Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 HDMI Cable Quality?, Really make a diffrent?

views
     
anfieldude
post Nov 5 2009, 09:03 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(moomoos @ Nov 5 2009, 09:00 AM)
this topic.... very nice debating indeed....

my fren, a sony technician and me did confirm there is a change,

one HDMI seem to display clearer PQ than the other, and also for AQ the ambience is different

As for me i believe there is a difference,
but at the end of the day... The Decision is Yours biggrin.gif
*
moomoos,

Was there less noise in the images?


Added on November 5, 2009, 9:06 am
QUOTE(cosmicmeadow @ Nov 5 2009, 01:09 AM)
Data stream received will not be accurate. So video/audio will not be reproduced accurately.

But typically in data transmission over network, if there are errors, the protocols allows for re-transmits, ie. send again to fix the error. But for high bandwidth streaming of audio/video, don't think there's time to re-transmit?

So, unless you have robotic eyes and ears that can sense all these minute inaccuracy of video/audio reproduction, then maybe the splurge on expensive HDMI cables is only psychologically effective, ie. you think you are seeing a better picture or hearing a better sound, and so, therefore you "really" do.
*
Isn't there enuf redundacy in the transmission that can take care of this? I was under the impression that there were checks and balances on the HDMI transmission on the receiving side. But of course I cold be wrong.

This post has been edited by anfieldude: Nov 5 2009, 09:06 AM
anfieldude
post Nov 5 2009, 03:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(Johannbeckham @ Nov 5 2009, 02:54 PM)
HI! i just bought my CPU yesterday and my graphic card has HDMI port and Display port (also optical connection for audio). I also have DELL 2408WFP at home with DisplayPort Cable already include. I also have 2.1 Speaker with optical Audio connection (but does not have HDMI I think). Now my question is, do i still need to buy HDMI cable for a more clearer FULL HD quality video, or is DisplayPort cable enough already? Is there alot difference if I also buy the optical cable for my sound?
*
Suffice to say, Display Port shd be enuf.
anfieldude
post Nov 5 2009, 03:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(fun_feng @ Nov 5 2009, 03:40 PM)
Firstly each pixel has 32 bits (0,1), so a FULL HD 1080p  is 2 million x 32 bits = 64mil bits.
Assume a 60Hz refresh rate which means 60x64 mil bits = 3.84Gbps + additional bits for CRC, audio and god knows what... is well within the range of HDMI 1.3 (10.2 Gbps)

YOu must understand 0 or 1 is not ON or OFF this simple in this case. These 32 bits represent a coding that the TV understand so that it will project a color to the pixel.

Then you must also understand something call CRC (Cyclic Redundancy Check). These bits transmit throught the cable in "packets". Any corrupted bits in the packets gets detected by the CRC algorithm which the TV calculates. Now the TV know that the packet for this particular pixel is spoilt, the TV will most probably display a default color for it, white if i am not wrong.

You are correct you will still get a picture, but not getting the FULL picture. But if a few thousands pixels are corrupted, most probably your picture will have white patches on it. You will not get clearer picture, red is redder, sky is bluer etcc....
Anyway, the probabllity of getting corrupted bits is probably 0.0001%.
*
The colour bits are a bit more complicated than that with the sub pixel yet to be talked about. But your explanation shd be enuf for most to get the jist.

However, moomoos sees something different. Let's leave it at that.

I for one have not seen differences and the measurement equipment I have also does not show anything different. However, picture noise and sharpness are pretty subjective and cannot be measured.

Maybe the next time I'm in Ipoh I can take a look and see it on his screen.
anfieldude
post Nov 5 2009, 04:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(Johannbeckham @ Nov 5 2009, 04:04 PM)
Guys, follow-up on my question about. Is there a big difference between DisplayPort Cable and HDMI cable? Coz I only have display port cable as of now (bundled when I buy DELL 2408WFP). What is the advantage if I use HDMI cable instead of DisplayPort cable
*
I thought I answered already. No differences. They are competing technologies. Display Port shd be fine.
anfieldude
post Nov 6 2009, 09:39 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(fun_feng @ Nov 6 2009, 09:30 AM)
Since the analog signal only carries the interpration of 0 or 1, the error margin is big, you don't need a super quality cable to do the job.
Any decent cable will do the job.
*
I admire your patience in educating people.

BTW: Do PM me what the importance of Nov10 is...
anfieldude
post Nov 24 2009, 11:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(jchong @ Nov 24 2009, 11:04 AM)
On this point, I just read on wired.com:

The claim that "digital cables, by definition, have no signal loss" is indeed false. It’s only true if the transmission is error-corrected, for example by using a protocol like IP.  Without error correction, the stream of ones and zeroes can lose integrity en-route just like an analog wave. DVI and HDMI are not error corrected.

So that implies that transmission error / signal loss could potentially occur in poorly built HDMI cables.
*
jchong,

The error correction they are talking about is jitter. Remember that at the end of the HDMI cable there are DAC that can reduce the jitter. What will happen in the end is that if there are problems with recreating the data stream you will know that there is a problem it will not be subtle.

Also remember there is parity data encoded for some form of error correction at the receiving end and it is catered for. This is all part of the HDMI standards.

On a final note, this is all I will say, if u can see the differences between cables, then so be it, in your eyes its money well spent! I think trying to justify to people who say otherwise is a waste of energy....
anfieldude
post Nov 24 2009, 02:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(tracktion3 @ Nov 24 2009, 02:22 PM)
I would suggest for those who play CD Audio. Try this test:

When you play CD Audio, compare between:
1. Use the HDMI cable to your AVR. At your AVR choose HDMI input.
2. Use a RCA cable red/white (L/R) to your AVR. At AVR chooce AV1 input.

Compare the result. You will notice the diffrent. This is how I listen to audio CD using my player. At least I can feel the diffrent.

In other words, if you plan to send digital signal, HDMI what ever price( with correct category) will do a good job. But if you plan to send an analog signal, get a good HDMI or out it thru other analog source. Just my 2 cents... tongue.gif
*
What you compared is the DAC in your CD player vs the DAC in the AVR in addition to the analogue cable. This is not an apple to apple comparison! Not to mention possible room correction on one and not in the other.
anfieldude
post Nov 24 2009, 02:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(wackojacko @ Nov 24 2009, 02:05 PM)
ok, so is da same applies to analog cables like component and s-video?
*
No, analogue cables do make a difference. There is shielding involved.
anfieldude
post Nov 24 2009, 02:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(tracktion3 @ Nov 24 2009, 02:32 PM)
I mention used the same BDPlayer with both output ( HDMI and RCA) from BDPlayer. I only have 1 player.
*
tracktion3,

when you output thru the RCA cables the BD player has already done the conversion to analog. When u send it thru the HDMI (unless u send a PCM) the conversion is done in AVR.
anfieldude
post Nov 24 2009, 03:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(wackojacko @ Nov 24 2009, 03:07 PM)
Audio CD is analog?????

I tot only cassette tapes and Vinyls were analog, since CDs are considered digital media, or am i off here?
*
No u're not off. CDs are digital...
anfieldude
post Nov 24 2009, 03:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(tracktion3 @ Nov 24 2009, 03:15 PM)
My apology.. is digital... but is a PCM format already.... smile.gif
*
And PCM is also digital. Somewhere along the line that needs to be converted to analog. That is where a DAC comes into play. When you send out the signals using the RCA cable from ur BD player, the conversion is already done. Then ur AVR (depending on the AVR) might or might not apply room correction and will send the signals to ur speaker to output. When u send the CD audio stream thru HDMI, the conversion takes place in ur AVR.
anfieldude
post Nov 29 2009, 06:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(mynewuser @ Nov 29 2009, 05:00 PM)
Btw, if we connect a notebook to F HD TV. We can select the max screen size of 1920x1080. But the LCD TV show over size. If this the TV setting or notebook setting? Any way to fit all into the TV screen?
*
Turn off the overscan on ur display. What TV do u have? Selecting the correct aspect ratio will also help.
anfieldude
post Dec 3 2009, 04:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(Vinceyang @ Dec 3 2009, 01:11 PM)
Well, I come from wire harness industry..

To be frank, even some renown electronic comsumer product brand (cant disclose the name here) is buying cheap HDMI cable from PRC and ask us to change the packaging and sell as their brand.

So, go figure...
*
I thought there are only 2 major manufacturers of stock hdmi cable in the world, Copartner and I forget the other. I believe the other companies buy the stock cable from them and terminate it themselves or OEM to others.
anfieldude
post Dec 3 2009, 07:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(Scud_eSpade @ Dec 3 2009, 06:58 PM)
Im an engineer in HDMI industry.
Let me clarify something. Not all HDMI are the same. HDMI are operated at Ghz frequency. It affects the resistance and conductance of the copper. Even loose connector does affect the transmission. To pass the HDMI certification test, manufacturer have to pass the eye pattern/diagram that are determine by the spec.

There are 2 category of the test.
Category 1 - equivalent to 720p or 1080i (74.5 MHz)
Category 2 - more than enough for 1080p (340 MHz)

a cable vendor can designate a cable as Category 1 or 2, but cannot specify a lower bandwidth, and consequently, all HDMI 1.3 compliance testing is done at at least 720p/1080i frequencies.

In case of Category 1 certified cable:
For high qualty cable, u should be able to transmit data without any error on 1080p device.
For a low quality cable, u must be very lucky for it to works on 1080p (yes, it can work)
Why? because no test to certify that the cable able to operate at least 1080p. Those low quality cable might just barely pass the test. You can buy certified category 2 cable to be sure. But of coz, prepare to pay more

hope this help
*
Good, since u r an engineer in the the industry, you can also verify that at lengths shorter than 10ft, most if not all cables will pass the Cat1 and Cat2. Am I right?
anfieldude
post Dec 3 2009, 07:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(neb @ Dec 3 2009, 07:34 PM)
avoid cable with 28awg copper wire, they are too fragile at the connection point with the socket
*
Funny, I would have thought otherwise. 28AWG is the lightest cable as such it would put the least stress on the connections. 22AWG is the heavier cable and if not properly secured will cause loosening at the connector in the outer and inner areas. That is why better companies offer bonded ends when they use the lower AWG.
anfieldude
post Dec 4 2009, 09:27 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(Scud_eSpade @ Dec 4 2009, 09:22 AM)
what is all the fuss? u want to buy cheap HDMI buy la. I NEVER said it wont work. but there is no gurantee it will work. If it work, just enjoy ur saving
*
No fuss. As you are the 1st real expert in the industry to voice you opinions here, I would like to know your opinion on cables at lengths shorter than 10ft.

I believe that people can buy any cable at any price, it their money and they can decide. I am only looking for data.

Also could you pls recommend a decently built cable that would work for most people.

Thanks
anfieldude
post Jul 12 2010, 05:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(wiNd @ Jul 12 2010, 04:32 PM)
thats why i wanna ask, know where to get cheapo optical cables..lets say rm30-50 ones

dont need monster cable, etc...not going to pay rm100+ for a cable  wink.gif
*
If u r in Penang, u can go check in ThyeHuat....

Edit: Just saw that ur r from PJ.

Maybe if I go to ThyeHuat I can check...

This post has been edited by anfieldude: Jul 12 2010, 05:22 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0302sec    0.46    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 06:28 PM