before crop
after crop
This post has been edited by finejava: Nov 25 2009, 08:26 PM
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Nov 25 2009, 08:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003  
|
Pic spam from sandakan ...
before crop after crop This post has been edited by finejava: Nov 25 2009, 08:26 PM |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 08:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(porkchop @ Nov 25 2009, 08:24 PM) is that monkey wearing shoes?? no my friend...this is a proboscis monkey... more to come...now still in sandakan...tomorrow flying to bangkok...will upload once i've filter all of my photos... This post has been edited by finejava: Nov 25 2009, 08:29 PM |
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 12:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
hi guys,
which raw converter do you use for mac which gives the best quality? apart from photoshop and sony converter ... |
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 06:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Albnok: i've just tried RRP & ACR. The JPG output from this 2 converters are like heaven and earth. 1 giving a more neutral color as the ACR are more contrast...
I though in our previous TT we did mention bout having TT in putrajaya mainly on wireless flash? |
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 06:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Below are the output from both IDC and RPP:
RPP:  IDC:  commentz, pls... This post has been edited by finejava: Dec 2 2009, 06:58 PM |
|
|
Dec 2 2009, 06:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
opps...yeah...sorry RPP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2009, 04:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(albnok @ Dec 3 2009, 02:07 AM) finejava: Tell us what you think of both of them! If you take the neutral one and increase contrast, is it more or less noisy than the ACR version? Albnok: Both the picture are direct conversion without any PP. i'm looking for converter that has result in between those 2.It looks like both IDC and RPP have a different idea of AWB but personally I think both are off; RPP is too cold while IDC is too warm. Oh no that Putrajaya TT was a long time ago with clivengu; pictures here: http://www.glaringnotebook.com/default.asp?id=1085 http://www.glaringnotebook.com/Default.asp?id=1054  Soony: No, the hood will not fit. Do not bother buying a CPL for an ultra-wide angle lens. You will never be able to tune the CPL evenly across the frame. ieR: I would think otherwise. Film is usually Daylight WB (it is hard to find Tungsten WB film) so it would look like IDC's output. Streetlights on Fujifilm Superia ASA400:  lwliam: Er... then you'd be left out in an advanced wireless TTL class LOL. Not many people have enough flashes to justify such a class I guess. cjlai: Love your ring collection! I have a similiar 49mm to 77mm step setting but skipping some sizes (forgot which ones.) porkchop: Use the Auto HDR mode lah since it is not moving. However if you want your blacks to stay black just turn off DRO and HDR. clivengu: Stylish! Now go change your avatar. Any plan for another wireless TT? |
|
|
Dec 3 2009, 06:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(albnok @ Dec 3 2009, 05:00 PM) finejava: Errr if you're not changing anything, what's the point of shooting RAW? As in you're supposed to change the export parameters. At the very least the WB finetuning is what I would use RAW for. Albnok: What i meant is both the straight conversion itself is already a huge difference between the 2 software. I'm looking for a good converter than can give output somewhere in between those 2. If i choose RPP then all my photos will be like oldies...if IDC then all of them are like orangeylwliam: Leos Trading at Ampang Park has both the original Cokin set and compatible copies. Jeff doesn't think the copy is too sturdy though... |
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 12:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Dec 4 2009, 11:30 AM) get the CZ16-80 with the Hoya Pro UV filter.. and a merry Christmas to you! lwliam: cz16-80 can't use any filter, will cause vignetting. I've got pro1d CPL filter, also will cause vignetting. Anyway, for any CZ lens best to use without any filter. Putting a filter in front of the lens will lower down the quality of the pic unless ur using cz filter as well. |
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 01:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Dec 4 2009, 12:51 PM) Yea I'm using the CZ filter on my CZ1680 too. No vignetting. (: aiya...if use CZ filter of course la!!! own filter ma...lwliam was referring to 3rd party hoya...i use 3rd party also still got vignetting and CZ filter cost a BOMB!!! |
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 05:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Soony @ Dec 4 2009, 03:39 PM) Im using B+W XS-PRO for my CZ1680 and perfecto. No vignette =) haha.. And the quality of the filter is superb.. at 16mm? ehm...i'm using the cipok nicna 62mm CPL pro1d slim...i do get vignetting at 16mm but not at 17mm... looks like only the VERY expensive filter dun get vignetting at 16mm... |
|
|
Dec 4 2009, 06:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(168257061 @ Dec 4 2009, 06:00 PM) Hmm... can try Hoya HD series cpl or B+W XS-Pro series Cpl. can't afford to try try la...all these filters above RM100...   |
|
|
Dec 5 2009, 08:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(168257061 @ Dec 4 2009, 06:54 PM) You afford to own 16-80z but cant whack rm100-200 filter ? bro, i bought UWA & 1680z at the same time la...where got budget for filter at that time...thought those moderate filter can do ma...mana tau...cilakak betul...got vignetting...i thought get the slimmest can do already...but anyway...i dun usually go to dusty place...so...filter is not necessary la...to me UV filter is more to like a lens protector only...i'm quite a careful when handling things...so it's fine for me to leave without a filter  CPL filter, i used it like once every 10 times...and 1mm zooming wouldn't hurt the picture... BTW, i've got many other hobbies as well and photography is just 1 of them. Economy these days not so good!!! Need to learn how to make full use of the things we have... RM300 for a filter? ehm...i would rather buy fresh coffee beans...and make a god-shot for you guys for the next TT ... oh yeah ... i'm a home barista as well, another hobby ...Added on December 5, 2009, 8:59 am QUOTE(weixuan @ Dec 5 2009, 08:58 AM) stoping down can improve vignetting as well i'll try and let u guys know...This post has been edited by finejava: Dec 5 2009, 08:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2009, 11:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Poadster: mind asking how do make the background till all is black except for where the flash is fired? how bout the build-in flash? i though the build-in flash is the controller?
This post has been edited by finejava: Dec 5 2009, 11:41 PM |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 04:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
guys,
24-70F2.8 vs 85F1.4, which 1 do you think is a better buy? p.s: i've already got a 16-80F3.5 though... |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 05:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
achew: btw, is 85f1.4 a full-frame lens?
kul | moo: no la...just have the thought only so far...not poison yet...but trying to poison myself to sell off to get 1...135mm...tried albnok 1, not really comfortable with the range la...50mm too close, 135mm too far...so mid is 85mm lor... This post has been edited by finejava: Dec 8 2009, 05:14 PM |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 05:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(albnok @ Dec 8 2009, 05:12 PM) http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores...=S_Sony_Howdini anyone got 85mm? wanna test test a bit...Nigel Barker video tutorials! Some of the tips are real gems if you watch them. finejava: For APS-C, the Carl Zeiss 85mm F1.4 to get a nice midrange. 135mm will be a bit too long on APS-C. Yes, the Zeiss 85mm is FF (of all the Zeiss lenses, only the 16-80mm is APS-C.) |
|
|
Dec 8 2009, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
anyone interested in taking over my sigma 10-20 F4-5.6?
|
|
|
Dec 12 2009, 12:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(achew @ Dec 10 2009, 08:13 PM) yupyup...decided to go 135 after i found out 70200 isnt my cup of tea..and saw some extremely poisonous shots of 135 on flickr..lol achew: why not go for 85mm f1.4? it seems that u like to snap a lot of portrait? |
|
|
Dec 12 2009, 12:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Dec 12 2009, 10:02 AM) hahahhahhaa, before using dSLR, i didnt even know about CZ's existence... so i didnt use Sony coz of CZ. as a matter of fact, i dont know why i chose Sony also lwliam: the reason u jump cos "it's a sony, like.no.others" |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0226sec
 0.83
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 12:04 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.