QUOTE(lehtung @ Oct 29 2009, 02:19 PM)
WALLAOWE... Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V33!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V33!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Oct 29 2009, 02:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31 2009, 10:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
Oct 31 2009, 11:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(wuszhtag @ Oct 31 2009, 11:19 AM) btw can anyone please help enlighten me whats wrong with the pic? i got the feeling that the it was overexposed and the background quite dark. spot metering can be tricky.. use center weighted, local metering (choose ur local point focus), ISO200, raise ur F42 90degrees.. try this, play thru the exposure -+g. i direct the flash to bounce off the ceiling. shutter speed 1/60, f 4.0, spot metering. iso 100, +0.3 EV. ![]() after that, try with AEL function plak.. |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 01:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(DolphinDiver007 @ Nov 4 2009, 01:37 PM) iits depend on photog him/herself, sumone like to shoot raw, others like jpeg, i'm a raw guys.. sum people maybe like JPEG+RAW, raw for later adjustment, the jpeg for easy review at laptop or pc.. Added on November 4, 2009, 1:46 pm QUOTE(DolphinDiver007 @ Nov 4 2009, 01:37 PM) iits depend on photog him/herself, sumone like to shoot raw, others like jpeg, i'm a raw guys.. sum people maybe like JPEG+RAW, raw for adjust, the jpeg for easy review at laptop or pc.. This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Nov 4 2009, 01:46 PM |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 03:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(freaky_deity @ Nov 4 2009, 03:06 PM) I've learn dat, take pict as raw is better. but when i use raw to take pict, i cant altered it in photoshop? so, y it is good to take RAW? u need raw plugin for photoshop, or u can use the sony converter 1 (from the Alpha CD)like i said before, the RAW file IS the original picture that camera take without compression, without data loss, without any image processing done.. more headroom when procssing raw compare to jpeg.. RAW- we can tweak there, tweak here (like we forgot to adjust WB will make the pic more bluish@yellowish) until we satisfied then save to jpeg for further manipulation.. u need to try it 1st for futher understanding.. |
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 10:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
HiroBoroi: lol, she's the same person
amadeo: thanks for the flash thingy sharing signither: congratz dude, which photo? share2 la sket.. lol follow albert post style This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Nov 5 2009, 10:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 11:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(signither @ Nov 5 2009, 11:16 AM) QUOTE Look For Different Angles When people look at your photos, they want to see different angles instead of what we may usually see from our height level. That being said, why not do a “Hail Mary” shot by raising the camera above your head and firing a shot without looking through the viewfinder. If it helps, you can use your Live View screen to aid in composition. Similarly, do what Signither did above and get down nice and low to get a different perspective. this is interesting |
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 12:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
Nov 6 2009, 03:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(Tainted @ Nov 6 2009, 02:56 PM) I do shoot at night too but less. Anyhow, is the 55200 suitable for landscape and architecture? Or the F1.8 50mm would be a better choice for landscape and architecture? the wider the lens is more suitable for landscape or architecture, the 55200 is tele lens, n 50mm is more to potrait. if ur budjek too tight, just use ur kitlen for landscape n a architecture.. every lens have a different purpose BUT u also can break the rules if u know how to.. using prime for landscape also can, every lenses also can.. if the angle is nice then its a good photo..When you are saying that its the same, so are you saying that its pointless to go for it as well? Since its the same as my kit lens? |
|
|
Nov 6 2009, 03:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(ieR @ Nov 6 2009, 03:25 PM) wait, i am confuse, how would wide open benefit landscape? on scapes and architechture, we use higher aperture like F8 and above. how could it benefit? F1.4 is mainly because the lack of light, that gives the upperhand in shutterspeed gain. u still can shoot with F5.6 and get the same amount of light, just that, the shutter might be slower that even SSS cant compasate. QUOTE(millenia3000 @ Nov 6 2009, 03:27 PM) sori cos make u confius geng, |
|
|
Nov 8 2009, 08:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
guys, i need some help here,
who have SAL1118, sigma 1020 or tamron 1024, can u give me ur full resolution sample pics at 10mm (for sigma n tamron) & 11mm for sony, need outdoor pic at a bright day.. can pm me for my email or any webhosting also can.. This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Nov 8 2009, 08:18 PM |
|
|
Nov 8 2009, 09:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2009, 02:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 04:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
guys, sigma uwa from digitalsmania grey set or local set?
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 08:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(SHOfrE3zE @ Nov 13 2009, 05:34 PM) oic, so if anything happen how to deal with this gret set?QUOTE(noprob @ Nov 13 2009, 06:56 PM) Cropped properly la bro .. hehe bro.. u forgot ar? Got ah ?! .. never seen it before Usually only got 2 AA per pack .. Try Lyn Sri Computer |
|
|
Nov 14 2009, 09:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(SHOfrE3zE @ Nov 13 2009, 10:27 PM) well, i've asked the shopkeeper and he said if there's any prob just send it to them and they'll send it for warranty. oic, thanks bro QUOTE(VincentCheun @ Nov 14 2009, 12:05 AM) guys, any wide angle lens can recommend... ok where u at jb bro? i'm at kluang.. how much the sigma? if u want to take the sony, i take the sigma, if take the sigma, i take the sony, of cos need to check kaw kaw 1st la.. i saw sony 1118 and sigma 1020 today... which 1 is better ah... sony 1118 was quoted rm 1250(2nd hand)... wat do u think... |
|
|
Nov 14 2009, 11:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(Ranceed @ Nov 14 2009, 01:23 AM) bro, did u recieved my pm? QUOTE(wcs2798 @ Nov 14 2009, 10:00 AM) oo, thanks bro..This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Nov 14 2009, 11:51 AM |
|
|
Nov 14 2009, 06:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2009, 02:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2009, 03:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 |
QUOTE(v1rtual @ Nov 17 2009, 02:45 PM) here broQUOTE(albnok @ Nov 17 2009, 12:15 AM) v1rtual: The Tamron 90mm F2.8 Macro is popular because it is a cheaper insect macro lens. this 5pm or 5pm + 8 = 1am? now i confius On full-frame it is very close to the classic portrait focal length of 85mm. 100mm is a fair bit longer. Also, 100mm on APS-C as a walkaround seems a bit in-between. achew: I like the stormtrooper's expression! Nice humor! clivengu: 5pm +800 GMT. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/conv...0&p1=256&p2=122 This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Nov 17 2009, 03:04 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0453sec
0.80
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 06:24 PM |