dec 14 2009, 02:35 PM) PS noobie here can somebody tell me how do i edit this picture to correct the overexposed on the model, but still have the current background im using PS CS4  do you have the raw file? This post has been edited by soulfly: Dec 14 2009, 02:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
soulfly
|
Dec 14 2009, 03:11 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
QUOTE(v1rtual @ Dec 14 2009, 03:05 PM) for this shot, yes i do have it in raw but dont have any idea how should i edit it, to get the proper exposed of her but the background still remains as the original lighting i'm not sure about photoshop CS4 as i don't have one... but in lightroom, use the recovery slider to get back the lost details in the highlight. Added on December 14, 2009, 3:12 pmQUOTE(tanjq87 @ Dec 14 2009, 02:56 PM) on a100 much crazier in terms of what? image quality? details at low iso This post has been edited by soulfly: Dec 14 2009, 03:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
soulfly
|
Dec 15 2009, 02:13 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
QUOTE(signither @ Dec 15 2009, 11:34 AM) guys, eed some opinion here.. i usually just bring my prime for a walkaround/lepak2/dining out because im quite lazy to bring the flash and so need the big aperture.. but most of the time, i found out that 50mm would be too tight.. therefore, im thinking of getting a wider prime.. anyone have any experience on the 20mm, 24mm or 28mm?? how's their performance in low light condition? which one is better? what focal length should i go for since i already have the 50mm? read some review that 20mm and 50mm combination is quite good.. is this really a good idea? or should i just start bringing my flash anywhere i go? thanks in advance.. Sony 30mm f2.8 macro
|
|
|
|
|
|
soulfly
|
Dec 15 2009, 06:16 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Dec 15 2009, 06:05 PM) albnok & others : How do I control a Nissin flash wirelessly with my F58 ar? :s nissin for canon/nikon? they will trigger, but may or may not sync with your exposure (this is based on my personal experience). there is no way u could control it because they dont recognize sony wireless ttl signal. as long as the nissin sees a flash, it will fire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
soulfly
|
Dec 16 2009, 11:14 AM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Dec 16 2009, 10:55 AM) hi guys between SAL 16-105 and 16-80z which is better? looking for a good wide angle telephoto here, to replace the 18-70 on the A350 and also a good kit lens for my next target A550. carl zeiss 16-80z is better, which is why it's more expensive  Added on December 16, 2009, 11:19 am http://www.flickr.com/photos/fakhrainms/4188643319/fisheye~~~~~~~ This post has been edited by soulfly: Dec 16 2009, 11:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
soulfly
|
Dec 16 2009, 07:24 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Dec 16 2009, 04:00 PM) Hahaha. Got lubang la. XD Im the king of cheap deals. =p good stuff must share share lah don't makan alone
|
|
|
|
|
|
soulfly
|
Dec 24 2009, 01:59 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
QUOTE(ieR @ Dec 24 2009, 01:19 PM) i tot AF speed is dependent on the motor in the body? meaning all lens(non motor) are about more or less the same speed? the diff only when u have SAM or SSM or 'HSM' or any Motorised lens? lenses have different gearings. like the sal16-105 has short gearings. even with longer range, it's faster at focusing compare to shorter 18-70mm kit lens. slightly faster than 16-80mm zeiss. sony 18-250 is faster focusing compare to its tamron 18-250 sibling This post has been edited by soulfly: Dec 24 2009, 01:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|