Now choices:
1. Stay in CoD4
2. Move to CS;S or CS 1.6
3. BLACKSHOT!

You guys serious about blackshot? Im hearing alot of blackshot from cod-ers these days...

And btw, cs:s is a no but cs:p maybe.
(P for Promod)

Well... Brian said its true also. The system is looks like you all play blackshot and sudden attack. I dont mind all this. As long there is no lag when we play, should be fine. I dont want lag game with 300+ pings. If below 150 pings, its should be ok. Anyway, wait and see what will happen after it release. xD

Wait and see what will happen later... I'm sure it will fail too much. lol.

p/s: Serioulsy I hate steam =.='' The most troublesome software to use.

Anyway, like i said in the other thread, Bowling is an idiot of a community manager. I highly doubt he had the knowledge of any technical features the game had yet alone its PC version.

If i was activision, i'd fire him now for the possible loss of sales just by announcing those things. (Marketing strategy 101, you only let people know the GOOD side of your system, not your actual system per-say. He fails.)

there are better ways to announce it. You dont say NO DEDICATED SERVERS and dont mention why. The good must always outweigh the bad.
Being honest is one thing, knowing what you're doing is another.

anyhoo, debate also useless. Hahaha

What constitutes as okay ping for steam users, and how often to you get a playable experience? Not trying to sound smart, just curious as I haven't used that platform before.

From a dev standpoint, is it possible to give dedicated hosting back to the players? To a layman like me it's akin to removing a prosthetic limb (a useless one) and replacing it  with another, but then again I can't tell one string of code from another. Heck, I dint care if they want to release it as DLC, I'm sure people would pay for it. Smth like a premium for paid users in mmorpgs.

One of the greatest examples to this -

"readding dedicated servers or Lan play" was seen in Demi-god. The initial release required you to play via internet match-making. Later patches "fixed" that by enabling Lan play via a 100mb patch if im not mistaken.

It is possible, with enough pressure, that IW may re-add lan play as a DLC. But get this, as a DLC, they may charge you for it.

Which means, you purchase a copy (original) then wait a month or two and get a LAN DLC patch so you can play locally. Its a great idea, since their market growth and income comes majorly from consoles, its highly possible they might take up this system.

Just a thought tho.

http://twitter.com/OfficialBFBC2

DICE is taking up the golden opportunity to kill IW on PC once and for all.. GO DICE go...

Well, suddenly an evil idea just cross my mind. (but completely legal way to get back at Activision/IW) 

1) Get as many friend as you can, share the money and buy ONLY 1 copy of MW2.

2) Create one solo account and activate MW2 with this solo account. (Meaning is no other games bind to this account.)

3) Download and start playing the single player, once finish, pass the account to your friend.
(Steam only allow 1 account active online at a time, and sharing account is a matter of trust, so I think this is perfectly legal?)

4) After everyone completed the single player, sale the game away. The MP will be sucks anyway. 

5) Rinse and repeat...

6) #$%#$#$ ????

7) Profit !! (Or no profit to Activision/IW) 

Silenced sniper rifle + heartbeat sensor at the beginning. Details > MW too. *sigh* the game that could have been.

The issue is not that you like or dislike or agree or disagree with its propaganda values.

The issue is that a lot of people here are unwilling to even ACKNOWLEDGE it, because it disturbs their sense of serenity.

ROFL!