QUOTE(albnok @ Dec 22 2009, 11:46 PM)
2) Rectangular cropping due to the rear baffle which is rectangular. I wish it didn't have this.
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Dec 23 2009, 10:17 AM
|
 
Junior Member
483 posts Joined: Oct 2006  
|
2) Rectangular cropping due to the rear baffle which is rectangular. I wish it didn't have this. |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 10:17 AM
|
 
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Dec 23 2009, 01:14 AM)  jz got back from Limbang » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 10:29 AM
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(Mavik @ Dec 23 2009, 10:17 AM) Nice shot bro, love the clouds. My suggestion is that perhaps if you could also increase the exposure for the foreground to make some foreground interest. If you don't have a graduated ND filter then shoot two exposures in RAW and then mask them together. thanks for the suggestion, but i do have a few exposures of this...i wanted to make the foreground dark so that it doesnt take away the attention from the clouds at the back, while keeping enough light to show that its a boat. Added on December 23, 2009, 10:30 am QUOTE(porkchop @ Dec 23 2009, 10:12 AM) veron-7, very nice shots.....share more on achew bokeh's factory.... use a small aperturealso wanna ask some bro's here, notice veron's pic some of the pics is having a mini star flare (coming from the street lamp in pic 2) how to make it look more star-ish? This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 23 2009, 10:30 AM |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 10:34 AM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Dec 23 2009, 10:29 AM) thanks for the suggestion, but i do have a few exposures of this... Ah I see, perhaps a little bit more of dodging and burning the clouds to make it look a little more dramatic?i wanted to make the foreground dark so that it doesnt take away the attention from the clouds at the back, while keeping enough light to show that its a boat. |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 11:03 AM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(Mavik @ Dec 23 2009, 10:34 AM) Ah I see, perhaps a little bit more of dodging and burning the clouds to make it look a little more dramatic? how about now?   |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 11:07 AM
|
|
Elite
7,826 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Yeah much better!
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 11:14 AM
|
Junior Member
103 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Yesterday, 12: 59 AM
|
nice pic dude..
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 11:32 AM
|
Senior Member
834 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: there
|
QUOTE(porkchop @ Dec 23 2009, 10:12 AM) veron-7, very nice shots.....share more on achew bokeh's factory.... Smaller aperture (big number) for starry flarealso wanna ask some bro's here, notice veron's pic some of the pics is having a mini star flare (coming from the street lamp in pic 2) how to make it look more star-ish? Big aperture (small number) for bokeh u can only choose either one. |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 12:17 PM
|
Junior Member
340 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(noprob @ Dec 23 2009, 09:41 AM) Menara Tun Mustapha , Sabah . Taken w Sal1118 looks like there is some flare on this lens...but nice picture tho |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 01:00 PM
|
Senior Member
4,858 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Tawau, Sabah 
|
he he i just limpas2 the tun mustapha's tower.. now at home.. lying down tired.. gonna upload the wedding pics.. uhh tired.. oh no RAW RAW RAW
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 01:21 PM
|
Junior Member
296 posts Joined: Jan 2007
|
WTA : Can Lowepro Fastpack 250 fit a700 attached with 70-200 2.8?
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 01:30 PM
|
|
Senior Member
830 posts Joined: Dec 2009
|
QUOTE(Ranceed @ Dec 23 2009, 01:21 PM) WTA : Can Lowepro Fastpack 250 fit a700 attached with 70-200 2.8? i'm noob... judging on the dimensions..... i think can... better u wait for other pros to reply u... wakaka... |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 01:36 PM
|
Senior Member
3,065 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Sony 11-18mm f4.5-5.6 F 4.5 and 5.6 what the diffrent with tamrom 10-22mm is F3.5-.5.6 which good? SONY? cos i just order sony
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 02:06 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(fansoption @ Dec 23 2009, 01:36 PM) Sony 11-18mm f4.5-5.6 F 4.5 and 5.6 what the diffrent with tamrom 10-22mm is F3.5-.5.6 which good? SONY? cos i just order sony tamron's a 10-24, apart from the obvious focal length difference, then there's the max aperture too. but since u said you've placed an order for the SAL, stay strong with your decision. i'm having the 1118 as well, and it's serving me pretty well... welcome to the UWA gang |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 02:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,065 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
hope is that good 11-18 haha
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 02:47 PM
|
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: May 2008 From: i donno LOL
|
my userbar hilang liau
 |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 02:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
834 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: there
|
check with amadeo... his imageshack bandwidth use up ?
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 02:57 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(fansoption @ Dec 23 2009, 02:24 PM) hope is that good 11-18 haha both the images you see above in this page is taken with the SAL 1118 |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 03:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: May 2008 From: i donno LOL
|
btw any1 used marco filter b4?? good?
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 03:29 PM
|
Senior Member
919 posts Joined: Aug 2007
|
UWA 11-18 or G 70300?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0288sec
 0.12
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 03:48 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.