308cc might not brought in at all but pricing definitely higher than 207cc.

As far as I know 308cc is not available in Malaysia, maybe in Singapore. 308cc if available, I think it cost at least 200k.

---

Added on November 6, 2009, 9:22 amBTW just check Autocar Asean magazine (November), the price for 308cc is $133,900.00. If is Singapore dollar, it is very expensive indeed.

This post has been edited by CPURanger: Nov 6 2009, 09:22 AM

206cc 1.6
naza 206 1.4
Peugeot 206 1.6
Peugeot 206 and 206cc i think same engine. naza 206 1.4. diff engine

correct me if im wrong.

Correct. However Naza 206 1.4, the engine also from Peugeot. Naza merely rebadge it.

206 Petrol engine..

* 1.0 L (999 cc) D4D I4 16v, 77 PS (76 hp/57 kW)
* 1.1 L (1124 cc) TU1JP I4, 60 PS (59 hp/44 kW)
* 1.4 L (1360 cc) TU3JP I4, 75 PS (74 hp/55 kW) Naza 206
* 1.4 L (1360 cc) ET3J4 16v I4, 88 PS (87 hp/65 kW)
* 1.6 L (1587 cc) TU5JP 8v I4, 88 PS (87 hp/65 kW)
* 1.6 L (1587 cc) TU5JP4 16v I4, 110 PS (109 hp/80 kW)
* 2.0 L (1997 cc) DEW10J4 16v I4, 135 PS (133 hp/99 kW)
* 2.0 L (1997 cc) EW10J4 16v I4, 136 PS (134 hp/100 kW)
* 2.0 L (1997 cc) EW10J4S 16v I4, 177 PS (175 hp/130 kW)

fyi,

http://www.my206club.blogspot.com/

white 206cc found for sale SOLD

This post has been edited by lowpro: Nov 13 2009, 02:39 PM

drive last time, to me, this car look nice, but not nice to drive, lack of power if you compare to daily car like vios or city as ts compare...

i am a sales person, i don't really like to drive this car to go around.

sudah beli?

206cc and 207cc both look good (though I prefer the look of the 207cc). Some points to note (from own test drive experience and other people's ownership experience):

1. When driving the car, it felt underpowered (probably due to the heavy weight of the car vs other cars with similar engine size).
2. Gear shifting not as smooth - probably due to 4-speed auto transmission (compared with 5/6-speed autos)
3. This owner I know complained that the auto open-close roof mechanism was always breaking down, but she loved the car anyway for its looks.
4. Looks good
5. My friend had the 206cc (and then later the 207cc) as her dream car, but after test driving it, didn't like the underpoweredness and the gear-shifting. She bought a MINI One instead (similar price to a 207cc). But she still says the car looks great.

In short, from what I can tell, most people love the looks, but that has to be balanced by the lack of power and roof issues.

This post has been edited by Traveler: Nov 12 2009, 09:24 AM

agree...no power

i have driven the 207CC and i don't find it underpowered at all. in fact i find it quite perky plus it has great handling. maybe you could try a test drive before commenting.

This post has been edited by lowpro: Nov 12 2009, 09:59 PM

207cc i havent been in it before.. sorry my quote for underpower was for the 206 standard sry sry

I go choose 308 instead of 206cc

I have test driven both (206cc and 207cc).. and felt both were underpowered for its class (ie, vs other cars of similar engine power) which is not surprising given the extra weight of the roof & machinery. Comparing the 207cc and the MINI Cooper (both have the same 1.6L engine), the MINI Cooper is about 200kg lighter (if my memory serves me right), and you can feel that when driving. Now, if 207cc comes with a more powerful engine, then it might be different.

The Cooper also has a 6-speed gearbox, and that is also reflected in a smoother drive for the Cooper vs the 207cc.

Am not saying the 207cc is a bad car, just that you have to balance what you want from it.. looks/convertible vs power/smooth gear changes. Haven't taken the 207cc out at speed so I can't comment on the handling, but I know the MINI (One, Cooper, Cooper S) has great handling.