Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Petition 2 - To Infinity Ward

views
     
TSjwevrsn
post Nov 16 2009, 03:56 AM, updated 17y ago

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Nov 2009


PC Gamers,

I’ve come to make a topic here because of a post made by one of your members on the FPSAdmin.com forums prior to the release of Modern Warfare 2 showing support for the game from your clan/members.

As we are very much aware Infinity Ward have yet to respond to the concerns and feedback of the PC Community about Modern Warfare 2. PC Gamers have come under a large amount of criticism for acting out with a petition in advance of the games release without knowing what it would be like.

Well now the game has been released and we do know what it is like. This is a call for anyone within the PC Community to show their support for a new petition entitled ‘Modern Warfare 2 (PC) – Post Release’. The idea behind the new petition is to show Infinity Ward (with a completely clean slate) that we do really still care about the issues and are providing them with the feedback that they need to do good by us.

The petition covers the need for:

- Support for an in-game console;
- Support for the “/record” feature;
- Support for the lean feature;
- Support for auto-balancing;
- Support for multiple profiles;
- Support for better Graphics and FOV control;
- Support for actual ping readouts in ms (not graphs);
- Support for a tournament game type (like Promod);

Dedicated Server/IWNet specific:

- Support for mod tools and modded Dedicated Servers;
- Support for Punkbuster enabled Dedicated Servers;
- Support for Dedicated Server admins to choose player numbers (Max: 50);
- Support for PC gamers to choose if they wish to connect to an IWNet P2P server or a Dedicated Server (hosted by clans/individuals, etc)

Many PC Gamers are starting to give up on Infinity Ward ever making good of their damaging changes to the community. My response to that, and hopefully yours, is “let’s give it one last shot”. Let’s unite as one PC Community!

The IW forums post for this is at http://www.infinityward.com/forum/viewtopi...p?f=24&t=174552

The petition is at: http://www.petitiononline.com/mw2pcpr/petition.html

Thanks,
CS[Ex]JustJack
jack@celtsclan.com
www.celtsclan.com
Falk
post Nov 16 2009, 04:07 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: May 2008


Even though I highly doubt the effectiveness of petitions, nor do I know if you'll read these responses after your first post here, good luck. MW2 could easily be so much better of a game than it is at the moment.


TSjwevrsn
post Nov 16 2009, 04:44 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Nov 2009


QUOTE(Falk @ Nov 15 2009, 08:07 PM)
Even though I highly doubt the effectiveness of petitions, nor do I know if you'll read these responses after your first post here, good luck. MW2 could easily be so much better of a game than it is at the moment.
*
Nah - I'm around. I'm after feedback, I'm out to challenge the negatives and I hope that with a big community effort and some time from me and a few others we can turn this around. Right now I feel we just need to show IW that we are a community and we do care but they need to sort things out.
Falk
post Nov 16 2009, 05:57 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: May 2008


Several points:

The /record feature actually works, just that no console (and no way to bind keys to brute-force record/stop) puts it out of reach.

Other things may be much harder, such as leaning which would likely take a bit more work (there's a bunch of new stances in the game, i.e. riot shield, akimbo - nfi how the animation system works but those weren't in CoD4, at least)

At the moment you can get a semi-accurate ping readout up to 135ms by editing the multiplayer config file and setting the bars to 9 and bar division to 15ms. That's 'good enough' for me, although of course a numerical display would be much less of a blatant insult to intelligence.

Edit2: Just remembered, regarding graphic tweaks. Apparently at the moment re: r_drawdecal 0, instead of turning off surface decals actually makes some walls completely disappear. (Hey, whaddya know, an in-built wallhack!) If this is an engine rendering problem patchable with a new exe, that'd be fine. If it's actually some new methodology of creating maps (i.e. the problems exist in the map files) then we're probably sunk a little in that regard.

IW.net really, really needs these features:

- Auto-balancing (you listed this under non-IW.net but since being locked to teams is matchmaking related...)
- The ability to vote to change the map, both in-game and in-lobby
- The ability to vote for a new host
- The ability to queue for a friend's game when its full and enter as a slot becomes available (FIFO, game tells you how many are queued, if there are others) If the friend leaves that room it should instead throw you into his party for re-queueing.
- The ability to toggle on a confirmation dialog box for "Find game" which asks you if you wish to join the room based on the ping to the host (and other players in the room since IW.net can be a d*** and swap hosts for no reason) and the current map.
- edit: THE ABILITY TO TYPE IN THE LOBBY DEAR GOD SKFLDJAFJLKSJFDALKSJDFLKASJDFLAKJSDFKAJSDLKAJSDF

I know that IW.net replacing ded servers on their part is supposed to make the game more user-friendly, but the above features can do nothing but add to the end-user experience overall. Their inclusion will make their matchmaking service 0.2 as enjoyable as having ded servers instead of 0.1.

This post has been edited by Falk: Nov 16 2009, 06:05 AM
AdamNg
post Nov 16 2009, 06:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
219 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
Who care second or even third petition? It already sold more than US300 million..I don't think IW would see ur petition..
H@H@
post Nov 16 2009, 08:48 AM

I'M THE TEAMKILLING F***TARD!!!
Group Icon
VIP
6,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 6 feet under at Bloodgulch Outpost Alpha Number 1



So, basically its the same petition as the first one, just that its now a petition and not some thinly veiled boycott?

Also, why are you guys still asking for Punkbuster? There's VAC now (Which is even designed to regulate dedicated servers) and its something they've paid Valve for already... No need to add another on top.
eXPeri3nc3
post Nov 16 2009, 09:40 AM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



^ What he pointed out on PB issue.

Besides, screw promod. It's already balanced well enough in MW2.

Pssst, IW hates promod.
Xonius
post Nov 16 2009, 09:46 AM

Y U NO MAD???
******
Senior Member
1,113 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: <Insert interesting place>


I'd say no to Punkbuster, its a shitty anti-cheat program with alot of false detections. I'm up for the rest.

Auto team balancing is definitely and urgently needed, i have played in games where there were 9 of us against 3 of them.

I can live without lean though its nice to have. Last but definitely not the least, a dedicated server option is a must.

This post has been edited by Xonius: Nov 16 2009, 09:47 AM
SpikeTwo
post Nov 16 2009, 09:51 AM

無敵 PC Elitist
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Über Special Forces Gaming Room
i understand the concern, jwevrsn. other than the punkbuster, i am all good.
but why don't we, the pc gaming community, just let the half assed port die, and wait for a proper PC game.


H@H@
post Nov 16 2009, 09:54 AM

I'M THE TEAMKILLING F***TARD!!!
Group Icon
VIP
6,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 6 feet under at Bloodgulch Outpost Alpha Number 1



QUOTE(SpikeTwo @ Nov 16 2009, 09:51 AM)
i understand the concern, jwevrsn. other than the punkbuster, i am all good.
but why don't we, the pc gaming community, just let the half assed port die, and wait for a proper PC game.
*
This petition is for the ppl who have already bought the game...

Which means that using a Steam group appears to be a better solution since they can literally tell who owns the game and who doesn't.
syNcv9
post Nov 16 2009, 11:36 AM

FML
****
Senior Member
682 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Nearby your house [b]Status: Failed[/b]



QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Nov 16 2009, 09:40 AM)
^ What he pointed out on PB issue.

Besides, screw promod. It's already balanced well enough in MW2.

Pssst, IW hates promod.
*
Balanced? Really? Seriously? blink.gif

Sorry but I can't stop laughing.
Camo_Suit
post Nov 16 2009, 11:47 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Ampang


QUOTE(jwevrsn @ Nov 16 2009, 03:56 AM)
PC Gamers,

I’ve come to make a topic here because of a post made by one of your members on the FPSAdmin.com forums prior to the release of Modern Warfare 2 showing support for the game from your clan/members.

As we are very much aware Infinity Ward have yet to respond to the concerns and feedback of the PC Community about Modern Warfare 2. PC Gamers have come under a large amount of criticism for acting out with a petition in advance of the games release without knowing what it would be like.

Well now the game has been released and we do know what it is like. This is a call for anyone within the PC Community to show their support for a new petition entitled ‘Modern Warfare 2 (PC) – Post Release’. The idea behind the new petition is to show Infinity Ward (with a completely clean slate) that we do really still care about the issues and are providing them with the feedback that they need to do good by us.

The petition covers the need for:

- Support for an in-game console;
- Support for the “/record” feature;
- Support for the lean feature;
- Support for auto-balancing;
- Support for multiple profiles;
- Support for better Graphics and FOV control;
- Support for actual ping readouts in ms (not graphs);
- Support for a tournament game type (like Promod);

Dedicated Server/IWNet specific:

- Support for mod tools and modded Dedicated Servers;
- Support for Punkbuster enabled Dedicated Servers;
- Support for Dedicated Server admins to choose player numbers (Max: 50);
- Support for PC gamers to choose if they wish to connect to an IWNet P2P server or a Dedicated Server (hosted by clans/individuals, etc)

Many PC Gamers are starting to give up on Infinity Ward ever making good of their damaging changes to the community. My response to that, and hopefully yours, is “let’s give it one last shot”. Let’s unite as one PC Community!

The IW forums post for this is at http://www.infinityward.com/forum/viewtopi...p?f=24&t=174552

The petition is at: http://www.petitiononline.com/mw2pcpr/petition.html

Thanks,
CS[Ex]JustJack
jack@celtsclan.com
www.celtsclan.com
*
Hi Justjack,

I have sign the petition. Cheers.
Falk
post Nov 16 2009, 06:07 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: May 2008


"Like buying poo, everyone tells you its poo, you buy it and be like: damn this is poo, then demand others to help you to turn poo into a milkshake."

Still, can't say I'm against any form of effort to make MW2 less shitty than it is in many ways.


Added on November 16, 2009, 6:12 pm
QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Nov 16 2009, 09:40 AM)
^ What he pointed out on PB issue.

Besides, screw promod. It's already balanced well enough in MW2.

Pssst, IW hates promod.
*
You realize how much of a complete joke the highly anticipated, Activision-sponsored, first-ever MW2 tournament was, right?

Here, lemme quote it for you

QUOTE
On the competitive front, some amazing e-drama took place at i38 (EU's LAN event). Last week, Multiplay announced that due to Activision bullying them into doing so, they were taking out CoD4 Promod Live 2.04 (The main competitive mod that evolved over ~16 months of CoD4's lifespan, generally globally accepted as the professional tournament standard) and holding a Modern Warfare 2 tournament instead.

A lot of people were royally pissed, having already bought tickets/transport/etc to the LAN. A few top teams decide to go along with the charade and buy MW2 to participate in the tourney anyway (How bad can it be, right? Activision sponsoring the prize = free money)

Multiplay then says that the any CoD4 'side event' they run cannot have a prize pot as it is contractually prohibited by Activision which wants MW2 to be the spotlight. Fine, whatever.

Several teams are DQed for having participants under 18... or participants who are over 18 but cannot prove it. This includes one team which made it to the final 8 double elim knockout stage. Prior to that, a top team was DQed for not being able to get the peer-to-peer/Steam shit working properly. Awesome tourney.

Amidst all this, no one knows how much Activision is sponsoring for the prize. The amount was made known earlier today - 1000 Euros. Community goes absolutely nuts. (self-organized LANs have bigger prize pots than this) Apparently even after jacking up the price of MW2 by 10USD Activision is too poor to sponsor anything more than a complete joke of a pot.

Community gets together to hold their own CoD4 tournament instead, with a buy-in-winner-takes-all format. Several 3rd parties step in to sponsor additional prizes. Stick it to the man!

Multiplay announce i38 MW2 tournament - TEK9 Networks
i38: Reason unable to play in MW2 tournament - TEK9 Networks
i38: Drama at i38, Infused and Element out - TEK9 Networks
i38: Audio interview with Team Element Aerox - TEK9 Networks
i38: Prize purse set at �1,000 - TEK9 Networks
i38: Empathy removed from the playoffs - TEK9 Networks
i38: The community takes over * - TEK9 Networks


But it's okay, go ahead and keep pretending you know what balance is. All these top teams are wrong. IW, who have been making (awesome) SP and pub MP games, is right.

This post has been edited by Falk: Nov 16 2009, 06:12 PM
JuzJoe
post Nov 16 2009, 06:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


Sadly to say that I do not have the game and therefore I could not sign the petition. I wish to purchase this game but having heard a mixture of reviews from users that have bought the game I'm still not sure if I wanna take the risk of paying premium price of RM 209 (USD60) for a game which is a direct console port. The only thing that's stopping me from buying this game is because of the lack of dedicated server support, I'm not bothered about mod-tools or any sort of feature that is lacking from COD4. If only Malaysian internet connection is 2 to 3 times faster, I would already purchase this game without a second thought. Other than the lack of dedicated server, having to know that there are so many people abusing MW2 with hacks and cheats further justify my reason of not getting MW2.

This post has been edited by JuzJoe: Nov 16 2009, 06:22 PM
kaiser_falco
post Nov 16 2009, 09:06 PM

the world wanderer
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: sunway/petaling jaya



a lot of thing to turn off to make mw2 a balance game since too many gun/perk are way imba for any regular match..
BurningSoul
post Nov 17 2009, 07:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


A few points to consider:

QUOTE(Falk @ Nov 16 2009, 05:57 AM)
IW.net really, really needs these features:
- Auto-balancing
- The ability to vote to change the map, both in-game and in-lobby
- The ability to vote for a new host
- The ability to queue for a friend's game when its full and enter as a slot becomes available (FIFO, game tells you how many are queued, if there are others) If the friend leaves that room it should instead throw you into his party for re-queueing.
- The ability to toggle on a confirmation dialog box for "Find game" which asks you if you wish to join the room based on the ping to the host (and other players in the room since IW.net can be a d*** and swap hosts for no reason) and the current map.
- edit: THE ABILITY TO TYPE IN THE LOBBY DEAR GOD SKFLDJAFJLKSJFDALKSJDFLKASJDFLAKJSDFKAJSDLKAJSDF
*
+1 to those features thumbup.gif , it really should be implemented and i think IW will implement it in future patches because the current ORIGINAL (have to state since its malaysia) game owners are complaining on this and they would prolly listen to that.
However i would have to disagree about vote change of map in-game hmm.gif . Look at COD4 and we should already know the multiple vote abuse done on map changes which spoils the round removing the fun (thats why we are playing the game...for fun).
But map change in the lobby would be good though.

QUOTE(AdamNg @ Nov 16 2009, 06:34 AM)
Who care second or even third petition? It already sold more than US300 million..I don't think IW would see ur petition..
*
+1 nice reply. nod.gif

QUOTE(H@H@ @ Nov 16 2009, 08:48 AM)
Also, why are you guys still asking for Punkbuster? There's VAC now (Which is even designed to regulate dedicated servers) and its something they've paid Valve for already... No need to add another on top.
*
+1 on your reply dear sir rclxms.gif . VAC is good enough as it already works like pb, infact might be even better who knows . It clearly shows that the petition starter did not do proper research about the game's full systems before making petition whistling.gif .

QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Nov 16 2009, 09:40 AM)
Pssst, IW hates promod.
*
Vince Zampella of Infinity Ward: We would like you to play the game the way we designed and balanced it.

lol....think about it biggrin.gif .

QUOTE(H@H@ @ Nov 16 2009, 09:54 AM)
This petition is for the ppl who have already bought the game...
Which means that using a Steam group appears to be a better solution since they can literally tell who owns the game and who doesn't.
*
+1 to your reply thumbup.gif . I totally agree, by placing the petition in a Steam group, even IW might listen coz its a petition done by those who actually bought the game and are currently playing it. whistling.gif

Also note that the Steam group that was suppose to boycott MW2 has most of its members playing the game on the release date....so much for the "boycotts". More like TROLL to me. rolleyes.gif

QUOTE(kaiser_falco @ Nov 16 2009, 09:06 PM)
a lot of thing to turn off to make mw2 a balance game since too many gun/perk are way imba for any regular match..
*
That i agree, there are some things that still need balancing before it can go tourney mode. eg: grenade launchers etc.

Qirin
post Nov 17 2009, 08:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
82 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Seri Kembangan, Selangor


QUOTE(Falk @ Nov 16 2009, 05:57 AM)
Several points:

The /record feature actually works, just that no console (and no way to bind keys to brute-force record/stop) puts it out of reach.

Other things may be much harder, such as leaning which would likely take a bit more work (there's a bunch of new stances in the game, i.e. riot shield, akimbo - nfi how the animation system works but those weren't in CoD4, at least)

At the moment you can get a semi-accurate ping readout up to 135ms by editing the multiplayer config file and setting the bars to 9 and bar division to 15ms. That's 'good enough' for me, although of course a numerical display would be much less of a blatant insult to intelligence.

Edit2: Just remembered, regarding graphic tweaks. Apparently at the moment re: r_drawdecal 0, instead of turning off surface decals actually makes some walls completely disappear. (Hey, whaddya know, an in-built wallhack!) If this is an engine rendering problem patchable with a new exe, that'd be fine. If it's actually some new methodology of creating maps (i.e. the problems exist in the map files) then we're probably sunk a little in that regard.

IW.net really, really needs these features:

- Auto-balancing (you listed this under non-IW.net but since being locked to teams is matchmaking related...)
- The ability to vote to change the map, both in-game and in-lobby
- The ability to vote for a new host
- The ability to queue for a friend's game when its full and enter as a slot becomes available (FIFO, game tells you how many are queued, if there are others) If the friend leaves that room it should instead throw you into his party for re-queueing.
- The ability to toggle on a confirmation dialog box for "Find game" which asks you if you wish to join the room based on the ping to the host (and other players in the room since IW.net can be a d*** and swap hosts for no reason) and the current map.
- edit: THE ABILITY TO TYPE IN THE LOBBY DEAR GOD SKFLDJAFJLKSJFDALKSJDFLKASJDFLAKJSDFKAJSDLKAJSDF

I know that IW.net replacing ded servers on their part is supposed to make the game more user-friendly, but the above features can do nothing but add to the end-user experience overall. Their inclusion will make their matchmaking service 0.2 as enjoyable as having ded servers instead of 0.1.
*
yes..those..console blah-blah is livable, lobby talk and host vote is NEEDED...not kicking out the host,just changing host....
and...well, got kick out of the game just now...3 times or some host migration problem...i got my NAT open still the same. well....don't know my problem or IW problem,
about the partition, not really think they will change, maybe COD MW3 got?

kr898
post Nov 17 2009, 10:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
215 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kuching


QUOTE(Qirin @ Nov 17 2009, 08:15 PM)
yes..those..console blah-blah is livable, lobby talk and host vote is NEEDED...not kicking out the host,just changing host....
and...well, got kick out of the game just now...3 times or some host migration problem...i got my NAT open still the same. well....don't know my problem or IW problem,
about the partition, not really think they will change, maybe COD MW3 got?
*
even with a petition (which i will support) will they hear about it? will they do sumting about it? i guess not... =/

i'm guessing MW3 in 2 years time?

the game is too balanced till... it's boring... game mode is kinda limited... and 12 ppl in 1 room... 6vs6...

TSjwevrsn
post Nov 18 2009, 11:48 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Nov 2009


@ The Negatives

- 10 Seconds to sign;
- First petition, pre-release;
- IW stated that they would not listen to pre-release feedback because people had not played the game;
- This petition, post-release;
- IW stated that they would listen to post-release feedback as people had played the game.

While I have my doubts and while I understand yours, 10 seconds to sign a petition to say you support the community isn't asking an awful lot. Worst case scenario you've lost 10 seconds... best case scenario once we get the figures we think are good enough this goes to IW and Activision in both electronic and hard copy formats.

We'll kick up the fuss with any news and game reps willing to pick up the story and hope for the best.

I understand that this is the last fight for many but let's at least act as a community and put a good one up!

-- Sidenote:

a) All of the stuff we're actually asking for has already got code in the game and maybe at most could require the effort of a little tweaking a new GUI server browser and a master server;
b) Reason for Punkbuster (while I understand the frustration of people with PB) with good a/c streaming, pb configured right it instantly stops hackers getting in. Real CD Keys required and GUIDs based on them:

- MW2 has been illegally shared and a MP crack designed, you no longer need a CDKey on steam to play this game just add it as a non-steam game;
- VAC bans you for hack? Just make a new steam account;
- Nonpaying users can now play on IWNet alongside paying customers for free.

That's more of an anti cheat fail than COD4 ever had.
H@H@
post Nov 18 2009, 11:54 AM

I'M THE TEAMKILLING F***TARD!!!
Group Icon
VIP
6,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 6 feet under at Bloodgulch Outpost Alpha Number 1



QUOTE(jwevrsn @ Nov 18 2009, 11:48 AM)
b) Reason for Punkbuster (while I understand the frustration of people with PB) with good a/c streaming, pb configured right it instantly stops hackers getting in. Real CD Keys required and GUIDs based on them:

- MW2 has been illegally shared and a MP crack designed, you no longer need a CDKey on steam to play this game just add it as a non-steam game;
- VAC bans you for hack? Just make a new steam account;

- Nonpaying users can now play on IWNet alongside paying customers for free.

That's more of an anti cheat fail than COD4 ever had.
*
Do you even own the game? Are you aware of how Steam works (Add it as a non-Steam game? Eh?)? Steam CD-keys are forever tied to a Steam account. So, if your Steam account is hacked, your MW2 CD-key is GONE FOR GOOD.

Also, the failure of IWNet to prevent illegal users from using their matchmaking service is a failure on IWNet. VAC still works as it is and is a global fix (PB doesn't actually permban CD-keys on a global level)

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0179sec    0.31    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 06:55 AM