Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Pioneer - Sound, Vision & Soul, Pioneer AMP User Pls COME IN !

views
     
jchong
post Nov 9 2009, 12:33 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(mpyw @ Nov 9 2009, 11:10 AM)
the 4310 vs LX82 prices diff not that much mar....but SC-LX90 is drool.gif at RM24k sweat.gif
*
That LX90 sure looks impressive. But at 24k, isn't it better to buy all separates?
jchong
post Nov 9 2009, 02:02 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(mpyw @ Nov 9 2009, 01:02 PM)
24k can get 10.2 channel amp + processor?
simultaneous output of 1400W  sweat.gif
or can bi-amp all channel  thumbup.gif
*
Say you buy:

Onkyo PR-SC5507 pre/pro
Emotiva XPA-5 amp x2

I think total about 15-16k and can get simultaneous 2000W! smile.gif
jchong
post Nov 9 2009, 02:19 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(mpyw @ Nov 9 2009, 02:10 PM)
ok...

1 box vs 3 boxes ....

maybe st seong can quote us 15k for the LX90???  tongue.gif
*
Yeah, disadvantage is 3 boxes. But looks very impressive on the rack biggrin.gif

Wah if CT Seong can sell LX90 for 15k you gonna grab? tongue.gif
jchong
post Nov 24 2009, 05:08 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(Boat Collector @ Nov 24 2009, 12:54 AM)
Okie.. correction.. I probably need at least a 500w-1000w step down transformer, which should cost me between RM150-250. The US manual says 350w power consumption. BUT I get to save about RM1800 (its half the price in US). I got quoted RM3600 for the VSX1019 in KL. So minus the transformer I'm still up RM1500!!  rclxm9.gif I think....

Still think it is ironic that the US unit is made in Malaysia - but I have to go half way around the world to pay half price and go through the hassle of getting  transformer.. Anyone one where the Pioneer factory is? maybe got unit fall off truck..  brows.gif
*
Yup, ironic isn't it? Made in Malaysia but we don't get any benefit from that but instead get charged so much more locally sad.gif Dontcha just love the price arbitrage played by consumer brands... NOT!
jchong
post Oct 19 2011, 08:03 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(paskal @ Oct 2 2011, 02:54 PM)
xt32 would *maybe* be beneficial if you have a very poor room with lots of room gain over the freq range.
but if you have a decent room large enough not to have a dramatic gain then i would say go with a better sounding receiver.
*
The benefits of XT32 are not only limited to "a very poor room with lots of room gain". All rooms, even a larger one will cause some variation in the freq response. Have you ever used a tool like REW to graph your sub/room? Quite interesting.

Also, you shouldn't only be looking at the issue of room gain but also freq dips. Both should be addressed. One thing I would check with MCACC is whether it even equalizes the sub, some say it doesn't. Some say it only equalizes down to 60Hz. If true that is a major limitation to me. I'm not arguing about whether MCACC or Audyssey is better but just about functionality; if MCACC doesn't eq the sub then that is a major loss of functonality (like the low end Audyssey 2EQ).

You're assuming the LX75/85 is the better sounding receiver. No doubt being the top end Pioneer models they can sound good. But would it sound better than equivalent Denon/Onkyo models, I don't know. Have not compared them.

This post has been edited by jchong: Oct 19 2011, 08:05 AM
jchong
post Oct 19 2011, 08:07 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(lightning69 @ Oct 8 2011, 10:47 AM)
My friend order it from a Hifi dealer in Sibu.  We order 1 each.  Very tempted to go for the LX85 which is only RM4800.

Got to wait fot it to arrive from SG.
*
Good price indeed. No wonder, because it is from SG.

Dang, our neighbours down south sure get things much cheaper than here.

I just saw that the LX85 is made in Malaysia (like the Onkyos) and still we're screwed on price mad.gif

This post has been edited by jchong: Oct 19 2011, 08:17 AM
jchong
post Oct 19 2011, 08:34 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(lightning69 @ Oct 1 2011, 04:07 PM)
My friend just told me he can get SC-LX75 or LX85 for RM3800 and RM4800 respectively.
I just checked the xtremeplace forum. The price u mentioned above is even way, way lower than SG!!

The MSRP in SG is $3299 for LX75 and $3999 for LX85. Being so new, I think discounts are small. The fellas in SG are even running to buy from HK instead. In HK the LX85 is HK$13800.

So RM4800 for LX85 is a bargain!
jchong
post Oct 19 2011, 11:17 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(lightning69 @ Oct 19 2011, 10:14 AM)
That is why I was hoping that the deal is true.  We have confirm the order but yet to receive the receiver.
*
Do keep us informed. Hope the deal is true.
jchong
post Oct 19 2011, 11:19 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(kayroll @ Oct 19 2011, 09:44 AM)
I have the LX-82 and when I ran MCACC it set the distance, crossover, and dB level for the subwoofer so it would blend properly with the other speakers. tongue.gif
*
For any room correction solution there are normally 4 adjustments needed:

1. Distance
2. Crossover (related to bass management)
3. Trim or dB level
4. Equalization

I know MCACC does 1-3. Does it do 4?
jchong
post Oct 19 2011, 12:23 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(paskal @ Oct 19 2011, 12:16 PM)
then the ARC has a major flaw. it doesn't do distance measurement.
*
U sure? I thought ARC does distance. Or maybe they call it something else?

Edit: did some reading, yeah it seems ARC does not auto calculate the distance. Can it be entered manually?

This post has been edited by jchong: Oct 19 2011, 12:31 PM
jchong
post Oct 19 2011, 02:59 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(lightning69 @ Oct 19 2011, 02:20 PM)
Its so funny.  Instead of trusting our ears, we trusted the bloody cheap computer with a free calibrating mic.
*
The problem with trusting your ears is that it is a completely subjective thing. I think the majority of people like the room correction products (be it Audyssey, ARC, YPAO, whatever) and there are those that don't - does it mean the room correction product is wrong? No, it just means there are some people whose preference lie in a different direction.

We all assume our ears are great, but do you really know if your ears are good enough or not? Let's say you invite 10 friends over to come demo your system (which you think sounds good) - 7 say it is lousy, 3 say it is good. Does it mean your system is lousy? Or maybe those 7 just have different tastes? Or maybe they can detect things you can't? Or maybe in the end, you say "who cares what other people say, as long as I like it?". Ultimately, it probably boils down to that.

This post has been edited by jchong: Oct 19 2011, 03:10 PM
jchong
post Oct 20 2011, 09:46 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(paskal @ Oct 20 2011, 09:02 PM)
sometimes it seems bizarre to me why most people in this forum choose to pursue LFE more than everything else. more than detail, more than depth, more than naturalness, more than other areas which are also deemed important.
i see the lot going after dual subs and upgrading their avrs to be able to handle dual subs rather than upgrading to power amps, floorstanders for surround, bi-amping, tri-amping, active systems etc.


It's a matter of budget and priority I guess. Sure, everybody would love a system that has it all, good LFE, detail, soundstaging, etc. But with limited budget, where to spend it first? Upgrade AVR? Add power amp? New speakers? Extra sub?

Perhaps LFE has the most obvious improvement and impact, so people tend to do that first. Then only later move to something else.

QUOTE
i'm running the arc which is said to be better than xt32 for single sub and still i find it's more rewarding to upgrade to an avr with better sounding preamp section rather than pursuing better eq capability.
Usually the two go hand in hand. As you get a more expensive AVR, the preamp section is better and it comes with better eq capability.
jchong
post Oct 20 2011, 10:02 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
QUOTE(BOTBOTCHAI. @ Oct 20 2011, 08:09 PM)
Yup!  smile.gif He is very impressive with your system and always ask me why the gun shot in Die Hard 4 can't shake the couch in his setup( avr 4311 and also dual sub ). I just tell him that he is audition the one of the best setup in this forum ( The LFE in Htkaki system is thumbup.gif ) . You never know what you are missing until you audition the good one . icon_idea.gif
*
You gotta ask your friend to compare his subs and his configuration to htkaki's.

If his subs are not as good, that is part of the answer. The other important part is also the configuration/setup - you need to maximize the ability of the subs. Just because he has dual subs doesn't mean he automatically gets very good bass. I'm sure you know htkaki has spent a lot of time experimenting with placement and tuning. What you now hear is the result of all that time spent.
jchong
post Nov 23 2011, 04:22 PM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Congrats. It's still a very good price for the LX75.

Let us have your review after you've installed it.
jchong
post Nov 24 2011, 11:40 AM

****************
*******
Senior Member
5,989 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Nice pix. What camera did you use?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0335sec    0.80    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 05:36 AM