QUOTE(denzel88 @ Feb 20 2010, 01:04 PM)
Yup, Tomtom has a better interface and it is easier to use compared to Papago.
In the world of software and programing, sometimes interface and user friendliness can be factors to increase users/customers. Eg. iPhone Interface
In addition, it is useless for a software to provide many functionality such as detailed maps if it does not provide a good Software Usability.
Well I have no objection to the UI issue. Indeed it wasn't as nice as Tomtom or Garmin. It's a legacy of MapKing that's why. I will also not deny that the lagging problems of the UI.
But come to think of it as software bugs.. which can be resolve by the next update, well pending to the developer's effort obviously. Meaning to say, it's a relatively minor issue. Afterall, when navigating you're not going to keeps on touching the screen. Once routing, the apps will do its job.
The big issue here is the purpose of that apps itself. If you buy an apps to search for nearby atm location but the apps can't find any, then what good that will be?
What I'm pointing out here, can you live with a navigation apps that can't bring you to the destination that you want?
Well I'm not saying going to KLCC, that's an obvious choice.
How about these kampung roads/small town or even newly developed taman. For example, can you find Jalan Vista Emas 3, Bandar Baru Bangi by using TomTom?
I'm surprised if you are ever find it by using TomTom.
The Papago M6 is not perfect, but it's the application that serve its purpose satisfactorily for now.
Added on February 22, 2010, 2:20 pmQUOTE(liverpool red @ Feb 20 2010, 07:51 PM)
As the tom tom vs papago dedate goes on, i was standing outside my home after dinner and switched on gps and papago and tried to lock onto my location as my map was showing a different location.
I actually stood outside for 20 minutes under a clear blue sky and i never got a satellite lock. Amazing. I think if i stood outside for another ten minutes i might not still get a lock and my battery would be running out of juice.
Is the Iphone integrated GPS really this poor?
The accuracy of a navigation apps depends on both software and hardware..Means the map database and the GPS receiver. The GPS receiver issue is an ongoing debate. Some did said that the iPhone's receiver are not good enough compared to its competitors. Competitors here refer to other GPS phone, not other PND.
But we have to ponder why TomTom produce a GPS kit for iPhone equipped with a GPS receiver? Yup, that indeed increase the GPS signal but most probably not necessary.
My other GPS phone works well even with tinted car screen.
Added on February 22, 2010, 2:34 pmQUOTE(sugen @ Feb 21 2010, 06:07 PM)
with Papago malfreemaps, i can now say our iphone is now a true navigation device. No need to buy the GPS device anymore..
I beg to differ on this part.
A truly dedicated PND have bigger receiver, thus more accurate. Plus, it does have that extra function that make it more special compared to GPS phone.
For example, previously JV is only available in PND though we know now that Papago support it. AFAIK, only papago for the time being, GMXT still has no support for this function.
TTS is currently supported only by PND though I do heard that Taiwan's papago has TTS function which can say the names of the road you shoul be taking.
LA - Lane assist also not available for phones. Don't be mistaken this with JV.
Elevated highway also for PND.
Enough to say, there's a long way to go before a dedicated PND can be laid to rest.
But I must say that I'm satisfied with my current GPS phone though.
This post has been edited by mmmbop: Feb 22 2010, 02:34 PM