QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 24 2009, 08:57 AM)
skynet is the prefered deliver choice for all terminator movie. CLOSED
CLOSED
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 10:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#101
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,027 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 11:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#102
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,027 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
QUOTE(fadthil @ Dec 24 2009, 10:36 AM) On my way home from office, I'll pass Skynet office everyday.... didn't see any suspicious activities thus far. From outside really look outdated & old. No one would ever imagine what they they've done to the future... the future cannot be change, skynet taking over is just a matter of time, i for one welcome our new robot overlord. |
|
|
Dec 26 2009, 12:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#103
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,027 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
yesterday watched avatar in 3D, one thing i notice is the 3D object that are move toward audience seem to be not in focus expecially when it is moving fast. and the movie most of the time have shallow depth of field help our eye to focus on the main character. maybe this is why less people complain about headache watching avatar than other 3D feature.
there are article already written on how to avoid headache watching avatar, the trick is basicly dont look at the out of focus backgroup, this is not a horror movie, the bad guy dont always jump out of blurred background http://www.shadowlocked.com/index.php/comp...watching-avatar |
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 11:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#104
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,027 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 27 2009, 09:32 PM) i think weta studio recycle the mecha in avatar, but i think the district 9 version is cooler Added on December 27, 2009, 11:42 pm QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 27 2009, 09:16 PM) the movie a lot of time looks like a reality tv show kind of feel with the digital camera, most of the time it have very deep depth of field which contribute to the cheap digital camera production feel. but i kind of like their style of cinematography many of of the scene are either dark or in a twilight setting. the best feature of digital camera are during the dark there is minimum lighting required to get a sharp focus making the night scene more realistic, but a the same time it cause motion blur during fast moving scene.Added on December 27, 2009, 11:45 pm QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 27 2009, 10:03 PM) true also. Video and audio quality also better. Cinema looks worse than 720p projector many times i observed. i just go to watch avatar this week, the AQ quality is uneven, the is even time of pause in the sound, the screen also feel too dark and not perfectly in focus, maybe it is just the problem with the GSC in time square This post has been edited by robertngo: Dec 27 2009, 11:45 PM |
|
|
Dec 28 2009, 10:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#105
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,027 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
|
|
|
Dec 28 2009, 12:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#106
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,027 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0442sec
0.79
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 11:23 AM |