Dec 15 2009, 09:27 PM
QUOTE(joe_star @ Oct 14 2009, 04:23 PM)
Yeah I know regarding the background of Heisenbergs principle (both momentum AND position of particle cannot be accurately determined at the same time), but a theory of everything in my book should be able to override this. In other words, randomness would cease to be in a universe where a certain fundamental equation can explain every single occurrence. I believe this is one of the paradoxes that theorists have greatly debated about. Shall give it more reading when I have more free time 
On a sidenote, imho Einstein was a total brainiac, but at the same time approached things with a set outcome in his mind. He might have achieved more had he not been so set in his ideals of a static universe etc
Not really, Heisenberg postulated that "measurement" or "observation" would influence the final outcome to become "less accurate"On a sidenote, imho Einstein was a total brainiac, but at the same time approached things with a set outcome in his mind. He might have achieved more had he not been so set in his ideals of a static universe etc
The principle you're generally looking for is the GIT, or Godel's Incompleteness Theorem.
Quote
0.0148sec
0.27
6 queries
GZIP Disabled