Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion

views
     
soulfly
post Nov 27 2009, 11:56 AM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



Pro or not, it is not about the gear, it's the practice.
A noob who buys a 1Ds just because he has a lot of money, doesn't mean that he's a pro. Even a good photographer with a 1Ds, also doesn't mean that he's a pro.

A pro is a person who works exclusively in his particular field, with professional ethics and conducts, supported by professional level of support services.

soulfly
post Dec 1 2009, 09:26 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(Killabee88 @ Dec 1 2009, 09:06 PM)
eneloop / maha / imedion

how much aaa? shop? what suitable current? 2000mH or 2700mH have any effect? need to replace my rechargeable battery. icon_question.gif

pic spam

user posted image
*
awesome editing. mind teaching a bit to get that look?
soulfly
post Dec 14 2009, 02:47 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(ronnie @ Dec 14 2009, 02:04 PM)
Would having a CZ 85mm F1.4 or CZ 135mm F1.8 be an overkill on A200 body ?
*
no such thing as overkill.
at iso 100~400, A200 is awesome with details.
but A100 would be much crazier... heheh.


Added on December 14, 2009, 2:48 pm
QUOTE(v1rtual @ Dec 14 2009, 02:35 PM)
PS noobie here
can somebody tell me how do i edit this picture to correct the overexposed on the model, but still have the current background
im using PS CS4 notworthy.gif

user posted image
*
do you have the raw file?

This post has been edited by soulfly: Dec 14 2009, 02:48 PM
soulfly
post Dec 14 2009, 03:11 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(v1rtual @ Dec 14 2009, 03:05 PM)
for this shot, yes i do have it in raw
but dont have any idea how should i edit it, to get the proper exposed of her but the background still remains as the original lighting
*
i'm not sure about photoshop CS4 as i don't have one... but in lightroom, use the recovery slider to get back the lost details in the highlight.


Added on December 14, 2009, 3:12 pm
QUOTE(tanjq87 @ Dec 14 2009, 02:56 PM)
on a100 much crazier in terms of what? image quality?
*

details at low iso


This post has been edited by soulfly: Dec 14 2009, 03:12 PM
soulfly
post Dec 15 2009, 02:13 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(signither @ Dec 15 2009, 11:34 AM)
guys, eed some opinion here..

i usually just bring my prime for a walkaround/lepak2/dining out because im quite lazy to bring the flash and so need the big aperture.. but most of the time, i found out that 50mm would be too tight..

therefore, im thinking of getting a wider prime.. anyone have any experience on the 20mm, 24mm or 28mm?? how's their performance in low light condition? which one is better? what focal length should i go for since i already have the 50mm? read some review that 20mm and 50mm combination is quite good..

is this really a good idea? or should i just start bringing my flash anywhere i go?

thanks in advance..
*

Sony 30mm f2.8 macro icon_idea.gif

soulfly
post Dec 15 2009, 06:16 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Dec 15 2009, 06:05 PM)
albnok & others : How do I control a Nissin flash wirelessly with my F58 ar? :s
*

nissin for canon/nikon? they will trigger, but may or may not sync with your exposure (this is based on my personal experience). there is no way u could control it because they dont recognize sony wireless ttl signal. as long as the nissin sees a flash, it will fire.

soulfly
post Dec 16 2009, 11:14 AM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Dec 16 2009, 10:55 AM)
hi guys between SAL 16-105 and 16-80z which is better? looking for a good wide angle telephoto here, to replace the 18-70 on the A350 and also a good kit lens for my next target A550.
*

carl zeiss 16-80z is better, which is why it's more expensive tongue.gif


Added on December 16, 2009, 11:19 amuser posted image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fakhrainms/4188643319/

fisheye~~~~~~~ biggrin.gif

user posted image

This post has been edited by soulfly: Dec 16 2009, 11:19 AM
soulfly
post Dec 16 2009, 07:24 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Dec 16 2009, 04:00 PM)
Hahaha. Got lubang la. XD Im the king of cheap deals. =p
*
good stuff must share share lah don't makan alone biggrin.gif
soulfly
post Dec 24 2009, 01:59 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(ieR @ Dec 24 2009, 01:19 PM)
i tot AF speed is dependent on the motor in the body? meaning all lens(non motor) are about more or less the same speed?

the diff only when u have SAM or SSM or 'HSM' or any Motorised lens?
*
lenses have different gearings. like the sal16-105 has short gearings. even with longer range, it's faster at focusing compare to shorter 18-70mm kit lens. slightly faster than 16-80mm zeiss.
sony 18-250 is faster focusing compare to its tamron 18-250 sibling

This post has been edited by soulfly: Dec 24 2009, 01:59 PM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0519sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 06:53 AM