Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Hong Leong Cash Builder Scheme

views
     
jamzz
post May 3 2011, 12:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
365 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(mikro @ May 2 2011, 09:26 PM)
With yield lesser than risk free FD rate of 2.5% compound quarterly if you may, it seems less attractive.

Insurance doesn't guarantee your saving, bank does!
*
Come on ! No 1 guarantees our cash, were just lending in a nice term !


Added on May 3, 2011, 12:34 pm
QUOTE(Phonzy @ May 2 2011, 03:19 AM)
im just going to say one thing.

the 5.5% or 12% or whatever % they guarantee you return. are u sure it's on your dividend?

most of the time this % returns is on YOUR SUM ASSURED. not the money you put in. go check.

secondly , if HLA is offering such a damn good savings plan, why are they not part of HLB?

You go put your investment in an insurance company whereby the agents already eat 35% of the commission plus acquisition cost, etc. make sense?

you want investment, go buy from a bank / unit trust.

you want protection, go buy from insurance company.

google word insurance. it means protection, cash value, savings, etc is a bonus. you want investments, go buy from a bank.
*
what if the agent commission are half of it, do you think ur value is higher?

This post has been edited by jamzz: May 3 2011, 12:34 PM
jamzz
post Dec 2 2011, 02:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
365 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(wu ming @ Dec 2 2011, 01:48 AM)
So do you mean that the Cash Builder Scheme is better?
*
At least it provide a compounding 5.5% interest better thn saving acc rite

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0138sec    0.58    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 11:06 PM