skin tone is a ghoulish green
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Dec 18 2009, 04:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#121
|
 
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2009, 05:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#122
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Dec 18 2009, 05:01 PM) so a good picture should be weird - under exposure and over exposure... a good picture should be pleasing to the eye. doesnt have weird angles and doesnt make the viewer feel uncomfortable.Added on December 18, 2009, 5:11 pm u are working in studio?  it has harmony among the elements in the picture. |
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 12:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#123
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
HAPPY BIRTHDAY ALBERT aka ALBNOK aka masterjedi!
|
|
|
Dec 19 2009, 03:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#124
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
what he means by reclimatize means let the lens/body to slowly warm up to the ambient temperature before taking it out from its casing. if from cold to warm temp, lens/sensor will fog up and there's no way to clean the internal lens and sensor. this doesnt happen if going from hot to cold...
QUOTE(augustinestyle @ Dec 19 2009, 09:52 AM) Pic Spam i also got one» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « C&C welcome Happy birthday to Albert...wish u always have a happy moment  |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#125
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
achew: beautiful hairlight. IMHO the cateye bokeh a bit too strong though, and the patch of white on top right a bit distracting, but main subject really awesome catch
Added on December 23, 2009, 12:23 am QUOTE(pky @ Dec 23 2009, 12:12 AM) i remember reading somewhere that one of the sony lens is equivalent to the CZ minus the Z coating, was it the 16-105 or 18-200? the 16105This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 23 2009, 12:23 AM |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 12:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#126
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
it is oval with sharper ends and usually appears more prominently at the edges of an uncropped image
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 01:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#127
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
 jz got back from Limbang |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 08:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#128
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(ieR @ Dec 23 2009, 01:33 AM) limbang? dropping by miri or not?  QUOTE(hkhk @ Dec 23 2009, 01:38 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « --------- Nice one.. Any Creative mode applied ? Sunset? or Standard? QUOTE(eddybeh @ Dec 23 2009, 01:47 AM) nice 1, lwliam... achew: yeah, one of the shots, havent gone thru all the pics yet, so tired  Added on December 23, 2009, 1:48 am oopss.... reply wrong post pulak... inteded to compliment lwliam's photo... keke.. Added on December 23, 2009, 1:51 amnite every1.... having last paper later in the afternoon... wish me luck..... ieR: transit at miri for flight to limbang hkhk: standard settings, using Av. eddy: thanks |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#129
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(Mavik @ Dec 23 2009, 10:17 AM) Nice shot bro, love the clouds. My suggestion is that perhaps if you could also increase the exposure for the foreground to make some foreground interest. If you don't have a graduated ND filter then shoot two exposures in RAW and then mask them together. thanks for the suggestion, but i do have a few exposures of this...i wanted to make the foreground dark so that it doesnt take away the attention from the clouds at the back, while keeping enough light to show that its a boat. Added on December 23, 2009, 10:30 am QUOTE(porkchop @ Dec 23 2009, 10:12 AM) veron-7, very nice shots.....share more on achew bokeh's factory.... use a small aperturealso wanna ask some bro's here, notice veron's pic some of the pics is having a mini star flare (coming from the street lamp in pic 2) how to make it look more star-ish? This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 23 2009, 10:30 AM |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 11:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#130
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(Mavik @ Dec 23 2009, 10:34 AM) Ah I see, perhaps a little bit more of dodging and burning the clouds to make it look a little more dramatic? how about now?   |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 02:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#131
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(fansoption @ Dec 23 2009, 01:36 PM) Sony 11-18mm f4.5-5.6 F 4.5 and 5.6 what the diffrent with tamrom 10-22mm is F3.5-.5.6 which good? SONY? cos i just order sony tamron's a 10-24, apart from the obvious focal length difference, then there's the max aperture too. but since u said you've placed an order for the SAL, stay strong with your decision. i'm having the 1118 as well, and it's serving me pretty well... welcome to the UWA gang |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 02:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#132
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(fansoption @ Dec 23 2009, 02:24 PM) hope is that good 11-18 haha both the images you see above in this page is taken with the SAL 1118 |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 03:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#133
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(5564321 @ Dec 23 2009, 03:29 PM) UWA 11-18 or G 70300? ask yourself, "do i shoot wide or tight" |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 03:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#134
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
300mm tight
Added on December 23, 2009, 3:58 pmor 450mm on an aps-c This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 23 2009, 03:58 PM |
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 12:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#135
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
from recent hannah tan's charity concert @ Gardens
   |
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 03:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#136
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
guys, who's still on the look out for A700?
saw this on FTZ a700 body only| 8G card | battery |charger | manual | usb cable | LCD protect| remote |video cable| CD |all items included in box |ver 4| Shutter Count around 12k (3 month/Condition 9.9/10 RM2600)...sony lens 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 ssm G (1 month/Condition 10/10 RM2300)...sony big bag LCS-AMSC30 (3 month/Condition 9.7/10 RM200)...location COD at PJ area Only ALL item(lowest price)pls call/sms 012-2341033 Thx - chan <keezei@hotmail.com> |
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 12:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#137
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE~!!!
 |
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 10:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#138
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Dec 25 2009, 08:56 AM) aiyo, bro albnok just proven that sigma f1.4 is much better i think you might be  Added on December 25, 2009, 8:59 am excellent infomation. physically both are 50mm but sigma is much bigger body, bigger body = good quality in most case? thanks for the sharing. that model is your gf  with the price of the sigma and the sony.with the amount of light gathering capability in that front element, of course its expected to deliver better results. or else why get a glass that is nearly more than double the weight of a normal 50mm (in terms of physical weight and price)? This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 25 2009, 10:53 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0479sec
 0.35
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 06:48 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.