QUOTE(shingyong84 @ Mar 31 2016, 08:01 PM)
Thanks for the quick respond 
Sorry to ask a silly quest.. how to define "NOT WORKING" in MY eh..?
Yes, I was based in MY more than 185days a year.
NOT WORKING.. hmm.. yeah, most of the time not in working condition.
Not tagging with any agencies. No working record in Malaysia..
My role is basically a middle-man/ art buyer.
To buy Malaysian Art behalf of my company in SG and sell to overseas clients..
So it was actually some other artists WORK, send me soft copy, and i export via email.
From MY Tax point of view: U should be deriving income from MY based on your role/function as a middle-man/art buyer in MY. Since you are being remunerated for that role to your clients the income earned during your stint in MY shud be taxed here.Sorry to ask a silly quest.. how to define "NOT WORKING" in MY eh..?
Yes, I was based in MY more than 185days a year.
NOT WORKING.. hmm.. yeah, most of the time not in working condition.
Not tagging with any agencies. No working record in Malaysia..
My role is basically a middle-man/ art buyer.
To buy Malaysian Art behalf of my company in SG and sell to overseas clients..
So it was actually some other artists WORK, send me soft copy, and i export via email.
The time period of > 182 days only determines whether u shud be taxed as a Tax Resident or not.
Since u have been in MY for more than 6 months, I assume u have been travelling back and forth a few times and did not stay in MY consecutively for the entire 6 months.
If you didn't use any Professional Visit Pass or Employment pass to come in to MY for that 6 months duration, then it will be difficult for IRB to prove on your income derivation activities unless you declared to Immigration that your intention to stay in MY for X no. of days was for work/business purposes.
100% of your fees charged to your customers will be paid to your sole prop in SG?
Apr 1 2016, 12:45 PM

Quote
0.0218sec
0.28
7 queries
GZIP Disabled