Luckily I bought a RM20 HDMI cable. And it works.
HDMI Cable Quality?, Really make a diffrent?
HDMI Cable Quality?, Really make a diffrent?
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 03:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
Luckily I bought a RM20 HDMI cable. And it works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 03:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
What kinda interference?
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 03:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(jchong @ Nov 3 2009, 03:47 PM) I suppose in a very general sense what you say is correct. A lot of people say digital is digital, it is either received or not received. But if you look at the details there are still some slight differences but which I don't fully understand. Have a look at this article: http://www.audioholics.com/education/cable...ble-bench-tests - in particular read about the test equipment and the eye pattern. thinking about the tramission of all the bits.Another theory of mine, yes bits are either 0 or 1. But a signal isn't just 1 bit, it's not a case of cannot receive a 0 or 1 signal = complete failure. In one second megabits of signal is passed through the cable, what if the cable is not capable of transmitting all the bits perfectly? What if only 99.9998% are ok and the 0.0002% is not received? How does this affect the audio/video? If we are copying a excel file from a ext HDD to a PC via a cheapo USB cable. If the USB cable only can transmit 99.9998%, theoretically the excel file is incomplete and some data is missing. But this does not happen even though most people uses regular USB cable. Thus I still don't understand the expensive HDMIs... |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 04:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
Ya... agree... let's support local cap ayam HDMI!
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 04:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
oh ya. Support cap Asia then!
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 10:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
even the Brand name of the cable already tell you that you will be eaten~
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 11:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 02:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
I agree.. its lotsa info for SiriuslyCold to share
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 03:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
physcologically the RM75 provides better quality~
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 11:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
Oh I tot RM15 cable data more accurate
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 11:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 11:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
Faster by 12ms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 12:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 02:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(fun_feng @ Nov 5 2009, 02:29 PM) Ok let me see if i can convince you. I am even more confused after hearing your opinion Do you know how binary (0, 1) system works? A LCD tv is made of millions of pixels (or dots). 1920x1080(2 million pixels) for a FullHD tv Each pixel is encoded by binaries. If you see your GC properties, there is an option to choose 32-bit color or 16-bit color, this is what represents a pixel. 32 bit means 32 (0 or 1) to represent the color that a pixel can display. So take an example that you are displaying a fat straight line with some blur around the edges (which means grey pixels around it) These grey pixels can never becomes black pixels which will make the line looked clearer. WHY?? Because the cable can never know what encoding to make it display a black pixel. It doesn't have a chip/DSP for such algorithm. Similarly, if the picture is a well defined straight line with no grey pixels around it, a capalang cable can never make the pixels grey in color. At most (if the build quality is lousy), the encoding for that particular pixel got lost during the transmission and the TV will just display a weird color for pixel (white i think). Similarly is for audio. Do you know how analog signal is encoded into digital form? |
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,006 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
fun_feng,
can you then relate this theory to a transfer of a say, Excel file. No matter what type of USB cable u use to transfer from a HDD to another HDD, the content of the excel file will always be the same. how is this different from HDMI that carries video/audio signal in digital too? |
| Change to: | 0.0438sec
0.59
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 10:28 PM |